Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96121| Title: | 在亞洲保持平衡?亞洲當代國際關係的新現實主義分析 Balancing in Asia? A Neorealist Analysis of Contemporary International Relations in Asia |
| Authors: | 米尼克 Nikolaj Ryoe Mikkelsen |
| Advisor: | Jan Kofron Jan Kofron |
| Keyword: | 結構現實主義,中國,東亞洲,東南亚,日本, Neorealism,China,East Asia,Southeast Asia,Japan,Power Politics,Naval Modernization,Balancing,Bandwagoning,Hedging, |
| Publication Year : | 2024 |
| Degree: | 碩士 |
| Abstract: | The rise of China, a transformative event in the strategic landscape, has profoundly impacted International Relations in Asia. This study examines how specific East and Southeast Asian countries have responded in the maritime domain, focusing on whether Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam are balancing against China. The scholarly debate on this topic has centered around differing views on the presence or absence of balancing, often critiqued through cultural factors.
Using a multi-case study framework grounded in neorealism, this research analyzes internal balancing through military modernization and external balancing through military cooperation from 2014 to 2024. The findings indicate that balancing is occurring, as evidenced by the substantial increase in military spending, modernization, and bilateral cooperation among the six countries. However, formal alliances have yet to materialize. All states have significantly upgraded their military capabilities, focusing on advanced missiles, surface platforms, and fighter jets. While substantial evidence of balancing exists, some cases also show behaviors interpreted as hedging rather than clear-cut balancing. The rise of China, a transformative event in the strategic landscape, has profoundly impacted International Relations in Asia. This study examines how specific East and Southeast Asian countries have responded in the maritime domain, focusing on whether Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam are balancing against China. The scholarly debate on this topic has centered around differing views on the presence or absence of balancing, often critiqued through cultural factors. Using a multi-case study framework grounded in neorealism, this research analyzes internal balancing through military modernization and external balancing through military cooperation from 2014 to 2024. The findings indicate that balancing is occurring, as evidenced by the substantial increase in military spending, modernization, and bilateral cooperation among the six countries. However, formal alliances have yet to materialize. All states have significantly upgraded their military capabilities, focusing on advanced missiles, surface platforms, and fighter jets. While substantial evidence of balancing exists, some cases also show behaviors interpreted as hedging rather than clear-cut balancing. |
| URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96121 |
| DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202404436 |
| Fulltext Rights: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
| metadata.dc.date.embargo-lift: | 2029-09-30 |
| Appears in Collections: | 政治學系 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf Until 2029-09-30 | 2.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
