請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96366完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 熊秉荃 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ping-Chuan Hsiung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王培根 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Ken Wang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-05T16:08:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-01-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 【中文部份】
Bukun Ismahasan Islituan（2014）。Na Asa Tadau Sumbang 我想要呼吸－從自我生命經驗暨其書寫探討布農族語文學創作。國立中正大學臺灣文學研究所碩士論文。 Campbell & Gregor（2012）為弱勢者畫權力地圖︰建制民族誌入門（王增勇、唐文慧、陳伯偉、許甘霖、徐畢卿、陳志軒、梁莉芳譯）。群學。（原作出版年：2004） Ciwang Teyra、黃炤愷、謝宛蓉（2021）。只想好好地生活：原住民同志之交織處境與因應策略。臺大社會工作學刊，43，1-53。 http://dx.doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr.202106_(43).0001 Earl Babbie（2013）。社會科學研究方法（林秀雲譯）。五南。（原作出版年：2012） Erving Goffman（2010）。污名：管理受損身分的筆記（曾凡慈譯）。群學。（原作出版年：1990） Solomon, Andrew（2020）。正午惡魔：憂鬱症的全面圖像（齊若蘭譯）。大家。（原作出版年：2002） 尤柏勛（2019）。離散之後：眷村族群的身分認同與精神主體建構。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文。 王秀萍（2018）。從破碎到重建：我與安置少女的同行路。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 王育瑜（2018）。身權公約關於身心障礙者「自立生活融入社區」的意涵。社區發展季刊，162，148-160。 王國羽（2009）。三種不同障礙類別之女性身心障礙者之生命經驗：由『女性』與『身心障礙』認同角度之詮釋。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，編號NSC 96-2629-H-194-001-MY2。 王國羽（2012）。ICF應用在健康資訊與身心障礙人口統計之意義。載於李英琪（主編），更好的改變，還是更多的限制？國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統（ICF）概念與運用。財團法人愛盲基金會。 王國羽（2017）。《The Disabled State》： 失能的治理與失控的政策： 檢閱臺灣身心障礙政策。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，5-10。 王國羽、林昭吟、張恒豪（2012）。障礙研究：理論與政策應用。臺北：巨流。 王培根（2019a）。〈從起心動念到走上街頭：三位身心障礙者參與障權運動經驗的敘事研究〉。「障礙作為一種社會壓迫：障礙政治與社會工作研討會論文」，台中：東海大學。 王培根（2019b）。〈與杖同行：談盲人的汙名、次文化與集體記憶〉，「2019臺灣大學與伊利諾大學社工系雙年國際研討會論文」，台北。 王維菁、楊榮宗、潘淑滿、張恒豪（2018）。媒介他者的正名政治：身心障礙與同志族群比較研究。傳播與社會學刊，44，49-83。 王增勇（2014）。後證照時期的台灣社會工作專業如何自我解殖？《玄奘社會科學學報》，12，1-18。 平英驊（2016）。布農族獵人的狩獵文化敘事：一個自傳式民族誌。國立中正大學臺灣文化碩士在職專班碩士論文。 田淑蘭（2016）。身心障礙運動的實踐與政治性探究：一個跨界反思的旅程。輔仁大學心理學系碩士論文。 全仲彥（2017）。臺灣基督長老教會與布農族都市原住民第二代身分認同之自我民族誌。中原大學宗教研究所碩士論文。 何粵東（2005）。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理學報，25，10-24。 何粵東（2009）。課程想像的自我民族誌：課程研究與實踐的自我經驗反思。國立中正大學課程研究所博士論文。 吳永毅（2010）。運動在他方：一個基進知識分子的工運自傳。香港中文大學應用社會科學系博士論文。 吳建昌、李舒中、林桂卉、林淑蓉、洪晨碩、陳嘉新、曾凡慈、湯家碩、黃嬡齡、楊添圍、蔡友月（2018）。不正常的人？臺灣精神醫學與現代性的治理。聯經。 吳惠慈（2013）。身心障礙者之身心障礙認同歷程－以肢體障礙者為例。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士論文。 吳嘉真（2014）。屏東縣三位不同族籍國民中學校長生命歷程之敘事分析。國立屏東教育大學教育行政學系研究所碩士論文。 呂思嫺、林雅容、邱大昕（2013）。臺灣女性視障按摩師的職業污名管理，身心障礙研究，11(2)，101-114。 李佳運（2018）。男言之隱－臺灣男同志的個體展演。國立臺灣師範大學運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。 李其峰（2003）。從「憂鬱」進入存在：「疾病」經驗的敘事與辯證。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 李彥柏（2018）。臺灣崑劇乾旦曲友的空間、性別與身體的跨越。國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。 李紀祥（2001）。時間－歷史－敘事。麥田。 李素楨（2009）。參與殘/障礙運動的變革知識：一位女瘸子的行動路徑。輔仁大學心理學系碩士論文。 周月清（2017）。去機構教養化與解放研究：身心障礙者服務及障礙研究。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，11-20。 周月清、彭淑芬、舒靜嫻、鄭芬芳（2004）。中途障礙社會模式介入與生活重建服務整合－伊甸、新事暨陽光服務方案為例，臺灣社會工作學刊，2，123-157。 周怡君（2011）。身心障礙者服務的正常化與個別化原則之迷思與再省思：以「身心障礙兒童與少年安置寄養家庭委託服務方案」為例。臺大社會工作學刊，24，87-133。http://dx.doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2011.24.03 周怡君（2017）。制度化障礙者的生活樣貌：福利國家與身心障礙者政策。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，52-57。 周倩如（2017）。學術會議如何支持障礙者？。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，29-32。 易君珊（2016）。障礙文化與社會正義：博物館無障礙可及性服務的實踐與服務關係中的權力議題。博物館與文化，12，5-41。 林俐（2015）。從衝撞、蛻變到實踐－我在精神醫療長照機構的二十寒暑。慈濟大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 林昭吟、鄭雅之、張恒豪（2018）。當「不標準的病人」遇到醫療專業體制：身心障礙者就醫經驗的質化分析。臺大社會工作學刊，38，99-145。http://dx.doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr.201812_(38).0003 林惠芳（2019）。陪同障礙者的倡導路－從專業到附權的過程。「障礙作為一種社會壓迫：障礙政治與社會工作研討會論文」，台中：東海大學。 林駿杰、張恒豪（2020）。什麼是「障礙研究」？英美的理論發展、建制化與臺灣本土化歷程。人文及社會科學集刊，32(4)，645–691。 邱大昕（2008）。「殘障設施」的由來：視障者行動網絡建構過程分析。《科技醫療與社會》，6，21~67。https://doi.org/10.6464/TJSSTM.200804.0021 邱大昕（2009）。被忽略的歷史事實：從視障者工作演變看大法官釋字第六四九號解釋。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，13（2），55-86。 邱大昕（2011）。〈誰是身心障礙者－從身心障礙鑑定的演變看「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」（ICF）的實施〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，15(2)，187-213。 邱大昕（2012）。〈為什麼需要女性主義身心障礙研究〉，《婦研縱橫》，96，16-24。 邱大昕（2013a）。〈誰是盲人：臺灣現代盲人的鑑定、分類與構生〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，16，11-48。 邱大昕（2013b）。〈誰來為獅子寫歷史？身心障礙者故事的社會學分析〉。《巷仔口社會學》。https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/09/02/chiutahsin/ 邱大昕（2018）。「慈善」與「權利」之間：盲人團體爭取車船半價優待的過程（1950-1980），臺灣社會學，36，167-188。 邱大昕（2019）。〈日本殖民現代性下的臺灣盲人〉。，〈日本殖民統治下的底層社會：臺灣與朝鮮〉，105-136。 邱大昕（2020）。點與線的選擇：十九世紀末臺灣盲用文字的演變。特殊教育研究學刊，45（1），97-112。DOI: 10.6172/BSE.202003_45(1).0004 邱大昕、陳美智（2015）。身心障礙醫療化的在地經驗與反思。《科技醫療與社會》，21，135-158。https://doi.org/10.6464/TJSSTM.201510_(21).0003 姚祥喆（2014）。鍾馗嫁妹》演出經驗：自我民族誌。臺北市立大學舞蹈學系碩士論文。 施澤程（2016）。從社會工作者觀點探討臺灣身心障礙者自立生活支持服務之執行經驗。玄奘大學社會福利與社會工作學系研究所碩士論文。 柯瑞英、陳明鎮（2015）。視障夫妻教養經驗初探。身心障礙研究季刊，13(1)，52-69。 洪瑋伶（2011）。從未遇見的「自己」－一位女性社工人失落之主體再現。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 洪瑞斌、陳筱婷、莊騏嘉（2012）。自我敘說研究中的真實與真理：兼論自我敘說研究之品質參照標準。應用心理研究，56，19-53。 胡幼慧（1996）。質性研究－理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。 張恆豪（2006）。必也正名乎：關於障礙者正名與認同的反思，教育社會學通訊，71，3-7。 張恆豪、顏詩耕（2011）。從慈善邁向權利：臺灣身心障礙福利的發展與挑戰。社區發展季刊，133，402-416。 張恆豪、蘇峰山（2009）。戰後臺灣國小教科書中的障礙者意象分析。臺灣社會學刊，42，143-188。 張恒豪（2013）。我們還在為上公車抗爭：制度歧視與障礙者文化資訊權，巷仔口社會學，11/28/2013。https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/11/28/changhenghao/ 張恒豪（2015a）。障礙的鑑定與再分配政治：以大臺北地區「殘障」停車位爭議為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊，19(1)，91-138。 張恒豪（2015b）。障礙者的公民運動：權利論述與社會模式的在地實踐。思語言，53(2)，89-136。 張恒豪、王靜儀（2016）。從「殘障」到「身心障礙」：障礙標籤與論述的新聞內容分析。臺灣社會學刊，31，1-41。 張恒豪、周月清、陳俊賢、陳重安（2020）。誰代表障礙者？障礙者代表的政府參與及其在公民權上的意義。臺灣民主季刊，17(1)，95-136。 張恒豪、周倩如（2014）。自立生活的理念與夏威夷自立生活中心的運作。社區發展季刊，148，179-193。 張翠芬（2000）。一個青年女性自我之建構與轉化─自傳式民族誌取向。輔仁大學心理學系碩士論文。 教育部（2023）。一一二年度特殊教育統計年報。教育部。 莊勝堯（2013）。潛水鐘與蝴蝶：尋找遺失的社會工作拼圖。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 莊曉霞、劉弘毅（2011）。反壓迫社會實務工作。編入李明政（主編），多元文化社會工作。松慧。（頁35-56） 郭志南（2012）從一位寫不出論文的研究生說起：逆寫社會工作專業帝國。國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 郭志南（2019）。停在紅線上的復康巴士司機：民族誌的紀錄、探索及追問。「障礙作為一種社會壓迫：障礙政治與社會工作研討會論文」，台中：東海大學。 郭惠瑜（2007）。〈右腳告白：一位肢體障礙社會工作學習者的生命書寫與主體實踐〉。台北大學社工系碩士論文。 郭惠瑜（2017）。微光「殘」影：消失的身心障礙女性群像。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，38-43。 郭惠瑜（2020）。障礙與性別的交織：探討小兒麻痺女性母職經驗。 女學學誌（TSSCI），46，79-122。 陳冠碩（2017）。逆生之擊：一位空手道選手比賽歷程之自我民族誌。臺北市立大學運動教育研究所碩士論文。 陳則茵（2007）。置身「社工」脈絡中的反思與行動---探究「助人」位置的歷程。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 陳秋慧(2015)。孤島與海一位女性肢體障礙者的回家之路。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 陳淑妙（2011）。從主流到非主流的跨文化教師歷程—一位泰雅族部落幼教師的自我民族誌。國立臺北教育大學幼兒與家庭教育學系碩士論文。 陳惠萍（2003）。常體之外；「殘障」的身體社會學思考。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 曾凡慈（2010）。醫用者的運籌行動：形塑早期療育的照護軌跡。臺灣社會學刊，45，63-116。 曾凡慈（2017）。障礙與童年的交織：障礙兒童的童年研究。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，33-37。 游政諺、陳孝平（2015）。就醫路關卡多：成年聽覺障礙者就醫經驗之研究。臺灣社會福利學刊，12，2，145-184。 游詠馨（2020）。常與異之間的游移人生：亞斯論述、認同與社交常規。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 游歆羽（2019）。教師信念的形塑— 一位舞蹈教師的自我民族誌研究。臺北市立大學舞蹈學系碩士論文。 游鯉綺（2019）。和障礙者一起散散步，「障礙作為一種社會壓迫：障礙政治與社會工作研討會論文」，台中：東海大學。 鈕文英（2019）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。 黃文慧（2014）。淺論障礙的社會模式。特殊教育季刊，135，35-42。 黃秋霞（2016）。淺談量化與質性研究的反思。臺灣教育評論月刊，5，9。 黃珮綺（2017）。2007-2017年基層社工抵抗行動：行動者生命歷程的敘事分析。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 黃雅雯（2019）。你的障礙不是你的障礙：身心障礙社工助人反思。「障礙作為一種社會壓迫：障礙政治與社會工作研討會論文」，台中：東海大學。 黃麗玲（2018）。助人工作者的反身之路 - 憂鬱受苦者的自傳民俗誌研究。國立東華大學諮商與臨床心理學系碩士論文。 葉琇姍（2019）。排除或融入：做個就業好公民的障礙者就業論述分析。臺灣社會研究季刊，114，147-194。 劉文（2023）。走向積極「去華性」：本土脈絡中的權力結構與抵殖民心理學的可能。《本土心理學研究》，60，119-127。 潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究－理論與應用。心理。 潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-143。 蔡培元（2008）。我僅僅只是一個胖子－記述一段朝向自在的歷程。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文。 蔣郁芬（2016）。一個機緣，一份執著：以自我民族誌探討美麗排球人生。臺北市立大學運動教育研究所碩士論文。 鄭君萍（2013）。我一直努力的在呼吸─找一個有我有部落的社會工作。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 鄭涵尹（2016）。解開「好社工」的封印 ---一段尋找專業與自我靠近的歷程。國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 鄭慈瑩（2016）。談臺灣1990年代障礙主體的漂泊與逆流。國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 蕭旭智（2003）。干預與調節：論十八世紀的生命政治的概念與技術史。東海大學社會學系博士論文。 賴俊帆（2018）。臺灣身心障礙需求評估與服務輸送圖像：脈絡中的制度化效果。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊。8(2)，87-118。 謝東儒、張嘉玲、黃珉蓉（2005）。殘障聯盟發展史。社區發展季刊，109，300-310。 謝國雄、高穎超、李慈穎、吳偉立、劉怡昀、劉惠純、鄭玉菁、葉虹靈、林文蘭（2007）。以身為度、如是我做：田野工作的教與學。群學。 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（主編）（2012）。社會及行為科學研究法.2，質性研究法。東華。 藍介洲（2020）。障礙與老化的交織—高齡視覺障礙者的生命歷程與生產老化。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系博士論文。 顏彩妮、成令方（2012）。全盲夫妻的家務勞動經驗與家務分工：以核心家庭為例。身心障礙研究季刊，10(2)，130-147。 羅素玫（2019）。擺盪於異己之間：來自都蘭和峇厘島的田野反思。刊於趙恩潔、蔡晏霖（編）辶反田野：人類學異托邦故事集，頁147-173。左岸出版。 蘇怡帆、黃國晏、畢恆達（2012）。視障者在臺北市空間中的移動經驗，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育學報，36，93-114。 【英文部分】 Adams, T. E., Boylorn, R. M. and Tillmann, L. M. (Eds.)(2021). Advances in autoethnography and narrative inquiry:_Reflections on the legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner. Routledge. Adams, T. E., Holman Jones, S., and Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. Oxford University Press. Albrecht, F. (1999). The use of Non-Western approaches for special education in the Western world: A cross-cultural approach. In B. Holzer, A. Vreede and G. Weigt (Eds.), Disability in different cultures: Reflections on local concepts (pp. 122-134). Transcript. Allen-Collinson, J. and Hockey, J. (2008). Autoethnography as valid methodology? A Study of disrupted identity narratives. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(6), 209-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v03i06/52631 Amin, A. S., Sarnon, N., Akhir, N. M., Zakaria, S. M., & Badri, R. N. F. R. Z. (2021). Main challenges of students with visual impairment at higher education institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(1), 734-747. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytical autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373-395. Anderson, L. and Glass-Coffin, B. (2016). I Learn By Going Autoethnographic Modes of Inquiry. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams and C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 57-83). Routledge. Atkinson, P. (2006). Rescuing autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 400-404. Baldwin, M. (Ed.). (2013). The use of self in therapy (3rd ed.). Routledge. Beaudry, J. S. (2016). Beyond (Models of) Disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 41(2), 210-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv063 Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer. Beacon Press. Bernell, S. L. (2003). Theoretical and Applied Issues in Defining Disability in Labor Market Research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(1), 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10442073030140010501 Berube, M. (2016). Disability, Democracy, and the New Genetics. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (5th ed.)(pp. 73-86). Routledge., Bolt, D. (Ed.)(2021). Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order. Routledge. Botha, M. and Frost, D. M. (2020). Extending the Minority Stress Model to Understand Mental Health Problems Experienced by the Autistic Population. Society and Mental Health, 10(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318804297 Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267-1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750 Brian, N. (1986). The history of the education of the blind and deaf. ERIC Number: ED309614. Campling, J. (ed.)(1981). The handicapped person a new perspective from social workers. Radar. Carless, D. and Douglas, K. (2017). Narrative research. The Journal of Positive Psychology Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 12(3), 307-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262611 Chang, E. (2008). Autoethnography as method. West Coast Press. Charlton, J. I. (2000). Nothing about Us without Us : Disability Oppression and Empowerment. University of California Press. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. Chivers, S. and Kriebernegg, U. (2018). Care Home Stories_Aging, Disability, and Long-Term Residential Care-transcript. Verlag. Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.)(2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226552 Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Collins, P. H. (2003). Toward an Afrocentric Feminist Epistemology. In Y. S. Lincoln, and N. K. Denzin, (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 73-94). AltaMira Press. Collins, P. H., and Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Conover, K., Israel, T. and Gibson, K. (2017). Development and Validation of the Ableist Microaggressions Scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(4), 570-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011000017715317 Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. u. Chi. Legal f., 139, article:1. CroftEmail, E. (2020). Experiences of visually impaired and blind students in UK higher education: An exploration of access and participation. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.721 Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Davies, H. (2021). The metanarrative of Down syndrome: Proximity to animality. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order (pp. 106-122). Routledge. Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. Verso. Davis, L. J. (Ed.)(2016). Disability Studies Reader (5th ed.). Routledge. Denshire, S. (2013). Autoethnography. Sociopedia, 12(1), 221-236. http://doi.org/10.1177/205684601351 Denzin, N. K. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin and E. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 933-958). Sage. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage. Deveau, J. L. (2014). Using institutional ethnography's ideological circle to portray how textually mediated disability discourse paralysed a Supreme Court of Canada ruling. Culture and Organization, 22(4), 311-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.940042 Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. Douglas, K., and Carless, D. (2013). A history of autoethnographic inquiry. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 84-106). Left Coast Press. Dutta, M. and Basu, A. (2013). Negotiating our Postcolonial Selves: From the Ground to the Ivory Tower. In S. HOlman Jones, T. E. Adams & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 143-161). Left Coast Press. Edwards, S. D. (2009). Definitions of disability: ethical and other values. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about Disability:Philosophical perspectives (pp. 30-41). Routledge. Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. AltaMira Press. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets. Revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733-768). Sage. Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. P. (2016). Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Telling Stories. Routledge. Ellis, C. and Flaherty, M. (Eds.) (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Sage. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E. and Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An Overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), article: 10. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589 Ellis, C., and Bochner, A. P. (1992). Telling and performing personal stories: The constraints of choice in abortion. In C. Ellis and M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 79—93). Sage. Engelhardt, T. (1996). The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. Erickan, K. and Roth, W. M. (2009). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Education Researcher, 35(5), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005014 Felin, T., Koenderink, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2017). Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1040-1059. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1198-z Fine, M. and Asch, A., (1988). Women with disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics. Temple University Press. Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and Disabled People. World Rehabilitation Fund. Foucault, M. (1971). Madness and Civilization. Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Pantheon Books. Fraser, B. (2018). Cognitive Disability Aesthetics-Visual Culture, Disability Representations, and the (In)Visibility of Cognitive Difference. University of Toronto Press. Freedman, V. A. (2011) Disability, functioning, and aging (7thed.). In H. B.Robert &K. G.Linda (Eds.). Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (pp. 57-71). Academic Press. Gilgun, J. (2008). Lived experience, reflexivity, and research on perpetrators of interpersonal violence. Qualitative Social Work, 7(2), 181-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473325008089629 Gleeson, B. (2013). Lost and Found in Space: The Geographical Imagination and Disability. In M. Wappett and K. Arndt (Eds.), Foundations of Disability Studies (pp. 69-81). Palgrave Macmillan. Goering, S. (2015). Rethinking disability: the social model of disability and chronic disease. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 8(2), 134-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z Goldschmidt, W. (1977). Anthropology and the Coming Crisis: An Autoethnographic Appraisal. American Anthropologist, 79(2), 293-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1977.79.2.02a00060 Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage. Gulland, J. (2019). Gender, work and social control; A century of disability benefits. Palgrave Macmillan. Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997). Anthropological Locations- Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. University of California Press. Harris, J. (2000). Is There a Coherent Social Conception of Disability, Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(2): 95-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.2.95 Hartman, D. and Asbell, B. (1978). White Coat, White Cane: The Extraordinary Odyssey of a Blind Physician. Simon and Schuster. Hayano, D. M. (1979). Auto-Ethnography: Paradigms, Problems, and Prospects. Human Organization, 38(1), 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v Healey, D. and Michalko, R. (2021). The metanarrative of blindness in North America: Meaning, feeling, and feel. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order (pp. 3-15). Routledge. Heider, K. G. (1975). What Do People Do? Dani Auto-Ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 31(1), 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/jar.31.1.3629504 Hill, D. C., Callier, D. M., and Waters, H. L. (2019). Notes on Terrible Educations: Auto/Ethnography as Intervention to How we See Black. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(6), 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806609 Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), article:4. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html Holman Jones, S. and Harris, A. (2019). Queering autoethnography. Routledge. Holman Jones, S. and Pruyn, M. (Eds.)(2018). Creative selves/creative cultures: Critical autoethnography, performance, and pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan. Holman Jones, S., Adams, T. E., Ellis, C. (Eds.). Handbook of Autoethnography. Routledge. Holzer, B., Vreede, A. and Weigt, G. (1999). Disability in different cultures: Reflections on local concepts. Transcript. Hoogsteyns, M. and Horst, V. D. (2013). Wearing the arm (or not), Reconceptualising notions of in- and exclusion in Disability Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 15(1), 58-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.679687 http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/9682 DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/9682 Hynes, C. (2019). Numbers of students with disabilities studying in higher education in Ireland 2017/18. AHEAD Educational Press Inda, J. X. (Ed.) (2005). Anthropologies of Modernity_ Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Ingstad, B. (1997). Community-Based Rehabilitation in Botswana. The Myth of the Hidden Disabled. Queenston, Canada: Lampeter. Jago, B. J. (2002). Chronicling an academic depression. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31(6), 729-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124102237823 Jago, B. J. (2006). A primary act of imagination - An autoethnography of father-absence. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 398-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284599 Jago, B. J. (2021). Risk and reward in autoethnography: Revisiting “Chronicling an Academic Depression”. In T. E. Adams, R. M. Boylorn and L. M. Tillmann (Eds.), Advances in Autoethnography and Narrative Inquiry_ Reflections on the Legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner (pp. 15-26). Routledge. James, C. and George, E. M. (1986). Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jeon, B., Kwon, S. and Kim, H. (2015). Health care utilization by people with disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of the Korea Welfare Panel Study (KoWePS).Disability and Health Journal, 8(3), 353-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.01.001 Kalyanpur, M. (1999). Concepts of Disability with Regard to Migrants Meanings of Disability for Culturally Diverse and Immigrant Families of Children with Disabilities. In B. Holzer, A. Vreede and G. Weigt (Eds.), Disability in different cultures: Reflections on local concepts (pp. 135-145). Transcript. Karah, H. (2021). The metanarrative of blindness in India: Special education and assumed knowledge cultures. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order (pp. 30-44). Routledge. Kattari, S. K., Ingarfield, L., Hanna, M., McQueen, J., & Ross, K. (2019). Uncovering issues of ableism in social work education: a disability needs assessment. Social Work Education, 39(18), 1-18. Kiesel, L. R., Dezelar, S., & Lightfoot, E. (2019). Equity in social work employment: Opportunity and challenge for social workers with disabilities in the United States. Disability & Society, 34(9-10), 1399-1418. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1561354 Kim, E. J., Skinner, T. and Parish, S. L. (2019). A study on intersectional discrimination in employment against disabled women in the UK. Disability & Society, 35(5), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1702506 Kim, J. &Sellmaier, C. (2020). Making disability visible in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(3), 496-507. DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2019.1661899 Kristen, F. B. & Taylor, E. K. (2012). The Integration of Disability Content into Social Work Education: An Examination of Infused and Dedicated Models. Advances in Social Work, 13(3), 633-647. https://doi.org/10.18060/2131 Kristiansen, K., Vehmas, S. and Shakespeare, T. (Eds.)(2009). Arguing about Disability:Philosophical perspectives. Routledge. Kuppers, P. (2011). Disability Culture and Community Performance_ Find a Strange and Twisted Shape. Palgrave Macmillan. Lawson, A. and Schiek, D. (2016). European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality: Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination. Routledge. Leherer, J. (2010). The truth wears off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method? New Yorker, December 13. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/13/the-truth-wears-off Lempert, L. B. (2007). Cross-race, cross-culture, cross-national, cross-class, but same-gender: Musings on research in South Africa. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 19, 79-103. Lincoln, Y. S. and Denzin, N. K. (Eds.)(2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. AltaMira Press. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (2013). The Constructivist Credo. LEFT COAST PRESS. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York University Press. Lutz, B. J. and Bowers, B. J. (2005). Disability in Everyday Life. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1037-1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305278631 MacDonald, J., Carter, I., Hanes, R., Skinner, S., and McMurphy, S. (2014). Disability and Social Work Education in the United Kingdom. Canadian Disability Studies Journal, 3(3), 53-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v3i3.173 Mairs, N. (1986). Plaintext: essays. University of Arizona Press. Masasa, T. (2002). Cultural beliefs towards disability: their influence on rehabilitation. Thesis presented in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Physiotherapy at the University of Stellenbosch. Meekosha, H. & Dowse, L. (2007). Integrating critical disability studies into social work education and practice: An Australian perspective. Practice, 19(3), 169-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09503150701574267 Mendez, M. G. (2013). Autoethnography as a research method: advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09 Minnes, P. M., Woodford, L. and Passey, J. (2007). Mediators of Well?being in Ageing Family Carers of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(6), 539 - 552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2007.00364.x Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (2001). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press. Mitchell, D. T., Snyder, S. L. and Antebi, S. (Eds.)(2019). The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. University of Michigan Press. Molyneux, W. (1688). Letter to John Locke, 7 July, in The Correspondence of John Locke (9 volumes), E.S. de Beer (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978 (Volume 3, No. 1064). Morley, C. (2008). Teaching Critical Practice: Resisting Structural Domination through Critical Reflection. Social Work Education, 27(4), 407-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615470701379925 Morris, J. (1993a). “Feminism and disability. Feminist Review, 43(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1993.4 Morris, J. (1993b). Independent Lives? Community Care and Disabled People. Palgrave. Morris, M. and Hartnett, J. (2008). Disability, Long-term Care, and Health Care in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Neville-Jan, A. (2003). Encounters in a world of pain: An auto-ethnography. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 88-98. Nordenfelt, L. (1997). The Importance of a Disability/Handicap Distinction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 22(6), 607-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/22.6.607 Ochieng, B. M. N. (2010). “You know what I mean:” The ethical and methodological dilemmas and challenges for Black researchers interviewing Black families. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1725-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732310381085 Offe, C. (1984) Zu einigen Widerspruchen des modernen Sozialstaates. In Claus Offe (Ed.), Arbeitsgesellschaft: Strukturprobleme und Zukunftsperspektiven (PP. 323–339). Frankfurt/M. Campus. Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. St. Martin’s Press. Oliver, M., Sapey, B and Thomas, F. (1999). Social work with disabled people. Palgrave Macmillan Education. Padilla, A. (2021). The metanarrative of blindness in the global south: A LatDisCrit counterstory to the bittersweet mythology of blindness as giftedness. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order (pp. 16-29). Routledge. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis. Health Serv Res, 5(2), 1189-1208. Payne, M. (2014). Modern Social Work Theory. Oxford University Press. Pensoneau-Conway, S. L., Adams, T. E. and Bolen, D. M. (Eds.) (2017). Doing autoethnography. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Peters, S. (2003). Inclusive Education: Achieving Education for All by Including those with Disabilities and Special Needs. Washington, D. C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/614161468325299263/Inclusive-education-achieving-education-for-all-by-including-those-with-disabilities-and-special-education-needs Peters, S. (2010). Is there a Disability Culture? A syncretisation of Three Possible World Views. Disability & Society, 15(4), 583-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687590050058198 Pfeiffer, D. (1993). The Problem of Disability Definition. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4(2), 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104420739300400206 Pintiggar, S. and Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating Narrative Inquiry Historically: Thematics in the Turn to Narrative. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 3-34). Sage. Porkertova, H. (2022). Revising modern divisions between blindness and sightedness: Doing knowledge in blind assemblages. The Sociological Review, 70(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221076199. Puar, J. K. (2017). The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Duke University Press. Rambo, C. (2007). Handing IRB an unloaded gun. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 353-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297652 Ray, S. J. (2013). Normalcy, Knowledge, and Nature in Mark Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i3.3233 Richards, R. (2008). Writing the othered self: Autoethnography and the problem of objectification in writing about illness and disability. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1717-1728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732308325866 Richardson, L. (1992). The consequences of poetic representation: Writing the other, rewriting the self. In C. Ellis & M. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 125-137). Sage. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Sage. Riddell, S and Watson, N. (2013). Disability, Culture and Identity. Routledge. Rosaldo, R. (1984). Grief and a Headhunter's Rage: On the Cultural Force of Emotions Sakamoto, I., and Pitner, R. O. (2005). Use of Critical Consciousness in Anti-Oppressive Social Work Practice: Disentangling Power Dynamics at Personal and Structural Levels. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch190 Saxton, M. (2016). Disability Rights and Selective Abortion. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (5th ed.) (pp. 87-101). Routledge., Schillmeier M. (2006). Othering blindness – on modern epistemological politics. Disability & Society, 21(5), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590600785910 Schillmeier, M. (2010). Rethinking disability: Bodies, senses, and things. Routledge. Schuck, L. (2015). Predictors of college attendance and persistence among blind and visually impaired students. Thesis presented in fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor degree of Philosophy at Western Michigan University. Scotch, R. K. (2001). From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy. Temple University Press. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. Routledge. Shakespeare, T. (2017). Disability: The Basics. Taylor & Francis. Shier, M., Sinclair, C., & Gault, L. (2011). Challenging ‘ableism’ and teaching about disability in a social work classroom. Critical Social Work, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/csw.v12i1.5860 Siebers, T. (2017). Disability, pain, and the politics of minority identity. In A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem and M. Ingwersen (Eds.), Culture - Theory - Disability (pp. 111-121). transcript Verlag. Silvers, A. (2003). On the possibility and desirability of constructing a neutral conception of disability. Theoretical Medicine, 24(6), 471-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:META.0000006924.82156.5b Smith, D. E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: a Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press. Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography_ A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15 (1), 4-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015001004 Smith, S. R. (2009). Social justice and disability: competing interpretations of the medical and social models. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about Disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 15-29). Routledge. Starr, L. J. (2010). The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 3(1), article:7. Stillman, M. D., Bertocci, G., Smalley, C., Williams, S., and Frost, K. L. (2017). Healthcare utilization and associated barriers experienced by wheelchair users: A pilot study. Disability and Health Journal,10(4),502-508. Stone, D. A. (1985). The Disabled State. Macmillan. Thomson, R. G. (2017). Disability Bioethics: From Theory to Practice. KEnnedy Institute of Ethics, 27(2), 323-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0020 Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Allen Lane and Penguin Books. UPIAS. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. [Online]. Available: https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf Vehmas, S. AND Makela, P. (2009). The ontology of disability and impairment: a discussion of the natural and social features. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about Disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 42-56). Routledge. Vernon, A. (1999). The dialectics of multiple identities and the disabled people's movement. Disability & Society, 14(3), 385-398. Visweswaran, K. (2003). Defining Feminist Ethnography. In Y. S. Lincoln, and N. K. Denzin, (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 47-72). AltaMira Press. Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H. and Ingwersen, M. (Eds.) (2017). Culture - Theory - Disability. transcript Verlag. Walker, A. (1983). Disability and dependency: A challenge for the social services. Research Policy and Planning, 1, 1-7. Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103 Wasserman, D., Adrienne, A., Jeffrey, B. and Daniel, P. (2016). Disability: Definitions, Models, Experience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, article avalable at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/disability/ Webster, L. and Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Routledge. Wilson, A. R. (Ed.), (2013). Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy, and Power. Palgrave Macmillan. World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: The Author. Yang, C. (2014). Being independent from whom? Analysing two interpretations in the paradigm of ‘independent living’. Disability & Society, 29(5), 671-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.844098 Yuval-Davis, N. (2007). Intersectionality, citizenship and contemporary politics of belonging. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10(4),561-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230701660220 Zola, I. K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 67(2), 401-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3350151 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96366 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文述說一段「障礙身體」與「鑲嵌健全主義視框的社工專業」遇合的故事，探尋如何詮釋與實踐交織障礙和社工專業的主體經驗。透過梳理既有文獻和學術處境，我覺察欲發展本文必先跨越己身處在障礙知識客體化和視覺理性的失語位置。因而立基建構主義對於主體經驗的關照，我拾回對為己敘事、反出主流和回觀主體的決心，邁向以自我民族誌方法整理我專業成長脈絡的書寫之路。
文中以我十年來交織障礙經驗和社會工作專業留存的126份檔案資料為分析素材，輔以訪談內容、文獻和次級資料編織故事的材料。最終收束為四段敘事主軸，其一是由偏向微視層面，談「斷裂的自我、斷裂的障礙經驗」；其二則論述專業和巨視結構形塑「充權又消權，難以脫身的健全視框，並接續第三段敘事主軸較縱向地詮釋支配和介入受迫者的生命經驗下，如何發展出一段「看到集體的壓迫與抵抗」的敘事。最終隨著成長和行動，我得以分享追尋「走向解殖、走向自己」的劇集，立足於交織性和抵殖民論述，拾回自身的掌控感與盲人敘事。 本文由個人經驗起始，映出障礙、社工教育、專業治理等等建制所立足的基底，存續過多國家治理的干預、中心化的單一典範及製造健全和回歸主流的敘事。面對主流健常社會，我得以完成本文，標記了我嘗試走向屬於自身主體的抵抗與生存足跡，而不求回歸主流，或將障礙、多元性別、少數身分等主體經驗「納入」健全主義或國家治理既定的構框。終能開展自己的抵抗和詮釋，亦希望透過文本號召更多離散和邊緣的主體，再認己身、反出主流、述說自己的故事並且終能成為自己。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis narrates the intersection between "disabled bodies" and the "social work profession framed by ableism," exploring how disability and social work intersect in interpretation and practice. Reviewing existing literature and academic contexts, I recognize the need to transcend voicelessness rooted in the objectification and visual rationalization of disability knowledge. Grounded in a constructivist approach to subjectivity, I reclaim my determination to narrate personal experiences, resist the mainstream, and reflect on subjectivity, using an autoethnographic method to contextualize my professional growth.
The analysis draws on 126 archival documents from ten years of intersecting disability and social work, supplemented by interviews, literature, and secondary sources. The thesis culminates in four narrative axes: first, a micro-level discussion of "fractured self and fractured disability experiences"; second, how professional practice and macro structures shape a "disempowering yet empowering ableist framework"; third, a longitudinal interpretation of oppression and resistance, leading to a narrative that "recognizes collective oppression and resistance." Finally, I share a journey toward "decolonization and self-discovery," grounded in intersectionality and anti-colonial discourse, reclaiming agency and disabled narratives. Beginning with personal experience, this thesis reflects on the foundations of disability, social work education, and professional governance within national interventions, centralized paradigms, and narratives constructing ableism and mainstream conformity. Facing the mainstream able-bodied society, I mark my attempts to resist and forge a survival path, rather than reintegrating into the mainstream or assimilating diverse identities into pre-established ableist frameworks. Ultimately, I aim to articulate resistance and inspire marginalized individuals to recognize themselves, resist the mainstream, narrate their own stories, and become themselves. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-05T16:08:19Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-05T16:08:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 序言與謝辭 ......................................................................................................................................... ii
中文摘要 ............................................................................................................................................ iv 英文摘要 ............................................................................................................................................. v 目次 ................................................................................................................................................... vii 表次 ..................................................................................................................................................... x 第一章 導論 ....................................................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 ....................................................... 3 一、重新採定立足點 ................................................................................................................. 3 二、尋回自己的聲音 ................................................................................................................. 6 三、由個人至集體的失語 ......................................................................................................... 8 第二節 我與這份研究的關係 .................................................. 11 一、研究目的 ........................................................................................................................... 11 二、研究問題 ........................................................................................................................... 12 第三節 文獻探討──為己書寫 ................................................ 14 一、因應社會而生的障礙 ....................................................................................................... 15 二、失語的障礙主體 ............................................................................................................... 27 三、盲人成為敘事的主角 ....................................................................................................... 31 第四節 定向和發展我的研究 .................................................. 43 一、研究的核心哲思──研究典範 ....................................................................................... 43 二、說故事作為一種研究的取向——敘事的方法論基礎 ................................................... 45 三、選定說故事的方法－自我民族誌的呼喚 ....................................................................... 46 第五節 如何從敘說中回觀主體 ................................................ 52 一、眾裡尋他千百度的循環 ................................................................................................... 52 二、如何收拾故事的吉光片羽 ............................................................................................... 54 三、如何由故事中提取意義 ................................................................................................... 56 第六節 如何說一段好故事 .................................................... 58 一、著手自我民族誌的品質指標 ........................................................................................... 58 二、說故事的道之所在 ........................................................................................................... 61 第二章 斷裂於視界之外的瞽述日常 ............................................................................................. 65 第一節 矯正與復原的戰爭 .................................................... 66 一、矯正視力 ........................................................................................................................... 66 二、追趕失落的生活 ............................................................................................................... 68 三、復原所見的眼界 ............................................................................................................... 71 四、難及的視界 ....................................................................................................................... 76 第二節 權利奔跑下的體能失調 ............................................... 80 一、在助人專業的殿堂現身 ................................................................................................... 80 二、萬花筒中的迷失 ............................................................................................................... 86 三、福利與權利間的百盪 ....................................................................................................... 90 第三章 超越又或體認限制 ........................................................................................................... 99 第一節 不斷再現的理盲劇情 ................................................. 100 一、貼滿標籤的生活 ............................................................................................................. 100 二、一起重塑標籤的嘗試 ..................................................................................................... 105 第二節 我是不安視世的盲人 ................................................. 111 一、易脆的日常 ..................................................................................................................... 111 二、不安視世的循環 ............................................................................................................. 114 第四章 盲目尋找專業地圖上自己的位置 ................................................................................. 118 第一節 我支撐障礙者的招牌？ ............................................... 119 一、審視與回應間的角力 ..................................................................................................... 119 二、我還能顧得了誰？ ......................................................................................................... 123 三、伸不出去與等不到的兩雙手 ......................................................................................... 132 第二節 健全掛帥的社工專業 ................................................. 136 一、仰望專業的自居高處 ..................................................................................................... 136 二、障礙停留在專業想像當中 ............................................................................................. 140 三、貫穿內外的健常主軸 ..................................................................................................... 148 第五章 抵抗與韌力 ..................................................................................................................... 157 第一節 障礙與後殖民觀點的對話 ............................................. 158 一、離家與離群的起點 ......................................................................................................... 158 二、源自抵抗而生的根系 ..................................................................................................... 166 第二節 重新與盲連結 ...................................................... 173 一、與杖同行的起點 ............................................................................................................. 173 二、抵抗盲目的建構 ............................................................................................................. 177 三、述說我心中所想 ............................................................................................................. 187 第六章 走向尾聲 ........................................................................................................................... 195 一、覺察與抵抗 ..................................................................................................................... 195 二、祈願與邀請 ..................................................................................................................... 197 三、我未盡的功課 ................................................................................................................. 198 四、若可見光 ......................................................................................................................... 201 參考文獻 ......................................................................................................................................... 203 附錄一 原版文獻探討及研究方法內容 ....................................................................................... 237 附錄二 田野筆記截錄——拾回自我的韌力 ............................................................................... 309 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 盲與社會工作經驗交織的成長敘事 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Self-Narrative of Growth through the Intersectional Experiences of Blindness and Social Work | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 畢恆達;邱大昕 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Herng-Dar Bih;Ta-Sing Chiu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 盲人經驗,社工專業,抵抗,交織性,自我民族誌,障礙研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Blind Experiences,Social Work Profession,Resistance,Intersectionality,Autoethnography,Disability Studies, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 316 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500192 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-01-21 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-18 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 2.43 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。