請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99878完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭雅文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yawen Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林妤婕 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chieh Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T16:10:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alderson, C. P. (2024). The Impact of Health, Safety and Well-Being Capacity on Firm Value
Alli, B. (2001). Fundamental Principles of Occupational Health and Safety. Amaliyah, F., Putri, A. H., Andyna, N. P., & Amri, Z. K. (2025). PRISMA systematic review: The application of natural language processing (NLP) to identify greenwashing in sustainability reports within the oil and gas industry. Journal of Innovation Materials, Energy, and Sustainable Engineering, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/jimese.v3i1.2025.2004 Antons, D., Grünwald, E., Cichy, P., & Salge, O. (2020). The application of text mining methods in innovation research: current state, evolution patterns, and development priorities. R&D Management, 50, 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12408 Brundtland, G. H., & Khalid, M. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB. Chang, D. S., & Cheng, Y. W. (2013, 17-19 July 2013). Explore the effects of industrial context and leaders' viewpoints on corporate sustainability in Taiwan by text mining. 2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, CSRone 永續智庫. (日期未詳). GRI 全球永續性報告協會. https://csrone.com/companies/311 CSRone 永續智庫; 國立政治大學信義書院. (2024). 2024 臺灣暨亞太永續報告現況與趨勢 https://csrone.com/reports/6805 Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, 4(2), 27-54. Dixon, S. M., Nordvall, A.-C., Cukier, W., & Neumann, W. P. (2017). Young consumers’ considerations of healthy working conditions in purchasing decisions: a qualitative examination. Ergonomics, 60(5), 601-612. Earle, H. A. (2003). Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of facilities management, 2(3), 244-257. Evangelinos, K., Fotiadis, S., Skouloudis, A., Khan, N., Konstandakopoulou, F., Nikolaou, I., & Lundy, S. (2018). Occupational health and safety disclosures in sustainability reports: An overview of trends among corporate leaders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 961-970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1512 Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.2307/259074 fxsjy. jieba. https://github.com/fxsjy/jieba?tab=readme-ov-file Gardiner, E. (2022). Evaluating the quality of WHS disclosures by ASX100 companies: Is mandatory WHS reporting necessary? Safety Science, 153, 105798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105798 Global Reporting Initiative. (2024). Consolidated Set of GRI Standards - Traditional Chinese. In. Global Reporting Initiative. (日期未詳). About GRI. https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/ GRI. (2021). The value of sustainability reporting and the GRI Standards https://www.globalreporting.org/media/jzylu3ek/the-value-of-sustainability-reporting-and-the-gri-standards.pdf Hillebrand, L., Pielka, M., Leonhard, D., Deußer, T., Dilmaghani, T., Kliem, B., Loitz, R., Morad, M., Temath, C., & Bell, T. (2023). sustain. AI: a Recommender System to analyze Sustainability Reports. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Hou, Y., & Huang, J. (2025). Natural language processing for social science research: A comprehensive review. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150x241306780 Ibrahim, I. M., Attallah, M. S., Abdel Hamid, S. O., Zween, S. T., & Abuhadrous, I. (2025). Leveraging Large Language Models for Document Analysis and Decision-Making in AI Chatbots. Advanced Sciences and Technology Journal, 2(1), 1-16. Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., Avetisyan, E., Kinderman, D., & Knudsen, J. S. (2020). Mandatory Non-financial Disclosure and Its Influence on CSR: An International Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04200-0 Jain, A., Zwetsloot, G., & Torres, L. (2024). Sustainability, business responsibility and occupational health, safety and wellbeing in the future of work. Safety Science, 174, 106463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106463 Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K., & Singh, S. (2023). Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(3), 3713-3744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4 Kobayashi, V. B., Mol, S. T., Berkers, H. A., Kismihók, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2018). Text Mining in Organizational Research. Organ Res Methods, 21(3), 733-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117722619 Kumar, A., & Das, N. (2021). A Text-Mining Approach to the Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices: Evidence from a Cross-Country Study. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 16(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.1.06 Lin-Hi, N., & Müller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1928-1936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.015 Lin, Y., Choo, W. C., & Ng, K. Y. (2024). Decoding Sustainability Reporting: Insights from Text Mining and Classification Models for SDGs. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e02768. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe02768 Liu, S.-H., Chen, S.-Y., & Li, S.-T. (2017). Text-Mining Application on CSR Report Analytics: A Study of Petrochemical Industry. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.164 Liu, X., Xia, F., Liu, H., & Cai, Y. (2025). Text Analysis of Ethnic Work in China Based on Comparison of LDA Topic Model and TF-IDF Algorithm Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Risk Management, https://doi.org/10.1145/3718751.3718787 Luccioni, A., Baylor, E., & Duchene, N. (2020). Analyzing Sustainability Reports Using Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.08073 Lukács, B., Rickards, R. C., Molnár, P., Suta, A., & Tóth, Á. (2025). ESG disclosure topics and reporting frameworks: exploratory research across automotive, construction, and energy industries. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01533-x Matsui, T., Suzuki, K., Ando, K., Kitai, Y., Haga, C., Masuhara, N., & Kawakubo, S. (2022). A natural language processing model for supporting sustainable development goals: translating semantics, visualizing nexus, and connecting stakeholders. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 969-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01093-3 Mavillonio, M. S. (2024). Natural Language Processing Techniques for Long Financial Document. Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Economia e Management. Mohammadrezaei, M., Marques, J. C., & Huq, A. (2025). Use of text mining and natural language processing techniques in analyzing sustainability reports: A systematic literature review and assessment. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5071032 Monteiro, S., Ribeiro, V., & Molho, C. (2023). A 5 pillars approach to the sustainable development goals performance and reporting in Portuguese higher education institutions. Proposal for an applied framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2023-0047 Moreno, A.-I., & Caminero, T. (2022). Application of text mining to the analysis of climate-related disclosures. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102307 O’Neill, S., Flanagan, J., & Clarke, K. (2016). Safewash! Risk attenuation and the (Mis)reporting of corporate safety performance to investors. Safety Science, 83, 114-130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.007 Ong, K., Mao, R., Satapathy, R., Shirota Filho, R., Cambria, E., Sulaeman, J., & Mengaldo, G. (2025). Explainable natural language processing for corporate sustainability analysis. Information Fusion, 115, 102726. Rosskam, E. (1996). Introduction to occupational health and safety. (Your health and safety at work. Collection of modules) Schimanski, T., Reding, A., Reding, N., Bingler, J., Kraus, M., & Leippold, M. (2024). Bridging the gap in ESG measurement: Using NLP to quantify environmental, social, and governance communication. Finance Research Letters, 61, 104979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104979 Senave, E., Jans, M. J., & Srivastava, R. P. (2023). The application of text mining in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50, 100624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100624 Song, J., Hu, R., Sun, B., Gu, Y., Xiong, W., & Zhu, J. (2019). Research on news keyword extraction based on TF-IDF and Chinese features. 2nd Int. Conf. on Financial Management, Education and Social Science (FMESS 2019), Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, Spinder, S., Frasincar, F., Matsiiako, V., Boekestijn, D., & Brandt, T. (2023). A text mining approach to identifying sustainability in the private sector. Computers in Industry, 149, 103932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103932 Suthar, O. P., Mishra, A., & Singhal, S. (2025). Exploring the Landscape of Natural Language Processing for Text Analytics: A comprehensive Review. Procedia Computer Science, 259, 453-462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.347 TEJ 科技新報. (2022). 更詳細更好理解的 ESG資訊揭露：SASB準則. Retrieved March 7 from TEJ 科技新報. (2023). TCFD為何？內容、核心要素、揭露資訊一次看！. Retrieved March 10 from https://www.tejwin.com/insight/tcfd/ The IFRS Foundation. (2025). Materiality Finder. https://sasb.ifrs.org/standards/materiality-finder/ Williams, S., & Adams, C. (2013). Moral accounting? Employee disclosures from a stakeholder accountability perspective. Accounting, 26. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311311892 Yoon, J., Han, S., Lee, Y., & Hwang, H. (2023). Text Mining Analysis of ESG Management Reports in South Korea: Comparison With Sustainable Development Goals. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231202896. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231202896 Yun, L. (2024). Role of Natural Language Processing in Document Understanding and Semantic Analysis: A Chinese Perspective. Profesional de la información, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2025.ene.0324 Zhang, M., Shen, Q., Zhao, Z., Wang, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2025). Optimizing ESG reporting: Innovating with E-BERT models in nature language processing. Expert Systems with Applications, 265, 125931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125931 Zhang, W., Yoshida, T., & Tang, X. (2011). A comparative study of TF*IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2758-2765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.066 Zhou, Z., Liu, M., & Tao, Z. (2023). Quantitative analysis of Citi’s ESG reporting: LDA and TF-IDF approaches. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 6(3), 53-63. 公司治理中心. (2025). ESG 企業永續發展 參考資料. Retrieved March 7 from https://cgc.twse.com.tw/responsibilityRef/listCh 王立天, 顏秀珍, 王磊, & 李御璽. (2022). 以文本挖掘為基礎之企業風險評分模型的研究 [The study of corporate risk scoring model based on text mining]. 資訊電子學刊, 10(1), 133-148. 王全三, 林正芳, & 荷世平. (2023). 永續性發展的歷史演進、理論基礎與新理論觀點. 會計研究月刊(456), 106-113. 王浩婷. (2023). 科學教育傳播：以文字探勘重現108課綱在新聞媒體中之科學概念網路 (Publication Number 2023年) 中原大學]. AiritiLibrary. 行政院國家永續發展委員會. (2019). 臺灣永續發展目標. Retrieved from https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/archives/meet3/detail?id=3a5cd7cc-a26f-4b48-a884-fd114433b604 吳政諺, & 葉俐伶. (2022). 投資等級數據之永續報告書及國內確信執行之觀察. 會計研究月刊(440), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.6650/arm.202207_(440).0007 李秀玲. (2010). 淺談「上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則」及相關配套機制推動情形. 證券暨期貨月刊, 28, 5-18. https://www.fsc.gov.tw/fckdowndoc?file=/01-%E5%B0%88%E9%A1%8C%E4%B8%80990517.pdf&flag=doc 李育萱. (2022). 臺灣企業永續報告書之職業安全衛生揭露現況探討：以2020-2021年得獎企業為例 [碩士論文]. 長榮大學. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z4477z 李宜樺, 趙永潔, & 羅唯瑄. (2021). 永續報告書ESG資訊的公信力. 會計研究月刊(422), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.202101_(422).0012 李承緯. (2021). 企業實踐永續發展目標之探討: 以台灣上市公司為例. 國立東華大學. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9qbf5c 周芃辰. (2022). 幫助投資人更好理解ESG資訊揭露──SASB準則是什麼？. 貨幣觀測與信用評等, 154, 81-88. 尚光琪. (2022). 上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖及資訊揭露規範. Retrieved from https://dsp.tpex.org.tw/storage/csr/%E4%B8%8A%E5%B8%82%E6%AB%83%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E8%B7%AF%E5%BE%91%E5%9C%96%E5%8F%8A%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A%E6%8F%AD%E9%9C%B2%E8%A6%8F%E7%AF%84.pdf 林子堯. (2024). 論ESG與我國法制之交錯－以勞工權益保障為例. 當代法律(27), 70-76. 林宛頤. (2024). 探討本國金融控股公司永續報告書內容對企業獲利及股價的影響 國立臺灣師範大學]. https://doi.org/10.6345%2fNTNU202400495 林桓億；溫芳宜；張郁婕. (2022). 氣候服務在我國推動氣候相關財務揭露（TCFD）的角色與可能發展. 經濟前瞻, 總號：199, 46-53. https://www.lawdata.com.tw/anglekmc/ttswebx?@0:0:1:lawkm!ID%3DA08060199_046@@ 金融監督管理委員會. (2014, 2014/9/19). 強制上市(櫃)特定公司編製企業社會責任報告書. https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201409180005&toolsflag=Y&dtable=News 胡韶雯. (2025). 中小企業在永續供應鏈中之ESG義務與實踐－以資訊揭露為核心 [The ESG Duties and Practices of Small and Medium Enterprises in Sustainable Supply Chains: Centering on Information Disclosure]. 臺灣財經法學論叢, 7(1), 163-202. 財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會. (2024). 永續發展相關規範與實務(113年版). 上櫃公司編製與申報永續報告書作業辦法, (2024). https://www.selaw.com.tw/Chinese/RegulatoryInformationResult/Article?__RequestVerificationToken=CfDJ8Gy9s7kJ3vJIn5rzQDoOGMHhWoDJAGhDeYsSasaMq1Y0m7qs79-BhVqueOrNDbyFR0KvPXMfxWUsoUTfr5CeHsjUTSraF8u-K64jWeN1kgdDDT071XGLZJE2787haVswSKrlCqksg7tDP2e3-vZDL9w&lawId=306995 張國明. (2023). 我國健康勞動力永續發展之推動策略. https://www.coapre.org.tw/files/202311151031009988.pdf 莊閔茜. (2024). TCFD報告書怎麼寫？掌握4大揭露資訊，助企業辨識氣候變遷風險、機會. CSRone. Retrieved March 10 from https://csrone.com/news/8981 郭芸滋. (2024). 以 THE 影響力排名與大學永續報告書分析臺灣高等教育機構 SDGs 執行現況. 臺灣師範大學永續管理與環境教育研究所學位論文, 1-104. 陳巧容. (2022). 以文字探勘模型探討台灣企業ESG活動量與企業績效之關聯 [碩士論文]. 國立成功大學. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7p7by4 陳立奇. (2022). 台灣醫院社會責任永續發展公開資訊之現況分析. 醫務管理期刊, 23(3), 240-253. 陳彥龍. (2020). 中文斷詞方法之研究與實作 (Publication Number 2020年) 國立暨南國際大學]. AiritiLibrary. 勞動部職業安全衛生署. (2021). 我國職安衛發展 2011-2020 十年紀實. 新北市：勞動部職業安全衛生署: 鄒子廉 Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov.tw/media/jvblhexe/%E6%88%91%E5%9C%8B%E8%81%B7%E5%AE%89%E8%A1%9B%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95-2011-2020%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E7%B4%80%E5%AF%A6.pdf#page=108.79 勞動部職業安全衛生署. (2023). 2023年企業永續報告書公開職業健康與安全績效基線調查. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov.tw/48110/48207/134603/134612/158485/post 勞動部職業安全衛生署. (2024). 112年職業安全衛生署年報. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov.tw/48110/48461/48683/48685/171579/post 湯奕華, 王. 謝. (2013). 工業局推動CSR報告書之策略與方法介紹 (Vol. 64) 黃嘉彥, & 陸培中. (2018). PTT推文之詞組規則研究. 楊德倫. (2014). 文字探勘之前處理與TF-IDF介紹. https://www.cc.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/epaper/0031/20141220_3103.html 經濟部產業發展署. (2021). GRI準則 (GRI Standards). https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Article/ArticleView/58?mid=12&page=1 上市公司編製與申報永續報告書作業辦法, (2024). https://www.selaw.com.tw/SFIWebSeLaw/Chinese/RegulatoryInformationResult/Article?__RequestVerificationToken=CfDJ8ES9Dj7XAhpOiDVhgyEePk_Svejf-zFVui02iLdEpTCkk9OMqniWmGtVK9fW6S443ofmUKU1mmUvQBmLQvzHiSx45M7IAa7tm7vENtkQ1Kk3vMeIp_baJunVMzDSm29GTlvv4G-ssj-gRIREqlehavM&lawId=306959 上市上櫃公司永續報告書確信機構管理要點, (2024). https://www.selaw.com.tw/Chinese/RegulatoryInformationResult/Article?__RequestVerificationToken=CfDJ8Gy9s7kJ3vJIn5rzQDoOGMHFqff-gbryzv4Wfy4J-9PIr2SruFpuxhn2nB3WHID5bmewscFKCohQ5aH3L8CGEyqdNY24XSxWQ1NRAdy1xhL2UakjvP_uBKDhqExOHgKVGGGDXHTW8XoPCvI4nCsL5Ck&lawId=307217 蔡寶億. (2024). 應用文字探勘技術探索企業永續報告書之資訊內涵：ESG永續發展績效與企業價值 [碩士論文]. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a9q6g3 經濟社會文化權利國際公約, (1966). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=Y0000038 簡又新, 申. 胡. (2011). 國際企業永續報告發展趨勢及我國推動現況. 永續產業發展季刊, 55, 30-39. https://www.tpex.org.tw/web/about/publish/monthly/monthly_dl.php?l=zh-tw&DOC_ID=1068 證券期貨局. (2024). 公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖. Retrieved from https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=992&parentpath=0,8,882,884 證券櫃檯買賣中心. (2025). 永續報告書規範對象與應加強揭露項目. https://dsp.tpex.org.tw/web/csr/info_list.php 蘇威傑. (2017). 為什麼企業要發佈永續報告書？從非市場觀點解釋 [Why do Firms Publish Sustainability Reports? A Nonmarket Perspective]. 管理學報, 34(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.6504/jom.2017.34.03.01 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99878 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討台灣上市櫃公司永續報告書中，有關工作者安全與健康福祉的揭露內容，並檢視其與企業實際勞動法遵紀錄之關聯性。研究以2023年度企業永續報告書為主要語料來源，運用自然語言處理技術進行文本斷詞、詞頻分析與TF-IDF，描繪各產業揭露內容之語詞特徵與差異。本研究同時建構語意比對模型，量化報告書內容與《職場永續健康與安全SDGs揭露實務建議指南－2024修訂版》之語意相似度，進一步與勞動部公布之重大職業災害與違法紀錄相關性分析，檢視企業在揭露與實踐層面之間是否存在可觀察的對應關係。
研究結果顯示，企業揭露內容多傾向標準化語言，不同產業間雖具若干詞彙差異，但整體語用趨勢收斂。法遵紀錄則呈現明顯產業落差，營造業與重工業為違法與職災風險集中區，但其永續揭露比例偏低。語意相似度與違法紀錄之相關性不顯著，顯示揭露內容未必能真實反映企業職場安全健康的實務表現，惟語意得分高者在制度接軌與政策對應面仍具參考價值。 本研究提出四項政策建議：一、強化實質性揭露要求；二、建立語意監測工具；三、納入外包與供應鏈風險資訊；四、擴大高風險產業之揭露義務。研究結果除補充永續揭露與勞動實務間關係之實證證據，亦對職場安全與健康治理政策之資訊透明化、責任可歸屬與制度優化提供參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates how Taiwanese listed companies disclose information on occupational safety and health (OSH) in their 2023 sustainability reports, and examines whether such disclosures align with actual compliance records. Using natural language processing techniques—such as word segmentation, term frequency analysis, and TF-IDF weighting—this research identifies linguistic patterns across industries. A semantic similarity model was developed to assess alignment between report content and the 2024 Guideline on Sustainable Workplace Safety and Health SDG Disclosure. These scores were then cross-referenced with official records of major occupational accidents and labor law violations.
Results show that most disclosures rely on standardized language, with only minor industry-level variation. While construction and heavy industries accounted for the highest compliance risks, they were underrepresented in sustainability reporting. No significant correlation was found between semantic similarity and compliance records, suggesting that disclosure content may not reflect actual OSH performance. However, high similarity scores may still indicate better alignment with institutional norms. The study proposes four recommendations: enhancing substantive disclosure, building semantic monitoring tools, including supply chain risks, and expanding reporting obligations for high-risk industries. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-19T16:10:30Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-19T16:10:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 iv 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究重要性 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 2.1 永續報告書 4 2.1.1 發展背景 6 2.1.2 規範對象 7 2.1.3 報導原則 9 2.1.4 查驗規範 18 2.1.5 小結 19 2.2 永續報告書分析方法 20 2.2.1 回顧分析中文永續報告書之文獻 20 2.2.2 自然語言處理 24 2.2.3 文字探勘 25 2.2.4 TF-IDF 27 2.2.5 中文斷詞 28 2.2.6 小結 30 2.3 職業安全衛生 31 2.3.1 定義 31 2.3.2 國內職業安全衛生現況 31 2.3.3 重大職業災害公開網 32 2.3.4 違反勞動法令事業單位（雇主）查詢系統 33 2.3.5 小結 34 2.4 職業安全衛生與永續發展 35 2.4.1 國內現況 35 2.4.2 職場永續健康與安全SDGs揭露實務建議指南 36 2.4.3 小結 37 2.5 自願揭露與資訊透明性 38 2.5.1 小結 39 2.6 研究假設 40 第三章 研究方法 41 3.1 研究設計與架構 41 3.1.1 永續報告書文字探勘 41 3.1.2 企業法遵表現分析 42 3.1.3 語意分數與法遵數據相關性分析 43 3.2 研究對象 43 3.2.1 永續報告書文字探勘 43 3.2.2 企業法遵表現分析 44 3.2.3 語意分數與法遵數據相關性分析 44 3.3 資料來源與資料處理流程 44 3.3.1 永續報告書文字探勘 44 3.3.2 企業法遵表現分析 50 3.3.3 語意分數與法遵數據相關性分析 52 3.3.4 補充 53 3.4 研究倫理遵循狀況 57 第四章 研究結果 58 4.1 描述性統計 58 4.1.1 永續報告書 58 4.1.2 企業法遵數據 60 4.2 永續報告書文字探勘 68 4.2.1 揭露概況（詞頻分析） 68 4.2.2 揭露重點詞彙（TF-IDF分析） 80 4.2.3 語意相似度 85 4.3 語意分數與法遵數據相關性分析 90 4.3.1 語意分數與重大職災相關性分析 90 4.3.2 語意分數與違法紀錄相關性分析 91 第五章 討論 93 5.1 研究方法 93 5.2 研究結果 94 5.2.1 報告書揭露樣貌與產業特性 94 5.2.2 法遵表現 95 5.2.3 語意相似度與法遵表現關聯性 95 5.3 研究限制 96 第六章 結論與建議 99 6.1 結論 99 6.2 建議 99 參考文獻 101 附錄 107 附錄1：上市公司報告書擷取內容表 107 附錄2：上櫃公司報告書擷取內容表 128 附錄3：分詞用專有名詞字典 143 附錄4：同義詞對應表 148 附錄5：語意相似度比對結果 150 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | TF-IDF | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續報告書 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職業安全衛生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語意分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法遵紀錄 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Semantic analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Compliance | en |
| dc.subject | TF-IDF | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainability report | en |
| dc.subject | Occupational safety and health | en |
| dc.title | 台灣公司的社會與治理指標與其勞動與職場安全健康法規遵循狀況之相關性分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Correlation Analyses of the Social and Governance Performance Scores of Taiwan's Corporates and their Compliance with Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王彥雯;李政憲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yen-Wen Wang;Cheng-Hsien Li | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續報告書,職業安全衛生,語意分析,TF-IDF,法遵紀錄, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainability report,Occupational safety and health,Semantic analysis,TF-IDF,Compliance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 165 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504068 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-09-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 8.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。