請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97103完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 畢恆達 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Herng-Dar Bih | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡哲豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Che-Hao Hu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-27T16:12:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-28 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-27 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王俊豪（2013）〈高山原住民部落因應氣候變遷之農業調適策略〉。《台灣農業學會報》，14（5），491-505。
田靈生（2014）〈萬興關碑：清朝推行漢化政策的遺跡〉。《原住民族文獻》，13，10-11。 台邦．撒沙勒（2011）〈生態保育、在地發展與遷村：山林守護在西魯凱的實踐經驗〉。《台灣原住民族研究學報》，1（3），145-174。 台邦．撒沙勒（2012）〈災難、遷村與社會脆弱性：古茶波安的例子〉。《臺灣人類學刊》，10，51-92。 江樹生（2003）《熱蘭遮城日誌第三冊》。臺南市政府。 江冠榮（2010）〈布農族傳統建築家屋選址之智慧〉。《台灣原住民研究論叢》，8，85-116。 官大偉（2011）〈國土計畫、原住民族自治與原住民族土地權之落實〉。《台灣原住民族研究學報》，1（3），123-143。 官大偉（2012）〈「原住民族土地專刊」專題導言〉。《文化研究雙月報》，132，15-16。 官大偉（2013）〈原住民生態知識與流域治理:以泰雅族Mrqwang 群之人河關係為例〉。《地理學報》，70，69-105。 官大偉（2014）〈原住民族土地權的挑戰：從一個當代保留地交易的區域研究談起〉。《考古人類學刊》，80，7-52。 官大偉、戴秀雄（2019）《國土計畫法下城鄉整合治理之研究-國土計劃法下原住民族地區的機會與 挑戰:原住民規劃本土認識論與方法論探討》。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。 李展平（2005）《前進婆羅洲-台籍戰俘監視員》。國史館台灣文獻館。 林全信（2003）〈老兵札記〉。《耕心週刊》，378。 吳密察（2017）〈臺灣總督府「土地調查事業（1898-1905）」 的展開及其意義〉。《師大臺灣史學報》，10，5-35。 吳杰穎、陳亮全（2020）〈原住民傳統生態智慧與部落災害韌性〉。《防救科技與管理學刊》，9（2），33-50。 宋彥廷（2020）《原住民傳統生態知識中之颱風韌性-以高雄市桃源區荖濃溪周 邊聚落為例》。國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 李根政（2010.03.01）〈誰是山林破壞者？論國土復育政策〉。地球公民基金會。https://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/2833 近藤正己（2014）《總力戰與臺灣：日本殖民地的崩潰（上）（下）》（林詩庭譯）。國立臺灣大學出版中心。 邱馨慧（2001）《家、物與階序：以一個排灣社會為例》。國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。 松擇員子（1986）〈東部排灣族之家族與親族：以ta-tjaran一條路的概念為中心〉。張燕秋譯。黃應貴（編）《臺灣土著社會文化研究論文集》（頁445-478）。中央研究院民族學研究所。 洪馨蘭（2019）《屏東農業百年史及淺談水資源》。屏東縣政府。 張松（1953）《臺灣山地行政要論》。正中書局。 康培德（2009）〈離島淨空與平原移住：荷蘭東印度公司的臺灣原住民聚落遷移政策〉。《新史學》，20，99-126。 康培德（2018）〈荷蘭東印度公司在臺灣的紀念性地名〉。《成大歷史學報》，50，1-21。 葉高華（2013）〈日本時代集團移住對原住民社會網絡的影響：新高郡的案例〉。《臺灣文獻》，64（1），105-127。 葉高華（2017a）〈從山地到山腳：排灣族與魯凱族的社會網絡與集體遷村〉。《臺灣史研究》，24（1），125-170。 葉高華（2017b）〈分而治之：日本時代原住民的集團移住〉。《臺灣學通訊》，99，22-23。 葉高華（2017c）〈部落土地重疊的歷史根源〉。《原住民族文獻》，31，38-43。 葉高華（2023）《強制移住：臺灣高山原住民的分與離》。國立臺灣大學出版中心。 葉神保（2002）《排灣族caqovoqovolj（內文）社群遷徙與族群關係的探討》。國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所碩士論文。 孫稚堤、顏愛靜（2012）〈流域治理與土地倫理之研究-以石門水庫上游集水區的原住民族部落為例〉。《地理學報》，66，21-51。 黃舒楣、張宇忻、胡哲豪Valagas Gadeljeman（2021）〈臺灣紅藜新興經濟中的「小農」製造？災後離鄉的原住民農產業參與及困境〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》，119，1-65。 黃清琦（2013）〈牡丹社事件的地圖史料與空間探索（上）〉。《原住民族文獻》，8，4-27。 徐雅慧、戴永禔（2006）〈布農族小米文化與生態的關係〉。《設計學研究》，9（1），63-74。 陳文玲（2012）〈莫拉克風災後嘉蘭村的重建：一個災害人類學的研究〉。《華人應用人類學學刊》，1，157-173。 畢恆達（2020）《教授為什麼沒告訴我》。小畢空間出版社。 臺南市政府（2003）《熱蘭遮城日誌第三冊》（江樹生譯）。臺南市文化局文化資產課。 臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課（2011） 《高砂族調查書蕃社概況》（中央研究院民族學研究所編譯）。中央研究院。 臺灣省行政長官公署（1946）〈高山族施政研究會舉行時間通知案〉《高山族研究會議》。國史館臺灣文獻館藏。 臺灣省級機關（1946）〈臺灣省政府山地行政指導委員會組織章程修正送核案〉《民政廳山地行政處組織規則》。國史館臺灣文獻館藏。 臺灣省行政長官公署（1946）《高山族戶口調查》。國史館臺灣文獻館。 蔡石山（2011）《海洋臺灣：歷史上與東西洋的交接》。聯經。 蔣斌（1984）《重修台灣省通志屏東縣志－卷七同冑志》。 Adger, W. N., Pulhin, J. M., Barnett, J., Dabelko, G. D., Hovelsrud, G. K., & Levy, M. (2014). Human security. Cambridge University Press. Alfred, T. (1999). Peace, power, righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. Oxford University Press. Anthias, P. (2016). Ch’ixi landscapes: Indigeneity and capitalism in the Bolivian Chaco. Geoforum, 82, 268-275. Anthias, P. (2018). Limits to decolonization: Indigeneity, territory, and hydrocarbon politics in the Bolivian. Cornell University Press. Alexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press. Anaya, J. (1996). Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford University Press. The Anchorage Declaration (2009). Declaration agreed by consensus of the participants in the indigenous peoples' global summit on climate change. The Author. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/168.pdf. Barcham, M. (1998). The challenge of urban maori: Reconciling conceptions of indigeneity and social change. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 39(3), 303-314. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis. Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards, 41, 283-295. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications,10(5), 1251-1262. Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2012). Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach, society & natural resources. Society & Natural Resources, 26(1), 5-20. Bonds, A. & Inwood, J. (2015). Beyond white privilege: Geographies of white supremacy and settler colonialism. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 715-733. Bryan, J. (2009). Where would we be without them? Knowledge, space and power in indigenous politics. Futures, 41, 24-32. Byrd, J.A. & Rothberg, M. (2011). Between subalternity and indigeneity. Interventions, 13(1), 1-12. Cameron, E., Leeuw, D. S. & Desbiens, C. (2014). Indigeneity and ontology. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 19-26. Coppola, D. P. (2011). Introduction to international disaster management (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann Press. Cuny, F. C. (1983). Disasters and development. Oxford University Press. Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch'ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95-109. Cutter, L. S., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008a). Community and regional resilience: Perspectives from hazards, disasters, and emergency management. Community and Regional Resilience Initiative (CAARI) Institute Press. Cutter, S., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008b). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 598-606. Emergency Management Australia. (2004). Emergency management in Australia. Concepts and principles. Emergency Management Australia Press. Erikson, C. & Hankins, D. L. (2015). Colonisation and fire: Gendered dimensions of indigenous fire knowledge retention and revival. In A. Coles, L. Gray, & J. Momsen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development (pp. 129-137). Routledge. Gaillard, J. C. (2007). Resilience of traditional societies in facing natural hazards. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(4), 522-544. Glavovic, B. C. (2010). The role of land-use planning in disaster risk reduction: An introduction to perspectives from Australasia. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2101(1), 1-22. Hallenbeck, J., Krebs, M., Hunt, S., Goonewardena, K., Kipfer, S. A., Pasternak, S., & Coulthard, G. S. (2016). Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. The AAG Review of Books, 4(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2325548X.2016.1146013 Harris, L. D. & Wasilewski, J. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: Four R’s (Relationship, Responsibility, Reciprocity, Redistribution) vs. two P’s (Power and Profit). Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(5), 489-503. Hewitt, K. (1983). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Routledge. Hirsch, E. (2016). Mediating indigeneity: Public space and the making of political identity in Peru. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39(1), 95-109. Hodder, I. (2012). The present past: An introduction to anthropology for archeologists. Pen & Sword Archaeology Press. Jones, N., Staff, F. H., Wadsworth, J. F., Adams, P., Holmgren, L. H., & Jimenez, S. (2012). The importance of indigenous knowledge and good governance to ensuring effective public participation in environmental impact assessments. Environmental Science Press. Kalland, A. (2000). Indigenous knowledge: Prospects and limitations. In A. Bicker, R. Ellen, & P. Parkes (Eds.), Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations: Critical anthropological perspectives (pp. 319-336). Routledge. Kaomea, J. (2004). Indigenous studies in the elementary curriculum: A cautionary Hawaiian example. University of Melbourne Press. Kincheloe, J. L. & Steinberg, S. L. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 135-156). Sage. Kobayashi, A. & Leeuw, D.S. (2010). Colonialism and tensioned landscapes of indigeneity. In S. J. Smith et al. (Eds.), The handbook of social geographies (pp. 118-138). Sage. Koike, O. & Payyappallimanai, U. (2010). Traditional knowledge for sustainable development: A case from the health sector in Kerala, India. Global Environmental Research, 14, 167-175. Layfield, D. (2008). Marxism and environmental crises. Bury St. Edmunds Press. Leeuw, S. D. (2016). Tender grounds: Intimate visceral violence and British Columbia’s colonial geographies. Political Geographies, 52, 14-23. Leeuw, S. D. & Greenwood, M. (2015). Geographies of indigenous children and youth: A critical review grounded in spaces of the colonial nation-state. Space, Place and Environment, 134(1), 1-19. Lobo, S. & Hammer, P. (1984). Working commission reports: Second Conference of Indian Nationals and organization of South America. South American Indian Information Center Press. Lyall, A. & Valdivia, G. (2015). The entanglements of oil extraction and sustainability in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Routledge. Maaka, R. C. A. (1994). The new tribe: Conflicts and continuities in the social organisation of urban Maori. The Contemporary Pacific, 6(2), 311-336. Maaka, R. C. A. (1997). The politics of diaspora. ‘Treaty of Waitangi: Maori political representation future challenges’ Conference. Macchi, M, Oviedo, G., Gotheil, S., Cross, K., Boedhihartono, A., & Wolfangel, C. (Eds.). (2008). Indigenous and traditional peoples and climate change international union for the conservation of nature. Political Science Pres. Maru, T. Y., Smith, S. M., Sparrow, A., Pinho, F. P. & Dube, P. O. (2014). A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Global Environmental Change, 28, 337-350. Maskrey, A. (1989). Disaster mitigation: A community based approach. Oxfam. Mauro, F. & Hardison, P. (2000). Traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities: International debate and policy initiatives traditional ecological knowledge. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1263-1269. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P. & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. Melbourne, H. (1995). Maori sovereignty: The Maori perspective. Hodder Moa Beckett Press. Metge, J. (1964). A new Maori migration: Rural and urban relations in northern New Zealand. The Athalone Press. Micah, F., Morton, Wang, J. & Li, H. (2016). Decolonizing methods: Akha articulations of indigeneity in the Upper Mekong Region. Asian Ethnicity, 17(4), 580-595. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). Epistemic disobedience and the decolonial option: A manifesto. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 2–5. Munzer, S. R. (2019). Dam(n) displacement: Compensation, resettlement, and indigeneity. Cornell International Law Journal, 51(3), 823-895. Nakashima, D., Galloway, M., Thulstrup, H., Castillo, R., & Rubis, J. (2012). Weathering uncertainty: Traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and daptation. Paris and Darwin Press . Nelson, R. D., Adger, N. W. & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 395-419. Newton, J. (1995). An assessment of coping with environmental hazards in Northern aboriginal communities. The Canadian Geography/Le Geographe canadien, 39(2), 112-120. Newton, J., Paci, J. D. C. & Ogden, A. (2005). Climate change and natural hazards in Northern Canada: Integrating indigenous perspectives with government policy. Migration and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 10, 541-571. Norris, J. M. & Clatworthy, S. (2011). Urbanization and migration 286patterns of aboriginal populations in Canada: A half Century in review. Aboriginal Policy Studies, 1(1), 13-77. Oliver-Smith, A. (2002). Theorizing disasters: Nature, power, and culture. In S. Hoffman, & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe & culture (pp. 23-47). School of American Research Press. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. Radcliffe, S. A. (2015). Dilemmas of difference: Indigenous women and the limits of postcolonial development policy. Duke University Press. Radcliffe, S. A. (2017). Geography and indigeneity I: Indigeneity, coloniality and knowledge. Human Geography, 41(2), 220-229. Radcliffe, S. A. (2018). Geography and indigeneity II: Critical geographies of indigenous bodily politics. Human Geography, 42(3), 436-445. Radcliffe, S. A. (2019). Geography and indigeneity III: Co-articulation of colonialism and capitalism in indigeneity’s economies. Human Geography, 44(2), 374-388. Ranginui, W. (1989a). Maori identity. In Novitz, D. & Wilmott, B. (Eds), Culture and identity in New Zealand. GP Books Press. Sainte, M. B. (1998). Woven by the grandmothers: Nineteenth-Century Navajo textiles from the National Museum of the American Indian. American Anthropologist, 100(4), 999-1005. Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6(2), 151-166. Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the border of settler states. Duke University Press. Stea, D. & Wisner, B. (1984). The fourth world. Antipode, 16(2), 3-12. Stoler, A. L. (2016) Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Duke University Press. Takeuchi, Y. & Shaw, R. (2008) Traditional flood disaster reduction measures in Japan. In R. Shaw, N. Uy, & J. Baumwoll (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge for disaster risk reduction (pp. 23-26). United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Press. Tallbear, K. (2007). Narratives of race and indigeneity in the Genographic Project. The Journal of Law, 35(3), 412-424. Tallbear, K. (2013) Genomic articulations of indigeneity. Social Studies of Science 43(4), 509-533. Taylor, A. J. (1978). Assessment of victim needs. Disasters, 3(1), 24-31. Twigg, J. (2004). Disaster risk reduction: Mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency planning. Humanitarian Practice Network Press. United Nations University. (2013). Why traditional knowledge holds the key to climate change? The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). http://unu.edu/publications/articles/why-traditional-knowledge-holds-the-key-to-climate-change.html UNISDR. (2009). 2009 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. UNISDR. Veracini, L. (2015). The settler colonial present. Palgrave Macmillan Press. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters (2 ed.). Routledge. Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 369–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623520601056240 World Bank. (2016). Indigenous Latin America in the Twenty-first century. World Bank Press. Worthen, H. (2015). Indigenous women’s political participation: Gendered labor and collective rights paradigms in Mexico. Gender and Society, 29(6), 914-936. Zulfadrim, Z., Toyoda, Y., & Kanegae, H. (2019). The integration of indigenous knowledge for disaster risk reduction practices through scientific knowledge: cases from Mentawai islands, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Management, 2(1), 1-12. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97103 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究不僅關注屏東縣隘寮山胞墾區的家戶遷徙、調適與原住民性的變遷，更進一步探討不同統治政權如何通過政策與權力機制「再承繼」及「再深化」殖民統治。本研究指出，臺灣即使進入民主化世代，統治者在原住民政策中的思維與實踐依然未解殖（decolonizing），導致「原住民性」（indigeneity）的持續弱化，並限制文化延續的可能性。本研究在第一部分聚焦於1930年代日本治臺時期，探討排灣族與魯凱族Raval、Vuculj、魯凱三個聚落群在墾殖開發中的治理機制，運用歷史檔案資料及耆老口述歷史指出統治者通過法令、政策與教化設施削弱原住民性的策略。研究進一步分析，因統治者對各部落的治理目標的差異，這些機制雖具延續性，但在實踐中卻因部落間的親屬關係、支配關係而呈現差異。
第二部分檢視國民黨統治者遷台初期至1960年代，對排灣族排灣族與魯凱族Raval、Vuculj、魯凱三個聚落群執行的墾殖政策，特別是在「屏東縣隘寮山胞墾區」實施山地平地化過程中，對聚落親屬關係、傳統規範制度與部落倫理的深遠影響，並強調將族人遷離原居地到平地的措施如何加劇世代創傷與原住民性的弱化。即使面對困境，外部組織臺灣基督教福利會如何與隘寮山胞墾區族人合作？並以文化規範及原住民知識系統來回應，以及由下而上的開展族群與部落之間的文化復振運動。最後，本研究反思這些歷史如何為當代政策設計提供啟示，主張通過將原住民知識與文化認同納入主流政策，實現真正的解殖（decolonization），以促進原住民文化與社會的可持續發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study not only focuses on household migration, adaptation, and the transformation of indigeneity in the I-Liao Indigenous Cultivation Area of Pingtung County but also further explores how different ruling regimes have "re-inherited" and "deepened" colonial rule through policies and power mechanisms. The research argues that despite Taiwan’s transition into a democratic era, the governance mindset and practices in Indigenous policies remain undetached from colonial frameworks, leading to the continued weakening of indigeneity and limiting the possibilities for cultural continuity.
The first part of this study examines governance mechanisms in the 1930s during Japanese colonial rule, focusing on the Paiwan and Rukai settlements of Raval, Vuculj, and the Rukai settlement group within the context of land cultivation and development. By utilizing historical archival materials and oral histories from elders, the study highlights the colonial rulers' strategies of weakening Indigenous identity through legal regulations, policies, and assimilation-oriented institutions. Further analysis reveals that while these governance mechanisms demonstrated continuity, their practical implementation varied due to differences in kinship ties and power relations among the settlements. The second part investigates the land cultivation policies imposed by the Kuomintang (KMT) government from its early rule in Taiwan to the 1960s, particularly their impact on the Paiwan and Rukai settlements within the I-Liao Indigenous Cultivation Area. It explores the far-reaching effects of the state-led “mountain-to-plains” relocation policy on kinship structures, traditional normative systems, and tribal ethics. The study underscores how the forced displacement of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands to lowland areas exacerbated intergenerational trauma and further weakened indigeneity. Amid these challenges, the research examines how external organizations, such as the Taiwan Christian Welfare Association, collaborated with the Indigenous residents of the I-Liao Indigenous Cultivation Area, responding with cultural norms and Indigenous knowledge systems. Additionally, it highlights the emergence of grassroots cultural revitalization movements that sought to reconnect Indigenous groups and tribal communities. Finally, this study reflects on how these historical experiences can inform contemporary policy design. It advocates for the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge and cultural identity within mainstream policies to achieve genuine decolonization and promote the sustainable development of Indigenous cultures and societies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-27T16:12:27Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-27T16:12:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝 辭 i
中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目 次 vi 圖 次 ix 表 次 xi 第一章 導言 1 一、 前言 1 二、 精通五種語言的耆老 6 三、 傳統領袖家譜系統作為搬遷決策 9 四、 文獻回顧與評述 13 （一） 我是誰，攸關我如何看待這個世界 14 （二） 為何需要原民性的理論概念 16 （三） 原民性應用在哪些領域 20 （四） 原民性在其他領域的發展 24 五、 Indigeneity理論與原住民知識理論的對話 26 第二章 田野研究範圍與方法 30 一、 田野研究範圍 31 二、 研究空間與歷史範圍確認 39 三、 研究方法與田野概述 40 四、 以不同身分進入田野參與觀察 49 五、 半結構式訪談 54 六、 檔案與已出版文獻 54 第三章 從山地到「淺山」Raval、魯凱與Vuculj聚落群的社會網路與動遷（1931-1945） 61 一、 前言 61 二、 誰是總頭目 66 三、 從山上移住到山腳下：搬遷新村落「ワカバ若葉社」 78 四、 暴風雨前的寧靜：下淡水溪堤防整治計畫 84 五、 小結 92 第四章 從山地到「平地」戰後初期Raval、魯凱與Vuculj三個亞群家戶移住隘寮墾區（1946-1966） 94 一、 前言 94 二、 從山地到平地—新的原住民村落「屏東隘寮山胞墾區」 101 三、 隘寮墾區的族人從哪裡來 107 四、 耕地、家屋、村落如何配置 111 五、 第三條支線是屬於誰的及對於水原民性的調適 113 六、 小結 126 第五章 隘寮山胞墾區重建方案的關鍵時期（1967-1969） 130 一、 前言 130 二、 臺灣基督教福利會援助隘寮山胞墾區重建計畫 140 三、 從國際組織、學術單位到地方教會單位 143 四、 隘寮墾區重建計畫中的原住民關鍵人物及原住民知識的融入 148 五、 小結 159 第六章 結論 163 一、 空間治理主權的弱化及傳統領域範圍模糊化 163 二、 隘寮墾區的內部社會問題及互助的機制的演變 167 三、 組織地方與重塑原民性機制 171 四、 組織關係、組織共識、組織地方 173 五、 延續與傳承 175 參考文獻 177 附錄一 田野觀察與受訪者一覽表 187 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 從山地到平地：「屏東縣隘寮山胞墾區」之遷徙歷程、調適與原民性轉變 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From the Mountains to the Plains: The Migration Process, Adaptation, and Transformation of Indigeneity in the I-Liao Indigenous Cultivation Area of Pingtung County | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 官大偉;戴秀雄;葉高華;黃舒楣 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Da-Wei Kuan;Hsiu-Hsiung Tai;Ko-Hua Yap;Shu-Mei Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 原民性,排灣族,魯凱族,原住民知識,移住政策, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Indigeneity,Paiwan,Rukai,Indigenous Knowledge,Relocation Policies, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 190 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500645 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-13 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-28 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 建築與城鄉研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 6.57 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。