Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 健康政策與管理研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10632
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李蘭
dc.contributor.authorYu-Ying Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃瑜盈zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T21:45:23Z-
dc.date.available2011-03-01
dc.date.available2021-05-20T21:45:23Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-09-09
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-08-07
dc.identifier.citation中文部分
王國川 (1997)。從PRECEDE模式中教育與行為診斷來探討青少年事故傷害發生之影響因素。師大學報,42,75-93。
王國川 (1998)。臺灣地區青少年非致命性事故傷害之流行病學調查.。高雄醫學科學雜誌,14(6),348-356。
白璐 (2008)。傷害防制。載於財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會主編,公共衛生學(下冊) (四版, 頁117-136)。台北:財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會。
江宜珍、吳肖琪、李蘭 (2005)。台灣北部國小四年級學童曾經發生自殺意念之相關因素研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(6),471-482。
吳統雄 (1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度: 理論、應用、反省。民意學術專刊,2,29-53。
李采娟 (2008)。序位變項之線性趨勢 (Linear Trend for Ordinal Data) (II): 勝算比 劑量模式。取自 http://www2.cmu.edu.tw/~biostat/online/teaching_corner_022-1.pdf。
張鳳琴、蔡益堅、吳聖良 (2003)。台灣地區非致命事故傷害狀況。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,22(6),492-500。
陳建仁 (1999)。流行病學: 原理與方法. 台北: 聯經。
彭昭英 (1995)。SAS 與統計分析。台北市:儒林圖書有限公司。
衛生署 (2009)。民國 97 年主要死因統計結果分析。取自 衛生署統計室: http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DisplayStatisticFile.aspx?d=71700&s=1。
林為森、陳怡君、陳清浩、陳俞成、謝秀幸、魏美珠 (2005)。生物統計原理。台北市: 學銘。(Pagano M., & Gauvreau K.,2003)。
英文部分
Atkins, R., & Matsuba, K.M. (2008). The Association of Personality and the Likelihood of Serious Unintentional Injury During Childhood. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 23(6), 451-459.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Baranowski, T., Perry, C.L., & Parcel, G.S. (2002). How individuals, environments, & health behavior interact. Book Chapter, 165-184.
Begg, D.J., Langley, J.D., & Williams, S.M. (1999). A longitudinal study of lifestyle factors as predictors of injuries and crashes among young adults. Accident; analysis and prevention, 31(1-2), 1-11.
Bergen, G., Chen, L.H., Warner, M., & Fingerhut, L.A. (2008). Injury in the United States: 2007 Chartbook. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Chen, G., Smith, G.A., Deng, S., Chen, G., Kelleher, K., & Xiang, H. (2005). Psychological symptoms and nonfatal unintentional injuries among Chinese adolescents: a prospective study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(6), 460-466.
Chen, H.Y., Chang, H.Y., Shih, S.F., Hsu, C.C., Lin, Y.H., & Shih, Y.T. (2006). The regional differences in prevalence, medical expenditures and risk factors for injury in Taiwanese teenagers. BMC Public Health, 6(1), 107-115.
Chien, W.C., Pai, L., Chu, C.M., Kao, S., & Tsai, S.H. Trends in Child and Adolescent Injury Mortality in Taiwan, 1986-2006. Journal of Taiwan Public Health, 29(1), 22-32.
Clark, D.E., & Cushing, B.M. (1999). Predicting regional variations in mortality from motor vehicle crashes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(2), 125-130.
Cobb, B.K., Cairns, B.D., Miles, M.S., & Cairns, R.B. (1995). A longitudinal study of the role of sociodemographic factors and childhood aggression on adolescent injury and' close calls'. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 17(6), 381-388.
Dal Santo, J.A., Goodman, R.M., Glik, D., & Jackson, K. (2004). Childhood unintentional injuries: factors predicting injury risk among preschoolers. Journal of pediatric psychology, 29(4), 273-283.
Dunsire, M., & Baldwin, S. (1999). Urban-rural comparisons of drink-driving behaviour among late teens: A preliminary investigation. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 34(1), 59-64.
Edelman, L. (2007). Social and economic factors associated with the risk of burn injury. Burns, 33(8), 958-965.
Ekman, R., Svanstrom, L., & Langberg, B. (2005). Temporal trends, gender, & geographic distributions in child and youth injury rates in Sweden. Injury Prevention, 11(1), 29-32.
Feck, G., & Baptiste, M.S. (1979). The epidemiology of burn injury in New York. Public Health Reports, 94(4), 312-318.
Fernandez-Morales, E., Galvez-Alcaraz, L., Fernandez-Crehuet-Navajas, J., Gomez-Gracia, E., & Salinas-Martinez, J.M. (1997). Epidemiology of burns in Malaga, Spain. Burns, 23(4), 323-332.
Forjuoh, S.N. (2006). Burns in low-and middle-income countries: a review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, & prevention. Burns, 32(5), 529-537.
Gielen, A.C., & Sleet, D. (2003). Application of behavior-change theories and methods to injury prevention. Epidemiologic Reviews, 25(1), 65-76.
Haddon, W. (1963). A note concerning accident theory and research with special reference to motor vehicle accidents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 107(2 Research Methodology and Potential in Community Health and Preventive Medicine), 635-646.
Hingson, R.W., Heeren, T., Jamanka, A., & Howland, J. (2000). Age of drinking onset and unintentional injury involvement after drinking. Am Med Assoc, 284(12), 1527-1533.
Jelalian, E., Alday, S., Spirito, A., Rasile, D., & Nobile, C. (2000). Adolescent motor vehicle crashes: the relationship between behavioral factors and self-reported injury. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(2), 84-93.
Kypri, K., Chalmers, D.J., Langley, J.D., & Wright, C.S. (2002). Adolescent injury morbidity in New Zealand, 1987-96. Injury Prevention, 8(1), 32-37.
Laflamme, L., Hasselberg, M., Reimers, A.M., Cavalini, L.T., & Ponce de Leon, A. (2009). Social determinants of child and adolescent traffic-related and intentional injuries: A multilevel study in Stockholm County. Social Science & Medicine, 68(10), 1826-1834.
Langley, J., & Brenner, R. (2004). What is an injury? Injury Prevention, 10(2), 69-71.
Lee, A., & Tsang, C.K.K. (2004). Youth risk behaviour in a Chinese population: a territory-wide youth risk behavioural surveillance in Hong Kong. Public Health, 118(2), 88-95.
Lin, M.R., & Kraus, J.F. (2009). A review of risk factors and patterns of motorcycle injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(4), 710-722.
Lu, T.H., Lee, M.C., & Chou, M.C. (1998). Trends in injury mortality among adolescents in Taiwan, 1965-94. Injury Prevention, 4(2), 111-115.
MacKay, A., Halpern, J., McLoughlin, E., Locke, J., & Crawford, J.D. (1979). A comparison of age-specific burn injury rates in five Massachusetts communities. American Journal of Public Health, 69(11), 1146-1150.
Massie, D.L., Campbell, K.L., & Williams, A.F. (1995). Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accident; analysis and prevention, 27(1), 73-87.
Morrongiello, B., & Lasenby-Lessard, J. (2007). Psychological determinants of risk taking by children: an integrative model and implications for interventions. British Medical Journal, 13(1), 20-25.
Morrongiello, B.A., Corbett, M., McCourt, M., & Johnston, N. (2006). Understanding unintentional injury risk in young children II. The contribution of caregiver supervision, child attributes, & parent attributes. Journal of pediatric psychology, 31(6), 540-551.
Mytton, J., Towner, E., Brussoni, M., & Gray, S. (2009). Unintentional injuries in school-aged children and adolescents: lessons from a systematic review of cohort studies. British Medical Journal, 15(2), 111-124.
Peden, M., Oyebite, K., Hyder, A.A., Branche, C., Ozanne-Smith, J., & Rahman, F.A. (2009). World report on child injury prevention: World Health Organization.
Peek-Asa, C., Zwerling, C., & Stallones, L. (2004). Acute traumatic injuries in rural populations. Am Public Health Assoc, 94(10), 1689-1693.
Pickett, W., Dostaler, S., Craig, W., Janssen, I., Simpson, K., Shelley, S.D., et al. (2006). Associations between risk behavior and injury and the protective roles of social environments: an analysis of 7235 Canadian school children. Injury Prevention, 12(2), 87-92.
Rowe, R., Simonoff, E., & Silberg, J.L. (2007). Psychopathology, temperament and unintentional injury: cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(1), 71-79.
Schwebel, D., Summerlin, A., Bounds, M., & Morrongiello, B. (2006). The Stamp-in-Safety program: A behavioral intervention to reduce behaviors that can lead to unintentional playground injury in a preschool setting. Journal of pediatric psychology, 31(2), 152-162.
Schwebel, D.C. (2004). Temperamental risk factors for children’s unintentional injury: The role of impulsivity and inhibitory control. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(3), 567-578.
Schwebel, D.C., Hodgens, J.B., & Sterling, S. (2006). How mothers parent their children with behavior disorders: implications for unintentional injury risk. Journal of Safety Research, 37(2), 167-173.
Shope, J., Raghunathan, T., & Patil, S. (2003). Examining trajectories of adolescent risk factors as predictors of subsequent high-risk driving behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32(3), 214-224.
Shope, J.T. (2006). Influences on youthful driving behavior and their potential for guiding interventions to reduce crashes. British Medical Journal, 12(Suppl 1), i9-i14.
Simons-Morton, B., & Nansel, T. (2006). The application of Social Cognitive Theory to injury prevention. Injury and Violence Prevention: Behavioral Science Theories, Methods, & Applications, 41-64.
Stallones, L., Beseler, C., & Chen, P. (2006). Sleep patterns and risk of injury among adolescent farm residents. American journal of preventive medicine, 30(4), 300-304.
Stevenson, M.R., & Palamara, P. (2001). Behavioural factors as predictors of motor vehicle crashes: differentials between young urban and rural drivers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(3), 245-249.
Trifiletti, L.B., Gielen, A.C., Sleet, D.A., & Hopkins, K. (2005). Behavioral and social sciences theories and models: are they used in unintentional injury prevention research? Health Educ. Res., 20(3), 298-307.
Turner, C., & McClure, R. (2003). Age and gender differences in risk-taking behaviour as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 10(3), 123-130.
Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427-443.
Vidal-Trecan, G., Tcherny-Lessenot, S., Grossin, C., Devaux, S., Pages, M., Laguerre, J., et al. (2000). Differences between burns in rural and in urban areas: implications for prevention. Burns, 26(4), 351-358.
Ville, M., Jari, P., Leena, K., Tapio, N., Pekka, K., & Arja, R. (2008). Adolescents'health and health behaviour as predictors of injury death. A prospective cohort follow-up of 652,530 person-years. BMC Public Health, 8, 90-97.
Yang, C.Y., Chiu, J.F., Lin, M.C., & Cheng, M.F. (1997). Geographic Variations in Mortality from Motor Vehicle Crashes in Taiwan. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, & Critical Care, 43(1), 74-77.
Yen, L. (2002). Child and Adolescent Behaviour in Long-Term Evolution (CABLE): a school-based health lifestyle study. Promotion and Education, 9(1 suppl), 33.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10632-
dc.description.abstract背景:台灣非蓄意性事故傷害位居青少年死因第一位,其中車禍、溺水及燒燙傷等為主要原因,因此希望透過分析長期追蹤資料找出相關影響因素。
目標:為瞭解青少年發生車禍及燒燙傷之情形,並探討學生從十到十二年級發生車禍及燒燙傷之個人及社會環境因素,本研究利用 「兒童與青少年行為之長期發展研究」2001 至2009 年之問卷追蹤資料進行次級資料分析。
方法:本研究樣本為2001 年就讀四年級追蹤至2009 年就讀十二年級之學生,共1567 人,並以卜瓦松迴歸進行分析。
結果:在盛行率方面,學生十年級至十二年級之車禍盛行率有隨年級上升的線性趨勢;而燒燙傷之盛行率亦呈現平緩上升之線性趨勢。在發生率方面,學生十一年級至十二年級之車禍發生率有逐年上升的趨勢,而燒燙傷的上升趨勢較不明顯。在與發生車禍有關之因素方面,發現男性、家庭社經地位高者、具攻擊性人格、物質使用行為愈多、家中人數五人以上、技職及綜合體系、好友較多人從事反社會行為及物質使用行為之學生皆為車禍發生之高風險族群,而就讀學校所在地都市化程度較高者、父母支持程度較高者發生車禍機會較低。而與發生燒燙傷有關之因素方面,則發現具有不健康習慣、從事較多反社會及物質使用行為、學校所在地都市化程度較高、父母支持程度較高者及就讀技職體系的學生為好發族群,但家庭社經地位中等或較高者則具較低之風險。
結論:相較於社會因素,個人因素與發生車禍及燒燙傷之關係較為顯著,尤其以危害健康行為無論在車禍或燒燙傷皆有一致影響,因此若能在青少年習得問題行為之早發階段進行介入,並針對不同族群發展適合之衛教模式,將有助於青少年減少車禍及燒燙傷發生的機會;父母如能以正向方式提供青少年社會支持,透過相互回饋的互動給予青少年正確的指導與建議,亦能收良好的傷害防制效果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: Unintentional injuries, especially crash, drown and burn injuries, is accounting for the first ranked cause of adolescents’ death in Taiwan. Therefore, we want to apply long-term data to figure out more associated factors.
Purpose: To understand the attributes of crash and burn injury incidence of adolescents aged from 10 to 12 grade, we applied secondary data collecting from Child and Adolescent Behavior in Long-term Evolution (CABLE) research since 2001 to 2009.
Methods: The cohort participants included in the research are 1567 4th graders with the follow-up period of 8 years since 2001. We applied Poisson regression to access our result.
Result: Our results showed that from 2007 to 2009, while students are during their 10 to 12 grade, the prevalence as well as the incidence rates of crash and burn injuries both had linear ascending trend. The result of Poisson regression showed male, students who raised in wealthy family, owning offensive personality, using more substance, living within more than 5 people, studying in comprehensive or vocational school, and whose peer displaying more antisocial and substance using behaviors were more risky involving in car crash. Parents’ support and living in highly urbanized area played as protective factors which decrease the incidence of crash. Burn injury incidence rate was high in those displaying more unhealthy habits, antisocial and substance using behavior, living in highly urbanized area, owning high parents support, and studying in vocational school, while those who are raised in a more affluent family have lower risk of suffering burn injury.
Conclusion: Upon our results, we found that deviant behaviors played a definitely important role in resulting injuries. Therefore, if we can intervene in adolescences’ behaviors in their early ages while focusing parents’ support at the same time and developing appropriate intervention program for different groups, we can better control injury incidence and decrease social cost following by adolescents’ injury.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:45:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97845101-1.pdf: 5878886 bytes, checksum: 9597080cb597a5fe106eb9c9108ecdea (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究重要性 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 兒童及青少年非蓄意性事故傷害之情況 4
第二節 非蓄意性事故傷害之定義及測量 6
第三節 兒童及青少年發生非蓄意性事故傷害之相關因素 7
第四節 探討兒童及青少年發生非蓄意性事故傷害之相關理論 13
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 資料來源 17
第二節 研究架構 18
第三節 研究變項 20
第四節 研究工具 30
第五節 資料分析 33
第四章 研究結果 35
第一節 研究樣本個人及社會環境因素之分佈 35
第二節 研究樣本於十至十二年級發生車禍及燒燙傷之比率 37
第三節 與研究樣本十至十二年級發生車禍有關之個人及社會環境因素 39
第四節 與研究樣本十至十二年級發生燒燙傷有關之個人及社會環境因素 41
第五章 討論 43
第一節 研究樣本十至十二年級車禍及燒燙傷之比率及發生率之趨勢 43
第二節 個人因素及社會環境因素與研究樣本十到十二年級發生車禍之關係 45
第三節 個人因素及社會環境因素與研究樣本十到十二年級發生燒燙傷之關係 47
第四節 本研究之限制 49
第六章 結論與建議 50
第一節 結論 50
第二節 建議 51
參考文獻 54
附錄 58
圖表目錄
圖 3-1、研究架構:研究樣本十至十二年級發生車禍及燒燙傷之相關因素 19
表 3-1、研究變項操作型定義及計分方式 21
表 3-2、研究變項類型 23
表 3-3、量表之信度及效度分析結果 31
表 4-1、研究樣本個人因素及社會環境因素之分佈 36
表 4-2、研究樣本十年級至十二年級車禍及燒燙傷之比率及發生率 37
圖 4-1、研究樣本十年級至十二年級車禍、燒燙傷之比率及發生率 37
表 4-3、研究樣本十年級至十二年級研究樣本車禍及燒燙傷之次數分佈 38
表 4-4、車禍受傷之影響因素依Poisson 迴歸之分析結果 40
表 4-5、燒燙傷之影響因素依Poisson 迴歸之分析結果 42
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title學生從十到十二年級發生車禍及燒燙傷之個人及社會環境因素探討zh_TW
dc.titleAn Investigation of Personal and Social-Environmental Factors Related to Crash and Burn Injuries:A Follow-up of 10 to 12 Gradersen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張新儀,白璐
dc.subject.keyword青少年,車禍,燒傷,燙傷,物質使用行為,社會認知理論,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAdolescent,Crash,Burn,Injury,Substance use,Social cognitive theory,en
dc.relation.page121
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2010-08-08
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept衛生政策與管理研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:健康政策與管理研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf5.74 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved