Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 地理環境資源學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97417
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor簡旭伸zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShiuh-Shen Chienen
dc.contributor.author梁皓晴zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHo-Ching Leungen
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-05T16:10:56Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-06-
dc.date.copyright2025-06-05-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-05-27-
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Shifting politics in Bedouin love poetry (pp. 24-45). In Abu-Lughod, L., & Lutz, C. A. (e.d) Language and the politics of emotion, Cambridge University Press.
Adey, P. (2014). Air: Nature and Culture. Reaktion Books.
Adey, P. (2015). Air’s affinities: Geopolitics, chemical affect and the force of the elemental. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 54-75.
Adey, P. (2017). Mobility. Routledge.
Adey, P. (2021). Afterword: Breath-taking—ethical impulses for breath studies. The Life of Breath in Literature, Culture and Medicine, 527.
Agamben, G. (2008). State of exception. University of Chicago press.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective feelings: Or, the impressions left by others. Theory, culture & society, 21(2), 25-42.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy Objects. In Gregg and Seigworth, The Affect Theory Reader. Duke University Press.
Allen, I. K. (2020). Thinking with a Feminist Political Ecology of Air-and-breathing-bodies. Body & Society, 26(2), 79-105.
Amnesty International. (n.d.). Tear gas: A global perspective. https://teargas.amnesty.org/#incident-map (Accessed September 16, 2023)
Amoore, L. (2018). Cloud geographies: Computing, data, sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 4-24.
Amnuaylojaroen, T., & Parasin, N. (2021). The association between COVID-19, air pollution, and climate change. Frontiers in public health, 9, 662499.
Anderlini, J. (2019). Hong Kong’s “Water Revolution” Spins Out of Control. Financial Times, 2.
Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, space and society, 2(2), 77-81.
Allen, I. K. (2020). Thinking with a Feminist Political Ecology of Air-and-breathing-bodies. Body & Society, 26(2), 79-105.
Asher Ghertner, D. (2021). Postcolonial atmospheres: air’s coloniality and the climate of enclosure. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(5), 1483-1502.
BBC (2020-03-28). Coronavirus: Lockdowns continue to suppress European pollution. BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52065140 (Accessed October 29, 2024)
BBC (2020-04-20). Air pollution linked to raised Covid-19 death risk. BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52351290 (Accessed October 29, 2024)
BBC (2020-06-01). Then and now: Pandemic clears the air. BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57149747 (Accessed October 29, 2024)
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. duke university Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, communication & society, 15(5), 739-768.
Bertelsen, L., & Murphie, A. (2010). Félix Guattari on affect and the refrain. The affect theory reader, 138-156.
Bille, M., & Simonsen, K. (2021). Atmospheric practices: On affecting and being affected. Space and Culture, 24(2), 295-309.
Bille, M., & Hauge, B. (2022). Choreographing atmospheres in Copenhagen: Processes and positions between home and public. Urban Studies, 59(10), 2076-2091.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.
Catucci, S., & De Matteis, F. (2022). The affective city: Spaces, Atmospheres and Practices in Changing Urban Territories (Vol. 88). LetteraVentidue Edizioni.
Campos Medina, L., & Jaureguiberry Mondion, J. (2021). The march as a safe space and dynamics of resocialization. Space and Culture, 12063312211040202.
Chan, E. Y. Y. et. al. (2019). Use of tear gas for crowd control in Hong Kong. Lancet (London, England), 394(10208), 1517–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32326-8
Chen, S. et. al. (2021). Climate and the spread of COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 9042.
Cheng, E. W., Lee, F. L., Yuen, S., & Tang, G. (2022). Total Mobilization from Below: Hong Kong's Freedom Summer. The China Quarterly, 1-31.
Cheng, S. (2020). Pikachu's Tears: Children's Perspectives on Violence in Hong Kong. Feminist Studies, 46(1), 216-225.
Cheung, G. K. W. (2009). Hong Kong’s Watershed: The 1967 Riots. Hong Kong University Press.
Ching, J., & Kajino, M. (2020). Rethinking air quality and climate change after COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5167.
Clement, S. (2020). Walking with the rain: Sensing family mobility on-foot. In Weather: Spaces, Mobilities and Affects (pp. 51-66). Routledge.
Chow. K. (Director). (2021). Revolution of Our Times. [Film]. Haven Productions Ltd.
Choy, T. (2011). Ecologies of comparison. In Ecologies of Comparison. Duke University Press.
Choy, T., & Zee, J. (2015). Condition—suspension. Cultural Anthropology, 30(2), 210-223.
Crippen, M. (2019). Body politics: Revolt and city celebration. In Bodies in the Streets: The Somaesthetics of City Life (pp. 89-110). Brill.
Das, V. (2006). Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Univ of California Press.
de Certeau, M., & Mayol, P. (1998). The Practice of Everyday Life: Living and Cooking. Volume 2 (Vol. 2). U of Minnesota Press.
de Larrinaga, M. (2016). (Non)-lethality and war: tear gas as a weapon of governmental intervention. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9(3), 522-540.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. Princeton University Press.
Della Porta, D. (2016). Where did the revolution go?: Contentious politics and the quality of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Della Porta, D., & Fabbri, M. (2016). Producing space in action. The protest campaign against the construction of the Dal Molin military base. Social Movement Studies, 15(2), 180–196.
Diaconu, M. (2019). The weather-worlds of urban bodies. In Bodies in the Streets: The Somaesthetics of City Life (pp. 38-59). Brill.
Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. M. (2015). Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest. Amsterdam University Press.
Elden, S. (2021). Terrain, politics, history. Dialogues in Human Geography, 11(2), 170-189.
Engelmann, S. (2015). Toward a poetics of air: sequencing and surfacing breath. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(3), 430-444.
Engelmann, S., & McCormack, D. (2021). Elemental worlds: Specificities, exposures, alchemies. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1419-1439.
Feigenbaum. (2014). Resistant Matters: Tents, Tear Gas and the “Other Media” of Occupy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11:1, 15-24.
Feigenbaum, A. (2017). Tear Gas: From the Battlefields of World War I to the Streets of Today. Verso Books.
Feigenbaum, A., & Kanngieser, A. (2015). For a politics of atmospheric governance. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 80-84.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
Fregonese, S. (2017). Affective atmospheres, urban geopolitics and conflict (de) escalation in Beirut. Political Geography, 61, 1-10.
Furuhata, Y. (2022). Climatic media: Transpacific experiments in atmospheric control. Duke University Press.
Gandy, M. (2017). Urban atmospheres. Cultural geographies, 24(3), 353-374.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Gukelberger, S., & Meyer, C. (2020). Creating space by spreading atmospheres: Protest movements from a phenomenological perspective. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 22, No. 3).
Healy, S. (2014). Atmospheres of consumption: Shopping as involuntary vulnerability. Emotion, Space and Society, 10, 35-43.
Holzhey, C. F. E. (2020). Weathering ambivalences. Between language and physics.”. In C. F. E. Holzhey, & A. Wedemeyer (Eds.), Weathering. Ecologies of Exposure (pp. 3–40). Berlin: ICI Berlin Press. https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-17_02
Holzhey, C. F., & Wedemeyer, A. (Eds.). (2020). Weathering: Ecologies of Exposure (Vol. 17). ICI Berlin Press.
Iaquinto, B. L., Barber, L., & Yu, P. S. (2023). Grounding Mobility: Protest Atmospheres at Hong Kong International Airport. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(4), 933-948.
Irigaray, L. (1999). The forgetting of air in Martin Heidegger ; translated by Mary Beth Mader. (1st ed.). Athlone Press.
Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, S121-S139.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2016). Lighting up the atmosphere. In Elements of Architecture (pp. 163-176). Routledge. Ingold, T. (2020). On breath and breathing: A concluding comment. Body & Society, 26(2), 158-167.
International Christian Concern (2019-10-12). Hong Kong, 6/2019 - Sing Hallelujah to the Lord. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shkN744Q6qY (Accessed October 29, 2024)
Ip, I. C. (2019). Hong Kong’s new identity politics: Longing for the local in the shadow of China. Routledge.
Ismangil, M., & Lee, M. (2021). Protests in Hong Kong during the Covid-19 pandemic. Crime, Media, Culture, 17(1), 17-20.
Jack, M. (2021). The Crowd in Flux: Atmosphere and the Governance of Public Affects at FC Union Berlin. Ethnomusicology, 65(3), 497-518.
Jackson, M., & Fannin, M. (2011). Letting geography fall where it may—aerographies address the elemental. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(3), 435-444.
Kwok, C., & Chan, N. K. (2022). The making of contentious political space: The transformation of Hong Kong’s Victoria Park. Space and Culture, 25(4), 615-632.
Joronen, M., & Ghantous, W. (2024). Weathering violence: Atmospheric materialities and olfactory durations of ‘skunk water’in Palestine. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 25148486241226923.
Kenner, A., Mirzaei, A., & Spackman, C. (2019). Breathing in the anthropocene: Thinking through scale with containment technologies. Cultural Studies Review, 25(2), 153-171.
Kloet, J. D., Lin, J., & Chow, Y. F. (2020). ‘We are doing better’: Biopolitical nationalism and the COVID-19 virus in East Asia. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 635-640.
Kuriyama, S. (1999). The expressiveness of the body and the divergence of Greek and Chinese medicine. Princeton University Press.
Latour, B. (2006). Air. Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology and Contemporary Art. MIT Press, 9780262101172. ffhal-02057246f
Lee, N. K. (2009). How is a political public space made? The birth of Tiananmen Square and the May Fourth Movement. Political Geography, 28(1), 32–43.
Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157-172.
Leff, J. R. (2021). Expanding feminist affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 41, 100844.
Li, E. C. Y., & Lee, P. H. (2023). The geopolitics of disease prevention: Military analogies against
COVID-19 in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and beyond. Media, Culture & Society, 01634437231216444.
Lin, W. (2022). Atmospheric conditioning: Airport automation, labour and the COVID‐19 pandemic. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(1), 214-228.
Lo, K. C. (2023). Crowd Control and Mobilization with Nature in the China–Hong Kong Context. Cultural Politics, 19(3), 318-332.
Lowe, C. (2010). Viral clouds: becoming H5N1 in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 625-649.
Mak, H., & Koh, K. (2021). Building a Healthy Urban Environment in East Asia (No. 1). Report.
Malabou, C. 2012. The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain Damage. New York: Fordham University Press.
Mankoo, A. C. (2019). A Historical Sociology of Teargas in Britain and the Empire, 1925-1965 (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)).
Marinucci, L. (2019). Japanese atmospheres: Of sky, wind and breathing. Atmosphere and Aesthetics: A plural perspective, 93-118.
Martin, D., & Miller, B. (2003). Space and contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 143-156.
Marazziti, D. et. al. (2021). Climate change, environment pollution, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health. Science of the total environment, 773, 145182.
McCormack, D. P. (2008). Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. cultural geographies, 15(4), 413-430.
McCormack, D. P. (2017). Elemental infrastructures for atmospheric media: On stratospheric variations, value and the commons. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 418-437.
McCormack, D. P. (2018). Atmospheric things: On the allure of elemental envelopment. Duke University Press.
Menebo, M. M. (2020). Temperature and precipitation associate with Covid-19 new daily cases: A correlation study between weather and Covid-19 pandemic in Oslo, Norway. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 139659.
Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The make-believe space: affective geography in a postwar polity. Duke University Press.
Neimanis, A., & Walker, R. L. (2014). Weathering: Climate change and the “thick time” of transcorporeality. Hypatia, 29(3), 558-575.
Nieuwenhuis, M. (2016). Breathing materiality: Aerial violence at a time of atmospheric politics. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9(3), 499-521.
Nieuwenhuis, M. (2019). Porous skin: Breathing through the prism of the holey body. Emotion, Space and Society, 33, 100595.
Outka, E. (2019). Viral modernism: the influenza pandemic and interwar literature. Columbia University Press.
Pavoni, A., & Tulumello, S. (2023). Urban violence: Security, imaginary, atmosphere. Rowman & Littlefield.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2016). Withdrawing from atmosphere: An ontology of air partitioning and affective engineering. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(1), 150-167.
Pile, S. (1997). Opposition, political identities, and spaces of resistance in S Pile and M Keith (eds.) Geographies of resistance. Routledge, London, 1, 32.
Rahman, M. et. al. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic, dengue epidemic, and climate change vulnerability in Bangladesh: Scenario assessment for strategic management and policy implications. Environmental research, 192, 110303.
Rose (2020-03-23) “Coronavirus and the Hong Kong protest movement” Lowy Institute : https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/coronavirus-hong-kong-protest-movement (Accessed October 29, 2024)
Routledge, P. (1994). Backstreets, barricades, and blackouts: Urban terrains of resistance in Nepal. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12(5), 559-578.
Routledge, P. (1997). Space, mobility, and collective action: India's Naxalite movement. Environment and Planning A, 29(12), 2165-2189.
Routledge, P., (2015) Geography and Social Movement. In Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford University Press.
Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Stepnisky, J. (2020). Staging atmosphere on the Ukrainian Maidan. Space and Culture, 23(2), 80-97.
Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Airquakes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(1), 41-57.
Squire, R. (2016). Immersive terrain: the US Navy, Sealab and Cold War undersea geopolitics. Area, 48(3), 332-338.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Cambridge university press.
Tang, T. Y. T., & Cheng, M. W. (2022). The politicization of everyday life: understanding the impact of the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Protests on pro-democracy protesters’ political participation in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 54(1), 128-148.
Theophanidis, P. (2013). Caught in the cloud: the biopolitics of tear gas warfare. The Funambulist Papers, 42.
Tilly, C. (2000). Spaces of contention. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(2), 135-159.
Tominaga, K. (2017). Social reproduction and the limitations of protest camps: openness and exclusion of social movements in Japan. Social Movement Studies, 16(3), 269-282.
Tosepu, R.et. al. (2020). Correlation between weather and Covid-19 pandemic in Jakarta, Indonesia. Science of the total environment, 725, 138436.
Urry, J. (2012). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Wacquant, L. J. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford University Press,
Wall, I. R. (2019). Policing atmospheres: Crowds, protest and ‘atmotechnics’. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 143-162.
Wall, I. R. (2020). Law and disorder: Sovereignty, protest, atmosphere. Routledge.
Weizman, E. (2012). Hollow land: Israel's architecture of occupation. Verso books.
Whitehead, M. (2011). State, science and the skies: governmentalities of the British atmosphere. John Wiley & Sons.
Whitworth, K., & Li, Y. T. (2023). Visual framing: The use of COVID-19 in the mobilization of Hong Kong protest. The China Quarterly, 253, 19-34.
Zee, J. C. (2022). Continent in Dust: Experiments in a Chinese Weather System (Vol. 10). Univ of California Press.
艾迪 (Peter Adey),徐苔玲、王志弘譯(2013),《移動》,台北:群學。
諸多香港藝術家(2020),《傘下存志:香港反送中社會運動文宣作品集》,香港:Umbrella Uprising。
端傳媒(2020),《2019 香港風暴:端傳媒反修例運動報導精選》,台北:春山出版有限 公司。
中信圍困團隊(2020),《中信圍困日記》。香港:玻璃樹文化有限公司。
楊威利修(2023),《香港祕密行動》,臺北市 : 一八四一出版有限公司。
譚蕙芸(2020),《天愈黑,星愈亮 — 反修例運動的人和事》。香港:突破出版社。
韓麗珠(2021),《半蝕》,臺北:衛城出版。
王汎森 (2014),《執拗的低音 : 一些歷史思考方式的反思 》 。臺北:允晨文化。
疫境記者(2020),《口罩下的香港人》,香港:白卷出版社。
報導者(2020), 《世紀之疫:揭開COVID-19下,人性、病毒、新世界的深度紀實》,臺北:商周出版。
諸多香港藝術家(2020),《傘下存志:香港反送中社會運動文宣作品集》。香港:Umbrella Uprising。
沃草 (2019) 我係香港人:2019 反送中催淚彈下的一國兩制 沃草網站。網址: https://watchout.tw/projects/hongkonger/ (2023.01.04 取用)
立場新聞 (2019-06-05)「周五單車巡遊宣傳 6.9 遊行 周日遊行前宗教團體辦祈禱會」 聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/94973 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-06-13)「盧偉聰:「暴動」已拘 11 人 發射數枚橡膠彈 150 催淚彈 僅「低殺傷力武器」」 聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/95471 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-06-16)「反送中男太古廣場墮樓亡 家長、陳淑莊、吳靄儀獻花悼念」。立場新聞網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/R4cTq (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-06-19)「辦聚會助『中信幸存者』疏導情緒 發起人:如感困擾,切忌獨自面對」。立場新聞網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/53rYf (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-08-05)「踢拖抗暴 — 當催淚彈蔓延至長者社區」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/98853(2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞(2019-08-24)「示威者拉倒智慧燈柱 警偉業街施催淚彈、德福平台射胡椒彈」 聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/100132 (2023.01.04 取用)
立場新聞 (2019-09-12) 「《願榮光歸香港》創作人:音樂是凝聚人心的最強武器」HRIC。網址: https://www.hrichina.org/chs/zhong-guo-ren-quan-shuang-zhou-kan/ya-guo-xiang-gang-zhi-ge-dan-sheng-yuan-rong-guang-gui-xiang-gang (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-09-19)「無負少年時 萬千學子人鏈發聲」 聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/100991 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-11-06)「K Kwong:點解最近啲催淚彈咁多煙同咁高温?」 聞庫網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/ziiY0 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2019-11-09)「衞生署發布催淚煙健康資訊 承認可致持續影響 教關窗、洗眼、換衫」 聞庫網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/5jvNS (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2020-03-11)「不忘.不散 — 祭壇前的尚德街坊」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/112992:(2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2020-05-01)「被指違限聚令 工黨社民連 8 人五一請願遭票控 麥德正拒出示身份證被捕」聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/117239 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2020-05-06) 「警方以限聚令為由 反對周日九龍大遊行 主辦團體宣布延期」聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/117648 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2020-05-10)「13 歲學生記者被警帶走 警員斥童工、非法暴徒」聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/117940 (2024.10.29 取用)。
立場新聞 (2020-05-20)「支聯會 531『毋忘六四』遊行 警方以限聚令為由反對』」聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/118762 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2013-11-16) 「暴力抗拆遷 1999年香港都有過」蘋果日報。網址: https://web.archive.org/web/20161203060928/http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/ne ws/20131116/51894875 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2019-06-06) 「歷年最高3,000人黑衣靜默遊行 郭榮鏗促撤回修例:法律界不低頭」 聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/AEZ3YPOGSGIIH55ZEBZIVT6JMQ (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2019-06-09)「大專生綁鐵鏈 到中聯辦請願」長青網。網址:https://www.e123.hk/zh-hant/news/469053 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2019-06-14)「信徒『叫耶穌落嚟』聚會回應警」LIHKG。網址:https://lihkg.com/thread/1245192/page/1 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2019-06-10)「400基督徒政總外集會 唱聖詩撐反送中」。聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/J22G4URXURN3C2KJYKHZ3NEZFI (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-09-02)「中學勇武仔傾家蕩產買裝備:做大學生前先做有良知嘅人」問庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/GJMYIE3OUTCYCIM6564A42XLHM (2023.03.06 取用)
蘋果日報 (2019-09-11)「8:31pm默哀 高唱香港之歌」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/ZL7UU5JAMGBQDL4QRZF35OBYTY (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2019-09-12)「全城大合唱 越夜越響亮」LIHKG。網址: https://lihkg.com/thread/1562249/page/1 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-09-24)「火魔法師之煉成『只守不攻避免傷人』」問庫網站。 網址 :https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/5B5QW4NGBP6ILO2D26ABSSFXLI (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-11-18)「TG戰場 理大山埃濃度超標五倍」問庫網站。 網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/IMVSTT6TPBUUYZLDWCDG4H5U5Q (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-11-21)「催淚彈遺害 兒童爆出疹潮 」問庫網站。 網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/Q4EZIZUM2HYTHJE2HZS4QDN3OQ (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-11-27)「團隊驗山埃揭港人『吸毒』」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/QLOCR7CUTXCY43NEEY2TNKC5IA (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-11-28)「港人硬食10,000枚催淚彈」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/MQZCEDLRM24LDAGRITS7N2BN5E (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-12-07)「港淪毒氣倉 市民吸TG屙血」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/OEX5DCBXKBQR7BIZLLNLCW2DJ4 (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-12-07)「旺角催淚彈放題 劏房單親媽咳黑塊 與5歲出疹兒有家不敢歸」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/3PH7RFQB2NRREDEWQANP2QL5GQ (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-12-27)「TG射屋 枕袋洗五次仍致敏」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/IBMVBQMU7IK3QKCWVD5O7LRQY4 (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-12-27)「CS飄400米 16樓單位關窗也中招」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/6GRQ2UCTLX36CC3GDDHELF5COU (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報(2019-12-27)「滅火隊手套含可變山埃物質」問庫網站。 網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/6YCRHDG25RA5WUW2CQIB5HF6JQ (2023.03.06 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-01-22)「50警凌晨拆彥霖梓樂祭壇」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/BFGKAKSY3NEEGCWPHSTW73GUMI (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-02-05)「7,000醫護罷工 今登門促林鄭對話 Dirty Team:犧牲都要有意義」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/HDLF2UB2S4SBF5CLDTO4DHRBPE (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-03-03)「警方首度表明香港抗爭現『本土恐怖主義』 議員斥政府極端高壓管治所致」聞庫網站。網址 https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/SCSEEEAKKBJT5N22O57DAD4MHY (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-03-30)「新措施首24小時食環發280次勸喻 光榮冰室半小時內兩遭警掃場」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/LJDCNSHPM3UJ54PTRMXCZYKNRM (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-04-23)「83黃店聯盟 手足有工開 有糭堅持20萬Thx」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/RY4SCH725Q4IEQUNW43RYYJXBU (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-04-23)「警拆祭壇以限聚令恐嚇記者 惡警:『擸多個過嚟咪夠囉』」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/PZMCJ7O62AUVYS63P5EZA3ERRA (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-05-08)「會計手足義助黃店申抗疫基金」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/A7VFP5LDNQI542YKPGXO7NGCMY (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-05-09)「多區悼梓樂 『港人未放棄過你』」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/BPIYY7KQVGQULX2BPT7ZQKRXQA (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-06-04)「多區遍地開花 全城燭光悼六四」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/5GRFJPA36BWGUWKQ5L4N46QDZ4 (2024.10.29 取用)。
蘋果日報 (2020-06-17)「筆架山上直幡 『HK CAN'T BREATHE』」聞庫網站。網址: https://collection.news/appledaily/articles/7LHG4J3PQEJ3VRTLKQCDP7H5BU (2024.10.29 取用)。
明報 (2019-08-24) 「港九新界獅山人鏈延綿60公里 公布逾21萬人參與」明報新聞網。網址:https://shorturl.at/R9kjv (2024.10.29 取用)。
明報 (2020-01-02)「九成撐黃色經濟圈 市民倡擴大」LIHKG。網址: https://lihkg.com/thread/1807549/page/1 (2024.10.29 取用)。
明報 (2020-03-07) 「市民太古廣場悼念6.15墮斃梁凌杰」明報新聞網。網址:https://shorturl.at/xZmux (2024.10.29 取用)。
明報 (2020-06-15) 「大批市民太古廣場悼念梁凌杰 警方警告人群離開」明報新聞網。網址:https://shorturl.at/tzT89 (2024.10.29 取用)。
明報 (2019-08-31) 「獸醫界集會 抗議催淚煙傷害動物」明報加東網。網址: https://www.mingpaocanada.com/tor/htm/News/20190831/HK-gad3_r.htm (2024.10.29 取用)。
明周文化 (2019-12-27) 「香港地圖:催淚彈遍地開花」明周文化。網址:https://shorturl.at/G7XTe (2024.10.29 取用)。
明周文化 (2019-12-27) 「個案記錄 市民吃催淚氣體的日子」明周文化。網址: https://shorturl.at/zNjdf (2024.10.29 取用)。
香港 01 (2019-06-15)「催淚煙困中信大廈 中年男憶千人『生死一刻』」香港 01 網站。網址: https://www.hk01.com/突發/341093/逃犯條例-催淚煙困中信大廈-中年男憶千人-生死一刻 (2023.03.06 取用)
香港 01 (2019-06-15)「反修例黃衣男太古廣場危站五小時墮地 送院不治」 香港 01。網址: https://www.hk01.com/article/341018?utm_source=01articlecopy&utm_medium=referral (2024.10.29 取用)。
香港 01(2019-06-23)「記錄612衝突瞬間,重組示威者警方攻防時序」香港 01 網站。 網址: https://www.hk01.com/社會新聞/343590/逃犯條例-多圖-記錄612衝突瞬間-重組示 威者 警方攻防時序(2023.03.06 取用)
香港 01 (2020-04-24)「五一勞動節 警方禁止及反對職工盟遊行和集會申請」香港 01。網址: https://www.hk01.com/article/465305?utm_source=01articlecopy&utm_medium=referral 2024.10.29 取用)。
香港 01 (2020-05-01)「五一黃金周 多區『黃店』食肆現人龍」香港01。網址: https://www.hk01.com/article/467847?utm_source=01articlecopy&utm_medium=referral (2024.10.29 取用)。
香港 01 (2020-07-01)「港版國安法:警方首次舉「紫旗」警告港獨又號 盤點警7種顏色旗」香港 01 網站。網址:https://www.hk01.com/突發/492660/港版國安法-警方首次舉-紫旗-警告港 獨又號-盤點警7種顏色旗 (2023.01.04 取用)
香港 01 (2020-11-27)「警方6月至今用約萬枚催淚彈 11.12中大及多區衝突單日最多佔兩成」香 港 01 網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/c2CFy (2023.01.04 取用)
香港電台 (2019-09-11)「研究指催淚煙化學物質可殘留2至3星期飄離約250米」。Yahoo 新聞。網址:https://shorturl.at/VvH0o (2024.10.29 取用)。
眾新聞 (2019-09-11)「化學工程師:催淚彈化學物殘留在社區3周」。Yahoo 新聞。網址:https://shorturl.at/bEV2w (2024.10.29 取用)。
大學線 (2019-12-21)「催淚煙霧裏 動物也自危」。U-Beat Magazine。網址: https://ubeat.com.cuhk.edu.hk/145-pet/ (2024.10.29 取用)。
窩窩(2019-11-18)「烽火連天,香港抗爭下無處可逃的動物們」。WUOWUO。網址:https://wuo-wuo.com/report/issue/1066-pray-for-hk-animals-191118 (2024.10.29 取用)。
獨立媒體 (2021-12-25)「拒用『安心』堂食 港人FB組團野餐:小事先要堅持,唔合理就唔好做」。獨立媒體網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/d4HTs (2024.10.29 取用)。
法庭線 (2022-06-14)「涉染疫後往『藍店』播毒 男子認 11 罪還押候判 警查 Fb 、安心出行紀錄偵破」。法庭線網站。網址:https://shorturl.at/nEAEJ (2024.10.29 取用)。
轉角國際 (2019-06-17)「反送中的「抗爭背包」:香港示威者的街頭物資清單」轉角國際網站。 網址: https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/ 8664/3876893(2023.01.04 取用)
轉角國際(2019-12-31)「被遺忘的報導:香港「反送中抗爭」,後來呢?」轉角國際網站。網址: https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/4259558(2023.01.04 取用)
晴報(2019-06-20)「示威者用水淋熄催淚彈揚威國際 外媒讚簡單有效 或致警方升級」晴報網站。網址: https://skypost.ulifestyle.com.hk/ (2023.01.04 取用)
加拿大星島日報 (2019-12-17)「溫市『催淚彈聖誕樹』 掛黃雨衣悼港示威者」星島新聞網。網址: https://www.singtao.ca/googleamp/amp.php?region=toronto_hk&cat=52&post_id=39836 27 (2024.10.29 取用)。
東網 (2019.09.10)「修例風波︰香港對伊朗世盃外圍賽 逾百球迷高歌撐港隊」東網。網址: https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20190910/bkn-20190910191310997-0910_00822_001. html (2024.10.29 取用)。
東網 (2019.11.27)「修例風波:調查指逾千童對催淚煙有不良反應」東網。網址: https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20191127/bkn-20191127173858088-1127_00822_001. html (2024.10.29 取用)。
文匯報 (2020-06-03)「警方呼籲市民避免群組聚集 明日盡量留家」文匯快訊。網址: http://news.wenweipo.com/2020/06/03/IN2006030095.htm (2024.10.29 取用)。
紐約時報 (2019-09-16)「《願榮光歸香港》:屬於香港抗議者的『國歌』」紐約時報中文網。網址:https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20190916/glory-to-hong-kong-anthem/zh-hant/ (2024.10.29 取用)。
自由時報 (2019-06-17)「遊行人數200萬+1人創奇蹟!民陣︰+1是為了...」自由時報網站。網址:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/2824437 (2024.10.29 取用)。
自由時報 (2019-06-17)「聲援香港! 『FREE HONG KONG』人體排字震撼台北」自由時報網站。網址:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2881122 (2024.10.29 取用)。
自由時報(2019-08-24)「反送中網球王子是你?示威者拿球拍回擊催淚彈」自由時報網站。網址:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/2895131(2023.01.04 取用)
自由時報(2019-09-13)「港多地自築人鏈唱和反送中」自由時報網站。網 址: https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/1317574 (2023.01.04 取用)
香港特別行政區政府 (2019-11-20)「無文獻顯示催淚煙致二噁英中毒」政府新聞網。網址: https://www.news.gov.hk/chi/2019/11/20191120/20191120_170959_237.html(2024.10.29 取用)
香港特別行政區政府 (2019-12-04)「立法會十八題:催淚彈殘留物對健康的影響新聞公報。網址:https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201912/04/P2019120400259.htm (2024.10.29 取用)
香港特別行政區政府 (2020-01-22)「衞生防護中心調查輸入新型冠狀病毒感染高度懷疑個案」新聞公報。網址: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202001/22/P2020012200924.htm (2024.10.29 取用)
香港特別行政區政府 (2022-12-28)「社交距離措施取消 僅維持口罩令」政府新聞網。網址: https://www.news.gov.hk/chi/2022/12/20221228/20221228_164708_966.html (2024.10.29 取用)。
端傳媒 (2020-07-27)「重磅影片:超過16000枚催淚彈,給香港留下了什麽?」端傳媒。網址:https://theinitium.com/article/20200728-hongkong-video-live-with-tear-gas (2024.10.29 取用)。
端傳媒香港組 (2020-06-04)「不一樣的六四集會:燭光遍佈全港,人們為香港抗爭而歌」Yahoo 新聞。網址:https://shorturl.at/NaxaQ (2024.10.29 取用)。
報道者 (2019-11-12)「香港中文大學成煙硝戰場:港警衝入校園射催淚彈,全日至少51傷」報道者。網址: https://www.twreporter.org/a/hong-kong-extradition-law-12-november-protests-in-cuhk-campus (2024.10.29 取用)。
華僑日報(1991-02-28)「因賭債問題講數成導火綫 白石營船民兩度厮殺 施放八十催淚彈鎮壓 防暴警察奉召增援徹夜搜營」華僑日報。網址: https://archive.org/details/NPWK19910228 (2024.10.29 取用)
楊友仁 (2019-10-20)「《願榮光歸香港》何以動人?一個音樂社會學的分析視角」端傳媒。網址:https://theinitium.com/article/20191021-hongkong-glory-to-hk-song (2024.10.29 取用)。
劉細良(2019-08-26)「智慧燈柱倒下 政府公信力崩潰」聞庫網站。網址:https://collection.news/ appledaily/articles/XULHAQBWCTMZHC2AOYZG2K37DM (2023.01.04 取用)
侯志仁 (2020-01-10)「Be Water 如水一般的公共空間:向香港反送中運動學習」眼底城事。網址:https://eyesonplace.net/2020/01/10/13585/ (2024.10.29 取用)。
蔡友月 (2020-05-14)「想象的病毒共同體:全球 vs 台灣生物民族主義之戰」報道者。網址: https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-covid-19-imagined-communities (2024.10.29 取用)。
何桂藍(2020-05-07)「同呼吸 共命運」何桂藍臉書專頁。網址: https://shorturl.at/RZV0A (2024.10.29 取用)。
沃草(2019)「我係香港人:2019 反送中催淚彈下的一國兩制」沃草網站。網址: https://watchout.tw/projects/hongkonger/ (2023.01.04 取用)
羅淑敏 (2010)。從報章標題看越南船民在香港的歷史(1975-2000)。嶺南大學電子文庫。網址:https://commons.ln.edu.hk/proj_data/1 (2023.01.04 取用)
香港舊照片(2014-10-14)「催淚彈使用的歷史統計」香港舊照片網站。網址: https://oldhkphoto.com/lachrymatorybomb/ (2023.01.04 取用)
BBC News 中文 (2019-09-15)「《願榮光歸香港》成反送中歌曲 創作人:讓運動重拾活力」Youtube。網址:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdFeAsS5FNE (2024.10.29 取用)
BBC News 中文 (2020-03-28)「肺炎疫情:BBC 記者眼中的歐洲各國抗疫與隔離」BBC。網址:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-52064479 (2024.10.29 取用)
BCgame Channel (2019-09-12)「《願榮光歸香港》管弦樂團及合唱團版 MV」Youtube。網址:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMA12IAoOmE (2024.10.29 取用)。
Black & White (2019-09-14)「願榮光歸香港 912各區大合唱」Youtube。網址: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKnwRtqnfv8 (2024.10.29 取用)。
ChiMusic HONGKONGER (2019-09-30)「《願榮光歸香港》 中樂合奏及合唱團版 MV」Youtube。網址:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHOZuIO5G2s (2024.10.29 取用)。
Dgx music (2019-08-31)「《願榮光歸香港》初版」Youtube。網址:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7yRDOLCy4Y0 (2024.10.29 取用)。
Dgx music (2019-09-25)「《願榮光歸香港》 多國合唱版」Youtube。網址: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y5JOd7jWqk:(2024.10.29 取用)。
Matches(2021),「未有忘記音樂敬拜者的身分」,收錄於王少勇主編(2021),《無能的同在》(頁 26-30),加拿大:Vancouver Christians for Love, Peace and Justice。
now 新聞(2020-06-30)「警方去年 612 中信大廈外放催淚彈司法覆核第二日聆訊」now 新聞網站。網址:https://news.now.com/home/local/player?newsId=396222 (2023.01.04 取用)
Unwire (2019-08-23)「港人開發《WhatsGap》地圖App 找出附近罷食餐廳位置」Unwire 網址:https://unwire.hk/2019/08/23/whatsgap/software/android-app/ (2024.10.29 取用)。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97417-
dc.description.abstract二十一世紀以來,國家面對反全球化、反種族歧視、以及反威權擴張等社會運動,出現了許多採取使用催淚瓦斯等警治手段的案例。在這些都市抗議場域,抗議者沉浸於一種特殊毒性大氣環境,以及高亢警民衝突政治氛圍。本論文以香港流水革命 (2019-2020) 爲例,主張激進社會運動爆發過程會產生身體動作和都市移動的政治性,並對都市氛圍及抗議者產生持續的共同風化效應。內容將分為兩大部分。
第一部分會考慮口述歷史、媒體和筆者的訪談資料,從特定事件與場所重構流水革命參與者與國家大氣暴力相遇的過程,從三個角度理解「運動」的政治意涵:(一)抗議者身體緊密地與都市環境和元素糾纏起來。當身體遭遇國家化學暴力,群眾會逃逸、聚散和抵抗,溢出警戒框定的空間界線與交通模式。(二)面對化學暴力,示威者發展出多樣化的活動方式進行抵抗。隨著流水革命展開,日常移動載具、用品和運動商品被參與者挪用和轉化為充滿政治意涵的抵抗物質。(三)在都市衝突下遊走的身體,往往具有特殊的地勢挑戰。參與者在「運動」中身處不同位置,會產生差異化的風險和空間知識。他們之間激發了一種暫時性,卻黏著的團隊紐帶。
第二部分通過對抗議事件目錄的資料進行整理和分析,考察在更長時間幅度,因應催淚瓦斯、新冠肺炎疫情等大氣擾動事件而蔓延的威權政治氛圍,如何與運動參與者的身體共同風化,形塑他們的抗議風格及軌跡。透過風化的概念和情動理論的嫁接,本文分析了病毒爆發前後都市環境的變化,以及示威者面對大氣擾動,與國家暴力和病毒大氣一起風化的眾多方式,包括唱歌、悼念、集體現身與呼吸調適。這些身體美學實踐展示了抗議者如何在日漸嚴酷的都市氛圍中獲得政治覺醒,同時試圖讓流水革命在被政府抹除的危險中持存。
透過激進社會運動中的情動及具身視角,本文主張「運動」本身除了具有公民參與,推動體制變革的社會意義,也包含身體的移動、動作和練習,與都市大氣/氛圍共同風化的物理-情動面向。這樣橋接「運動」的社會意義與物理意義,清楚說明抗議者不只是被框限於預設的集會遊行空間,而是會外延和曝露於大氣下發聲。甚至這樣沉浸式身體感擴展抗議政治的空間性,更有其時間延展效應,會後續對抗議者日常生活節奏和實踐產生實質改變。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, global use of tear gas against participants in social movements has intensified, reflecting the rise of atmospheric policing as a means of crowd control. Within this form of state violence, protesters are immersed in toxic physical environments and intense political atmospheres shaped by urban conflict. This thesis uses the Hong Kong Be-water Revolution (2019–2020) as a case study to examine how radical social movements generate a politics of bodily exercise and mobility. It also explores how these movements engage in a process of weathering, a long-term entanglement between protesters and urban atmosphere that reshapes both material-affective conditions and embodied experiences of dissent.
The thesis is organized in two parts. The first draws on oral histories, media reports, and interviews to reconstruct how participants encountered atmospheric policing and state-deployed chemical violence. It considers the physical and political dimensions of movement from three perspectives: (1) bodily encounters with atmospheric policing and a tear gas-filled urban environment; (2) repurposing of everyday objects into resistant matters; and (3) navigation of contested terrain through differentiated risk and spatial knowledge.
The second part analyzes a catalog of protest events to explore how the Be-water Revolution co-evolved with an authoritarian atmosphere intensified by tear gas and the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on affect theory and the concept of weathering, it examines affective practices such as singing, mourning, breathing attunements, and withdrawal as forms of somaesthetic resistance that sustain protesters’ political awareness and solidarity, even under the threat of erasure.
Overall, this thesis proposes an expanded understanding of movement, not only as sustained collective action aimed at institutional and broader societal change, but also as physical movement involving kinesthetic intelligence and embodied experience of how bodies navigate conflict-ridden urban atmospheres. These affective encounters extend the spatiality of protest and, over time, transform the everyday lives and mobilities of those who resist.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-06-05T16:10:56Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-06-05T16:10:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii
摘要 v
Abstract vi
目次 vii
圖次 viii
表次 ix
第一章 前言與研究目的 1
第二章 文獻回顧與研究方法 6
2.1社會運動的多重空間性 7
2.2大氣警戒與抗議身體 10
2.3 研究社會運動的具身取徑 13
2.4糾纏的歷史線緒:香港的大氣警戒與社會騷動 15
2.5研究方法 21
第三章 流水革命的身體動作及移動性政治 29
3.1同呼吸:穿行於香港流水革命的都市氛圍 29
3.2六一二事件:與催淚瓦斯及警治氛圍相遇… 30
3.3共命運:拼裝反抗物質與召喚抗議氛圍 37
3.4兄弟爬山:社會運動作為熟練身體動作及戰略移動 44
3.5重新概念化社會運動:伴隨思考與認知的身體作為 58
3.6小結:橋接「運動」的雙重意義 60
第四章 與催淚瓦斯和新冠肺炎一起風化 62
4.1兩種激發抗議的動盪大氣/氛圍:催淚瓦斯與新冠肺炎 62
4.2催淚圍城:遭受毒氣風化的香港都市環境 66
4.3抗議的身體美學:儀式、疊歌與情感轉化 84
4.4病毒蔓延:持續擾動的都市環境 100
4.5呼吸的維安化:新冠肺炎爆發期間的大氣分隔 106
4.6小結:都市大氣/氛圍與身體的風化政治 115
第五章 結論 123
參考文獻 127
附錄一:訪談大綱 146
附錄二:香港示威者基本裝備 149
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject運動zh_TW
dc.subject呼吸身體zh_TW
dc.subject量體zh_TW
dc.subject移動性zh_TW
dc.subject風化zh_TW
dc.subject抗議政治zh_TW
dc.subjectweatheringen
dc.subjectmovementen
dc.subjectcontentious politicsen
dc.subjectbreathing bodiesen
dc.subjectvolumeen
dc.subjectmobilityen
dc.title香港流水革命的大氣/氛圍政治: 從「運動」及「風化」兩個理論視角切入zh_TW
dc.titleAtmospheric Politics of Hong Kong’s Be-water Revolution: Theoretical Perspectives on Movement and Weatheringen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee何明修;陳重仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeMing-sho Ho;Chung-jen Chenen
dc.subject.keyword抗議政治,運動,風化,移動性,量體,呼吸身體,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcontentious politics,movement,weathering,mobility,volume,breathing bodies,en
dc.relation.page153-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202500997-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-05-28-
dc.contributor.author-college理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept地理環境資源學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-06-06-
Appears in Collections:地理環境資源學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-113-2.pdf5.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved