請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5277
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 謝寶煖 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fang-Tzu Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭芳慈 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:54:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-03 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:54:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-02-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-11-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
Bell, P. A.(2003)。個人空間和領域權(聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯)。在環境心理學(頁317-379)。台北縣新店市:桂冠發行。 王嘉鈴(民90)。臺灣地區公共圖書館青少年服務現況與發展之探討。未出版之碩士論文。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 丘東江(民95)。閱覽桌。在新编圖書館學情報學辭典。北京市:科學技術文獻。 吳政叡(民92)。圖書館使用者需求調查:以台北縣立圖書館附近區域為例。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊,9(2),11-20。 李文馨(民84)。閱覽桌。在圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。台北市:漢美。 李興國(民84)。「選位子」一個探討環境心理學、在圖書館閱覽室所做的試驗、統計與分析。空間雜誌,68,110-113。 施侑坤(民98)。圖書館環境窗外景緻和窗戶型式偏好─以逢甲大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,逢甲大學建築研究所,台中市。 徐磊青、楊公俠(民94)。私密性。在環境心理學 : 環境、知覺和行為(第五章,頁135-161)。台北市:五南。 國立公共資訊圖書館(民102)。國立公共資訊圖書館簡介及歷史沿革。上網日期:102年7月10日,檢自http://www.nlpi.edu.tw/About/introduction/library02.htm 國立公共資訊圖書館服務空間使用須知(民102年6月26日)。上網日期:102年7月10日,檢自http://www.nlpi.edu.tw/RuleAndConducts/VenueService/space. htm 國立公共資訊圖書館閱覽規定(民102年1月11日)。上網日期:102年1月27日,檢自http://www.nlpi.edu.tw/RuleAndConducts/ReaderRules.htm 國立臺中圖書館(民94)。國立臺中圖書館讀者閱讀需求及閱讀型態調查研究。台中市:國立臺中圖書館。 國立臺灣圖書館自修室使用要點(民國102年6月5日)。上網日期:102年8月17日,檢自http://www.ntl.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1489&ctNode=357&mp=1 莊鎮戎、吳可久(民92)。從閱覽私密性角度探索閱覽桌安置於開架式閱覽空間之研究。在吳可久、胡弘才、陳秀玲編著,圖書館建築規劃與設計演練:大學圖書資訊大樓建築設計專題教學成果彙編(頁43-48)。台北市:建築情報季刊雜誌社。 陳茂柏、賴福林、許銘哲(民79)。國立成功大學圖書館自修室使用後評估(二)─領域感與桌椅配置形態。在國立台北工專建築科編著,中華民國建築學會第三屆建築學術研究發表會論文集(頁233-236)。台北市:中華民國建築學會。 陳格理(民82)。大學圖書館建築用後評估硏究:以中原大學圖書館為例。台中市:捷太。 黃夢竹(民99)。國家圖書館自修室座位選擇之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所,台北市。 經濟部中央標準局(民85)。公共圖書館建築設備。在圖書館相關國家標準彙編(頁64-82)。台北市:經濟部中央標準局。 圖書館法(民90年1月17日)。總統府公報,6377,27-29。 蕭秀玲、莊慧秋、黃漢耀(民80)。隱私權。在環境心理學(第八章,頁267-306)。台北市:心理。 鮑家聲、姚宇澄(民75)。閱覽室設計。在圖書館建築(第六章,頁224-260)。北京市:書目文獻出版社。 二、西文部分 Ahmed, S. M. S. (1979). Invasion of personal space: A study of departure time as affected by sex of the intruder, sex of the subject, and saliency condition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(1), 85-86. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. Altman, I., & Chemers, M. M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. Applegate, R. (2009). The library is for studying: Student preferences for study space. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), 341-346. Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28(3), 289-304. Barash, D. P. (1973). Human ethology: Personal space reiterated. Environment and Behavior, 5(1), 67-72. Becker, F. D. (1973). Study of spatial markers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(3), 439-445. Brown, C. R. (2002). Basic interior design issues. In Interior design for libraries: Drawing on function & appeal (chap. 3, pp. 24-42). Chicago: American Library Association. Campbell, J. B., & Hawley, C. W. (1982). Study habits and Eysenck's theory of extraversion-introversion. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 139-146. Eastman, C. M., & Harper, J. (1971). A study of proxemic behavior: 'Toward a predictive model'. Environment and Behavior, 3(4), 418-437. Edney, J. J. (1974). Human territoriality. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 959-975. Edney, J. J. (1976). The psychological role of property rights in human behavior. Environment and Planning A, 8(7), 811-822. Felipe, N. J., & Sommer, R. (1966). Invasions of personal space. Social Problems, 14(2), 206-214. Fisher, J. D., & Byrne, D. (1975). Too close for comfort: Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 15-21. Fishman, D., & Walitt, R. (1972). Seating and area preferences in a college reserve room. College & Research Libraries, 33(4), 284-297. Gal, C. A., Benedict, J. O., & Supinski, D. M. (1986). Territoriality and the use of library study tables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 567-574. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. Holt, R. M. (1989). Space planning for segments of the library. In Planning library buildings and facilities: From concept to completion (chap. 12, pp. 137-149). Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press. Kilic, D. K., & Hasirci, D. (2011). Daylighting concepts for university libraries and their influences on users' satisfaction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 471-479. Klinge, J. W. (1999). How different areas of personal space are protected: A look at gender differences. National Undergraduate Research Clearinghouse, 2. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.webclearinghouse.net/volume/2/ KLINGE-HowDiffere.php Krail, K. A., & Leventhal, G. (1976). The sex variable in the Intrusion of personal space. Sociometry, 39(2), 170-173. Leventhal, G., Lipshultz, M., & Chiodo, A. (1978). Sex and setting effects on seating arrangement. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 100, 21-26. Mahoney, E. R. (1974). Compensatory reactions to spatial immediacy. Sociometry, 37(3), 423-431. Metcalf, K. D. (1965). Reading, reference, and study rooms: Their planning. In Planning academic and research library buildings (chap.14, pp. 102-132). New York: McGraw-Hill. Patterson, M. L., Mullens S. & Romano J.(1971). Compensatory reactions to spatial intrusion. Sociometry, 34(1), 114-121. Polit, D., & Lafrance, M. (1977). Sex differences in reaction to spatial invasion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 102(1), 59-60. Rüstemli, A. (1986). Male and female personal space needs and escape reactions under intrusion: A Turkish sample. International Journal of Psychology, 21(1-4), 503-511. Schaeffer, G. H., & Patterson, M. L. (1977). Studying preferences, behavior, and design influences in a university library. In Peter Suedfeld & James A. Russell (Eds.), The behavioral basis of design (Vol. 2, pp. 301-305). Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross. Shoham, S. (1991). The ecology of public library reference rooms. Public Library Quarterly, 11(4), 43-51. Sommer, R. (1965). Further studies in small group ecology. Sociometry, 28, 337-348. Sommer, R. (1966). The ecology of privacy. The Library Quarterly, 36(3), 234-248. Sommer, R. (1967). Sociofugal space. American Journal of Sociology, 72(6), 654-660. Sommer, R. (1968). Reading areas in college libraries. The Library Quarterly, 38(3), 249-260. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Taylor, R. B., & Brooks, D. K. (1980). Temporary territories?: Responses to intrusions in a public setting. Population and Environment, 3(2), 135-145. Veatch, L. (1987). Toward the environmental design of library buildings. Library Trends, 36(2), 361-376. Webb, K. M., Schaller, M. A., & Hunley, S. A. (2008). Measuring library space use and preferences: Charting a path toward increased engagement. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 8(4), 407-422. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Athenum. Wheeler, J. L., & Githens, A. M. (1941). Reading, reference, and study rooms: Their planning. In The American public library building: Its planning and design with special reference to its administration and service (chap. 14, pp. 102-132). Chicago: American Library Association. Young, V. E. (2003). Can we encourage learning by shaping environment? Patterns of seating behavior in undergraduates. In ACRL Eleventh National Conference, Symposium held at the Charlotte, North Carolina. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5277 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 公共圖書館之自修室為國內讀者高度需求之空間,故其規劃管理相形重要。在規劃上,一般考量自修室的面積、桌子大小、間距及型式等;在管理上,國內規模較大的圖書館普遍運用座位管理系統輔助館員管理座位。然而,自修室對於人與環境互動關係的考量較為缺乏。許多研究顯示讀者有選擇座位的偏好,且會受到環境、社會及個人因素之影響,顯現自修室在規劃管理上若未將讀者選擇座位的需求納入考量,自修環境及座位管理系統將難以符合讀者的期待。
為探討符合讀者需求之座位管理系統樣貌,以及自修環境品質之改善方向,本研究於國立公共資訊圖書館自修室進行問卷調查,探討讀者偏好的座位及特性,並分析讀者偏好的座位類型、不同讀者是否有不同的座位偏好,以及讀者對於自修環境的重視程度及感受。 研究發現,熱門座位為角落及落地窗旁的座位,特性為安靜、座位附近較不易有其他讀者走動且較有隱私;讀者優先選擇的座位具有讀者重視的特性。在座位類型上,讀者偏好內區、朝向入口、離入口較遠及靠牆的旁邊位。不同性別、年齡、職業及教育程度的讀者對於座位有一致的偏好。在自修環境上,最需優先改善的項目為「座位附近讀者走動的頻率」。最後,依研究結果提出建議,供圖書館規劃自修室座位管理系統及改善自修環境之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The study room of public library is highly required by readers in Taiwan, so its’ planning and management should be well considered. In terms of planning, libraries generally take the seating capacity of study room, aisle space between tables, seating space, and types of tables, etc into considerations. In management aspects, large-scale libraries usually use seat management system to assist librarians managing seat assignment. However, researchers found that readers would prefer different seats in response to environmental, social, and personal factors, and this interaction between human and environment was little regarded. These findings revealed that if libraries do not take readers’ seating preference into consideration, the study environment and seat management system will be difficult to meet readers’ expectations.
In order to find a seat management system that meets readers’ needs and to improve study environment, a survey investigation was made in the study room of National Library of Public Information. The purpose was to explore the reader-preferring seats and their features, examine which kind of seats were preferred, analyze whether seat preferences vary from different readers, and investigate the feeling of readers toward study room. It was found that popular seats, which were in the corner or beside French windows, were quiet, less readers moving around and with high privacy. The features of preferred seats corresponded to what readers emphasized. In addition, the seats readers preferred were in the inner region, back of the room, facing the entrance, and end seats beside wall. Readers with distinct backgrounds such as gender, age, occupation, and education had consistent seat preference. Also, what should be improved with highest priority was reduce the distractions of readers moving around. Based on these results, there are some suggestions for libraries on planning seat management system and improving the study environment of study room. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:54:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99126018-1.pdf: 4533910 bytes, checksum: 1ee82c527a4d0cc4ea8b78872f1c86e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 i
Abstract iii 表 次 vii 圖 次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻分析 7 第一節 圖書館中的領域行為與個人空間 7 第二節 圖書館座位選擇相關研究 23 第三章 研究設計與實施 43 第一節 研究對象 43 第二節 研究方法 48 第三節 資料處理與分析 52 第四節 研究步驟 54 第四章 結果與討論 55 第一節 基本資料分析 55 第二節 座位選擇分析 77 第三節 座位特性分析 106 第四節 座位選擇因素重要性分析 109 第五節 座位滿意度分析 131 第六節 座位整體感受分析 144 第七節 座位選擇因素重要性與滿意度差距分析 150 第八節 綜合討論 154 第五章 結論與建議 159 第一節 結論 159 第二節 建議 162 第三節 進一步研究之建議 166 參考文獻 167 附錄一 自修室座位選擇調查問卷 173 附錄二 第一優先選擇座位表 180 附錄三 座位選擇其他因素填答內容 183 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公共圖書館自修室座位選擇之研究:以國立公共資訊圖書館為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of Seat Choice in Public Library Study Room:
A Case Study of National Library of Public Information | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳格理,吳可久,賴麗香 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公共圖書館,自修室,座位選擇,座位偏好,座位管理系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | public library,study room,seat choice,seating preference,seat management system, | en |
dc.relation.page | 187 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-11-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf | 4.43 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。