請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21542
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 高德(David. J. Cohen) | |
dc.contributor.author | ZHENGQIAN WANG | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王崢騫 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:37:20Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 于省吾
1957 從甲骨文看商代社會性質. 東北人民大學人文科學學報 1. 97-136. 方輝 編 2013 山東大學東方考古研究書系: 大辛莊遺址研究研究卷 資料卷套裝共2冊. 科學出版社. 山東大學考古系、山東省文物考古研究所、東營市博物館 2010 山東東營市南河崖西周煮鹽遺址. 考古. 3:37-43. 山東大學東方考古研究中心 2003 濟南大辛莊商代遺址. 中國重要考古發現. 北京:文物出版社. 58-63. 2004 濟南大辛莊商代遺址與墓葬. 考古. 7:25-33. 99-100. 2. 2008 大辛莊遺址1984年秋試掘報告. 東方考古. 4:288-521. 山東大學東方考古研究中心、壽光市博物館. 2005 山東壽光市北部沿海環境考古報告. 華夏考古. 4: 3-17. 山東大學歷史文化學院考古系、山東省文物考古研究所 2010 濟南大辛莊139號商代墓葬. 考古. 10:3-6. 山東大學歷史系考古專業 1995 1984年秋濟南大辛莊遺址試掘述要. 文物. 6:12-27. 1. 山東省文物考古研究所、北京大學中國考古研究中心、山東師範大學齊魯文化研究中心、 濱州市文物管理處 2010 山東陽信縣李屋遺址商代遺存發掘簡報. 考古. 3:3-17. 山東省博物館 1972 山東益都蘇埠屯第一號奴隸殉葬墓. 文物. 8:17-30. 中國社會科學院考古研究所 2003 中國考古學-夏商卷. 中國社會科學出版社. 2005 滕州前掌大墓地. 文物出版社. 中國社會科學院考古研究所山東工作隊 1980 山東滕縣古遺址調查簡報. 考古. 1:32-44. 1986 西夏侯遺址第二次發掘報告. 考古學報3:307-308. 391-396. 1992 滕州前掌大商代墓地. 考古學報. 3:365-392. 中國社會科學院考古研究所山東工作隊、鄒縣文物保管所 1983 鄒縣古代遺址調查. 考古學集刊. 3. 98-108. 中國科學院考古研究所山東工作隊 1965 山東泗水、兗州考古調查簡報. 考古. 1. 中國科學院考古研究所山東工作隊、曲阜縣文物管理委員會 1965 山東曲阜考古調查試掘簡報. 考古. 12:599-613. 中國科學院考古研究所山東發掘隊 1961 山東平陰縣朱家橋殷代遺址. 考古. 2:41-47. 1962 山東梁山青堌堆發掘簡報. 考古. 1:69-80. 公雪霜. 于麗君. 聶躍平. 朱建峰. 潘玉青 2016 遼寧西部地區先秦時期聚落遺址空間格局分析. 中國科學院大學學報. 33(3): 377. 1999 新中國考古五十年. 文物出版社. 240. 中國社會科學院考古研究所 2003 中國考古學·夏商卷. 中國社會科學出版社. 317. 王迅 1990 「亞醜」族. 《東夷與淮夷》. 北京大學出版社. 136-137. 王恩田 1998 人方位置與徵人方路線新證. 胡厚宣先生紀念文集. 2000 山東商代考古與商史諸問題. 《中原文物》2000. 4:10-14. 王貴民 1989 商周政權結構. 商周制度考信. 明文書局. 95-169. 王國維 1959. 殷周制度論. 觀堂集林 卷十. 中華書局. 451-480. 王震中 2006 「中商⽂化」概念的意義及其相關問題. 考古與⽂物. (1):44-49. 北京大學考古系商周組、山東省菏澤地區文展館、山東省荷澤市文化館 1987 菏澤安邱堌堆遺址發掘簡報. 文物. 11:38-42. 付琳 2014 滕州前掌大墓地分期及相關問題研究. 華夏考古. (1). 72-84. 安志敏. 江秉信. 陳志達 1961 1958—1959 年殷墟發掘簡報 . 考古. (2). 朱繼平 2008 從商代東土的人文地理格局談東夷族群的流動與分化. 考古. 3. 宋豫秦 1988 論魯西南地區的商文化. 華夏考古. 1. 69-85. 宋鎮豪 1994 商代的王畿. 四土與四至. 南方文物. 1. 55-59. 2001 論商代的政治地理架構. 中國社會科學院歷史研究所學刊· 第一集. 6-27. 李水城、燕生東 2008 山東廣饒南河崖發現大規模鹽業遺址群. 中國文物報. 4. 23. 第二版. 李水城、蘭玉富、王輝 2009 魯北、膠東鹽業考古調查記. 華夏考古. 1:11-25. 李水城、蘭玉富、王輝、胡明明 2003 萊州灣地區古代鹽業考古調查. 鹽業史研究. 1: 82-91. 李拓宇. 莫多聞. 胡珂. 張翼飛. 王建軍 2013 山西襄汾陶寺都邑形成的環境與文化背景. 地理科學. 33(4). 443-449. 李發 2014 殷卜辭所見 「夷方」 與帝辛時期的夷商戰爭. 歷史研究. (5). 1. 李魯滕 1997 略論前掌大商代遺址群的文化屬性和族屬 . 華夏考古. (4) . 李學勤 1959 《殷代地理簡論·帝乙十祀徵人方路程》. 科學出版社. 1998 海外訪古續紀. 四海尋珍. 清華大學出版社. 66-119. 2005 論新出現的一片征人方卜辭. 殷都學刊.1. 1-3. 2006 商代夷方的名號和地望. 中國史研究. 4. 3-7. 2008 帝辛征夷方卜辭的擴大. 中國史研究. 1. 15-20. 1997 重論夷方. 走出疑古時代. 遼寧大學出版社. 331-336. 肖燕 1993 從文化變遷的角度論山東地區早商文化. 東南文化. (2). 62-72. 杜正勝 1979 卜辭中所見的城邦形態. 周代城邦. 聯經出版事業公司. 12-34. 1998 新史學與中國考古學的發展. 文物世界. 1 松丸道雄 1970 殷周國家の構造. 岩波講座:世界歷史:四. 古代:四—東アジア 世界の形成. 岩波書店. 49-100. 1985 殷の國家. 中國文明の成立. 松丸道雄、永田英正著. 講談社. 57-66. 林澐 1981 甲骨文中的商代方國聯盟. 古文字研究. 第六輯. 中華書局. 查曉英 2012 「正當的歷史觀」: 論李濟的考古學研究與民族主義. 考古. 6. 晁福林 1985 從方國聯盟的發展看殷都屢遷原因. 北京師範大學學報: 社會科學版. 1. 65-73. 施雅風 1992 中國全新世大暖期的氣候波動與重要事件. 《中國科學. B輯》12:1300-1308. 胡秉華 1994 滕州前掌大商代墓葬地面建築淺析. 考古. 2. 1997 a. 滕州前掌大商周遺址. 中國考古學年鑒 (1995) . 文物出版社: 152 ~ 153. 1997 b. 山東史前文化遺跡與海岸、湖泊變遷及相關問題. 《中國考古學會第九次年會論文集》.文物出版社. 35-49. 唐際根 1999 中商⽂化研究. 考古學報. (4):393-420. 徐昭峰 2012 商王朝東徵與商夷關係. 考古. 2. 61-62. 徐基 1990 從濟南大辛莊遺址的第二類遺存探索岳石文化的發展去向. 遼海文物學刊. (1). 1993 商文化大辛莊類型初論. 中國考古學會第九次年會論文集. 文物出版社. 1995 1984 年秋濟南大辛莊遺址試掘述要. 文物. (6). 1. 1998 濟南大辛莊商代文化遺存的再認識. 中國社會科學院考古研究所: 中國商文化國際學術討論會論文集. 中國大百科全書出版社. 2000 關於濟南大辛莊商代遺存年代的思考. 中原文物. (3). 徐堅 2012 暗流:1949年之前安陽之外的中國考古學傳統. 科學出版社. 殷之彝 (張長壽) 1977 山東益都蘇埠屯墓地和「亞醜」銅器. 《考古學報》2:23-33. 劉延常 2001 珍珠門文化初探. 華夏考古. 4. 94-105. 張光明 1999 山東桓台史家遺址發掘收穫的再認識. 《夏商周文明研究─山東桓台中國殷商文明國際學術討論會》. 中國文聯出版社. 1-14. 張光直 1988 美術. 神話與祭祀: 通往古代中國政治權威的途徑. 遼寧敎育出版社. 1998 《商名試釋 》.《中國商文化國際學術討論會論文集 》. 中國大百科全書出版社 . 109— 112. 張長壽. 張光直 1997 河南商丘地區殷商文明調查發掘初步報告. 考古. 4. 24-31. 張亞初 1983 殷墟都城與山西方國考略. 古文字研究. 第十輯. 中華書局. 許順湛 2010 臨汾龍山文化陶寺類型聚落群研究. 中原文物. 3. 34-40. 連劭名 1995 殷墟卜辭所見商代的王畿. 考古與文物. 5. 38-43. 郭永盛 1990 歷史上山東湖泊的變遷. 《海洋湖沼通報》3:15-22. 郭克煜、孫華鐸、梁方建、楊朝明 1990 索氏器的發現及其重要意義. 《文物》. 7:36-38. 郭妍利 2009 也論蘇埠屯墓地的性質. 三代考古. 15. 郭寶鈞 1951 一九五○ 年春殷墟發掘報告. 考古學報. 1. 陳洪波 2011 《中國科學考古學的興起——1928~1949年歷史語言研究所考古史》. 廣西師範大學出版社. 陳淑卿 2003 山東地區商文化編年與類型研究. 華夏考古. 1. 52-68. 陳雪香 2007 山東地區商文化聚落形態演變初探. 華夏考古. 1. 102-115. 陳壽 1980 大保簋的復出和大保諸器. 考古與文物. 4. 陳夢家 1956 殷墟卜辭綜述 (考古學專刊甲種第二號). 中華書局. 傅斯年 1928 歷史語言研究所工作之旨趣. 歷史語言研究所集刊. 1(1). 1933 夷夏東西說. 傅斯年、董作賓、李濟、梁思永、吳金鼎、郭寶鈞、劉嶼霞等 1934 中國考古報告集之1城子崖. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所. 馮時 2005 殷代史氏考. 黃盛璋八秩華誕紀念論文集. 中國教育文化出版社. 19-31. 黃川田修. 藍秋霞. 許宏 2005 齊國始封地考——山東蘇埠屯遺址的性質. 文物春秋. (4). 69-78. 黃銘崇 2011 晚商政體形態的研究-空間模型的考察. 新史學. 22(3). 2013 a. 晚商王朝的族氏與族氏政治. 《東亞考古的新發現》 第四屆國際漢學會議論文集.中央研究院. 2013 b. 晚商⽂化的分佈及其意義 —以⼭東地區為例的初步探討. 《東亞考古學的再思—張光直先生逝世⼗週年紀念論⽂集》. 中央研究院歷史語⾔言研究所. 257-337. 2013 c. 從邯鄲地區漢代以前遺址的跨時分佈看環境/社會變遷與距落發展《金⽟交輝—商周考古、藝術與⽂化論⽂集》. 中央研究院歷史語⾔研究所會議論⽂集之十三. 中央研究院歷史語⾔研究所. 601-689. 2016 導⾔:古代文明的形成——內容、結構與前景. 中國史新論. 古代⽂明之形成分冊. 聯經. 2018 從基於親屬的政府到官僚的政府── 殷周變革的一個重要面向. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊. 279-338. 董作賓 1977 《卜辭中的毫與商 》. 《董作賓先生全集 》乙編第 3冊 . 藝文印書館. 611. 1945 《殷歷譜 ·帝辛日譜》. 見《歷史語言研究所專刊》. 石印本. 劉莉. 陳星燦 2000 城: 夏商時期對自然資源的控制問題. 東南文化. 3. 45-60. 2002 中國早期國家的形成——從二裡頭和二里崗時期的中心和邊緣之間的關係談起. 古代文明 (輯刊). 5. 滕州市博物館 1994 山東滕州出土商代青銅器. 《考古》1:94-95. 1996 山東滕州市薛河下游出土的商代青銅器. 《考古》5:29-31. 2010 滕州前掌大村南墓地發掘報告 (1998-2001). 《海岱考古》3:227-375. 鄭振香 1988 殷墟發掘六十年概述. 考古. 10. 燕生東 2004 山東陽信李屋商代遺存考古發掘及其意義. 古代文明研究通訊. 20.: 9-15. 2005 山東壽光雙王城西周早期鹽業遺址群的發現與意義. 古代文明研究通訊. 24. :30-38. 2006 山東陽信李屋發現商代生產海鹽的村落遺址. 發現中國: 2004年100個重要考古新發現. 學苑出版社. 134-137. 原載中國文物報. 2004. 3. 5. 第一版. 2010 渤海南岸地區商周時期鹽業遺址群結構研究—兼論製鹽的生產組織.《古代文明》8: 88. 燕生東. 蘭玉富 2014 2007年魯北沿海地區先秦鹽業考古工作的主要收穫. 古代文明研究通訊. 36:43-56. 衛聚賢 1998 中國考古學史 . 商務印書館. 閻文儒 2004 中國考古學史. 廣西師範大學出版社. 魏峭巍 2013 魯北商周社會變遷研究. 山東大學. 龐小霞、高江濤 2009 索氏銅器銘文中的「索」字考辨及其相關問題. 《南方文物》4. 92-96. 嚴文明 1989 東夷文化的探索. 《文物》9:1-12. 蘭玉富 2002 泗水尹家城新石器時代至商周時期遺址. 中國考古學年鑑-2001. 文物出版社. 顧宏義 主編 2016 考古圖外五種. 上海書店出版社. 顧頡剛 1926 古史辨. 第一冊. Ammerman, A. J. 1992 Taking stock of quantitative archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21(1). 231-249. Arthur, David& Sergei, Vassilvitskii 2007 “K-means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeding. ” In SODA 07. Proceedings of the eighteenth Annual Acm-Siam Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. edited by Harold Gabow. 1027–35. Philadelphia. PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Ashmore, Wendy 2004 Social Archaeologies of Landscape. In A Companion to Social Archaeology. Lynn Meskell and Robert W. Prucel. eds. Pp. 255-271. Oxford: Blackwell. Bender, Barbara, ed. 1993 Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Providence: Berg. Burrough, P. A. 1986 Principles of GIS for land resources assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Campbell, Roderick B. 2009 'Toward a Networks and Boundaries Approach to Early Complex Polities: The Late Shang Case. ' Current Anthropology 50(No. 6). 821-48. 2014 Archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age: From Erlitou to Anyang. Cotsen Inst of Archaeology. Chang, Kwang-chih 1958 Study of the Neolithic Social Grouping: Examples from the New World. American Anthropologist 60(2): 298-334. Chang, Kwang-chih. ed. 1968 Settlement Archaeology. Palo Alto: National Press Books. Chapman, Henry Philip 2006 Landscape Archaeology and GIS. Tempus. Chen, Xingcan& Liu, Li 2003 State formation in early China . Duckworth. Clarke, D. L. 1977 Spatial archaeology. London: Academic Press. Cohen, D. J. 2001 The Yueshi culture. the Dong Yi. and the archaeology of ethnicity in early Bronze Age China. Harvard University. Conolly, James & Mark Lake 2006 Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DE HOON, Michiel, IMOTO Seiya& MIYANO Satoru 2003 The C clustering library. Institute of Medical Science. Human Genome Center. University of Tokyo. 11. F. S. Drake 1939 Shang Dynasty find at Ta-Hsin Chuang. Shantung. The China Journal. 31(2). 1940 Ta-Hsin Chuang again. The China Journal. 33(1). Falkenhausen, Lothar Von. 1993 'On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology. ' Antiquity 67 (257) . 839-849. 2006 Chinese Society in The Age Of Confucius : (1000 - 250 BC) ; The archaeological Evidence. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology. University of California. Fang Hui 2013 The eastern territories of the Shang and Western Zhou: Military expansion and cultural assimilation. ' In Anne P. Underhill editor. A Companion to Chinese Archaeology. pp. 473-493. Blackwell Publishing. Hietala, H. & Stevens, D. 1977 Spatial analysis: multiple procedures in pattern recognition studies. American Antiquity 42 (4). 539-559. Hillier, Bill & Julienne Hanson 1984 The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hodder, I. & Orton, C. 1976 Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hoon, Michiel de. Seiya Imoto & Satoru Miyano 2017 The C Clustering Library. Tokyo. Japan: The University of Tokyo. Institute of Medical Science. Human Genome Center. Jones, S. 2002 The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. Routledge. Kathleen, M. S. Allen, Stanton W. Green & Ezra B. W. Zubrow (Eds.) 1990 Interpreting space: Gis and Archaeology. Taylor & Francis. Keightley, D. N. & Barnard, N. 1983 The Origins of Chinese civilization. University of California Press. Keightley, D. N. 2000 The ancestral landscape: time. space. and community in late Shang China (ca. 1200-1045 B. C. ). Institute of East Asian Studies. 1987 Archaeology and mentality: the making of China. Representations 18. 91-128. Kent, S. 1984 Analyzing activity areas: an ethnoarchaeological study of the use of space. University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque. Kintigh, K. W. & Ammerman, A. J. 1982 Heuristic approaches to spatial analysis. American Antiquity. 47: 31-63. Kvamme& Kenneth, L. 1983 Computer Processing Techniques for Regional Modelling of Archaeological Site Locations. Advances in Computer Archaeology 1: 26-52. Kyle Steinke 2014 Art and Archaeology of the Erligang Civilization. Edited by Kyle Steinke with C. Y. Ching Dora. Princeton. Princeton University Press. Lawton, T. 1975 A Group of Early Western Chou Period Bronze Vessels. Ars Orientalis. 111-121. Li Feng 2006 Landscape and Power In Early China: The Crisis And Fall of The Western Zhou. 1045-771 BC. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press. 2013 Early China: a social and cultural history. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press. Linduff Katheryn M, Robert D. Drennan& Gideon Shelach 2004 Early complex societies in NE China: The Chifeng International Collaborative Archaeological Research Project.” Journal of Field Archaeology 29(1/2): 45-73. Liu Li. Xingcan Chen, Yun Kuen Lee, Henry Wright& Arlene Rosen 2004 Settlement patterns and development of social complexity in the Yiluo Region. North China.” Journal of Field Archaeology 29(1/2): 75-100. Liu Li 1996 Settlement patterns. chiefdom variability. and the development of early states in North China.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 15: 237-288. 2005 The Chinese Neolithic: trajectories to early states. Cambridge University Press. Lock, Gary, ed. 2000 Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. Amsterdam. IOS Press. Loewe, Michael 1999 The Cambridge history of ancient China: Cambridge University Press. Maguire, S. E. 2007 Brother Jonathan goes to war: The archaeology of national identity along political borders. State University of New York at Buffalo. Wagner, Mayke, Pavel Tarasov, Dominic Hosner, Andreas Fleck, Richard Ehrich, Xiaocheng Chen& Christian Leipe. 2013 Mapping of the spatial and temporal distribution of archaeological sites of northern China during the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Quaternary International.Volumes 290–291. 344-357. Peterson, C. E. & Drennan, R. D. 2005 Communities. Settlements. Sites & Surveys: Regional-Scale Analysis of Prehistoric Human Interaction. American Antiquity. 70(1):5-30. Pitt-Rivers, A. 1892 Excavations at Bokerfy and Wansdyke. In Wheatley & Gillings 2002. 2. Schiffer, M. B. 1972 Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity. 37. 156-65. 1976 Behavioral archaeology. Academic Press. New York. Siegel, P. E. & Roe, P. G. 1986 Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation. World Archaeology. 18(1):96-115. Simek, J. F. & Larick, R. R. 1983 The recognition of multiple spatial patterns: a case study from the French upper paleolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science. 10(2):165-180. Simek, J. F. 1984 A K-means approach to the analysis of spatial structure in Upper Paleolithic habitation sites: Pincevent 36 and Le Flageolet I. Ph. D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology. State University of New York. Binghamton. 1987 Spatial order and behavioural change in the. French Palaeolithic. Antiquity. 61(231). 25-40. Shennan, S. 1997 Quantifying archaeology. University of Iowa Press. Thorp, L. 1985 The Growth of Early Shang Civilization: New Data from Ritual Vessels. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 45(1):5-75. 2006 China in the Early Bronze Age: Shang Civilization. University of Pennsylvania Press. Tilley, C. 1994 A phenomenology of landscape: places. paths and monuments. 1st edn. Oxford/Providence USA: Berg. Trevino, A. 2016 Introduction to K-means Clustering. Oracle+datascience. com. https://www. datascience. com/blog/K-means-clustering. December 6. Trigger, B. 1989 A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Verhagen, Philip 2018 Spatial analysis in archaeology: moving into new territories. Digital Geoarchaeology. Springer. Cham: 11-25. Wheatley, David & Mark Gillings 2002 Spatial Technologies and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS. London: Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10. 4324/9780203302392. Yates, R. 1997 The city-state in ancient China. The Archaeology of City-States: Cross-Cultural Approaches. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington. DC. 71-90. Yoffee, N. 2005 Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities. States. and Civilizations. by Norman Yoffee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21542 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 晚商時代的中國山東地區在眾多商代政權控制區域中表現出諸多不同於差異之處,與中原區域相比,山東被商王朝納入勢力版圖的時間相對較晚,但相對於真正意義上的“邊疆”又呈現出較強的控制能力,特別是彰顯出明顯的集聚與分散並存的分佈特徵,此外在山東地區的一些重要商文化遺址之上出土的器物組合也與商王朝核心區域的中原安陽一帶不盡相同。在此情況之上則因發出了許多問題,其中最重要的就是,在經過一定的歷史過程之後,最終在晚商時代所形成的這一地區商文化遺址分布狀況,在多大程度上影響到了中原商王朝上層對於山東地區的治理?他們這些遺址彼此之間的關係和分佈模式又是如何的?這將是本論文將著重探討的核心問題。前輩學者透過研究豐富的出土甲骨文資料與傳世文獻,曾對商代晚期廣大的東方區域有過一定的認識,從商夷交錯乃至分野的族群格局到商王對其他部族的征伐路線,不勝枚舉。考古學者也確實能夠在山東地區發現一些中原商文化與本土岳石文化分佈地域上的差異。這無疑為進一步探討商王朝對晚商時期山東地區的控制、組織都提供了重要材料。
作為一種廣泛應用在多個領域的統計方法,K-mean Clusters 群集分析的方式可以將雜亂無序分佈的數據根據彼此之間距離和預設的群集數目劃分成數個群集單位。在不同群集總數的層次之下檢視遺址分佈的情形,則可看出不同區域尺度之下的遺址分佈與組織層次。經過K-means 群集分析演算與GIS地圖可視化操作可以看出,晚商山東地區的商文化遺址分佈的多個特點與組織情況,首先在魯北區域的渤海灣地區有大量鹽業生產相關遺址,彰顯晚商王朝對於山東地區鹽的需要,同時在魯北東部地區大量遺址密集分佈,其中還包括了高規格的青州蘇埠屯,這似乎和鹽業生產、轉運的管控,以及軍事震攝膠東半島區域的“非商”族群珍珠們文化不無關聯。魯北西部中部東西走向河流沿線的遺址群則一定程度上具備為保護鹵鹽西運水道的職責。蘇埠屯遺址被認為屬於商王朝子姓貴族族氏與文獻記載以及前人研究中所稱的“族氏政治”不謀而合;在較為不重要的區域如泰沂山脈以南地區,以及岳石文化等非商族群聚居的地區,則僅有稀疏的分佈,且在群集劃分上並不具備穩定性,顯示出其不同遺址間關聯較弱,看似屬於較為鬆散的社會組織模式。因此可以看出,商王朝在晚商時期對於山東地區的經營處於族氏政治重點經營和控制重要資源以及交通線相結合的策略,而非全面而強力的控制。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | During the Late Shang period (ca. 1300-1046 BC) in the Shandong region of China, many differences appear amongst various Shang Dynasty polities. The timing of when Shandong was incorporated into the territory controlled by the Shang Dynasty was relatively late compared to the Central Plains region, but in contrast to what the true sense of what a “frontier” is taken to be, there was a strong capability to control the region, which is particularly manifested in the coexistence of agglomeration and dispersion in the distribution of sites. Furthermore, the assemblages of artifacts unearthed from a few important Shang Culture sites in the Shandong region are not completely the same as those from the core region of the Shang Dynasty near Anyang in the Central Plains. This circumstance gives rise to many questions, among which the most important is, in the end, how greatly did the situation of the distribution of Shang Culture sites in this region, after having gone through a certain historical process and then formed during the Late Shang period, impact the upper strata of the Central Plains Shang Dynasty’s governance on the Shandong region? What is the relationship and distribution patterns between these sites? This is the core issue on which this thesis focuses. Previous generations of scholars, who studied the rich data from the unearthed oracle bone records and the received historical texts, had their own understanding of the vast region in the east during the Late Shang Dynasty, looking at the interaction between Shang and Yi and the patterns of the boundaries between ethnic groups, as well as the routes of military campaigns by the Shang kings against other tribes—these are too numberous to enumerate. Archaeologists, as well, have indeed been able to discover some differences in the Shandong region in the distribition of Central Plains Shang Culture sites and indigenous Yueshi Culture sites. These past studies undoubtedly offer us important material to advance our investigations of the Shang Dynasty's control of the Shandong region during the Late Shang period and of organization.
K-means Clusters analysis is a statistical method broadly applied across many fields. It can be used to divide irregularly distributed data points into a predetermined number of Clusters based upon their distances between each other. By viewing the changing distributions of the sites under the different number of Clusters, we can see the distribution and organization of sites under different regional scales. After calculating K-means Clusters and doing GIS map visualization, we can see many characteristics and the organization of the distribution of Shang Culture sites in the Late Shang period in the Shandong region. First, there are a large number of sites related to salt production in the Bohai Bay are of northern Shandong, highlighting the needs of the Shang Dynasty kings during the Late Shang period for salt from the Shandong region. At the same time, a large number of sites in the eastern part of northern Shandong are densely distributed, including the large-scale Subutun site in Qingzhou, which seems to be in control of salt production and trans-shipment, as well as it must having been related to military matters in the watch over the “non-Shang” groups of the Zhenzhumen Culture in the eastern Shandong Peninsula region. The group of sites along the east-west riverways in the western and central parts of northern Shandong had a certain degree of responsibility for protecting the waterways used for transporting salt toward the west. The Subutun site has been considered to belong to the noble Zi lineage of the Shang Dynasty kings, a view which also coincides with the literary record and what earlier research has called “lineage politics”. In less important areas such as the region south of the Taiyi Mountains, as well as in the areas occupied by the Yueshi Culture and other non-Shang groups, there is only a sparse distribution of sites, and there is no stability in clustering as the number of Clusters changes, showing that the connectedness between different sites is relatively weak: it seems that these sites belong to a relatively looser mode of social organization. Therefore, it can be seen that during the Late Shang period, the Shang Dynasty’s management of the Shandong region was through combined strategies stressing the control and management of major resources and transportation routes rather than comprehensive and strong control over the entire region. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:37:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05125009-1.pdf: 14672126 bytes, checksum: 3c8ab2414dd73936c24712df1e8379d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. i
摘要......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgement 謝誌 ........................................................................................... iv 目錄......................................................................................................................... vi 圖目錄 ................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction 簡介......................................................................................1 1. 1: 考古學中的空間分析.....................................................................................1 1.2: K-means 集群與區域性社會組織....................................................................5 1.3 :商、山東與中國考古學 .................................................................................. 10 1.4:本章小結..........................................................................................................13 Chapter 2: Background and literature review 研究背景與文獻回顧 .......................14 2.1: 本章內容概述................................................................................................14 2.2: 時空背景與研究概述....................................................................................14 2. 2. 1: 中國考古學:從殷墟到殷墟...............................................................14 2. 2. 2: 商、晚商與山東...................................................................................17 2. 2. 3: 章節小結...............................................................................................22 2. 3: 理論、方法論與文獻回顧...........................................................................23 2.4 本章小結.........................................................................................................26 Chapter 3: Materials and Methodologies 研究材料與操作方法..............................27 3.1: 時空範圍畫分與確認....................................................................................27 3.2: 研究對象的獲取與資料庫建置....................................................................29 3.3: 數據處理流程................................................................................................30 Chapter 4: Data Processing and Analysis 數據處理與分析.......................................33 4.1: 數據運算處理結果呈現................................................................................35 4.2: 分群結果的初步分析....................................................................................46 4.2.1 K-means Clusters 的原理與其所暗含的本質 .........................................46 4.2.2 四種不同分布狀態的劃分......................................................................46 4.2.3 不同群分尺度下的群組差異性..............................................................47 4.3: 本章小結........................................................................................................51 Chapter 5: Discussion 討論.....................................................................................52 5.1: 山東地區晚商商文化的分佈基本型態........................................................52 5.2: 四種類型與三種性質的考古學解讀............................................................57 5.2.1 四種集群類型與區域功能的聯繫..........................................................57 5.2.2 三種變化特質與區域組織層次的關係..................................................60 5.2.3 各區域特色的分析..................................................................................64 5.3: 交通、區劃與族氏政治....................................................................67 5.4 本章小結.........................................................................................................69 Chapter 6: Conclusions 總結......................................................................................72 6.1:組織、分佈與空間模型 ............................................................................... 72 6.2: 空間分析視角下的中國青銅時代考古學研究............................................74 6.3:反思與展望......................................................................................................77 參考文獻................................................................................................................. 79 中、日文文獻............................................................................................................79 英文文獻 English references .....................................................................................87 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | K-means集群方法在區域性考古遺址空間分佈研究上的應用:以晚商山東地區為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of a K-means Clusters approach to the analysis of the regional distribution of Late Shang period archaeological sites in Shandong, China | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃銘崇(Ming-chorng Hwang),林圭偵(Kuei-chen Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 空間分析,K-means 集群分析,山東,商代考古,中國, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Spatial analysis,K-means Clusters,Shandong,China,Late Shang period, | en |
dc.relation.page | 91 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901697 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 人類學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 人類學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 14.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。