政府採購法第93條共同供應契約之研究：以契約類型與定性為中心

Abstract

政府採購法第93條所謂「共同供應契約」，指一機關為二以上機關具有共同需求特性之財物或勞務與廠商簽訂契約，使該機關及其他適用該契約之機關均得利用該契約辦理採購者。隨著時間經過，這個制度在適用上發生許多疑義。本文首先觀察法律條文之沿革、現行共同供應契約實施辦法以及臺灣銀行之契約範本，以定義何謂「共同供應契約」，並提出現行制度的問題。 其次，本文研究契約實務運作後，提出：應以「至少兩個契約」來解釋共同供應契約制度；兩個契約之間的關係則可以學說上「架構契約」理論來建構。另外關於兩個契約應如何定性，本文建議定性為「兩個私法契約」。 最後，本文舉出若干最高行政法院之案例，藉以說明本文前開見解可以適當地解決現行救濟實務上之爭議；並提出對現行制度之立法論建議。

The term“inter-entity supply contract”in Article 93 of the Government Procurement Act means that an entity, on behalf of two or more entities, signs a contract with a supplier for property or services that are commonly needed by entities, so that the entity and other entities to which the contract applies can utilize the contract to conduct procurements. As time goes by, the dispute about aforementioned system becomes more and more. This thesis, first, tries to define the contents of“inter-entity supply contract” by observing the evolution of law, the Regulations of The Implementation of Inter-entity Supply Contracts, and the contract sample of Bank of Taiwan. Second, after researching of the practice of the contract, I suggest that there shall be two or more contracts in this system, and the relationship between these contracts could be constructed on the basis of“Frame Contract( Rahmenvertrag) Theory.” Moreover, the two contracts may be characterized as contracts under private law. Finally, by studying several cases of Supreme Administrative Court, I advice aforementioned notions should become appropriate solutions to the practical issues. Furthermore, this thesis also makes several suggestions toward legal amendments.