請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55593
標題: | 租稅公平與公正補償之研究
—土地徵收與捐地抵稅以大法官釋字第705號解釋為中心 A study of Taxation Equity and Just Compensation —Eminent Domain and Tax Deduction for the Donation of Expropriated Land based on Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 705 |
作者: | Cheng-Jung Lee 李振戎 |
指導教授: | 陳志龍 |
關鍵字: | 所得稅法,釋字第705號,徵收補償,租稅優惠,租稅規避, Income Tax Law,J. Y. Interpretation No. 705,eminent domain,tax incentives,tax avoidance, |
出版年 : | 2014 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 大法官釋字第705號解釋涉及捐地申報所得稅列舉扣除額其認列標準之財政部函釋,認定係與憲法第19條租稅法律主義不符,為行政規則僅屬執行所得稅法規定之細節性或技術性事項及應予法律具體明確授權之問題。此外,其間存在兩個相互衝突的現狀:一是公共設施保留地與負有公用地役關係之既成道路的徵收補償延宕,為延續大法官釋字第400號解釋之財產權保障精神,以實現個人自由、發展人格及維護尊嚴,捐地抵稅具有一定之正當性;二是納稅義務人之節稅規劃,利用購買系爭土地捐贈造成所得稅收鉅額之減少。以取得成本為基礎之扣除額估算有其未盡公平合理之處,所得稅法第17條之4修正草案條文仍有財產權、人性尊嚴保障不足之缺憾。本文提出應以「財產損失」、「特別犧牲」有無為區別之原則,若為「有受損失補償權利」之納稅義務人,方可捐地抵稅以獲取相當於徵收補償之租稅減免,而土地徵收條例第30條規定:「在都市計畫區內之公共設施保留地,應按毗鄰非公共設施保留地之平均市價補償其地價」,為維持法律統一性與補償之公正,實有參考之必要;至於購買土地捐贈抵稅者,在未達特別犧牲之情形,如採「公告現值」認列,則應考量租稅優惠不宜過度與存在援引實質課稅原則之可能。針對減低財政負擔衝擊之建議,可規定受贈者須為有徵收義務之地方政府,訂定每年受贈總額,並以分期抵償方式解決。 Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 705 associates with the Ministry of Finance orders prescribing the standard of assessment in tax declarations for the amount to be deducted for the donation of land, which do not comply with the principle of taxation by law of Article 19 of the Constitution. These administrative rules are not merely detailed or technical matters for the enforcement of Income Tax Law. Such matters shall be specified by a law or regulations having the clear authorization of a given law. In addition there are two conflicked present situations. Firstly, the postponement of eminent domain for the land reserved for public facilities and the private preexisting roads burdened with public easement, to persist the protection of people's property right to develop personality and to maintain dignity of people disclosed by Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 400 make it legitimate to render the abovementioned land tax-deductible. Secondly, the tax saving planning of taxpayers through purchasing and then donating these land tremendously reduces Income Tax revenues. However utilizing purchasing cost as the basis to estimate the amount to be deducted for the donation of land is not fair and reasonable sufficiently. The amended draft of Article 17-4 of the Income Tax Law still not well protect people's property right and maintain their dignity. This thesis reveals using the existence of “property loss” and “special sacrifice” as the distinguished standard. Only when the taxpayers have the right to be compensated from land expropriation, can donate the land to have the tax deduction which equals to eminent domain compensation. Besids, the Land Expropriation Act 30 states: “The value of land reserved for public facilities in the urban planning area shall be compensated based on the average market value of its adjoining lands not reserved for public facilities.” It shall be refered to maintain the unitity of law and just compensation. For those people purchased then donated land for tax deduction, if there is no special sacrifice, declarating the amount according to the “government declared value” of the donated land shall be considered as the cases of over tax incentive and have the possibility of applying principle of substantive taxation. The suggestions of lowering the impact of finance are restricting the donated land must be received only by local government with expropriation obligation, limiting total receiving amount of donation per each year and deducting tax by installments. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55593 |
全文授權: | 有償授權 |
顯示於系所單位: | 科際整合法律學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。