請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45947
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李玲玲(Ling-Ling Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shao-Yi Weng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 翁紹益 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:49:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王穎、陳順其。1990。動物園食蟹獴行為之初步研究。動物園學報 2 : 161-174。
林則桐。1994。福山試驗林植被之研究。全球變遷:福山森林生態系長期研究。行政院國家科學委員會。 莊順安。1994。福山森林生態系三種食肉目動物 (麝香貓、食蟹獴、鼬獾) 的食性研究。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。 陳德豪。1997。福山試驗林食蟹獴 (Herpestes urva) 的巡遊行為與空間分布。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。 張豐緒、林曜松、王鑫、王穎、呂光洋、徐國士、劉小如。1986。哈盆地區自然資源之調查。行政院農業委員會。102頁。 黃美秀。1995。福山試驗林食蟹獴族群與資源利用之研究。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。 黃傳景。2005。利用排遺DNA標定法探討金門地區水獺之族群遺傳結構與雌雄播遷模式之差異。國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文。 董世良、黃淑梅、黎明儀、葉雲吟、林佩青。1998。福山植物園解說系列-水生植物池,初版。台灣省林業試驗所,台北市。 端木茂甯。2001。福山試驗林食蟹獴 (Herpestes urva) 的棲地利用。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。 Balmforth, Z. E. 2004. The demographics, spatial structure and behaviour of the yellow mongoose, Cynictis penicillata, with emphasis on cooperative breeding. DPhil thesis, University of Sussex at Sussex. Cavallini, P. & J. A. J. Nel. 1990. Ranging behaviour of the Cape grey mongoose Galerella pulverulenta in a coastal area. Journal of Zoology. 222, 353-362. Cavallini, P. & J. A. J. Nel. 1990. The feeding ecology of the Cape grey mongoose, Galerella pulverulenta (Wagner 1839) in a coastal area. African Journal of Ecology. 28, 123–130. Cavallini, P. 1993. Spatial organization of the yellow mongoose Cynictis penicillata in a costal area. Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 5, 501-509. Cavallini, P. & J. A. J. Nel. 1995. Comparative behaviour and ecology of two sympatric mongoose species (Cynictis penicillata and Galerella pulverulenta). South African Tydskrif Dierk. 30(2), 46-49. Charles-Dominique, P. 1978. Ecology and social-behavior of African palm civet Nandinia binotata in Gabon - with a comparison with sympatric prosimians. Terre et Vie. 32, 477- 528. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1989. Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature. 337, 70-72. Costello, C. M., S. R. Creel, S. T. Kalinowski, N. V. Vu & H. B. Quigley. 2008. Sex-biased natal dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in American black bears as revealed by spatial genetic analyses. Molecular Ecology. 17, 4713-4723. Dieringer, D. & C. Schlotterer. 2003 Microsatellite analyzer(msa): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes. 3, 167-169. Dobson, F. S. 1982. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Animal Behaviour. 30, 1183–1192. Gittleman, J. L. 1989. Carnivore group living: comparative treds. In J. L. Gittleman (ed.), Carnivore Behavior, Ecologu and Evolution. Vol.2. Conell University Press, New York. Pp. 183-207. Gompper, M. E., J. L.Gittleman & R. K. Wayne. 1998. Dispersal, philopatry, and genetic relatedness in a social carnivore: comparing males and females. Molecular Ecology. 7, 157–163. Gorman, M. L. 1979. Dispersion and foraging of small Indian mongoose, Herpestes auropunctatus (Carnivora: Viverridae) relative to the evolution of social viverrids. Journal of Zoology. 187, 65-73. Gottelli, D., J. Wang, S. Bashir & S. M. Durant. 2007. Genetic analysis reveals promiscuity among female cheetahs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 274, 1993–2001. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Accessed December 2007. Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behariour. 28, 1140-1162. Hays, W. S. T. & S. Conant. 2003. Male social activity in the small Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus. Acta Theriologica. 48, 485–494. Hide, R. A. 1976. Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man. 11, 1-17. Huck M., A. C. Frantz, D. A. Dawson, T. Burke & T. J. Roper. 2008. Low genetic variability, female-biased dispersal and high movement rates in an urban population of Eurasian badgers Meles meles. Journal of Animal Ecology. 77, 905–915. Hamilton, W.D. 1976a. The genetic evolution of social behavior, I. J. Theoret. Biol. 7, 1–16. Hamilton, W.D. 1976b. The genetic evolution of social behavior, II. J. Theoret. Biol. 7, 17–52. Hayne, D. W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy. 30, 1-18. Janecka, J. E., T. L. Blankenship, D. H. Hirth, M. E. Tewes, C.W. Kilpatrick & L. I. Grassman Jr. 2006. Kinship and social structure of bobcats (Lynx rufus) inferred from microsatellite and radio-telemetry data. Journal of Zoology. 269, 494-501. Kalinowski, S. T., A. P. Wagner & M. L. Taper. 2006. ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6, 576–579. Kenward, R. E. 1987. Wildlife Radio Tagging: Equipment, Field Techniques and Data Analysis. Academic Press, London. Kenward, R., A. South & S. Walls, 2002. Ranges 6: for the Analysis of Tracking and Location Data. Wareham, Dorset, UK: Anatrack Ltd. Macdonald, D. W. 1983. The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature. 301, 379-384. Macdonald, D. 1986. The encyclopedia of mammals. Grolier International Inc. 151. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Research. 27, 209-220. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk & J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology. 7, 639-655. Moyer, M. A., J. W. McCown, T. H. Eason & M. K. Oli. 2006. Dose genetic relatedness influence space use pattern? A test on Florida black bears. Journal of Mammalogy. 87, 255-261. Palomares, F. & M. Delibes. 1993. Key habitats for Egyptian mongooses in Donana National Park, south-western Spain. Journal of Applied Ecology. 30, 752-758. Petit, E., F. Balloux & J. Goudet. 2001. Sex-biased dispersal in a migratory bat: a characterization using sex-specific demographic parameters. Evolution. 55, 635-640. Queller, D. C. & K. F. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution. 43, 258-275. Ralls, K., K. L. Pilgrim, P. J. White, E. E. Paxinos, M. K. Schwartz & R. C. Fleischer. 2001. Kinship, social relations, and den sharing in kit foxes. Journal of Mammalogy. 82, 858-866. Rathbun, G. B. & T. E. Cowley. 2008. Behavioural ecology of the black mongoose (Galerella nigrata) in Namibia. Mammalian Biology. 73, 444-450. Ratnayeke, S., G. A. Tuskan, & M. R. Pelton. 2002. Genetic relatedness and female spatial organization in a solitary carnivore, the raccoon, Procyon lotor. Molecular Ecology. 11, 1115-1124. Ray, J. C. 1997. Comparative ecology of two African forest mongooses, Herpestes naso and Atilax paludinosus. African Journal of Ecology. 35, 237-253. Raymond, M., & F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP Version1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. The Journal of heredity. 86, 248–249. Rood, J. P. 1986. Ecology and social evolution in the mongooses. In: Rubenstein, D. I. And Wrangham, R. W. (eds.), Ecological aspects of social evolution. Birds and Mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 131-152. Rood, J. P. 1989. Male association in a solitary mongoose. Anim. Behav. 38, 725-728. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch & T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. Schenk, A., M. E. Obbard, K. M. Kovacs. 1998. Genetic relatedness and home-range overlap among female black bears (Ursus americanus) in northern Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 76, 1511-1519. Støen, O. G., E. Bellemain, S. Sæbø, J. E. Swenson. 2005. Kin-related spatial structure in brown bears Ursus arctos. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 59, 191-197. Van Orsdol, K. G., J. P. Hanby & J. D. Bygott. 1985. Ecological correlates of lion social organization (Panthera leo). Journal of Zoology (London) 206, 97-112. Veron, G., M. Colyn, A. E. Dunham, P. Taylor & P. Gaubert. 2004. Molecular systematics and origin of sociality in mongoose (Herpestidae, Carnivora). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 30, 582-598. Vidya, T. N. C., Z. Balmforth, A.LeRoux1 & M. I. Cherry. 2009. Genetic structure, relatedness and helping behaviour in the yellow mongoose in a farmland and a natural habitat. Journal of Zoology. 278, 57-64. Waser, P. M. 1981. Sociality or territorial defense? The influence of resource renewal. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. 8, 231-237. Waser, P. M. & W. T. Jones. 1983. Natal philopatry among solitary animals. Quarterly Review of Biology. 58, 355-382. Waser, P. M. & M. S. Waser. 1985. Ichneumia albicauda and the evolution of viverrid gregariousness. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 68, 137-151. Waser, P. M., Austad, S. N. & Keane, B. 1986. When should animals tolerate inbreeding? The American naturalist. 128, 529-537. Waser, P. M., B. Keane, S. R. Creel, L. F. Elliott & D. J. Minchella. 1994. Possible male coalitions in a solitary mongoose. Animal Behariour. 47, 289-294. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Wolff, J. O. 1993. What is the role of adults in mammalian juvenile dispersal? Oikos. 68, 173-176. Wolff, J. O. 1994. More on juvenile dispersal in mammals. Oikos. 71, 349-352. Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology. 70(1), 164-168. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45947 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 獴科動物的社會結構從獨居到群居,有許多類型;但是被歸類為獨居性的獴也可能展現許多複雜的社會行為。本研究利用捕捉標放及無線電追蹤,收集被認為屬於獨居性的食蟹獴族群組成與空間分布資料,並配合微衛星體基因座分子技術分析分子遺傳資料,檢視福山試驗林內食蟹獴的社會結構,包括個體間遺傳相似度與活動範圍分布的關係、播遷模式及食蟹獴配對系統。
自2008年4月至2009年9月共捕獲22隻食蟹獴 (10雄12雌) 51次,所有個體皆掛有發報器。扣除定位點數不足的個體,19隻食蟹獴有效定位點從16點至80點不等,活動範圍面積介於5.01公頃至80.51公頃,平均44.77 ± 19.04公頃,性別間及年齡間都沒有顯著差異。同一時期追蹤的食蟹獴活動範圍,在雄性間、雌性間及異性間活動範圍都會有重疊,從0 %至96.4 %。 以11組微衛星基因座分析23份食蟹獴組織樣本(包括一隻非本研究捕獲的死亡個體之組織),每個基因座的對偶基因數為2至6個,平均為3.27個,HO為0.565 ± 0.283,HE為0.513 ± 0.221,與1997年食蟹獴樣本的遺傳多型性類似,但遺傳結構有分化的趨勢。FIS值為-0.063,顯示福山食蟹獴沒有偏離逢機配對之預期。兩兩個體配對的遺傳相似度從-0.472至0.338,平均為-0.026,雄性兩兩配對與雌性兩兩配對之平均遺傳相似度沒有差異,顯示福山食蟹獴的播遷模式沒有性別上的偏差。根據遺傳分析個體間關係的結果配合野外觀察資料推論出5組親子組合,其中兩組有相同的父親不同的母親,推論食蟹獴的配對系統為一雄多雌。 比較有親屬關係的個體與沒有親屬關係個體間活動範圍重疊度沒有顯著差異;而雄性間及雌性成體間遺傳相似度越近時活動範圍及核心區域重疊度會越小,推測可能是為了降低和有關係個體的競爭或交配機會。在研究期間所紀錄一起活動的2隻個體多為繁殖對或親子對,但有1組2隻一起活動的是沒有關係的非成體,推論一起行動的原因可能為共同禦敵,顯示福山食蟹獴除了生殖和育幼外,還會出現其他不同程度的互動行為,並非完全獨居的動物。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Social structures of different mongoose species of Family Herpestidae vary greatly from being solitary to social. Some solitary mongooses have been observed to have complex social interaction than expected. To understand the social structure of the crab-eating mongoose (Herpestes urva), which was categorized as a solitary mongoose, I conducted mark-recpture, radio-tracking and genetic analysis using microsatellite markers to examine spatial distribution and relatedness of individuals, dispersal pattern of male and females, and mating system of the species. From April 2008 to September 2009, I captured 22 crab-eating mongoose (10 males and 12 females), and all of them were fitted with transmitters. The number of location fixes recorded for 19 mongooses ranged from 16 to 80. Average home range size was 44.77 ± 19.04 ha (range: 5.01 - 80.51 ha). Home range overlaps could be found in male, female and inter-sexual pairs, and the degree of home range overlaps varied from 0 % to 96.4 %. Genetic analysis based on 11 microsatellites loci showed that mean number of alleles per locus was 3.27 (range: 2 – 6) and the average observed and expected heterozygosity was 0.565 ± 0.283 and 0.513 ± 0.221, respectively. Genetic diversity of population in 1997 and 2008, though not significantly different, showed trend of genetic differentiation. Genetic data also indicated no in-breeding in the Fushan population (FIS = -0.063). Mean pairwise relatedness was -0.026 (range: -0.472 to 0.338) and no significant difference was found between that of male pairs and female pairs, which suggested no sex-biased dispersal. Parent-offspring analysis suggested potential polygynous mating system. The Mantel test indicated a significantly negative relationship between relatedness of male pairs and overlaps of their home ranges, and between that of adult female pairs, which suggested that crab-eating mongooses may avoid resource competition and mating with individuals that are closely related. The crab-eating mongooses were mostly solitarily or active in either breeding or parent-offspring pairs. However, one pair of unrelated subadults which were found to move together, perhaps as a anti-predator strategy, suggested that the crab-eating mongoose may have more complex social interaction than expected of a solitary animal. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:49:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95b44022-1.pdf: 489804 bytes, checksum: eca20160b5e9f4356bdffcad682842ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘要......................................................i 前言......................................................1 研究方法 捕捉標放..............................................4 無線電追蹤............................................5 DNA萃取及微衛星體基因座...............................6 資料分析方法 活動範圍..............................................8 分子辨識..............................................8 空間分布與遺傳資料....................................9 結果 捕捉標放.............................................11 無線電追蹤及活動範圍.................................11 分子分析.............................................13 空間分布與遺傳資料...................................13 討論 空間分布.............................................16 播遷行為.............................................17 基因多型性...........................................17 社會互動.............................................18 參考文獻.................................................19 圖.......................................................24 表.......................................................29 附錄.....................................................35 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 福山試驗林食蟹獴(Herpestes urva)之社會結構 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Social structure of crab-eating mongoose (Herpestes urva) in Fushan Experimental Forest | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李壽先,陳德豪,翁國精 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 親緣關係,空間結構,微衛星體基因座,食蟹獴,福山, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Relatedness,Spatial structure,Microsatellite,Crab-eating mongoose,Fushan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 38 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 478.32 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。