請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45867完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪茂蔚 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Wen Lo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 羅淑文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:47:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-10 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-10 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Acharya, V. V. and T. C. Johnson, 2005, “Insider Trading in Credit Derivatives,” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=767864.
2. Ammann, M., 2001, “Credit Risk Valuation: Methods, Models and Applications,” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 3. Bank of England, 2007, “Financial Stability Report,” Issue No. 22, Available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/fsr/2007/fsrfull0710.pdf. 4. Bloomfield, R. and M. O’Hara, 1999, “Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?”, Review of Financial Studies. 5. Bloomfield, R. and M. O’Hara, 2000, “Can Transparent Markets Survive?”, Journal of Financial Economics. 6. Bodie, Z., A. Kane, A. J. Marcus及林哲鵬著,投資學,美商麥格羅•希爾國際股份有限公司台灣分公司,2008年1月。 7. Byström, H., 2005, “Credit Default Swap and Equity Prices: The iTraxx CDS Index Market,” Available at http://www.nek.lu.se/publications/workpap/Papers/WP05_24.pdf. 8. Caouette, J. B., E. I. Altman, P. Narayanan, and R. Nimmo, 2008, “Managing Credit Risk, The Great Challenge for the Global Financial Markets,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 9. Chacko, G., A. Sjöman, H. Motohashi, and V. Dessain, 2007, “Credit Derivatives: A Primer on Credit Risk, Modeling, and Instruments,” Pearson Education, Inc. 10. Chaplin, G., 2005, “Credit Derivatives: Risk Management, Trading and Investing,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11. Coffee, J. C., Jr. and A. A. Berle, 2008, “Turmoil in the U.S. Credit Markets: The Role of the Credit Rating Agencies,” Hearing Before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, 110th Cong. 5. 12. Cox, C., 2008, “Statement on Proposal to Increase Investor Protection by Reducing Reliance on Credit Rating,” The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 13. Duffie, D. and H. Zhu, 2010, “Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?”, Available at http://www.stanford.edu/~duffie/DuffieZhu.pdf. 14. European Central Bank, 2009, “Credit Default Swap and Counterparty Risk,” Available at http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/creditdefaultswapsandcounterpartyrisk2009en.pdf. 15. Gavil, A. I., W. E. Kovacic, and J. B. Baker, 2002, “Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Policy,” West Group, 2002. 16. Gibson, M. S., 2007, “Credit Derivatives and Risk Management,” Working Paper in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1034269. 17. Glass, A. W., 2009, “The Regulatory Drive Towards Central Counterparty Clearing of OTC Credit Derivatives and the Necessary Limits on This,” Capital Markets Law Review Journal, Vol. 4, No. S1. 18. Hunt, J. P., 2009, “Credit Rating Agencies and the “Worldwide Credit Crisis”: The Limits of Reputation, the Insufficiency of Reform, and a Proposal for Improvement,” Columbia Business Law Review. 19. International Monetary Fund, 2005, “Global Financial Stability Report,” Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/GFSR/2005/02/pdf/chp2.pdfhttp://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/GFSR/2005/02/pdf/chp2.pdf. 20. International Monetary Fund, 2008, “Containing Systemic Risks and Restoring Financial Soundness, Global Financial Stability Report, World Economic and Financial Surveys,” Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2008/01/pdf/chap2.pdf. 21. Kothari, V., 2009, “Credit Derivatives & Structured Credit Trading,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 22. Lando, D., 2004, “Credit Risk Modeling: Theory and Applications,” Princeton University Press. 23. Mollenkamp, C., 2008, “Behind AIG’s Fall, Risk Models Failed to Pass Real-World Test,” Wall Street Journal. 24. Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfeld, 2009, “Microeconomics,” Pearson Education, Inc. 25. Saunders, A. and L. Allen, 2002, “Credit Risk Measurement: New Approaches to Value at Risk and Other Paradigms,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 26. Senior Supervisors Group of Financial Stability Forum, 2009, “Observation on Management of Recent Credit Default Swap Credit Events.” 27. Shadab, H. B., 2010, “Guilty by Association? Regulating Credit Default Swaps,” The Ohio State University Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal. 28. Standard & Poor’s, 2009, “Understanding Standard & Poor’s Rating Definition.” 29. Sy, A. N. R., 2009, “The System Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies and Rated Markets,” International Monetary Fund Working Paper, Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09129.pdf. 30. Tavakoli, J. M., 黃嘉斌譯, 2007,「信用衍生性&結構型商品」,寰宇出版股份有限公司。 31. The President’s Working Group on Financial Market, 2008, “Policy Statement on Financial Market Developments,” Available at http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/reports/ pwgpolicystatemktturmoil_03122008.pdf 32. The Securities and Exchange Committee, 2008, “Annual Report on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations.” 33. The Securities and Exchange Commission, 2008, “Summary Report of Issues Identified in the Commission Staff’s Examinations of Select Credit Rating Agencies.” 34. Zabel, R. R., 2008, “Credit Default Swap: From Protection to Speculation,” Pratt’s Journal of Bankruptcy Law. 35. 吳友梅,1998,「衍生性商品市場風險之管理」,證交資料月刊,第436期,頁次1-13。 36. 洪茂蔚,2010,「財務管理」,雙葉書廊有限公司。 37. 財團法人台灣金融研訓所,2005,「風險管理理論與方法」,財團法人台灣金融研訓所。 38. 曾令寧、黃仁德,2004,「現代銀行監理與風險管理」,財團法人台灣金融研訓所。 39. 簡堅訓,2006,「衍生性商品與ISDA合約法務控管實務手冊」,秀威資訊科技股份有限公司。 40. 儲蓉,2008,「信用衍生性金融商品」,財團法人台灣金融研訓所。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45867 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 信用衍生性金融商品源於1990年代。二十一世紀初期,各國政府在鼓勵金融創新之政策下,未對信用衍生性金融商品市場及交易制定嚴格之法令規範,此政策使得信用衍生性金融商品可以迅速發展,也使得金融市場蓬勃發展。斯時,信用衍生性金融商品之交易多依市場參與者所組成或設立之國際性協會或組織所訂定之規則或制度進行。
信用衍生性金融商品之主要目的為分散信用風險,其基本類型有信用違約交換、總報酬交換、信用價差商品、擔保債權憑證及信用連結債券,各基本類型又可單層或多層地架構在相同或不同的基本類型之上,而形成更複雜之商品。本文以信用衍生性金融商品之構成要素,說明信用保障之買方及信用保障之賣方從事信用衍生性金融商品交易之動機,及信用衍生性金融商品在櫃檯市場及集中市場交易之情形。 大部分之信用衍生性金融商品乃於櫃檯市場交易,而不於集中交易市場交易。櫃檯市場係由交易雙方達成共識後作成交易,依雙方所簽署之契約作為行使權利、負擔義務之基礎,外界難以窺探個別交易之詳情,對於整體信用衍生性金融商品之交易情形,亦難知梗概。因此,2008年金融風暴發生後,各國政府均認有對信用衍生性金融商品之市場交易秩序加以規範之必要,故針對信用衍生性金融商品為人詬病之交易不透明、資訊不對稱、交易相對人之信用風險及信用評等品質不佳等情形,討論改善方式。 准此,美國政府修正1934年證券交易法(Securities Exchange Act of 1934),要求信用評等機構揭露對結構型金融商品之評等方式,將完整及正確之重大資訊揭露與市場參與者,作為市場參與者從事交易之依據;另制訂暫時條例允許中間機構之設置,鼓勵市場參與者透過中間機構進行交易,以降低交易相對人之信用風險,更可進一步使交易資訊透明化。美國政府於2010年7月21日由總統正式簽署華爾街改革及消費者保護法(Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act),首次對於櫃檯買賣之衍生性金融商品交易加以法律規範,並加強對信用評等機構及以資產為基礎之證券化商品之規範。新制定之法律是否可解決上述信用衍生性金融商品市場交易不透明等問題,同時又可維持金融市場之創新與進步,尚待市場考驗。此外,新法勢將影響市場參與者之既有獲利來源,如何使大多數之市場參與者欣然透過新的交易制度揭露相關交易資訊,將是執事者努力之目標。本文亦將介紹新修正法律之內容,並探討新法施行後可能對於信用衍生性金融商品市場造成之影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The history of credit derivatives can be traced back to as early as the 1990s. At the outset of the 21st century, the credit derivatives market flourished as a result of the policy of encouraging financial innovation and the absence of stringent regulations. At that time, all derivatives transactions were conducted in accordance with the rules and protocols of international associations, which were dominated by major market players.
Credit derivatives, which were created to diffuse credit risks, include credit default swaps, total return swaps, credit spread products, collateralized debt obligations and credit-linked notes. One type of credit derivatives may, in a single or multiple layers, be embedded in the same or other types of derivatives to create complex financial products. This article addresses the motives behind the transactions and the trading conditions on the over-the-counter (OTC) and listed markets. Most credit derivatives transactions are conducted on the OTC market rather than the listed market. OTC transactions are characterized by the agreement between the parties to each transaction. As a result, the public is unaware of the terms and conditions of each transaction or the actual market condition. The 2008 financial crisis triggered the necessity of tightening the regulations on credit derivatives market in order to overcome the drawbacks of low transparency, asymmetric information, credit risks and poor quality of credit rating data. In 2009, the United States (US) amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, thereby requiring credit rating agencies to disclose to investors material and complete information on the procedures and methodologies for valuating structured financial products. In addition, temporary regulations were announced in order to encourage investors to trade through the central counterparties thereby reducing the counterparties’ default risk and facilitating the transparency of trading information. On July 21, 2010, the US president signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), which is the first piece of legislation that regulates OTC derivatives transactions, and imposes further restrictions on credit rating agencies and asset-backed securities. It remains to be seen as to whether the Act could help to resolve the above-mentioned drawbacks of credit derivatives transactions and facilitate financial innovation simultaneously. As the new laws may affect the profit margins of traders, it is critical to identify ways to convince traders to disclose relevant trading information via the new trading system. This article explains the new legislations and explores their potential impact on the market. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:47:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-P97746011-1.pdf: 717297 bytes, checksum: 1d48887c2561d4c834657ef74217fbb4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒 論 1
第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究架構 3 第二章 信用衍生性金融商品之基本種類及交易動機 4 第一節、基本種類 4 第一項、信用違約交換(Credit Default Swaps) 4 第一款、單一資產信用違約交換(Single Name Credit Default Swaps) 4 第二款、一籃子信用違約交換(Basket Credit Default Swaps) 5 第三款、投資組合信用違約交換(Portfolio Credit Default Swaps) 7 第四款、結構型投資組合信用違約交換(Structured Portfolio Credit Default Swaps) 7 第二項、總報酬交換(Total Return Swaps) 8 第三項、信用價差商品(Credit Spread Products) 9 第一款、信用價差選擇權(Credit Spread Options) 10 第二款、信用違約交換選擇權(Credit Default Swaptions) 11 第三款、固定期限信用違約交換(Constant Maturity Credit Default Swaps) 11 第四項、擔保債權憑證(Collateralized Debt Obligations) 12 第一款、現金式擔保債權憑證(Cash Collateralized Debt Obligations) 14 第二款、合成式擔保債權憑證(Synthetic Collateralized Debt Obligations) 15 第三款、混合式擔保債權憑證(Hybrid Collateralized Debt Obligations) 16 第五項、信用連結債券(Credit-Linked Notes) 16 第二節、交易動機 18 第一項、信用保障之買方 20 第二項、信用保障之賣方 21 第三章 信用性衍生性金融商品之交易情形 23 第一節、櫃檯市場交易 25 第一項、信用衍生性金融商品交易服務之主要提供者 25 第二項、國際交換暨衍生性金融商品協會制定之合約文件 26 第三項、結算方式 29 第四項、結算方式之變革 32 第一款、2009年決策委員會及拍賣結算補充條文(2009 ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees and Auction Settlement Supplement) 32 第二款、2009年決策委員會、拍賣結算及重組補充條文(2009 ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees, Auction Settlement and Restructuring Supplement) 35 第三款、中間機構(Central Counterparties)之設立 35 第二節、集中市場交易 38 第四章 信用衍生性金融商品之定價模型 41 第一節、違約率之定價模型 41 第一項、統計模型法 41 第二項、結構式模型(Structural Form Models) 42 第三項、縮減式模型(Reduced Form Models) 44 第二節、單一資產之評價模型 45 第三節、一籃子投資組合之評價模型 46 第五章 信用評等機構對信用衍生性金融商品交易之影響 49 第一節、信用評等結果對交易之影響 49 第二節、信用評等機構與結構型金融商品 52 第一項、信用評等機構對結構型金融商品之評等方式 52 第二項、信用評等機構對結構型金融商品之信用評等 55 第三節、對信用評等機構之規範及改革 58 第一項、2009年4月10日前對信用評等機構之規範 59 第二項、2009年4月10日後對信用評等機構之規範 63 第三項、華爾街改革及消費者保護法對信用評等機構之規範 72 第六章 信用衍生性金融商品之風險管理 75 第一節、風險種類 75 第一項、市場風險 76 第二項、交易相對人風險 79 第三項、流動性風險 82 第四項、作業風險 83 第五項、法律風險 85 第二節、巴賽爾銀行監理委員會之衍生性金融商品風險管理準則 86 第七章 信用衍生性金融商品交易之市場規範及法律問題 90 第一節、由美國保險集團(AIG)之傾圮看信用違約交換之市場規範 90 第一項、美國保險集團危機之發生 90 第二項、美國保險集團危機發生後之立法改革 92 第二節、信用衍生性金融商品之法律問題 100 第一項、合約解釋爭議 100 第二項、內線交易之問題 111 第三項、反托拉斯法之適用 116 第八章 結論 118 參考文獻 122 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 契約解釋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 美國保險集團 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 華爾街改革及消費者保護法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信用違約交換 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 擔保債權憑證 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信用衍生性金融商品 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內線交易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信用評等機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中間機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | American Insurance Group | en |
| dc.subject | Inc. (AIG) | en |
| dc.subject | Credit Default Swaps (CDS) | en |
| dc.subject | Collateral Debt Obligations (CDO) | en |
| dc.subject | Credit Derivatives | en |
| dc.subject | Credit Rating Institutions | en |
| dc.subject | Central Counterparties | en |
| dc.subject | Risk Management | en |
| dc.subject | Contract Interpretation | en |
| dc.subject | Insider Trading | en |
| dc.subject | Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act | en |
| dc.title | 信用衍生性金融商品市場交易及規範之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Market Trading and Regulations of Credit Derivatives | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林世銘,陳思寬 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 美國保險集團,信用違約交換,擔保債權憑證,信用衍生性金融商品,信用評等機構,中間機構,風險管理,契約解釋,內線交易,華爾街改革及消費者保護法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | American Insurance Group, Inc. (AIG),Credit Default Swaps (CDS),Collateral Debt Obligations (CDO),Credit Derivatives,Credit Rating Institutions,Central Counterparties,Risk Management,Contract Interpretation,Insider Trading,Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 124 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 700.49 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
