請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98971完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭安妮 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Annie On-Lei Kwok | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 辛奕呈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Cheng Xin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-20T16:29:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-20 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. American Lifelines Alliance (2001). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, part 1-Guidelines, ASCE-FEMA, Reston, VA.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (2013). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE 7-10). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. 3. Applied Technology Council (1985). Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California (ATC-13). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA. 4. Andreotti, G., & Calvi, G.M. (2022). Damage model for underground tunnels to evaluate vulnerability and seismic risk. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Salt Lake City, UT. 5. Anbazhagan, P., Neaz Sheikh, M., Bajaj, K., Mariya Dayana, P. J., Madhura, H., & Reddy, G. R. (2017). Empirical models for the prediction of ground motion duration for intraplate earthquakes. Journal of Seismology, 21, 1001-1021. 6. Argyroudis, S., Tsinidis, G., Gatti, F., Pitilakis, K. (2017). Effects of SSI and lining corrosion on the seismic vulnerability of shallow circular tunnels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98, 244-256. 7. Argyroudis, S., Tsinidis, G., Gatti, F., Pitilakis, K. (2014). Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels considering SSI and aging effects. 2nd Eastern European Tunnelling Conference, Athens, Greece. 8. Argyroudis, S.A., Pitilakis, K.D. (2012). Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 35, 1-12. 9. Bertero, V.V. (1977). Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. In: Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, Pister KS (ed.). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 211–215. 10. Billah, A., Alam, M. (2014). Seismic Fragility Assessment of Highway Bridges: A State-of-the-Art Review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1-29. 11. Corigliano, M., Lai, C.G., Barla, G. (2007). Seismic Vulnerability of Rock Tunnels Using Fragility Curves. 11th ISRM Congress, Lisbon, Portugal. 12. Dowding, C.H., Rozen, A. (1978). Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 104(2), 175-191. 13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2022). HAZUS Earthquake Model Technical Manuals. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. 14. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame buildings. Report No. FEMA-351, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. 15. Fragiadakis, M., Christodoulou, S.E. (2014). Seismic reliability assessment of urban water networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43(3), 357-374. 16. Huang, G., Qiu, W., & Zhang, J. (2017). Modelling seismic fragility of a rock mountain tunnel based on support vector machine. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,102, 160-171. 17. Huang, T. H., Ho, T. Y., Chang, C. T., Yao, X. L., Chang, Q. D., & Lee, H. C. (1999). Quick investigation and assessment on tunnel structures after earthquake, and the relevant reinforced methods. Report for the Public Construction Commission, Taipei, Taiwan. 18. Hu, X., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Ren, Y. (2020). Seismic Fragility Analysis of Tunnels with Different Buried Depths in a Soft Soil. Sustainability, 12(3). 19. Huang, Z. (2022). Resilience Evaluation of Shallow Circular Tunnels Subjected to Earthquakes Using Fragility Functions. Applied Sciences, 12(9). 20. Huang, Z., Argyroudis, S., Zhang, D., Pitilakis, K., Huang, H., Zhang, D. (2022). Time-Dependent Fragility Functions for Circular Tunnels in Soft Soils. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 8(3). 21. Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Pitilakis, K., Tsinidis, G., Huang, H., Zhang, D., Argyroudis, S. (2022). Resilience assessment of tunnels: Framework and application for tunnels in alluvial deposits exposed to seismic hazard. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 162. 22. Itasca. 2011. FLAC Version 7.0 –Manual on line, Minneapolis, Itasca Counsulting Group inc. 23. Kennedy, R.P., Ravindra, M.K. (1984). Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 79(1), 47-68. 24. Kuhlemeyer, R. L., & Lysmer, J. (1973). Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99(5), 421-427. 25. Kuesel, T.R., (1969). Earthquake Design Criteria for Subways. J. Struct. Div., ASCE ST6, 1213-1231. 26. Lysmer, J., & Kuhlemeyer, R. L. (1969). Finite dynamic model for infinite media. Journal of the engineering mechanics division, 95(4), 859-877. 27. Le, T., Huh, J., Park, J.H. (2014). Earthquake Fragility Assessment of the Underground Tunnel Using an Efficient SSI Analysis Approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2, 1073-1078. 28. Moayedifar, A., Nejati, H.R., Goshtasbi, K., Khosrotash, M. (2019). Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Earthquake and Structures, 16(6), 705-714. 29. Mow, C.C., Mente, L.J. (1963). Dynamic stress and displacement discontinuities due to plane harmonic shear wave, Transactions of the ASME, 598-603. 30. Newmark, N.M., (1968). Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials. 31. Owen, G. N., & Scholl, R. E. (1981). Earthquake engineering of large underground structures. 32. Osmi, S.K.C., Ahmad, S.M. (2016). Seismic fragility curves for shallow circular tunnels under different soil conditions. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 10, 1351-1357. 33. Osmi, S.K.C., Ahmad, S.M., Adnan, A. (2015). Seismic fragility analysis of underground tunnel buried in rock. In: Proceedings of the 50th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Kiel, Germany. 34. Park, K. H., Tantayopin, K., Tontavanich, B., & Owatsiriwong, A. (2009). Analytical solution for seismic-induced ovaling of circular tunnel lining under no-slip interface conditions: A revisit. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(2), 231-235. 35. Pao, Y. H. (1962). Dynamical stress concentration in an elastic plate. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 29, 299-305. 36. Qiu, W., Huang, G., Zhou, H., Xu, W. (2018). Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Rock Mountain Tunnel. International Journal of Geomechanics, 18(3). 37. Railway Technical Research Institute (2001). Design Code for Tunnels in Urban Areas (in Japanese). Railway Technical Research Institute, Japan. 38. Sun, B., Zhang, S., Deng, M., Wang, C. (2020). Inelastic dynamic response and fragility analysis of arched hydraulic tunnels under as-recorded far-fault and near-fault ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 132. 39. St John, C. M., & Zahrah, T. F. (1987). Aseismic design of underground structures. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 2(2), 165-197. 40. Sarkar, R., Pareek, K. (2021). Influence of stratification and assessment of fragility curves for mountain tunnels. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 174(3), 279-290. 41. Stefanidou, S.P., Kappos, A.J. (2017). Methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46, 73-93. 42. Tsinidis, G., de Silva, F., Anastasopoulos, I., Bilotta, E., Bobet, A., Hashash, Y. M., He, C., Kampas, G., Knappett, J., & Madabhushi, G. (2020). Seismic behaviour of tunnels: From experiments to analysis. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 99, 103334 43. Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514. 44. Wang, J. (1993). Seismic Design of Tunnels: A Simple State-of-the-art Design Approach. Monograph 7,Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. 45. Wang, W. L., Wang, T. T., Su, J. J., Lin, C. H., Seng, C. R., & Huang, T. H. (2001). Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 16(3), 133-150. 46. Yucemen, M.S. (2013). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for buildings. In: Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, 787-815. 47. Zi, H., Ding, Z., Ji, X., Liu, Z., Shi, C. (2021). Effect of voids on the seismic vulnerability of mountain tunnels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 148. 48. 蘇仁偉(2021)。岩石隧道受震反應：現地監測資料解析與三維數值模擬，國立臺灣大學土木工程學系學位論文。 49. 葉勇凱、周德光(2018)。土木404-100設計例之耐震評估與易損性曲線。國家地震工程研究中心，台北，編號：NCREE-18-016，。 50. 朝倉俊弘、志波由紀夫、松岡茂、大矢敏雄、野城一榮(2008)，山岳 トンネルの地震被害 とその メ力ニズム，土 木 学 会 論 文 集，20-36。 51. 陳正勳、王泰典、黃燦輝(2011)，山嶺隧道受震損害類型與原因之案例研究，第 30 卷，第 1 期，P45-57，岩石力學與工程學報。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98971 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣的山岳隧道工程在設計階段時，通常僅會依據工程沿線所預估會遭遇的地質狀態進行支撐種類的設計，有關於地震對隧道的影響則不一定會加以考慮。也因為隧道或維生管線等線型構造與傳統的建築物形式大相逕庭，特別是台灣的地質狀態相對年輕且複雜，導致山岳隧道沿線的地層變化經常相當劇烈。近年更因為隧道結構逐漸老化或是圍岩風化等原因，地震對於隧道的影響有可能加劇。
本研究利用FLAC 2D軟體進行山岳隧道受震反應的數值模擬，以嘉寶隧道周圍岩體的地質與材料性質作為分析參數，建立貼近現場條件的模型。模擬過程考量覆土深度、剪力波速等重要影響因子，並施加具有特定回歸期之設計地震，以全面評估隧道於地震作用下之動態行為。最終，從分析輸出的隧道襯砌彎矩結果中提取損傷指標，據此繪製脆弱性曲線，以量化並評估山岳隧道在各種地震強度條件下之損傷潛勢與耐震性能 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In Taiwan, mountain tunnels are typically designed based solely on anticipated geological conditions encountered along the tunnel alignment, and seismic impacts on tunnels are often overlooked at the design stage. Unlike conventional buildings, long tube-like structures such as tunnels or lifelines differ significantly in their structural behavior. Particularly, Taiwan's relatively young and complex geological settings cause abrupt variations in geological conditions along tunnel routes. Furthermore, due to progressive structural aging and surrounding rock weathering, tunnels may become increasingly vulnerable to seismic risks.
This study employs FLAC 2D software to numerically simulate the seismic response of mountain tunnels. Lining properties and geotechnical properties from the rock mass surrounding the Jiabao Tunnel were incorporated into the numerical model, ensuring realistic and representative conditions. Critical influencing factors, including overburden depth and shear wave velocity, were considered. On the other hand, seismic input motions with different ground motion attributes were used to comprehensively evaluate the dynamic tunnel response. Finally, the bending moment results of the tunnel linings served as damage indicators, facilitating the development of fragility curves to quantify and evaluate the seismic vulnerability and resilience of mountain tunnels under various seismic intensity scenarios. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-20T16:29:14Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-20T16:29:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Objectives 1 1.2 Research Process and Steps 2 1.3 Organization of this Thesis 4 Chapter 2 Literature review 5 2.1 Earthquake-induced damage in mountain tunnels: The Chi-Chi Earthquake Case Study 5 2.1.1 Cases of tunnel damage due to earthquakes 6 2.2 Tunnel damage mechanism 10 2.3 Seismic response and earthquake resistance analysis of rock tunnels 13 2.3.1 Seismic Response of Tunnels 13 2.3.2 Seismic Analysis of Tunnels 15 2.4 Fragility Curves 19 2.4.1 Related Studies in Taiwan and Abroad 20 2.4.2 Definition and Probabilistic Formulation of Fragility Curves 23 2.4.3 Post-earthquake tunnel damage assessment methods 27 Chapter 3 Methodology 31 3.1 FLAC Dynamic Analysis 31 3.1.1 Governing Equations in FLAC Dynamic Analysis 32 3.1.2 Selection of dynamic boundaries 32 3.1.3 Element size 37 3.1.4 Damping Considerations in Dynamic Analysis. 37 3.2 Model Validation 40 3.2.1 Model material and element test 40 3.2.2 Validation of theoretical rock-lining interaction 46 3.2.3 Validation of wave propagation 54 3.3 Earthquakes and Stations 58 3.3.1 Return Period Design Earthquakes for Chi-Chi and Nahanni Events 61 Chapter 4 Numerical Simulation of Tunnel Response under Seismic Loading 66 4.1 Numerical Model Parameters 67 4.1.1 Establishment and Derivation of the Allowable Bending Moment 69 4.2 Development of Fragility Curves Using Moment Demand-to-Capacity Ratio 70 4.2.1 The influence of overburden depth 71 4.2.2 Influence of Shear Wave Velocity of rock 76 4.2.3 Influence of Different Input Ground Motions 79 4.2.4 Influence of return period design earthquakes 87 4.2.5 Influence of Intensity Measures: PGA vs PGV 92 4.2.6 Influence of Intensity Measures: PGA vs PGD 96 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Recommendations 99 5.1 Conclusion 99 5.2 Recommendations 101 Reference 103 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 脆弱性曲線 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 山岳隧道 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地盤反應分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 隧道數值模擬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 襯砌強度設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Fragility curves | en |
| dc.subject | Lining strength design | en |
| dc.subject | Tunnel numerical simulation | en |
| dc.subject | Site response analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Mountain tunnels | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣山岳隧道受震脆弱性曲線之建立 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Establishment of Fragility Curves for Mountain Tunnels in Taiwan under Seismic Events | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱俊翔;邱雅筑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jiunn-Shyang Chiou;Ya-Chu Chiu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 脆弱性曲線,山岳隧道,地盤反應分析,隧道數值模擬,襯砌強度設計, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Fragility curves,Mountain tunnels,Site response analysis,Tunnel numerical simulation,Lining strength design, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 108 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503897 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-15 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 3.94 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。