請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98353完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kai-Ping Grace Yao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳彥廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Ting Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-04T16:08:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-31 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 林青慧（2003）：《臺灣簡短36（SF-36）健康量表工具信效度及常模之建立》（碩士論文，中國醫藥學院），臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統，https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kk45qt
高莉（2025）：《完美主義對臺大學生心理健康之影響：探討自我慈憫與社會支持的中介角色》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣大學。 張雅筑（2023）：《研究生情緒困擾的成因及其對身心健康的影響：探討情緒調節自我效能之調節機制》（未出版之碩士論文），國立臺灣大學。 陳伊柔（2024）：《探討社會心理因素對臺大學生心理健康之影響：情緒調節自我效能感的預測效果》（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學），華藝線上圖書館，https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202401054 陳禹昕（2022）：《自我認同與環境支持對經濟弱勢大學生校園生活適應之影響》（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學），華藝線上圖書館，https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202201567 陳慶餘，吳英璋（1987）：〈以生物心理社會模式探討臺大新生之身心症狀〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，3（1），89-105。 臺灣衛生福利部（2021a）：《世界心理健康日衛生福利統計通報》。臺灣衛生福利部統計處。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-72387-864eb8f0-64ef-42db-8a12-63169b8b97fc.html 臺灣衛生福利部（2021b）：《108年死因統計年報》。臺灣衛生福利部統計處。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-69453-7815f16e-47b9-49cb-bec5-17497ccac32d.html 賴宜琳（2024）：《正向因應資源與負向情緒反應對網路成癮之影響：以臺大大學部新生為例》（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學），華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202401712 Beesdo-Baum, K., Klotsche, J., Knappe, S., Craske, M. G., Lebeau, R. T., Hoyer, J., Strobel, A., Pieper, L., & Wittchen, H. U. (2012). Psychometric properties of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-V in an unselected sample of German treatment seeking patients. Depression and anxiety, 29(12), 1014-1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21994 Caprara, G. V., & Gerbino, M. (2001). Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale (RESE) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t23438-000 Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06 Chen, S.-H., Weng, L.-J., Su, Y.-J., Wu, H.-M., & Yang, P.-F. (2003). Chinese Internet Addiction Scale--Revised (CIAS, CIAS-R) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t44491-000 Clark, D. M. (1988). A cognitive model of panic attacks. In S. Rachman & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Panic: Psychological perspectives (pp. 71-89). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506 Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113 Conroy, D. E., Willow, J. P., & Metzler, J. N. (2002). Multidimensional Fear of Failure Measurement: The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200252907752 Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N. L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D. E., Glenn, L. M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S. A. T., Rizzo, D. M., Simpatico, T., & Robert, S. R. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2:3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05500-000 Fletcher, T. D. (2023). psychometric: Applied Psychometric Theory (Version 2.4) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychometric Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235001 Gregory, R. J. (2015). Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications (7th ed.). Pearson. Harvey, R. J., & Murry, W. D. (1994). Scoring the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Empirical comparison of preference score versus latent-trait methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62(1), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6201_11 Horn, J. L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Irribarra, D. T., & Freund, R. (2014). Wright Map: IRT item-person map with ConQuest integration. (Version 1.0) [R package]. https://github.com/david-ti/wrightmap Ju, G.-F., & Duann, Y.-S. (2002). The Development of the College Students' Adjustment Check List and the Analysis the Students' Problems. Journal of Research on Measurement and Statistics, (10), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.6773/JRMS.200212.0001 Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Kelderman, H. (1996). Multidimensional Rasch models for partial-credit scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169602000205 Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices. (3rd ed.). New York: Springer. Lai, Y.-C., & Wu, P.-H. (2018). The Development of the Epistemological Beliefs Scale-Mathematics for Taiwan Junior High School Students. Psychological Testing, 65(3), 315-339. Lee, E. H., Moon, S. H., Cho, M. S., Park, E. S., Kim, S. Y., Han, J. S., & Cheio, J. H. (2019). The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population. Asian Nursing Research, 13(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006 Lee, M. B., Liao, S. C., Lee, Y. J., Wu, C. H., Tseng, M. C., Gau, S. F., & Rau, C. L. (2003). Development and verification of validity and reliability of a short screening instrument to identify psychiatric morbidity. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 102(10), 687-694. Lee, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Huang, C.-L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The construct and measurement of peace of mind. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 14(2), 571-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9343-5 Leng, C.-H, & Yao, G. (2024). Developing an abbreviated WHOQOL-BREF for patients with major chronic diseases with the assistance of Item Response Theory (IRT). Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 43(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.202402_43(1).112130 Li, C., Lin, Y., Tosun, B., Wang, P., Guo, H. Y., Ling, C. R., Qi, R., Luo, Q. Y., Wang, Y., Huang, F., Wang, J., Ma, S. H., Xu, D. F., Wu, S. Z., & Zhang, L. (2025). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1532709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709 Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U Lue, B.-H., Chen, H.-J., & Kao, M.-Y. (2006). Perceived Stress in Medical Students and Its Relationship to Mental Health. Journal of Medical Education, 10(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.200603_10(1).0004 Luthar, S. S., Kumar, N. L., & Zillmer, N. (2020). High-achieving schools connote risks for adolescents: Problems documented, processes implicated, and directions for interventions. The American Psychologist, 75(7), 983-995. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000556 McBrien, A., Wild, M., & Bachorowski, J. A. (2020). Social-Emotional Expertise (SEE) Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Assessment, 27(8), 1718-1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118794866 McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64 Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59-71. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/014662169001400106 Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169201600206 Muraki, E. (1997). A Generalized Partial Credit Model. In: van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_9 Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2004). Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications (6th ed.). Prentice Hall. National Taiwan University. (2023). Number of male and female students, sorted by college. National Taiwan University. https://annualstatistics.cc.ntu.edu.tw/data/acct2023/acct2023e/acct1/27.pdf Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X²: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004 Osman, A., Wong, J. L., Bagge, C. L., Freedenthal, S., Gutierrez, P. M., & Lozano, G. (2012). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(12), 1322-1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21908 Piedmont, R. L. (2014). Inter-item Correlations. In: Michalos, A. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493 Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Thissen, D., Revicki, D. A., Weiss, D. J., Hambleton, R. K., Liu, H., Gershon, R., Reise, S. P., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., & PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22-S31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (1990). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400105 Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553 Revelle, W. (2025). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. (Version 2.5.3) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4, Pt. 2), 100. Santor, D. A., Ramsay, J. O., & Zuroff, D. C. (1994). Nonparametric item analyses of the Beck Depression Inventory: Evaluating gender item bias and response option weights. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.255 Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M. (2006). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki155 Schulenberg, S. E., Schnetzer, L. W., & Buchanan, E. M. (2011). The Purpose in Life Test-Short Form: Development and Psychometric Support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 861-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9231-9 Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61(2), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294343 Segrin, C., Hanzal, A., Donnerstein, C., Taylor, M., & Domschke, T. J. (2007). Social skills, psychological well-being, and the mediating role of perceived stress. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(3), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701282252 Smith, R. M. (1996). Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(3), 516-517. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 Syed, H. R., Zachrisson, H. D., Dalgard, O. S., Dalen, I., & Ahlberg, N. (2008). Hopkins Symptoms Check List-10 (HSCL-10) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t12173-000 Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscripts, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1031-1010. Thomas, M. L. (2019). Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1442-1455. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000597 Walter, O. B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J. B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B. F., & Rose, M. (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for ‘Anxiety’ (Anxiety-CAT). Qual Life Res, 16 (Suppl 1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9191-7 Wang, C., & Chang, H.-H. (2011). Item Selection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing—Gaining Information from Different Angles. Psychometrika, 76, 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9215-7 Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNE) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00794-000 World Health Organization. (1998, February 12-13). Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the DepCare Project: report on a WHO meeting: Stockholm, Sweden, 1998. Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the DepCare Project: report on a WHO meeting: Stockholm, Sweden. Wright, B., Linacre, J. & Gustafson, J. (1994). Reasonable Mean-Square Fit Values. Rasch Measurement Transformation, 8, 370. Zimet, G. (2016). Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) - Scale Items and Scoring Information. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311534896_Multidimensional_Scale_of_Perceived_Social_Support_MSPSS_-_Scale_Items_and_Scoring_Information Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98353 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 2020年，國立臺灣大學接連發生多起學生自傷或自殺事件。校方輔導體系為了解學生的身心狀態或身心適應程度，自 2020年起著手「身心健康評量系統建置」計畫。此評量系統建置從2021年至2024年間收集多份測驗資料，並於每年收集資料後進行測驗與題目評估與增減。儘管歷年已減少部分不適合施測試題，提供學生施測的題目數量仍然偏高下，本研究將針對國立臺灣大學2024年大學部部分施測資料進行「正向因應資源」、「負向情緒反應」、「多向度感知社會支持量表」與「自我滿意度量表」試題簡化。除使用描述統計、古典測驗理論（Classical Test Theory [CTT]）及試題反應理論（Item Response Theory [IRT]）分析測驗試題外，亦利用試題訊息量找出適合高情緒風險學生施測試題。本研究發現部分在CTT中視為不適合施測試題，在IRT中被視為適合高度負向情緒填答者的試題。同時，在綜合兩測驗理論選擇試題結果，並考量身心健康評量系統建置目標：「提供一簡便釐清學生身心狀態工具協助區辨需高度關懷學生」後，建議施測「正向因應資源」十題，「負向情緒反應」十題，「多向度感知社會支持量表」七題，「自我滿意度量表」六題。綜上所述，本研究將提出身心健康評量系統建置之題目簡化建議，並提供第一線測驗實務者有效釐清學生身心狀態工具。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In 2020, National Taiwan University experienced a series of student self-harm and suicide incidents. In response, the university's counseling system initiated the “Physical And Mental Health Assessment System” project to better understand students' psychological states. From 2021 to 2024, the assessment system collected extensive test data, with annual evaluations and revisions of the assessment system items. Despite efforts to remove unsuitable questions over the years, the total number of items administered to students remained high. This study aims to reduce items from the "Positive Coping Resources”, “Negative Emotional Responses”, “Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support” and “Self-Satisfaction Scale” by using data from National Taiwan University’s undergraduate students in 2024. In addition to analyzing test items using descriptive statistics, Classical Test Theory (CTT), and Item Response Theory (IRT), the study also conducted the item information function to identify items suitable for students at high emotional risk. The key findings were as follows: (1). Some items deemed unsuitable by CTT standards were identified by IRT as being highly effective for respondents with high levels of negative emotions. (2). Integrating the results from both theories and considering the expecting goal of the assessment system “to provide a simple tool for clarifying students' mental health status and identifying those in need of high-level intervention”, this study recommends both administering ten items from “Positive Coping Resources”, ten from “Negative Emotional Responses”, seven from “Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support” , and six from the “Self-Satisfaction Scale”. In summary, this study provides recommendations for reducing items within “Physical And Mental Health Assessment System”, offering practitioners an effective tool for assessing students' psychological status. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-04T16:08:16Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-04T16:08:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ⅰ
中文摘要 ⅲ 英文摘要 ⅴ 目次 ⅶ 圖次 ⅸ 表次 ⅺ 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 身心適應量表相關研究及其問題 3 第二節 國立臺灣大學2021至2024年身心健康評量系統建置計畫簡介 3 第三節 試題簡化策略回顧 12 第四節 古典測驗理論與試題反應理論在臨床實務的研究問題 18 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 計畫參與者 21 第二節 分析量表工具 21 第三節 統計分析方法 23 第四章 結果 33 第一節 參與者人口學變項 33 第二節 基於古典測驗理論之試題選擇 37 第三節 基於試題反應理論之試題選擇 51 第四節 綜合兩測驗理論之試題簡化結果 73 第五章 討論 89 第一節 試題簡化結果討論：試題層面 89 第二節 試題簡化結果討論：策略層面 94 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 100 參考文獻 103 附錄一 原有量表施測試題 113 附錄二 探索性因素分析因素個數判別圖：平行分析法 118 附錄三 本研究使用之程式操作語法 120 附錄四 驗證性因素分析標準化參數報表 124 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 古典測驗理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 試題反應理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 試題訊息量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 試題簡化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 身心健康評量系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Physical And Mental Health Assessment System | en |
| dc.subject | Item Response Theory | en |
| dc.subject | item information function | en |
| dc.subject | Item Reduction | en |
| dc.subject | Classical Test Theory | en |
| dc.title | 應用古典測驗理論與試題反應理論簡化題目：以國立臺灣大學身心健康評量系統使用之量表為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Item Reduction of National Taiwan University Physical and Mental Health Assessment System through Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊宏;陳柏邑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jyun-Hong Chen;Po-Yi Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 古典測驗理論,試題反應理論,試題訊息量,試題簡化,身心健康評量系統, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Classical Test Theory,Item Response Theory,item information function,Item Reduction,Physical And Mental Health Assessment System, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 132 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501195 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-02 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。