Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2448
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳淑鈴
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Chun Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳姿㚬zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T06:40:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-16
dc.date.available2021-05-13T06:40:21Z-
dc.date.copyright2017-08-07
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-07-24
dc.identifier.citationArmstrong, C.S., Gow, I.D., & Larcker, D.F. (2013) The efficacy of shareholder voting: Evidence from equity compensation plans. Journal of Accounting Research 51(5), 909-950
Bainbridge, S.M (2011) Dodd-Frank Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II. Minnesota Law Review 95, Law-Econ Research Paper No.10-12, 1779-1820
Baker, T.A. (1999) Options reporting and the political costs of CEO pay. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14(2), 125-145
Balsam, S., Boone, J., Liu, H., & Yin, J. (2016) The impact of say-on-pay on executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(2), 162-191
Bebchuk, L.A., Friedman, A.T., & Friedman, W.J. (2007) In: Empowering Shareholders on Executive Compensation: Hearing on H.R. 1257 before the House Committee on Financial Services, 110th Congress Vol.68
Bebchuk, L.A., & Fried, J.M. (2003) Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 71-92
Bird, A., & Karolyi, S.A. (2016) Do institutional investors demand public disclosure? Review of Financial Studies 29(12), 3245-3277
Brunarski, K.R., Campbell, T.C., & Harman, Y.S. (2015) Evidence on the outcome of Say-On-Pay votes: How managers, directors, and shareholders respond. Journal of Corporate Finance 30, 132-149
Burns, N., & Minnick, K. (2013) Does say-on-pay matter? Evidence from say-on-pay proposals in the United States. The Financial Review 48(2), 233-258
Bushee, B.J. (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18(2), 201-246
Bushee, B.J., & Noe, C.F. (2000) Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research 38(1), 171-202
Cai, J., & Walkling, R.A. (2011) Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46(2), 299-339
Callen, J.L., & Fang, X. (2013) Institutional investor stability and crash risk: monitoring versus short-termism? Journal of Banking and Finance 37(8), 3047-3063.
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M.J. (2001) The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(3), 311-326
Collins, D.W., Gong, G., & Hribar, P. (2003) Investors sophistication and the mispricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies 8(2), 251-276
Conyon, M.J. (2013) Executive compensation and board governance in US firms. The Economic Journal 124(574), F60-F89
Core, J.E., Holthausen, R.W., & Larcker, D.F. (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(3), 371-406
Courtis, J.K. (1998) Annual report readability variability: Tests of the obfuscation hypothesis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 11(4), 459-472
Courtis, J.K. (2004) Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon? The British Accounting Review 36(3), 291-312
Elliott, W.B., Rennekamp, K.M., & White, B.J. (2015) Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest? Review of Accounting Studies 20(2), 839-865
Ernst & Young LLP (2014) Disclosure effectiveness: What companies can do now. available at http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-disclosure-effectiveness-what-companies-can-do-now/$FILE/EY-disclosure-effectiveness-what-companies-can-do-now.pdf
Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F, & Maber, D.A. (2012) Reputation penalties for poor monitoring of executive pay: Evidence from option backdating. Journal of Financial Economics 104(1), 118-144
Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2013) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research 51(5), 951-996
Ferri, F., & Maber, D.A. (2012) Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from UK. Review of Finance 17(2), 527-563
Hemmings, D., Hodgkinson, L., & Williams, G. (2016) ‘Plain English’ and Say-on-Pay: Regulatory requirements vs Potential behavioural consequences. available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2825932
Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S.H. (2003) Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1), 337-386
Jensen, M.C., & Murphy, K.J. (1990) The Journal of Political Economy 98(2), 225-264
Kaplan, S.N. (2012) Executive compensation and corporate governance in the U.S.: Perceptions, facts and challenges. Working paper, University of Chicago
Kimbro, M.B., & Xu, D. (2016) Shareholders have a say in executive compensation: Evidence from say-on-pay in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(1), 19-42
Laksmana, I., Tietz, W., & Yang, Y.W. (2012) Compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A): Readability and management obfuscation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 31(2), 185-203
Larcker, D.F., Ormazabal, G., & Taylor, D.J. (2011) The market reaction to corporate governance regulation. Journal of Financial Economics 101(2), 431-448
Lawrence, A. (2013) Individual investors and financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 56(1), 130-147
Lehavy, R., Li, F., & Merkley, K. (2011) The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 86(3), 1087-1115
Li, F. (2008) Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45(2-3), 221-247
Miller, B.P. (2010) The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review 85(6), 2107-2143
Murphy, K.J. (2011) The politics of pay: A legislative history of executive compensation. Working paper, University of Southern California
Murphy, K.J. (2012) Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in George Constantinides, Milton Harris, and René Stulz, eds.
Rennekamp, K. (2012) Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research 50(5), 1319-1354
Robinson, J.R., Xue, Y., & Yu, Y. (2011) Determinants of disclosure noncompliance and the effect of the SEC review: Evidence from the 2006 mandated compensation disclosure regulations. The Accounting Review 86(4), 1415-1444
Rutherford, B.A. (2003) Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance 7(2), 187-210
Say-on-pay and Golden Parachutes Votes (2011) Investor Assistance (800) 732-0030 https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/sayonpay.pdf
Securities and Exchange Commission. (1998) A plain English handbook: How to create clear SEC disclosure documents. SEC Office of Investor Education and Assistance, available at https://www.sec.gov/pdf/handbook.pdf
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2003) Release No. 34-48108; File Nos. SR-NYSE-2002-46 and SR-NASD-2002-140. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/34-48108.htm
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2006) Release No. 33-8765; 34-55009; File No. S7-03-06. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2006/33-8765.pdf
Sharma, S. (1996) Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
Thomas, R.S., & Cotter, J.F. (2007) Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response, and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance 13(2-3), 368-391
U.S. Chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness (CCMC) (2014) Corporate disclosure effectiveness: Ensuring a balanced system that informs and protects investors and facilitates capital formation. available at http://www.centerforcapitalmarkets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CCMC_Disclosure_Reform_Final_7-28-20141.pdf
Watts, R.L., & Zimmerman, J.L. (1986) Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Zhang, J.L., Lo, K., & Yang, S. (2014) ‘Say-on-Pay’ votes and compensation practices. available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2377093
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2448-
dc.description.abstract美國股東對薪酬的諮詢性投票制度(Say-on-Pay)係指股東可針對公司前五大高階經理人的薪酬表示贊成或反對,雖然此投票的結果不具約束性,Say-on-Pay納入股東的參與可減少企業擁有權與經營權分離而產生資訊不對稱的現象。本研究主要探討Say-on-Pay制度對股東會說明書(Proxy Statement)上薪酬討論及分析(Compensation Discussion & Analysis, CD&A)可讀性之影響。本研究以S&P 500公司作為樣本,樣本期間分為2007至2009 Say-on-Pay實施前期與2012至2014 Say-on-Pay實施後期,觀察前後期的CD&A可讀性變化。研究結果顯示Say-on-Pay實施後CD&A的可讀性降低,且有越來越難讀的趨勢。考量機構投資人具有外部治理的角色,且其對薪酬揭露的要求比一般投資大眾多,本研究將機構投資人加入額外分析,結果顯示機構投資人持股集中度高或是有較高專注機構投資人(Dedicated Institutional Investor)持股之公司,在Say-on-Pay實施後,其CD&A的可讀性降低之現象更加明顯。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe implementation of Say-on-Pay gives shareholders the right to vote and discuss compensation plans of firms’ top managements. My study investigates the relationship between Say-on-Pay regulations and CD&A (Compensation Discussion & Analysis) readability. I test the change of CD&A readability before and after Say-on-Pay provisions using the S&P 500 companies through the years 2007 to 2009 (pre-SOP), and the years 2012 to 2014 (post-SOP). The result shows that the CD&A readability decreases after the implementation of Say-on-Pay regulations, and there is an increasing trend in the difficulty of CD&A readability throughout my sample years. Moreover, I investigate how institutional investors affect the changes in CD&A readability from pre-SOP period to post-SOP period due to their important roles in shaping companies’ external governance. I find that the decrease in CD&A readability is larger in firms with a higher institutional ownership concentration and more dedicated institutional ownership.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:40:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R03722026-1.pdf: 906615 bytes, checksum: 660d70f26dd2948564c938494577509a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsCONTENTS
謝誌...................................................I
摘要..................................................II
ABSTRACT.............................................III
CONTENTS..............................................VI
LIST OF TABLES.........................................V
1. Introduction........................................1
2. Literature Review...................................4
2.1 Background of Say-on-Pay..........................4
2.2 Say-on-Pay and Corporate Governance...............7
2.3 Readability of Financial Information Disclosure..10
3. Hypothesis Development.............................15
4. Research Design....................................19
4.1 Sample and Data Sources..........................19
4.2 Regression Model.................................21
5. Results............................................32
5.1 Descriptive Statistics...........................32
5.2 Main Results.....................................33
6. Additional Analyses................................38
7. Conclusion.........................................43
REFERENCE.............................................45
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject機構投資人zh_TW
dc.subject股東決定薪酬制度zh_TW
dc.subject薪酬討論及分析zh_TW
dc.subject可讀性zh_TW
dc.subject薪酬揭露zh_TW
dc.subjectinstitutional investorsen
dc.subjectcompensation disclosuresen
dc.subjectSay-on-Payen
dc.subjectCD&Aen
dc.subjectreadabilityen
dc.titleSay-on-Pay制度對CD&A可讀性的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe effect of Say-on-Pay on CD&A readabilityen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee洪聖閔,廖芝嫻
dc.subject.keyword股東決定薪酬制度,薪酬討論及分析,可讀性,機構投資人,薪酬揭露,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSay-on-Pay,CD&A,readability,institutional investors,compensation disclosures,en
dc.relation.page49
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701957
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2017-07-25
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf885.37 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved