請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10495
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸怡蕙(Yir-Hueih Luh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yau-Huo Shr | en |
dc.contributor.author | 石曜合 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:34:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:34:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王金利 (1989)。「等成年男子數折算標準之比較檢討」。《經濟研究》,29: 81-101。
王德睦、何華欽、呂朝賢 (2003)。「兒童與成人基本生活費用的差異」。《調查研究》,13(34): 5-38。 朱雲鵬 (1990)。「1980與1986年台灣所得分配的因素分解分析」。《人文及社會科學集刊》,3(1): 145-167。 吳慧瑛 (1998)。「家戶人口規模與所得分配,1976-1995」。《經濟論文》,26(1): 19-50。 邢慕寰 (1979)。「所得分配與經濟成長階段--以英國、美國、日本、臺灣、南韓的經驗印證」。《經濟論文》,7(2): 1-23。 林金源 (1997)。「家庭結構變化對台灣所得分配及經濟福利分配的影響」。《人文及社會科學集刊》,9(4): 39-63。 林金源、朱雲鵬 (2003)。「移轉所得對台灣所得分配的影響」。《人文及社會科學集刊》,15(3): 501-538。 林國慶、許聖章、施瑩艷 (2009)。「我國農家所得變動及其政策意涵之分析」。全國實證經濟研討會,台北。 林進森 (2003)。「雲林縣家庭所得分配之研究 1979-2000」。碩士論文,國際經濟學研究所,國立中正大學。 洪明皇、鄭文輝 (2009)。「所得定義與均等值設定對經濟福利不均的測量影響」。《經濟研究》,45(1): 11-63。 張李淑容 (2005)。「臺灣地區農業補貼政策之效果分析」。《臺灣銀行季刊》,56卷(2期): 126-144。 曹添旺 (1996)。「臺灣家庭所得不均度的分解與變化試析,1980-1993」。《人文及社會科學集刊》,8(2): 181-219。 曹添旺、陳建良、陳隆華 (2003)。「我國所得差距之國際比較」。《經濟前瞻》,88期: 74-85。 許聖章 (2007)。「臺灣農家所得分配與貿易自由化」。《農業經濟半年刊》,81期: 93-119。 郭小喬 (1998)。「台灣農業政策與農家所得變化之分析」。碩士論文,財政學研究所,國立中興大學。 Adams, R. H., Jr. (1994). 'Non-farm Income and Inequality in Rural Pakistan: A Decomposition Analysis.' Journal of Development Studies, 31(1): 110-133. Adams, R. H., Jr. (2002). 'Nonfarm Income, Inequality, and Land in Rural Egypt.' Economic Development and Cultural Change , 50(2): 339-363. Allanson, P. (2006). 'The Redistributive Effects of Agricultural Policy on Scottish Farm Incomes.' Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1): 117-128. Allanson, P. (2008). 'On the Characterisation and Measurement of the Redistributive Effect of Agricultural Policy.' Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(1): 169-187. Anand, S. (1997). The Measurement of Income Inequality. Measurement of Inequality and Poverty. S. Subramanian, Oxford University Press: 81-105. Arayama, Y., J. M. Kim and A. Kimhi (2006). Determinants of Income Inequality among Korean Farm Households. Economic Research Center Discussion Paper, Nagoya University, Economic Research Center School of Economics, Nagoya University. Autor, D. H., L. F. Katz and M. S. Kearney (2008). 'Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists.' Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2): 300-323. Bellù, L. G. and P. Liberati (2005). Equivalence Scale - Subjective Methods. EASYPol, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Bellù, L. G. and P. Liberati (2006). Policy Impacts on Inequality - Inequality Axioms for Its Measurement. EASYPol, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Bradbury, B. (2008). 'Time and the Cost of Children.' Review of Income and Wealth, 54(3): 305-323. Canagarajah, S., C. Newman and R. Bhattamishra (2001). 'Non-farm income, gender, and inequality: evidence from rural Ghana and Uganda.' Food Policy, 26(4): 405-420. Chang, H.-H. and A. Mishra (2008). 'Impact of Off-Farm Labor Supply on Food Expenditures of the Farm Household.' Food Policy, 33(6): 657-664. Chinn, D. L. (1979). 'Rural Poverty and the Structure of Farm Household Income in Developing Countries: Evidence from Taiwan.' Economic Development and Cultural Change 27(2): 283-301. Chu, C. Y. C. and L. Jiang (1997). 'Demographic Transition, Family Structure, and Income Inequality.' Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4): 665-669. Chu, Y.-P. (1996). 'The Effects of Off-Farm Employment on Inequality: Theories and an Empirical Application to the Taiwan Case.' Journal of Economic Development, 21(2): 221-256. Coulter, F. A. E., F. A. Cowell and S. P. Jenkins (1992). 'Equivalence Scale Relativities and the Extent of Inequality and Poverty.' The Economic Journal, 102(414): 1067-1082. Cowell, F. A. (2009). Measuring Inequality, Oxford University Press. Duclos, J. and A. Araar (2006). Poverty and equity: measurement, policy and estimation with DAD, Springer Verlag. Dustmann, C., J. Ludsteck and U. Schönberg (2009). 'Revisiting the German Wage Structure.' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2): 843-881. Elbers, C. and P. Lanjouw (2001). 'Intersectoral Transfer, Growth, and Inequality in Rural Ecuador.' World Development 29(3): 481-496. Fei, J. C. H., G. Ranis, et al. (1978). 'Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor Components.' The Quarterly Journal of Economics 92(1): 17-53. Fields, G. S. (1979). 'Income Inequality in Urban Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis.' Review of Income and Wealth, 25(3): 327-341. Gastwirth, J. L. (1972). 'The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index.' The Review of Economics and Statistics 54(3): 306-316. Janvry, A. d. and E. Sadoulet (2001). 'Income Strategies Among Rural Households in Mexico: The Role of Off-farm Activities.' World Development 29(3): 467-480. Jao, C.-C. (2000). 'The Impact of Tax Revenue and Social Welfare Expenditure on Income Distribution in Taiwan.' Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 5(1): 73 - 90. Jenkins, S. P. (1995). 'Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK, 1971- 86.' Economica 62(245): 29-63. Kimhi, A. (2009). 'Does Non-farm Income Increase Farm-Household Income Inequality? Evidence from Three Continents'. The International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China. Koulovatianos, C., C. Schroder and U. Schmidt (2005). 'Properties of Equivalence Scales in Different Countries.' Journal of Economics, 86(1): 19-27. Lelli, S. (2005). 'Using Functionings to Estimate Equivalence Scales.' Review of Income and Wealth, 51(2): 255-284. Lerman, R. I. (1996). 'The Impact of the Changing US Family Structure on Child Poverty and Income Inequality.' Economica, 63(250): S119-S139. Lerman, R. I. and S. Yitzhaki (1985). 'Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United States.' Review of Economics & Statistics 67(1): 151. Levy, F. and R. J. Murnane (1992). 'U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations.' Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3): 1333-1381. Liu, X. and T. Sicular (2009). 'Nonagricultural Employment Determinants and Income Inequality Decomposition.' Chinese Economy, 42(4): 29-43. McNamara, K. T. and C. Weiss (2005). 'Farm Household Income and On- and Off-Farm Diversification.' Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 37(1): 37-48. Mishra, A. K. and B. K. Goodwin (1997). 'Farm Income Variability and the Supply of Off-Farm Labor.' American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3): 880-887 Mishra, A. K. and C. L. Sandretto (2002). 'Stability of Farm Income and the Role of Nonfarm Income in U.S. Agriculture.' Review of Agricultural Economics, 24(1): 208-221. Mishra, A., H. El-Osta and J. M. Gillespie (2009). 'Effect of Agricultural Policy on Regional Income Inequality among Farm Households.' Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(3): 325-340. Morduch, J. and T. Sicular (2002). 'Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, with Evidence from Rural China.' The Economic Journal 112(476): 93-106. Moriguchi, C. and E. Saez (2008). 'The Evolution of Income Concentration in Japan, 1886-2005: Evidence from Income Tax Statistics.' Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4): 713-734. Nelson, J. A. (1993). 'Household Equivalence Scales: Theory versus Policy?' Journal of Labor Economics, 11(3): 471-493. Oaxaca, R. (1973). 'Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets.' International Economic Review 14(3): 693-709. Oyama, M. (2006). 'Measuring Cost of Children Using Equivalence Scale on Japanese Panel Data.' Applied Economics Letters 13(7): 409-415. Piketty, T. (2003). 'Income Inequality in France, 1901–1998.' Journal of Political Economy, 111(5): 1004-1042. Piketty, T. and E. Saez (2006). 'The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective.' American Economic Review, 96(2): 200-200. Pyatt, G., C.-n. Chen and J. Fei (1980). 'The Distribution of Income by Factor Components.' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(3): 451-473. Rao, V. M. (1969). 'Two Decompositions of Concentration Ratio.' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 132(3): 418-425. Ray, D. (1998). Development Economics. Princeton, NJ, Princetin University Press. Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). 'Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components.' Econometrica 50(1): 193-211. Shorrocks, A. F. (1983). 'The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes.' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(2): 311-326. Stark, O., J. E. Taylor and S. Yitzhaki (1986). 'Remittances and Inequality.' The Economic Journal, 96(383): 722-740. Zaidi, A. and T. Burchardt (2005). 'Comparing Incomes when Needs Differ: Equivalization for the Extra Costs of Disability in the U.K.' Review of Income and Wealth 51(1): 89-114. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10495 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 所得不均的議題在經濟學領域中是長久以來持續被討論的問題,尤其是近年來在全球經濟環境變化下,各界對於所得不均問題的惡化越趨重視,而在貿易自由化的衝擊與面臨轉型的壓力下,台灣的農家所得與福利分配究竟受到何種影響更是需要被關注的議題。本研究採用主計處1979-2008年之家庭收支調查資料,利用多種指標衡量不均度,並將家庭人口規模納入考量,探討人口不均度與各種細項所得對於農家所得不均的影響。本研究同時經由與非農部門之比較以了解農家在所得不均上與其他家戶的差異,因此對於非農家戶之所得不均現象亦有深入探究。
本研究之實證結果顯示,農家所得不均度主要受到高所得農家之影響,且在1993年前呈現上升之趨勢,而在此期間人口規模之變動確實影響所得不均度之變化,但整體而言農家所得不均度的改變仍主要來自人均所得本身的變動。在所得來源的拆解上,農家之農業與非農業所得皆會擴大不均之程度,政府補貼則如預期有顯著縮小不均度之效果。在非農家戶中,所得不均度在均等化前呈現持續上升的趨勢,但在均等化之後,上升的幅度減緩許多;不同於農家,主要影響非農家所得不均度的族群乃是低所得家戶,且人口規模在研究資料期間都有增加不均度的效果。 無論在農家或非農家戶中,不同教育水準與年齡族群間之不均度的差異在均等化後並不顯著,顯示低教育水準與高齡等弱勢族群在福利分配上的問題或許不如未均等化指標顯示之嚴重。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Economists have long recognized the issue of income inequality. With globalization and recent changes in economic environment, this issue has become increasingly serious. In the case of Taiwan’s agricultural sector, it has been under the pressures of trade liberalization and agricultural reforms in recent decades. How the status quo may impact the welfare and income distribution of farm households needs to be examined.
Using the data of the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area of Republic of China from 1979 to 2008, the income inequality in farm households was assessed by calculating various indexes, comparing inequality between different groups of households, and using the equivalence scale to take the household size into consideration. This study also applied two inequality decomposition techniques to quantify the contributions of the household size and income sources. In the mean-time, this study evaluated the income inequality in non-farm households, and investigated the differences between farm and non-farm households. The empirical results are summarized as follows. First, the income inequality in farm households was generally lower than that in the non-farm households after the incomes were adjusted according to an equivalence scale, and mainly influenced by high-income households. Second, although the household size raised the income inequality among farm households before 1993, the inequality in income was mostly affected by income per capita. Third, government transfer helped reduce the total income inequality in both the farm and non-farm households, whereas the farm and non-farm incomes both aggravated the income inequality. Different from the inequality of the farm households, the inequality among non-farm households was mainly affected by low-income households, and kept rising during 1979-2008. Also, it was continuously influenced by the household size. This study also found education and age of household heads did not show significance influence in household income inequality after the income were adjusted using an equivalence scale, suggesting that the problem of welfare distribution in the households with lower-education and elder household heads was not as serious as revealed by the unadjusted inequality indexes. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:34:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97627001-1.pdf: 969534 bytes, checksum: 1a1b88c23a1b195c15ae7fc4f3109d82 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii Abstract iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究步驟與架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 台灣農家所得與不均度 4 第二節 非農業所得與政府補貼政策對農家所得或不均度的影響 7 第三節 所得不均度之衡量與拆解 8 第三章 資料概述與實證方法 15 第一節 家庭收支調查介紹與資料處理 15 第二節 所得不均度的拆解與衡量 17 第四章 台灣農家所得不均度現況以及與非農家之比較 26 第一節 農家與非農家所得現況之比較 26 第二節 依戶長年齡與教育程度分群之不均度比較 40 第五章 所得不均度之拆解 44 第一節 依均等化所得與人口規模之不均度拆解 44 第二節 農家所得之組成與變動 47 第三節 依所得來源之不均度拆解 49 第六章 結論 54 參考文獻 57 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣農家與非農家所得不均度之比較與分析-考量所得來源與家庭人口規模之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Income Inequality among Taiwan Farm and Non-farm Households: Accounting for Income Sources and Household Size | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃芳玫(Fung-Mey Huang),吳慧瑛(Huoying Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 所得分配,Gini係數,等成人均等值,因素拆解,政府移轉所得,家庭收支調查,教育水準, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Income distribution,Gini coefficient,Equivalence scale,Factor decomposition,Government transfer,Survey of Family Income and Expenditure,Educational level, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 946.81 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。