請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31192完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李玲玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Luo-Chieh Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳若潔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:34:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-02-02 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-02-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-01-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 甘慕龍. 1995. 武陵地區三種囓齒類動物(森鼠、黑腹絨鼠、巢鼠)的食性與棲地研究. 國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文.
朱惠菁 2001. 花蓮地區月鼠與赤背條鼠之棲地利用研究. 國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文. 江集鯉. 2006. 新竹白蘭地區台灣彩蝠(Kerivoula sp.)食性與覓食策略之研究. 國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文. 吳逸華. 2003. 外來種緬甸小鼠於兩種尺度中的棲地利用. 國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文. 李宜娟. 2001. 關渡草澤地共域小獸類的棲地利用. 國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文. 周文豪, 李敏嘉, 于宏燦. 2002. 臺灣中部亞熱帶山地森林地棲脊椎動物的群落結構- 兼論攔截籬掉落桶研究法的應用. 特有生物研究 4:1-11. 林益仁. 1988. 台灣森鼠的微棲地研究. 私立東海大學生物學研究所碩士論文. 胡峻毓. 2001. 關刀溪森林生態系華南鼬(Mustela sibirica)與長尾麝鼩(Crocidura kurodai)食餌昆蟲之碎片分析. 國立中興大學昆蟲學系碩士論文. 黃俊嘉. 2004. 梅峰農場三種鼩鼱(台灣短尾鼩、台灣灰麝鼩和長尾鼩)之食性研究. 國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文. 蔡執仲. 1997. 大漢山及南仁山地區刺鼠(Niviventer coninga)族群動態與微棲地利用關係. 國立中山大學生命科學研究所碩士論文. Adler, G. H. 1995. Habitat relations within lowland grassland rodent communities in Taiwan. Journal of Zoology, London. 237:563-576. Alexander P. S., L. K. Lin, and B. M. Huang. 1987. Ecological notes on two sympatric mountain shrews(Anourosorex squamipes and Soriculus fumidus) in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Museum 40(2):1-7. Arthur, S. M., B. F. J. Manly, L. L. McDonald, and G. W. Garner. 1996. Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77:215-227. Bellows, A. S., J. F. Pagels, and J. C. Mitchell. 2001. Macrohabitat and microhabitat affinities of small mammals in a fragmented landscape on the upper coastal plain of Virginia. American Midland Naturalist. 146:345-360. Boitani, L. and T. K. Fuller. 2000. Research techiniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York:112-117. Borror, D. J., and R. E. White. 1997. Insects. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, New York:152. Bowman, J., G. Forbes, and T. Dilworth. 2001. Landscape context and small-mammal abundance in a managed forest. Forest Ecology and Management 140:249-255. Brannon, M. P. 2000. Niche relationships of two syntopic species of shrews, Sorex fumeus and Sorex cinereus, in the Southern Appalachian mountains. Journal of Mammalogy 81:1053-1061. Brannon, M. P. 2002. Distribution of Sorex cinereus and Sorex fumeus on north- and south-facing slopes in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Southeastern Naturalist 1:299-306. Carfagno, G. L. F., E. J. Heske, and P. J. Weatherhead, 2006. Does mammalian prey abundance explain forest-edge use by snakes? Ecoscience 13(3):293-297. Castien, E., and J. Gosalbez. 1999. Habitat and food preferences in a guild of insectivorous mammals in the Western Pyrenees. Acta Theriologica 44:1-13. Churchfield, S., V. A. Nesterenko, and E. A. Shvarts. 1999. Food niche overlap and ecological separation amongst six species of coexisting forest shrews (Insectivora : Soricidae) in the Russian Far East. Journal of Zoology, London. 248:349-359. Churchfield, S., B. I. Sheftel, N. V. Moraleva, and E. A. Shvarts. 1997. Habitat occurrence and prey distribution of a multi-species community of shrews in the Siberian taiga. Journal of Zoology, London. 241:55-71. Coppeto, S. A., D. A. Kelt, D. H. V. Vuren, J. A. Wilson, and S. Bigelow. 2006. Habitat association of small mammals at two spatial scales in the Northern Sierra Nevada. Journal of Mammalogy 87:402-413. Dickman, C. R. 1995. Diets and habitat preferences of three species of Crocidurine shrews in arid Southern Africa. Journal of Zoology, London. 237:499-514. Dueser, R. D., and J. H. H. Shugart. 1978. Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59(1):89-98. Feinsinger, P., E. E. Spears, and R. W. Poole. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62:27-32. Ford, W. M. and J. L. Rodrigue. 2001. Soricid abundance in partial overstory removal harvests and riparian areas in an industrial forest landscape of the central Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 152:159-168. Frazer, G. W., C. D. Canham, and K. P. Lertzman. 2000. Gap light analyzer (GLA), version 2. Bulletin of the Ecological Scociety of America 81:191-197. Kirkland, G. L., and J. S. Findley. 1999. A transcontinental comparison of forest small-mammal assemblages: northern New Mexico and southern Pennsylvania. Oikos 85:335-342. Jabin, M., D. Mohr, H. Kappes, and W. Topp. 2004. Influence of deadwood on density of soil marco-arthropods in a managed oak-beech forest. Forest Ecology and Management 194:61-69. Jorgensen, E. E. 2004. Small mammal use of microhabitat reviewed. Journal of Mammalogy 85:531-539. Kitchings, J. T. and D. J. Levy. Habitat patterns in a small mammal community. Journal of Mammalogy 62(4): 814-820, 1981. Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological Methodology, second edition. University of British Columbia:475-493. Laakkonen, J., R. N. Fisher, and T. J. Case. 2001. Effect of land cover, habitat fragmentation and ant colonies on the distribution and abundance of shrews in southern California. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:776-788. Laurance, W. F. 1994. Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland. Biological Conservation 69:23-32. Lidicker Jr., W. Z. 1995. Landscpae approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota, USA. Loeb, S. C. 1999. Responses of small mammals to coarse woody debris in a southeastern pine forest. Journal of Mammalogy 80:460-471. Malcolm, J. R., and J. C. Ray. 2000. Influeunce fo timber extraction routes on central African small-mammal communities, forest structure, and tree diversity. Conservation Biology 14:1623-1638. Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald, and D. L. Thomas. 1993. Resource seletion by animals: Statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman and Hall, London. Manson, R. H., R. S. Ostfeld, and C. D. Canham. 1999. Responses of a small mammal community to heterogeneity along forest-old-field edges. Landscape Ecology 14:355-367. McCay, T. S., and M. J. Komoroski. 2004. Demographic responses of shrews to removal of coarse woody debris in managed pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 189:387-395. McCay, T. S., J. Laerm, M. A. Menzel, and W. M. Ford. 1998. Methods used to survey shrews (Insectivora : Soricidae) and the importance of forest-floor structure. Brimleyana:110-119. McComb, W. C. 2003. Ecology of coarse woody debris and its role as habitat for mammals, in Mammal Community Dynamics(edited by C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony). Cambridge University press:374-404. Mengak, M. T., and D. C. Guynn. 2003. Small mammal microhabitat use on young loblolly pine regeneration areas. Forest Ecology and Management 173:309-317. Menzel, M. A., W. M. Ford, J. Laerm, and D. Krishon. 1999. Forest to wildlife opening: habitat gradient analysis among small mammals in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 114:227-232. Mitchell, J. C., S. C. Rinehart, J. F. Pagels, K. A. Buhlmann, and C. A. Pague. 1997. Factors influencing amphibian and small mammal assemblages in central Appalachian forests. Forest Ecology and Management 96:65-76. Morrison, M. L., B. G. Marcot, and R. W. Mannan. 1998. Wildlife-Habitat Relationship: Concepts and Applications, second edition University of Wisconsin Press, England. Neet, C. R., and J. Hausser. 1990. Habitat selection in zones of parapatric contact between the common shrew Sorex araneus and millets shrew Sorex coronatus. Journal of Animal Ecology 59:235-250. Nupp, T. E., and R. K. Swihart. 2000. Landscape-level correlates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. Journal of Mammalogy 81:512-526. Pearson, D. E., Y. K. Ortega, K. S. McKelvey, and L. F. Ruggiero. 2001. Small mammal communities and habitat selection in Northern Rocky Mountain bunchgrass: Implications for exotic plant invasions. Northwest Science 75:107-117. Rychlik, L. 2000. Habitat preferences of four sympatric species of shrews. Acta Theriologica 45:173-190. Seagle, S. W. 1985. Patterns of small mammal microhabitat utilization in cedar glade and deciduous forest habitats. Journal of Mammalogy 66:22-35. Shanker, K. 2001. The role of competition and habitat in structuring small mammal communities in a tropical montane ecosystem in southern India. Journal of Zoology, London. 253:15-24. Tokeshi, M. 1999. Species Coexistence: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. School of biological sciences Queen Mary and Westfield College University of London and Amakusa Marine Biological Laboratory Kyushu University:294- 303. Torre, I., Diaz, M. 2004. Small mammal abundance in Mediterranean post-fire habitats: a role for predators? Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 25(3):137-142. Villarreal, D.,Machicote, M.,Branch, L. C., Martinez, J. J., and Gopar, A. 2005. Habitat patch size and local distribution of Burrowing Owls (Athene cunicularia) in Argentina. Journal of Ornitologia Neotropical 16(4):529-537. Warren S. T. Hays. 1998. A new method for live-trapping shrews. Acta Theriologica 43(3):333-335. Wilson, D. E., F. R. Cole, J. D. Nicholes, R. Rudran, and M. S. Foster. 1996. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: standard methods for Mammals Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London:60-69. Wrigley, R. E., J. E. Dubois, and H. W. R. Copland. 1979. Habitat, abundance, and distribution of 6 species of shrews in Manitoba. Journal of Mammalogy 60:505-520. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31192 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在國內各地的資源調查中,中低海拔地區多種棲地內能捕獲到的鼩形目動物以台灣長尾麝鼩最為優勢。本實驗希望藉由探討台灣長尾麝鼩在不同巨棲地內的微棲地利用模式,來檢視其是否屬於廣泛利用棲地的物種,以及該種是否偏好使用各巨棲地共通的微棲地因子,或是可因應巨棲地內各因子的可獲得性而調整棲地利用模式。實驗於2004年4月至2005年6月間,在新竹白蘭地區選擇四種不同類型的巨棲地,於乾濕兩季,每月以掉落式陷阱及改良式薛門氏陷阱,進行台灣長尾麝鼩的捕捉,並在四類巨棲地內進行微棲地調查,以比較巨棲地間、以及巨棲地內各捕捉點的微棲地因子差異。
實驗結果發現台灣長尾麝鼩在闊葉林、針葉林、竹林、果園四種類型的巨棲地內皆會出現,但其最偏好利用具有較多倒木、倒木覆蓋度較高的針葉林,較排斥利用有過多岩石及地表較為裸露的闊葉林。而在巨棲地內的分析則發現,台灣長尾麝鼩在不同類型的巨棲地內,會偏好利用幾項共通的微棲地因子,包含了較多倒木所產生的整體效應,以及較高的地上層覆蓋度和落葉覆蓋度;但是,台灣長尾麝鼩也會因應不同巨棲地內各微棲地因子的可獲得性,來調整其利用比例。顯示台灣長尾麝鼩確實能廣泛分佈於中海拔的各類型巨棲地內,並能有效的利用巨棲地內各種環境資源,但各巨棲地內台灣長尾麝鼩數量的多寡仍會受到其偏好因子多寡之影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous surveys of terrestrial fauna showed that Crocidura tadae kurodai is the most common soricomorpha species found in many types of habitat at mid to low elevation in Taiwan. In this study, we investigated patterns of microhabitat use by C. tadae in four different macrohabitat types to test the hypotheses wheather C. tadae is a habitat generalist or not. If it was a habitat generalist, does C. tadae prefer to use some microhabitat factors which are commonly found in all macrohabitat types, or does it adjust the use of different microhabitat factors according to their availability in each macrohabitat types. Between April 2004 and June 2005, we trapped C. tadae monthly during wet and dry season by pitfall traps and modified Sherman’s traps in four macrohabitat types in Bailan, Hsinchu. In addition, we measured the microhabitat factors in all macrohabitat types, to compare the differences of microhabitat at each trap site within and between macrohabitat types.
Our results revealed that C. tadae could be captured in board-leaved forest, conifer forest, bamboo forest and orchard, but it preferred conifer forest which has more fallen logs and higher coverage of fallen logs, and avoided board-leaved forest which has more rocks and exposure surface. Within each macrohabitat type, C. tadae preferred some microhabitat factors commonly found in different macrohabitat types, including whole effects of fallen logs, higher coverage of understory and litter layer. However, C. tadae also can adjust its microhabitat use based on the availability of each microhabitat factor. Our study revealed that C. tadae could use many environment resources efficiently within each macrohabitat, and distribute in many macrohabitat types at mid to low elevation, but the abundance of C. tadae in each macrohabitat type was affected by the availability of its preferred microhabitat factors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:34:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92b44002-1.pdf: 2701858 bytes, checksum: 9ea408617248c12a65698734cc8d1481 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………...……...…..i 誌謝...................................................................................................................................ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………......iv 一、 前言………………………………………………………………………………...1 二、 材料方法…………………………………………………………………………...4 (一) 實驗地描述…………………………………………………………………...4 (二) 鼩鼱捕捉方式………………………………………………………………...4 (三) 微棲地因子測量……………………………………………………………...6 (四) 資料分析方式………………………………………………………………...8 三、 結果……………………………………………………………………………….12 (一) 四類巨棲地捕捉狀況之差異…………………………………………….…12 (二) 台灣長尾麝鼩在四類巨棲地間的棲地利用……………………………….12 (三) 台灣長尾麝鼩在四類巨棲地內微棲地因子之利用……………………….14 (四) 四類巨棲地間之整體比較………………………………………………….16 四、 討論……………………………………………………………………………….17 (一) 台灣長尾麝鼩的微棲地利用……………………………………………….17 (二) 微棲地因子可獲得性對台灣長尾麝鼩棲地利用之影響………………….20 (三) 中尺度和小尺度測量方式與棲地利用結果之比較……………………….21 (四) 台灣長尾麝鼩之棲地利用模式…………………………………………….22 五、 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………….25 圖目錄 圖一、白蘭地區實驗地之植群分布圖及樣區位置圖...................................................31 圖二、白蘭地區各月平均累計降雨量及月均溫............................................................32 圖三、白蘭地區實驗地各類型之巨棲地.......................................................................32 圖四、本實驗所使用之掉落式陷阱...............................................................................33 圖五、本實驗所使用之改良式薛門氏陷阱...................................................................33 圖六、陷阱設置點及微棲地測量範圍說明圖...............................................................34 圖七、中尺度覆蓋度因子可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...................................35 圖八、小尺度覆蓋度因子可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...................................36 圖九、最近倒木距離可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...........................................37 圖十、最近喬木距離可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...........................................38 圖十一、最近殘幹距離可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例........................................39 圖十二、最近岩石距離可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例.......................................40 圖十三、落葉層厚度可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...........................................41 圖十四、落葉層濕度可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...........................................42 圖十五、土壤酸鹼度可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...........................................43 圖十六、土壤濕度可獲得性及台灣長尾麝鼩利用比例...............................................44 表目錄 表一、本實驗所選用的微棲地因子測量項目................................................................45 表二、不同捕捉方式對台灣長尾麝鼩在四類巨棲地捕捉率之比較...........................46 表三、台灣長尾麝鼩在四類巨棲地間出現頻度及對四類巨棲地偏好程度之比較...46 表四、白蘭地區四類巨棲地間中尺度微棲地因子之比較...........................................47 表五、白蘭地區四類巨棲地中各項中尺度微棲地因子之比較...................................48 表六、白蘭地區四類巨棲地間小尺度微棲地因子之比較...........................................51 表七、白蘭地區四類巨棲地中各項小尺度微棲地因子之比較...................................52 表八、白蘭地區四類巨棲地內有捕捉及未捕捉到台灣長尾麝鼩的點之中尺度 微棲地因子比較..................................................................................................54 表九、白蘭地區四類巨棲地內有捕捉及未捕捉到台灣長尾麝鼩的點之小尺度 微棲地因子比較..................................................................................................55 表十、白蘭地區濕季闊葉林之中尺度微棲地因子主成份分析...................................56 表十一、白蘭地區乾季針葉林之中尺度微棲地因子主成份分析...............................57 附錄……………………………………………………………………………………..58 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 棲地利用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣長尾麝鼩 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 可獲得性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 巨棲地 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 微棲地 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | availability | en |
| dc.subject | macrohabitat | en |
| dc.subject | Crocidura tadae kurodai | en |
| dc.subject | habitat use | en |
| dc.title | 台灣長尾麝鼩(鼩形目:尖鼠科)棲地利用之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Habitat Use of Crocidura tadae kurodai (Soricomorpha:Soricidae) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林良恭,吳聲海,吳海音,林雨德 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 台灣長尾麝鼩,棲地利用,可獲得性,巨棲地,微棲地, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Crocidura tadae kurodai,habitat use,availability,macrohabitat, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 70 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-01-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
