請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36946完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱雲漢(Yun-han Chu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jen-li Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張珍立 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:24:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-07-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參 考 書 目
中文部分 專書 石之瑜，《社會科學方法新論》，臺北：五南，民92 (2003 )，頁37。 石之瑜，《政治學的知識脈絡》，臺北：五南，民90 (2001)。 石之瑜、權湘，《女性主義的政治批判：誰的知識? 誰的國家? 》，臺北：正中，民83 (1994)。 任德厚，《政治學》，臺北：任德厚，民88 (1999)，頁55-86。 伊薩克(Alan C. Issak)原著，黃紀、陳忠慶譯，《政治學的範圍與方法》，臺北：幼獅文化，民67 (1978)。 林正弘，《伽俐略•波柏•科學說明》，臺北：東大，民77 (1988)。 柯拉克夫斯基(Leszek Kolakowski)原著，高俊一譯，《理性的異化：實證主義思 想史》，臺北：聯經，民77 (1988)。 高宣揚，《當代社會理論(上)》，臺北：五南，民87 (1998)，頁75-119。 溫特(Alexander Wendt)原著，秦亞青譯《國際政治的社會理論》，上海：上海人民出版社，民89 (2000)。 郭秋永，《政治學方法論研究專集》，臺北：臺灣商務印書館，民77 (1988)，頁1。 史密斯(Mark J. Smith)原著，吳翠松譯，《社會科學概說》，臺北：韋伯文化，民92 (2003)。 文區(Peter Winch)原著，張君玫譯，《社會科學的理念》，臺北：巨流，民84 (1995) 。 哈伯瑪斯(Jürgen Harbermas)原著，尼克森(Shierry Weber Nicholsen)、史達克(Jerry A.Stark)英譯，杜奉賢、陳龍森中譯，《論社會科學的邏輯》，臺北，結構群，民80 (1991)。 張國清著，《羅逖》，臺北，生智，民84 (1995)。 涂爾幹(Emile Durkheim)原著，黃丘隆譯，《社會學研究方法論》，臺北：結構群， 民78 (1989)。 馬許(David Marsh)等原著，陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏譯，《政治學方法論》，臺 北：韋伯文化，民87 (1998)。 路德納(Rudner Richard S.)原著，閰子桂譯，《社會科學的哲學》，臺北：幼獅文 化，民63 (1974)。 華爾納 (Fritz G.. Wallner) 原著，王榮麟、王超群合譯，《建構實在論》，臺北：五南，民86 (1997)。 羅伯特•奧迪 (Robert Audi)主編，《劍橋哲學辭典》，臺北：貓頭鷹出版：城邦發行，民91 (2002)。 期刊論文 方克濤，「超越實在論與反實在論」，國立臺灣大學哲學研究所碩士論文，民83年 (1994)。 石之瑜，「做為藝術的政治學－兼評建構主義的科學哲學立場」，美歐季刊，臺北 ，第十五卷第二期，民90年 (2001)，頁293-310。 秦亞青，「國際政治的社會建構－溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論」，美歐季刊，臺北，第十五卷第二期，民90年 (2001)，頁231-264。 袁頌西，「當代政治學中的解釋問題：實徵論與銓釋派之論爭」，政治學報，臺北，第九期，民70a年12月(1981)，頁53-105。 袁頌西，「從行為論到後行為論：政治學中爭論的焦點及其哲學背景」，臺大社會科學論叢，臺北，第二十九輯，民70b年(1981)，頁105-129。 袁頌西，「政治研究與價值問題：方法論上的探討」，政治科學論叢，臺北，第六期，民84年5月(1995)，頁145-170。 徐振國，「政治學方法論偏頗發展的檢討」，政治與社會哲學評論，臺北，第二期， 民91年9月(2002)，頁123-178。 郭秋永，「對峙的權力觀：行為與結構 」，政治科學論叢，臺北，第二十期， 民93年6月(2004)，頁29-78。 苑舉正，「典範社會學的限制」，臺灣社會學研究，臺北，第二期，民87年7月(1998)，頁173-200。 苑舉正，「從邏輯論和經驗論到反經驗論與反基礎論」，當代(自然化的科學哲學 專輯)，臺北，第一八六期，民92年2月(2003)，頁32-45。 莊錦農、魏中平，「解釋與批判：論批判實存論的科學解釋觀」，政治科學論叢 ，臺北，第九期，民87年6月(1998)。 鄭端耀，「國際關係『社會建構主義理論』評析」，美歐季刊，臺北，第十五卷第二期，民90年 (2001)，頁199-229。 黃旻華，「國際關係批判理論的重建與評論：科學實存論的觀點」，國立中山大學政治研究所碩士論文，民87年5月(1998)。 魏中平，「論社會科學解釋：問題與適當解釋模式的探討」，國立臺灣大學政治研究所碩士論文，民84年(1995)。 蕭全政，「兩種社會科學典範」，政治科學論叢，臺北，第五期，民國83年4月(1994)，頁59-85。 外文部分 專書 Adorno, Theodor W...et al. 1976. translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. New York : Harper & Row. Archer, Margaret and Tritter, Jonathan..et al.2000. Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization. London ; New York : Routledge. Bhaskar, Roy.1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks, Sussex : Harvester Press ; Atlantic Highlands, N.J. : Humanities Press. Bhaskar, Roy.1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London : Verso. Bhaskar, Roy.1989. Reclaiming Reality : a Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London ; New York : Verso. Bhaskar, Roy.1991. Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Oxford, UK ; Cambridge, Mass., USA : B. Blackwell. Bhaskar, Roy.1993. Dialectic : the pulse of freedom. London ; New York : Verso. Bhaskar, Roy.1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: a Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London ; New York : Routledge. Bhaskar, Roy..et al.1998. Critical Realism : Essential Readings. London ; New York : Routledge. Bhaskar, Roy. 2002a. Reflections on Meta-Reality : Transcendence, Emancipation, and Everyd y Life. New Delhi ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications. Bhaskar, Roy. 2002b. Meta-Reality : the Philosophy of Meta-Reality. New Delhi ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications. Bhaskar, Roy. 2002c. From Science to Emancipation : Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications. Collier, Andrew.1994. Critical Realism: an Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy. London ; New York : Verso. Comte, Auguste ; edited and translated by H. S. Jones 1998. Early Political Writings. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press. Cruickshank, Justin.ed.2003. Critical Realism : the Difference it Makes. London ; New York : Routledge. Danermark, Berth.. et.al. 2002. Explaining Society : Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London ; New York : Routledge. Easton, David. and Geunnell, John..et.al. 1991. The Development of political science : a comparative survey. London ; New York : Routledge. p.275-291. Farr, James. and Seidelman, Raymond. 1993. Discipline and History : Political Science in the United States. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press. Hall, Peter. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research” in Mahoney, James and Reuschemeyer, Dietrich eds. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, U.K.; New York：Cambridge University Press. p.373-404. Hempel, Carl G.ustav. 1952. Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Hume, David. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals: Oxford : Clarendon Press.p.60-79. Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco ; Scranton, Pa. : Chandler Pub. Co.p.31. Ken, Booth. and Smith ,Steve.eds. 1995. International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity. p.1-37. Kraft, Victor. 1969. The Vienna Circle : the Origin of Neo-Positivism, a Chapter in the History of Recent Philosophy. Westport, Connecticut : Greenwood Press. Ladyman, James. 2000. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge. Lichbach, Mark Irving. and Zuckerman, Alan S. eds.1997. Comparative Politics : Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press. Lopez , Jose. and Potter, Garry. eds. 2001. After Postmodernism : an Introduction to Critical Realism. London ; New York : Athlone. Manicas, Peter.1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Basil Blackwell. Marsh, David.. et al. 1999. Postwar British Politics in Perspective. Cambrige: Polity Press. Niniluoto, Ilkka. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press. p.V. Outhwaite, William. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science. London: Macmillan.p.36-37,42. Patomäki, Heikki. 2002. After International Relations : Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics. London ; New York : Routledge. Pierson, Paul. and Skocpol, Theda. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Katznelson, Ira. and Milner, Helen eds. Political Science: The State of the Discipline . New York: Norton, 2002, p.693-721. Rorty, Richard.1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge ; New York ; Cambridge University Press. Sarkar, Sahotra. ed.1996. The Emergence of Logical Empiricism: From 1900 to the Vienna Circle. New York : Garland Publishing. Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge. Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage Publications. Schickler, Eric. 2001.Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Smith, Steve. Booth, Ken. and Zalewski Marysia. eds.1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.p.149-85. Stadler, Friedrich. ed. 2003. The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism : Re-Evaluation and Future Perspectives. Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers. Stark, David. and L. Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Poperty in East Central Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Steimo, Sven. Thelen, Kathleen. and Longstreth, Frank. eds.1992. Structuring politics : Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge [England] ; New York : Cambridge University Press. Sylvan , David and Glassner, Barry.1985. A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences. Oxford [Oxfordshire] ; New York, NY, USA : Basil Blackwell. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. 期刊論文 Barnhart, Joe. ,“Karl Popper: Philosopher of Critical Realism,” The Humanist 56, 1996, p.35-38. Blankenburg, Stephanie..et al, “Special Issue on Critical Realism,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26, 2002, p.679-81. Carlsnaes, W. ,“The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis,” International Studies Quarterly 36, 1992 ,p.245-70. Fiorina, Morris, “Rational Choice and the New(?) Institutionalism,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.107-15. Hall, P.A. and Taylor, C.R. ,“Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms” Political Studies Vol.2, No.5 1996. Kloppenberg, James T., “Institutionalism, Rational Choice, and Historical Analysis,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.125-28. Kratochwil, Friedrich V., and Ruggie, John Gerard.,“International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40, 1986, p.753-75. Limerman, Robert C., “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change,” American Political Science Review 96, 2002, p.697-712. Lustik, Ian S., “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias,” American Political Science Review 90, 1996, p.605-18. Magill, Kevin ,“Against Critical Realism”Capital and Class 54, 1994, p.113-36. McDonald, Terrence J., “Institutionalism and Institutions in the Stream of History,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.129-33. March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. ,“The New Institutionalism: Organized Factors of Political Life,”American Political Science Review 78 ,1984, 734-49. Miller, Eugene F., “ Positivism, Historicism and Political Inquiry,” American Political Science Review 66, 1972, p.796-817. Miller, Eugene F., “Rejoinder to ‘Comments’ by David Braybrooke and Alexander Rosenberg, Richard S. Rudner and Martin Landau,” American Political Science Review 66, 1972, p.857-73. Orren, Karen, “Ideas and Institutions,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.97-101. Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 94, 2000, p.251-67. Wendt, Alexander, “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization,41, No.3,1987, p.335-70. Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46, 1992, p.391-425. Wendt, Alexander, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, 88.2, 1994, p.384-396. Ross, Dorothy, “The Many Lives of Institutionalism in American Social Science,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.117-23. Ruggie, John Gerard, “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization 47,1993, p.139-74. Ruggie, John Gerard,“The False Premise of Realism,” International Security 20,1995, p.62-70. Sayer,Andrew,“Critical Realism and the Limites to Critical Social Science,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27:4 ,1997, p.473-88. Smith, Rogers M., “Ideas, Institutions and Strategic Choices,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.135-40. Skocpal, Theda, “Why I am an Historical Institutionalist,” Polity XXVIII ,1995, p.103-06. Steve, Smith, “Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. “ Millenium: Journal of International Studies 16,1987, p.189-206. Thelen, Kathleen, “Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2 ,1999, p.369-403. 網際網路資訊 Archer, Margaret., Rachel, Sharp., Rob, Stones., and Tony, Woodiwiss., “Critical Realism and Research Methodology” Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n1_archer12.pdf ,1999,Apr, p.12-16. Archer, Margaret, “Realism and the Problem of Agency” Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 5.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCR(A)v5n1_archer11.pdf , 2002, May, p.11-20. Bhaskar, Roy, “The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part I: Identity, Spirituality, System,” (Interview. By Mervyn Hartwig.) Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating Alethia) 5.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/public/JCR(A)v5n1_bhaskar21.pdf , 2002d, May, p.21-34. Bhaskar, Roy, “The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, Part II: Agency, Perfectibility, Novelty,” Interview. By Mervyn Hartwig. Journal of Critical Realism 1.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_bhaskar67.pdf , 2002e,Nov, p.67-93. Bhaskar, Roy, “ Introducing Transcendental Dialectical Critical Realism,” Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 3.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv3n1_bhaskar15.pdf , 2000f, April p.15-21. Brown, Andrew, “Developing Realistic Methodology: How New Dialectics Surpasses the Critical Realist Method for Social Science,” http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/abrown_drm.html , 1999, Mar. CPGB (Communist Party of Great Britain ), “ Struggle for Science,” Weekly Worker 237, http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/237/strforsci.html , 1998, Apr. Danermark, Berth, “After Postmodernism: The Challenge for Critical Realism,” Review of After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism, edited by Jose Lopez & Garry Potter. Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating Alethia) 5.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCR(A)v5n1_danermark83.pdf ,2002, May, p.83-85. Engholm, Pär, “Realism, Social Theory, and Theoretical Practice,” Review of Realism and Social Science, by Andrew Sayer. Alethia 3.2 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv3n2_engholm14.pdf ,2000,Nov, p.14-20. Engholm, Pär, “The Possibility of Naturalism Twenty Years On,” Review of The Possibility of Naturalism, 3rd edition, by Roy Bhaskar. Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.1 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n1_engholm23.pdf ,1999 April, p.23-29. Gimenez, Martha E., “'For Structure: A Critique of Ontological Individualism,” Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.2 http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n2_gimenez19.pdf ,1999,Oct, p.19-25. Hammersley, Martyn, “'Research as Emancipatory: The Case of Bhaskar's Critical Realism,” Journal of Critical Realism 1.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_hammersley33.pdf , 2002, Nov, p. 33-48. Hartwig, Mervyn. ed., “A dictionary of Critical Realism,” ( list of entries, cross references and contributors), http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/public/DCR_List_of_Entries.pdf , 2003, Oct 28, p.1-41. Hartwig, Mervyn, and Rachel Sharp., “The Realist Third Way,” Review of Critical Realism: Essential Readings, by Margaret Archer, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie, eds. Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.1 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n1_hartwig17.pdf ,1999,Apr, p. 17-23. Hay, Collin, “What Place for Ideas in the Structure-Agency Debate? Globalisation as a 'Process Without a Subject',” http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/cshay_wpisad.html , 2001. Hirschheim, R.A., “Information Systems Epistemology: an Historical Perspective,” http://www.bauer.uh.edu/rudy/ISEpistemology.pdf ,2000,Sep 13. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., “'Marching to the Promised Land: Some Doubts on the Policy Affinities of Critical Realism,” Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.2, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n2_hogson2.pdf ,1999 October, p.2-10. Hooker, Richard , “Renaissance Neo-Platonism,” http://www.hermetic.com/texts/neoplatonism.html ,1997. Jones, Branwen Gruffydd., “International Relations as Internal Relations,” Review of After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics, by Heikki Patomäki. Journal of Critical Realism 1.1 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_jones147.pdf , 2002, Nov, p.147-157. Joseph, Jonathan, “Critical Realism and Postwar British Politics,” . Review of Postwar British Politics in Perspective, by David Marsh, Jim Buller, Colin Hay, Jim Johnson, Peter Kerr, Stuart McAnulla and Matthew Watson. Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 3.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv3n1_joseph49.pdf ,2000,Apr, p. 49-50. Kaboub, Fadhel, “Roy Bhaskar’s Critical Realism: A Brief Overview and a Critical Evaluation,” http://f.students.umkc.edu/fkfc8/BhaskarCR.htm ,2001,Dec. Lacey, Hugh, “Explanatory Critiques and Emancipation,” Journal of Critical Realism 1:1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_lacey7.pdf 2002, Nov, p. 7-31. Little, John H., “Between Positivism and Realtivism: A Middle Path for Public Administration ,”Paper prepared for the 13th Annual Conference of the Public Administrationi Theory Network, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, http://spectrum.troyst.edu/~little/MyPapers/Between%20Positivism%20and%20%20Relativism.pdf ,2000, Jan 28-29, p.3. Lindner, Johannes. and Rittberger, Berthold., “The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions—Revisiting Historical Institutionalism” http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/Politics/papers/2002/w5/w5.pdf ,2002,Jan 29. MacLENNAN, Gary, “Notes for a Reading Group: A Short Intro to the Critical Realist Approach to Science,”（discussion paper）, http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/gmac_intro.html ,1999, p.3. Morgan, Jamie, “'Philosophical Realism in International Relations Theory: Kratochwil's Constructivist Challenge to Wendt,” Journal of Critical Realism 1.1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_morgan95.pdf , 2002,Nov, p. 95-118. Morrow, Ross, “Resisting Rational Choice Theory ,” Review of Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, by Margaret S. Archer and Jonathan Q. Tritter, eds. Journal of Critical Realism 1:1 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_morrow159.pdf , 2002,Nov. Olsen, Wendy, “Originality or Collective Progress in the Social Sciences?,” Review of Social Science in Question, by M. J. Smith. Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 2.2 , http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv2n2_olsen35.pdf,1999, Oct, p.35-37. Patomäki, Heikki, “After International Relations, after Capitalism,”: A Rejoinder to Branwen Gruffydd Jones. Journal of Critical Realism 1.2, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n2_patomaki175.pdf, 2003,May, p.175-81. Peacock, Mark, “Explaining Theory Choice: An Assessment of the Critical Realist Contribution to Explanation,” paper presented at the Cambridge Realist Workshop Conference, http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/cambridge_workshop_2000/mpeacock_etc.pdf ,2000. Potter, Garry, “Critical Realist Strengths and Weakness,” Journal of Critical Realism 2:1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv2n1_Potter161.pdf , 2003,Nov. Roger, Caldwell, “How to Get Real,” Philosophy Now , http://www.philosophynow.org/issue42/42caldwell1.htm , 2003. Runes Dagobert D., “Dictionary of Philosophy”, http://www.ditext.com/runes/index.html , 1942. Ruth , Kowalczyk. , Sayer, Andrew. and New ,Caroline., “Critical Realism: What Difference Does It Make?,” Addresses to the closing plenary of The Fourth Annual IACR International Conference, The University of Lancaster, UK, August 2000. Journal of Critical Realism Alethia 3.2, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/ALETHIAv3n2_kowalczyk6 0.pdf ,2000,Nov, p.60-64. Sayer, Andrew, “Critical Realist Methodology: a view from Sweden,” Journal of Critical Realism 1:1, http://www.journalofcriticalrealism.org/archive/JCRv1n1_sayer168.pdf ,2002 ,Nov Spencer, Neville, “The Rediscovery of Reality,” http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/nspencer_rr.html ,1995, Jun 7. Viskovatoff, Alex, “Critical Realism from a Kantian Point of View,” http://www.raggedclaws.com/criticalrealism/archive/cambridge_workshop_2000/aviskovatoff_crkpv.pdf ,2000,Apr,15. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36946 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 社會科學哲學中，經驗主義與詮釋主義、個體論與整體論、唯心論與唯物論或量化方法與質化方法等等二元理念之間的長期對立與論爭，所反映的，是社會科學哲學中實證主義與非實證主義兩大哲學陣營對立的事實，兩大陣營持續地對立，引發一九八零年代追求「超越」、「中道」的社會科學哲學的誕生，身為科學實存論的社會科學版本，由英國科學哲學家羅伊•巴斯卡所倡議的批判實存論，正是致力於批判兩大陣營哲學，並嘗試創建社會科學哲學超越觀點的哲學。
本文的目的，乃從社會科學哲學層面引介批判實存論的超越哲學為起點，藉由探究政治學中社會建構論及歷史制度論對批判實存論的呼應主張，在二大哲學對立的現狀下，提供一個政治學方法論思考超越哲學啟示的方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the realm of philosophy of social science, there are long-term confrontations and controversies between empircism and hermeneutics、individualism and holism、idealism and materialism or quantitative method and qualitative method. These reflect the antagonistic fact of the two philosophical camps in philosophy of social science. Constant antagonism of the two camps caused the birth of philosophy of social science which quests transcendence and middle path. As the social science version of scientific realism, critical realism, which advocated by British scientific philosopher Roy Bhaskar, is indeed a philosophy commit to criticize the two camp’s philosophies and tries to establish a transcendental view of philosophy of social science.
The purpose of this dissertation is to introduce transcendental philosophy of critical realism from the aspect of philosophy of social science as a start. And through agruments of social constructivism and historical institutionalism investigated in political science, provide a direction for political methodology to meditate the enlightenment of a transcendental philosophy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:24:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90322007-1.pdf: 1019195 bytes, checksum: cd68cb2f9644462875eb77fdc5ac5cf6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………..1 第一節 問題背景、研究動機............................... 1 第二節 研究目的、研究方法................................3 第三節 研究範圍、研究限制…………………………………………6 章節安排…………………………………………………………………8 附錄 名詞解釋…………………………………………………….10 第二章 政治學方法論、社會科學哲學與批判實存論…........14 第一節 政治學方法論的演變：從行為主義到後行為主義……..14 第一項 政治學行為主義運動的概貌與哲學根源…………...14 第二項 政治學後行為主義時期的變革、哲學與未來.......18 第三項 小結.........................................22 第二節 兩大社會科學哲學傳統 ──批判實存論的觀點……….23 第一項 實證主義傳統……………………………...........23 第二項 非實證主義傳統….....................................................40 第三項 小結…………………………….................................59 第三節 批判實存論的出現－源起與梗概………………………..62 第一項 批判實存論是什麼…………………………….......62 第二項 哲學源起……………………………….............64 第三項 代表性哲學理念……………………………….......67 第四項 小結.......................................................71 第三章 作為社會科學哲學第三條路的批判實存論………...73 第一節 社會科學哲學主張…………….………………………73 第一項 本體論………………………………………………73 第二項 知識論………………………………………………86 第三項 方法論..……………………………………………98 第四項 小結...……………………………………………104 第二節 批判實存論的最新進展—後設真實(meta-reality)哲學概 說.........................................106 第一項 簡介……………………………………………..106 第二項 核心概念………………………………………..107 第三項 小結………………………………………………112 第三節 批判實存論遭受的批判與回應…………………………113 第一項 新實證論、非實證主義的批判與批判實存論的回 應........................................113 第二項 批判實存論者的自省………………………………123 第三項 小結…………………………………………………127 第四章 批判實存論在政治學研究的應用與啟發…………128 第一節 批判實存論在政治學中的應用—自理論、研究途徑及研 究實例說明…………………………………………...128 第一項 亞歷山大•溫特的社會建構論................128 第二項 歷史制度論…………………………………………138 第三項 研究實例：戰後英國政治分析………………... 146 第四項 小結……………………………150 第二節 批判實存論在政治學應用中的優缺點……………… 152 第一項 批判實存論應用於政治學的利與弊............152 第二項 小結……………………………................156 第五章 結論……………………………………………………157 第一節 主要研究成果………………………………………157 第二節 可能的研究貢獻……………………………………161 第三節 未來的研究展望…………………………………..162 參考書目……………………………………………………………164 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 批判實存論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 超越 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中道 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 實存論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治學方法論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會科學哲學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Transcendence | en |
| dc.subject | Critical Realism | en |
| dc.subject | Realism | en |
| dc.subject | Middle Path | en |
| dc.subject | Philosophy of Social Science | en |
| dc.subject | Political Methodology | en |
| dc.title | 批判實存論對當代政治學研究之啟發 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Enlightenment of Critical Realism to Contemporary Research of Political Science | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 袁頌西(Song-shi Yuan),徐振國 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 超越,中道,實存論,批判實存論,政治學方法論,社會科學哲學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Transcendence,Middle Path,Realism,Critical Realism,Political Methodology,Philosophy of Social Science, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 178 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 995.31 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。