請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46985
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李玲玲(Ling-Ling Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Hui Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許永暉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:44:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 呂秀英,2003,重複測量資料分析的統計方法,行政院農業委員會農業試驗所研究報告第2138號,農業試驗所。
林世強、林鎮洋,2006,動物車禍機率模式實證研究,第三屆生態工程學術研討會論文集,pp.28-43。 林宏榮、許富雄,2005,白尾八哥、家八哥與台灣八哥之群棲行為與巢位棲地類型比較。國立嘉義大學生物資源學系研究所碩士論文。 林憲德,1999,城鄉生態,詹氏書局,台北。 林德恩、趙仁方、黃永慶與林登榮,2007,綠島地區之道路殺手效應,動物行為暨生態研討會論文集,pp.95。 黃光瀛,2006,陽明山國家公園野生動物穿越道路涵洞微型生態廊道系統,生態廊道講習會講義。 黃于玻、黃俊嘉與李玲玲,2007,二高沿線環境特性調查與國道計畫環境復育之研究(第一期),交通部台灣區國道新建工程局。 陳寶章,2000,國道規劃之回顧與展望-國道建設十週年論文集,P1-14,台北:國道新建工程局。 蔡厚男、邱銘源與呂慧穎,2003,道路建設與生態工法,熊貓出版社。 高速公路局路段交通量通報系統, http://211.79.135.72/Linkvol/DB/query.asp。 Adams, L. W. 1984. Small mammal use of an interstate highway median strip. Journal of Applied Ecology 21:175-178. Arenas, J. P. 2008. Potential problems with environmental sound barriers when used in mitigating surface transportation noise. Science of the Total Environment 405:173-179. Barrios, L. and A. Rodriguez. 2004. Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:72-81. Baudvin, H., 2004. Motorway mortality of birds of prey and owls in the East of France.In: Chancellor, R.D., Meyburg, B.U. (Eds.), RaptorsWorldwide. Proceedings of the VIWorld Conference on Birds of Prey andOwls. Budapest, Hungary, pp. 787–793. Bennington, C. C. and W. V. Thayne. 1994. Use and Misuse of Mixed Model Analysis of Variance in Ecological Studies. Ecology 75:717-722. Bergmann H. H. 1974. Zur Phänologie and Ökologie des Strassentodes der Vögel. Vogelwelt 95: 1–21. Bourquin J. D. 1983. [Mortality of raptors along the route Genève-Lausanne]. Nos Oiseaux 37: 149–169. Brown, H. and Prescott, R. 1999. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Chichester:J. Wiley. Bruinderink, G. and E. Hazebroek. 1996. Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 10:1059-1067. Bruun-Schmidt J. 1994. [Traffic killed animals in relation to landscape, topography and type of road]. Upubliceret specialerapport, Odense Universitet, Biologisk Institut. Clevenger, A. P., B. Chruszczc, K. E. Gunson, and Nm. 2003. Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations. Biological Conservation 109:15-26. Coffin, A. W. 2007. From roadkill to road ecology: A review of the ecological effects of roads. Journal of Transport Geography 15:396-406. Crowder, Michael R., and Rhodes, O. E. 2000. Relationships Between Wing Morphology and Behavioral Responses to Unmarked Power Transmission Lines. IN: 7th International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management. Part VI. Wildlife. Eds. John W. Goodrich-Mahoney, Dean Mutrie and Colin Guild. Davenport, J., and J.L. Davenport (eds.). 2006. The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment. The Netherlands, Springer. Desrochers, A. and S. J. Hannon. 1997. Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology 11:1204-1210. Dhindsa, M. S., J. S. Sandhu, P. S. Sandhu, and H. S. Toor. 1988. Roadside birds in Punjab (india) - relation to mortality from vehicles. Environmental Conservation 15:303-310. Dunthorn A. A., Errington F. P. 1964. Casualties among birds along a selected road in Wiltshire. Bird Study 11: 168–182. Erritzoe, J., T. D. Mazgajski, and L. Rejt. 2003. Bird casualties on European roads - a review. Acta Ornithologica 38:77-93. Evans, K. L., R. B. Bradbury, and J. D. Wilson. 2003. Selection of hedgerows by Swallows Hirundo rustica foraging on farmland: the influence of local habitat and weather. Bird Study 50:8-14. Ferreras, P., J. J. Aldama, J. F. Beltran, and M. Delibes. 1992. Rates and causes of mortality in a fragmented population of iberian lynx felis-pardina temminck, 1824. Biological Conservation 61:197-202. Ferris, C. R. 1979. Effects of interstate 95 on breeding birds in northern Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 43:421-427. Forman, R. T. T. and L. E. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207-231. Forman, R. T. T., D. Sperling, J.A. Bissonette, A.P. Clevenger, C.D. Cutshall, V.H. Dale, L. Fahrig, R. France, C.R. Goldman, K. Heanue, J.A. Jones, F.J. Swanson, T. Turrentine and T.C. Winter, Editors,. 2003. Road Ecology: Science and Solutions, Island Press, Washington, USA. Glista, D. J., T. L. DeVault, and J. A. DeWoody. 2009. A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landscape and Urban Planning 91:1-7. Göransson G., Karlsson J., Lindgren A. 1978. [Influence of roads on the surrounding nature. II. Fauna]. Rapport från Statens Naturvårdsverk. Govett, J. R. 1960. Mortality of wild birds on roads. Naturalist 872: 5–6. Hansen, L. 1969. [Roadkill of Danish vertebrates]. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidskrift 63: 81–92 Harden, J. 2002. An overview of anthropogenic causes of avian mortality. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 25:4-11. Harris, R. J. and J. M. Reed. 2002. Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici 39:275-290. Havlin, J. 1987. Motorways and birds. Folia Zoologica 36:137-153. Hernandez, M., 1988. Road mortality of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Spain. J. Raptor Res. 22: 81–84. Hodson, N.L., 1962. Some notes on the causes of bird casualties. Bird Study 9, 168–173. Huijser, M.P. and A.P. Clevenger 2006. Habitat and corridor function of rights-of-way. pp. 233–254. Davenport, John, and J.L. Davenport (eds.). 2006. The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment. The Netherlands, Springer. Jacobson, S. L. 2005. Mitigation measures for highway-caused impacts to Birds. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. Janss, G. F. E. 2000. Avian mortality from power lines: a morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biological Conservation 95:353-359. Keller, V. & Bekker, H. 2003. Minimising fragmentation: fauna passages and other technical solutions. Wildlife and Traffic: A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions. Prepared by COST 341: Habitat Fragmentation Due to Transportation Infrastructure (eds B.Iuell, H.Bekker, R.Cuperus, J.Dufek, G. L.Fry, C.Hicks, V.Hlavac, J.Keller, B.Le Marie Wandall, C.Rosell Pagès, T.Sangwine&N.Torslov), pp. 129–173. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division, Delft, the Netherla Madsen A. B., Fyhn H. W., Prang A. 1998. [Traffic killed animals in a landschaft ecological planning and research]. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser. Faglig Rap. DMU 228. Malo, J. E., F. Suarez, and A. Diez. 2004. Can we mitigate animal-vehicle accidents using predictive models? Journal of Applied Ecology 41:701-710. Massemin, S. and T. Zorn. 1998. Highway mortality of Barn Owls in northeastern France. Journal of Raptor Research 32:229-232. Meunier, F. D., C. Verheyden, and P. Jouventin. 1999. Bird communities of highway verges: Influence of adjacent habitat and roadside management. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 20:1-13. Mumme, R. L., S. J. Schoech, G. W. Woolfenden, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 2000. Life and death in the fast lane: Demographic consequences of road mortality in the Florida Scrub-Jay. Conservation Biology 14:501-512. Nero R. W., Copland H. W. R. 1981. High mortality of Great Gray Owls in Monitoba — winter 1980–81. Blue Jay 39: 158–165. Newton, I., I. Wyllie, and A. Asher. 1991. Mortality causes in british barn owls Tyto alba, with a discussion of aldrin dieldrin poisoning. Ibis 133:162-169. Orlowski, G. 2005. Factors affecting road mortality of the Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in farmland. Acta Ornithologica 40:117-125. Orlowski, G. 2008. Roadside hedgerows and trees as factors increasing road mortality of birds: Implications for management of roadside vegetation in rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 86:153-161. Pons, P., 2000. Height of the road embankment affects probability of traffic collision by birds. Bird Study 47: 122–125. Ramp, D., J. Caldwell, K. A. Edwards, D. Warton, and D. B. Croft. 2005. Modelling of wildlife fatality hotspots along the snowy mountain highway in New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 126:474-490. Ramp, D., V. K. Wilson, and D. B. Croft. 2006. Assessing the impacts of roads in peri-urban reserves: Road-based fatalities and road usage by wildlife in the Royal National Park, New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 129:348-359. Ramsden D. J. 2003. Barn Owls and major roads: results and recommendations from a 15-year research project. The Barn Owl Trust, Ashburton. Reijnen, R., R. Foppen, and G. Veenbaas. 1997. Disturbance by traffic of breeding birds: Evaluation of the effect and considerations in planning and managing road corridors. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:567-581. Robertson McB. J. 1930: Roads and birds. Condor 32: 142-146. Russell A. L., C. M. Butchkoski, L. Saidak, and G. F. McCracke. 2008. Road-killed bats, highway design, and the commuting ecology of bats. Endang Species Res. Schmid, H., A. Sierro. 2000. Test of measures to prevent bird-strikes on transparent noise-protection walls. Natur und Landschaft 75:426-430. http://www.windowcollisions.info/e/bibliography.html. Seiler, A. 2005. Predicting locations of moose-vehicle collisions in Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:371-382. Seiler A. & Helldin J-O. 2006. Mortality in wildlife due to transportation. pp. 165-189. Davenport, John, and J.L. Davenport (eds.). 2006. The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment. The Netherlands, Springer. Slater, F.M., 2002. An assessment of wildlife road casualties – the potential discrepancy between numbers counted and numbers killed. Web Ecology 3, 33–42. Spellerberg, I. F. 1998. Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review. Global Ecology and Biogeography 7:317-333. St. Clair, C.C., Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A., Hannon, S.J., 1998. Winter response of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Conservation Ecology [online] 2 (2), 13. Available: http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art13. St Clair, C. C. 2003. Comparative permeability of roads, rivers, and meadows to songbirds in Banff National Park. Conservation Biology 17:1151-1160. Tremblay, M. A. and C. C. St Clair. 2009. Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1314-1322. Trombulak, S. C. and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14:18-30. Vanderzande, A. N., W. J. T. Keurs, and W. J. Vanderweijden. 1980. The impact of roads on the densities of 4 bird species in an open-field habitat - evidence of a long-distance effect. Biological Conservation 18:299-321. Varga, C., A. Monoki, and B. Barsony. 2005. Bird-protection walls: an innovative way to prevent bird strikes? IN: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Eds. Irwin CL, Garrett P, McDermott KP. Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC: pp. 565-568. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46985 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國道三號高速公路所造成的動物車禍傷亡以鳥類為主,道路高架雖能有效減輕地面活動動物的傷亡,但具飛行能力的動物如鳥類仍有機會被撞擊。隔音牆與路旁植被是最常被提及作為降低鳥類道路致死效應的減輕方案,也是道路權責單位最易於設置與管理的因子,但實證性的研究相當缺乏且實際成效亦有爭議。因此本研究分別在國道三號的平面以及高架路段檢視既有隔音牆(均為3 m高,分為單邊及雙邊兩類)以及不同高度的植被對於鳥類飛越道路行為的影響。研究於2008年4-6月(春季)與9-10月(秋季)在已知道路致死效應較高的路段進行取樣。樣線內優勢鳥種主要為鳩鴿科(Columbidae)、麻雀(Passer montanus)、白頭翁(Pycnonotus sinensis)及燕科(Hirundinidae)或雨燕科(Apodidae)。結果顯示: 不論平面或高架的雙邊隔音牆對於維持鳥類飛越高度在3 m以上都有良好成效,但不足以使鳥類飛行高度維持至4.5 m的大貨車高度以上,而完全避免被車輛撞擊的風險。單邊隔音牆對維持鳥類飛行高度的成效不佳,並與無隔音牆沒有顯著差異。平面道路旁的高密植被亦可以維持鳥類的飛越高度在3 m以上,但不足以使鳥類飛行高度維持至4.5 m以上。而高架道路旁的棕櫚科樹冠層高於橋面時,則可以將鳥類飛越高度引導至3 m,甚至是4.5 m之上。然而,隔音牆的存在有可能吸引特定鳥類如麻雀、椋鳥科停棲,而導致較多的間接飛越事件,使鳥類低空飛越路面而與車輛碰撞的機會增加。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Birds are major road-kill victims on National Freeway No. 3 in Taiwan. Although acoustic barrier and roadside hedgerows are often suggested to be the mitigation measures for bird road-kill, only a few studies have been conducted to evaluate their effectiveness and the results were often contradictory. This study examined the effects of acoustic barrier (3m high) and roadside hedgerows of different height on the behavior of birds when flying across embankment roads or viaducts respectively on National Freeway No. 3. Between April-June and September-November 2008, bird behavior was recorded along road sections of known road-kill hotspots. The major bird victims are Columbidae, Passer montanus, Pycnotus sinensis, and Hirundinidae/Apodidae.
Proportion of birds flying below 3m (height of acoustic barrier) were not significantly different between road sections with one-side or without acoustic barrier on either viaducts or embankment roads, but the proportion was significantly lower along road sections with acoustic barriers on both sides, which means that acoustic barrier on both sides could effectively facilitate birds to maintain their flying height when flying across the road, but not the one-side acoustic barriers. Proportion of birds flying below 3 m were significantly lower along road sections with high hedgerows than that of mid and low hedgerows, and the proportion along road sections of mid hedgerows are also significantly lower than that of low hedgerows on embankment roads. Proportion of birds flying below 3 m and 4.5 m were significantly lower along road sections with canopy height of road-side vegetation above viaducts. Although more birds maintained their flying height flying above 3 m when crossing over road sections with acoustic barriers on both sides or high hedgerows, such height is not enough for birds to avoid collision with trucks which are up to 4.5m in total height. Furthermore, birds may be attracted by acoustic barrier and road-side vegetation to perch and utilize, causing more chances of indirect pass and collision with cars. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:44:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95b44019-1.pdf: 896636 bytes, checksum: c315308aa34a94f72b018a4c465aece8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 前言 1 材料與方法 4 試驗地描述 4 樣線設置 4 隔音牆組 4 植被組 5 路面鳥類行為取樣 6 觀察與取樣方法 6 鳥類行為定義 7 路面鳥類屍體撿拾 8 路旁鳥類調查 8 統計分析 9 結果 11 鳥類路面行為 11 路旁微結構對直接飛越的影響 12 隔音牆組 12 植被組 13 季節與時段的差異 14 隔音牆對間接飛越的影響 14 路旁植被與鳥類數量的關係 15 路面鳥類屍體撿拾 15 討論 17 隔音牆與植被對鳥類直接飛越的影響 17 隔音牆對鳥類間接飛越的影響 19 季節與時段的影響 20 鳥類習性與行為和撞擊風險的關係 21 高架橋樑的效應 21 結論 23 鳥類道路致死效應減輕措施的建議 24 參考文獻 25 圖目錄 圖1. 道路範圍內風險區示意圖 33 圖2 . 隔音牆組鳥類以不同高度直接飛越路面的數量與比例 34 圖3 . 植被組鳥類以不同高度直接飛越路面的數量與比例 35 圖4. 不同時段與季節鳥類直接飛越進入風險區的比例與數量 36 表目錄 表 1. 植被組各處理以及樣點的數目 37 表 2. 國道3號各鳥種直接飛越路面且飛行高度低於4.5 m的隻數、佔所有鳥類總隻數比例、佔該種總隻數的比例,以及拾獲各鳥種屍體數量與比例 38 表 3. 國道3號平面與高架路段飛越高度低於4.5 m的鳥種組成與路旁鳥類調查所得50 x 50m範圍內鳥類數量之關係 39 表 4. 國道3號各鳥種表現直接飛越以外各類道路行為的次數與比例 40 表 5. 隔音牆組不同鳥類飛越高度的數量與比例檢定表 41 附表1. 國道3號鳥類道路致死效應隔音牆組調查樣線基本資料。 42 附表2. 國道3號鳥類道路致死效應植被組調查樣線基本資料。 43 附表3. 鳥類名錄。 44 附圖1. 路旁棲地示意圖 46 附圖2. 隔音牆示意圖 46 附圖3. 植被示意圖 46 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 高速公路鳥類道路致死效應減輕措施評估
-以路旁植被及隔音牆為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation of Mitigation Measures
for Highway Bird Road-kill | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 袁孝維(Hsiao-Wei Yuan),林世強(Shih-Chiang Lin),翁國精(Guo-Jing Weng),孫元勳(Yuan-Hsun Sun) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鳥類,行為,道路致死效應,隔音牆,植被,高架橋, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | acoustic barrier,behavior,birds,hedgerows,road-kill,viaducts, | en |
dc.relation.page | 46 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 875.62 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。