請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97677完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡宜展 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yi-Chan Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許峻瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun Wei Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-11T16:08:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-12 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-25 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., and Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1):131–166.
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., and Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4):877–908. Artige, L. and Bignandi, S. (2022). The firm size distribution: evidence from belgium.Applied Economics, 55. Böhringer, C. and Rutherford, T. (1997). Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy:a general equilibrium analysis of the german tax initiative. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 32:189–203. Cabral, L. M. B. and Mata, J. (2003). On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory. The American Economic Review, 93(4):1075–1090. Ferro, E., Mare, D. S., Liriano, F. M., Peña, F. P., Quezada, M. G. R., and Zeni, F. (2024). The effect of carbon taxes on aggregate productivity: The case of the dominican republic. Policy Research Working Paper. Golosov, M., Hassler, J., Krusell, P., and Tsyvinski, A. (2014). Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. Econometrica, 82(1):41–88. Heindl, P. (2015). The impact of administrative transaction costs in the eu emissions trading system. Climate Policy, 17(3):314–329. Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing tfp in china and india. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1):1403–1448. International Energy Agency (2008). Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Sweden 2008 Review. Paris: International Energy Agency(IEA). Jaraitėucd, J., Convery, F., and di Maria, C. (2010). Transaction costs for firms in the eu ets: lessons from ireland. Climate Policy, 10:17–32. Kurz, A. (2024). Within-country leakage due to the exemption of small emitters from emissions pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Marron, D. B. and Toder, E. J. (2014). Tax policy issues in designing a carbon tax. American Economic Review. Musa, H., Krištofík, P., Medzihorský, J., and Klieštik, T. (2024). The development of firm size distribution–evidence from four central european countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 91:98–110. Oates, W. E. (1995). Green taxes: Can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same. Southern Economic Journal. Restuccia, D. and Rogerson, R. (2009). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous plants. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(1):707–720. Sancho, F. (2009). Calibration of ces functions for real-world multisectoral modeling. Economic Systems Research. Timilsina, G. R. (2022). Carbon taxes. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(4):1456–1502. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97677 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文建立一套具備異質性廠商的多部門一般均衡模型，用以評估不同碳稅政策對經濟與環境的影響。該模型以歐盟27國2019年的資料進行校準，並用來分析四種稅制方案：統一碳稅、差異化稅率、部門豁免，以及小型排放源豁免。結果顯示，碳稅能有效減少排放，並影響生產要素在部門間的重新配置。與未課徵碳稅的情況相比，統一碳稅可將碳排放量減少73%，並使消費增加4.13%。若依部門特性調整稅率，整體福祉可進一步提升。相對地，以豁免為基礎的政策往往會降低減碳效率並導致資源錯置，進而造成福祉損失。然而，若豁免碳排放密集度低且生產力高的部門，則可透過引導資源配置提高整體福祉。至於依廠商規模設計的豁免政策，則會導致資源在部門內部及部門間重新分配。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis develops a multi-sector general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms to evaluate the impact of different carbon tax policies on economic and environmental performance. The model is calibrated using 2019 data from 27 EU countries and used to analyze four tax schemes: uniform carbon tax, differentiated tax rates, sectoral exemptions, and small emitter exemptions. The results show that carbon taxes effectively reduce emissions and affect inter-sectoral resource reallocation. A uniform carbon tax reduces emissions by 73% and increases consumption by 4.13% compared with no carbon tax. If tax rates are adjusted based on sectoral characteristics, welfare improves further. Sector-based exemption often reduces carbon mitigation efficiency and causes resource misallocation, leading to welfare loss. However, exempting the low-carbon-intensive and high-productivity sector could result in higher welfare through guiding resource allocation. Size-based exemption creates resource allocation within and across sectors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-11T16:08:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-11T16:08:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要i
Abstract iii Contents iv List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 The model 7 2.1 The Consumer’s Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.2 Final Good Producers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3 Sectoral Good Producers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.4 Market Clearing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5 Competitive Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.6 Social Planner’s Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.7 Optimal Carbon Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.8 Steady-State Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Chapter 3 Calibration and Parameterization 21 3.1 Preference and Intertemporal Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2 Climate System and Energy Price Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3 Production Technology Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.4 Sectoral Heterogeneity and Distributional Parameters . . . . . . . . . 25 Chapter 4 Quantitative Analysis 31 4.1 Uniform tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4.1.1 Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 4.1.2 Resource reallocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.2 Heterogeneous tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.3 Sectoral exemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.3.1 Resource reallocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.3.2 Macroeconomic outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.4 Exempting small emitters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.4.1 Intra-sector resource reallocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.4.2 inter-sector resource reallocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.4.3 Macroeconomic outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5 Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.5.1 Comparison of the optimal level in different scenarios . . . . . . . . 52 4.5.2 Comparison of achieving certain emission goal . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Chapter 5 Conclusion 55 References 58 Appendix A — Steady-state damage function 61 Appendix B — The aggregation 63 Appendix C — The sector mapping 67 Appendix D — The graph of resource reallocation 69 D.1 The uniform tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 D.2 The sectoral exemption scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 D.3 The small emitters exemption scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 產業結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候變遷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資源重分配 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 租稅赦免 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 碳稅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Climate change | en |
| dc.subject | Carbon tax | en |
| dc.subject | Tax exemption | en |
| dc.subject | Resource reallocation | en |
| dc.subject | Industrial structure | en |
| dc.title | 兩部門異質性廠商下的最適碳稅與資源重分配 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Optimal Carbon Tax and Resource Reallocation under Two-Sector Model with Heterogeneous Firms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳虹如;吳愷頡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hung-Ju Chen;Kai-Jie Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 碳稅,租稅赦免,資源重分配,產業結構,氣候變遷, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Carbon tax,Tax exemption,Resource reallocation,Industrial structure,Climate change, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 73 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500782 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-25 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-12 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 2.18 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。