請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96014完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪一薰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | I-Hsuan Hong | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 游欣慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Hui You | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-25T16:37:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-26 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-25 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | BBC News 中文 (2021年11月7 日)。COP26：氣候融資、淨零金融聯盟和可持續金融體系的含義。BBC News 中文。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/science-59163769
中國信託金控 (2023)。中國信託金控氣候相關財務揭露報告書。中國信託金控。 中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網(中央銀行) (n.d.)。金融機構放款與投資及金融市場票債券發行餘額/變動數。中央銀行。https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-524-1077-F52BC-1.html 世界企業永續發展協會、世界資源研究院 (2005)。溫室氣體排放量盤查議定書-企業會計與報告標準(第二版)。 台中商業銀行股份有限公司(台中商銀) (2022)。111年度溫室氣體盤查報告書。台中商銀。https://www.tcbbank.com.tw/pdf/ESG/111GreenhouseReport.pdf 玉山金控 (2023)。玉山金控永續報告書。玉山金控。 板信商業銀行股份有限公司(板信商銀) (2022)。111年度溫室氣體盤查報告書。板信商銀。https://www.bop.com.tw/api/ArticleFile/71e680c3-5eee-461b-a479-883ba9747783#page=11.73 邱金蘭 (2023年7月25日)。綠天鵝壓力測試／五大重點全解讀，銀行預期損失高達三千億，一整年獲利幾乎蒸發。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5613/7324242 金融業淨零推動工作平台 (2024)。金融業減碳目標設定與策略規劃指引。 孫秀惠等人 (2021年11月)。台塑零碳大作戰。商業周刊，1775，82-92。 涂憶君 (2022年4月28日)。減碳風暴壓境 逾九成中小企業還對策。財訊，658，70-73。 財團法人台達電子文教基金會(台達電) (2023)。企業內部碳定價制度研析。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/Information?publicationID=P20231027002&type=%E6%9C%9F%E5%88%8A&tabName=1&issueYear=&issueID=&publisherID=U20150602002 國泰金控 (2023)。國泰金控氣候暨自然報告書。國泰金控。 郭逸 (2024年4月3日)。碳費徵收將延後？台灣獨步全球卻引發企業碳焦慮。 ESG遠見。https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/49638 郭懋亨 (2017年10月7日)。九張圖看懂「道瓊永續指數」：用投資的力量，促使企業落實社會責。關鍵評論。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/80533 陳欣文 (2022年2月18日)。金融業首家 玉山金通過SBT審查。工商時報。 https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220218700147-430301 陳鴻達 (2022年4月1日)。金融如何支持淨零排放。自由時報。 https://www.tabf.org.tw/Article.aspx?id=3721&cid=3 彭禎伶 (2022年9月6日)。五大「綠金控」組永續先行者聯盟。工商時報。https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220906700123-430301 黃煒軒及黃浩珉 (2022年11月21日)。小台廠的減碳追殺令。今周刊，1352，62-71。 楊乃錚 (2023年11月)。碳競爭力100強：2023年大調查。商業周刊，1878，48-58。 楊喻閔 (2021)。內部碳定價之氣候風險效益評估—以台灣企業為例。國內臺北大學自然環境與環境管理研究所。 楊筱筠 (2023年12月27日)。中信金減碳 海外也適用。經濟日報。 https://udn.com/news/story/7239/7667585 經濟部產業發展署 (n.d.)。產業節能減碳資訊網。經濟部產業發展署。https://ghg.tgpf.org.tw/CVKnowledge/ 劉佩修等人 (2021年10月)。台灣減碳100強：商周大調查。商業周刊，1770，58-67。 ACPR. (2021). A first assessment of financial risks stemming from climate change: The main results of the 2020 climate pilot exercise. BANQUE DE FRANCE. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 45-62. Attig, N., Rahaman, M. M., & Trabelsi, S. (2021). Greenwashing and bank loan contracting: does environmental disclosure quality matter to creditors? https://ssrn.com/abstract=3880113 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880113 Azizuddin, K. (2021). IEA forecasts USD250 carbon price under Paris-aligned climate scenario. Responsible Investor. https://www.responsible-investor.com/iea-forecasts-usd250-carbon-price-under-paris-aligned-climate-scenario/ Bank of England (BOE). (2022). 2022-22 CCP Supervisory Stress Test: results report. BOE. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/stress-testing/2022/ccp-supervisory-stress-test-results-2021-22 Bartlett, N., Coleman, Y., Schmidt, S. (2021). Putting a price on carbon: The state of internal carbon pricing by corporates globally. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/000/005/651/original/CDP_Global_Carbon_Price_report_2021.pdf Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2021). Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels. Bank for International Settlements. BCBS. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d517.pdf Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7, 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3255 Baudino, P., & Svoronos, J.-P. (2021). Stress-testing banks for climate change – a comparison of practices. Bank for International Settlements (BIS). https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights34.pdf Ben-Amar, W., Gomes, M., Khursheed, H., & Marsat, S. (2022). Climate change exposure and internal carbon pricing adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2854–2870. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3051 Bento, N., & Gianfrate, G. (2020). Determinants of internal carbon pricing. Energy Policy, 143, 111499. Bernardelli, M., Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2022). Does fossil fuel financing affect banks’ ESG ratings? Energies, 15(4), 1495. BlackRock. (2020). Larry Fink’s 2020 letter to CEOs: A fundamental reshaping of finance. BlackRock. https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/2020-larry-fink-ceo-letter BlackRock. (2021). 2021 BlackRock client letter. BlackRock. https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/2021-blackrock-client-letter Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Viglione, A., Perdigão, R. A., Parajka, J., Merz, B., Bilibashi, A. (2019). Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature, 573(7772), 108-111. Bolton, P., Després, M., Pereira da Silva, L., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). Green Swans’: central banks in the age of climate-related risks. Banque de France, 229(8), 1-15. Boyce, J. K. (2018). Carbon pricing: effectiveness and equity. Ecological Economics, 150, 52-61. Budke, A., Krivtsova, E., Nicolaus, D., Tajti, Z., Vozian, K., Wieck, C. & Tajti, Z. (2023). Climate-related and environmental risks in loan pricing. KPMG. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2023/07/climate-related-and-environmental-risks-in-loan-pricing.html Busch, T., Bassen, A., Lewandowski, S., & Sump, F. (2022). Corporate carbon and financial performance revisited. Organization & Environment, 35(1), 154-171. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470. Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019). Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 1-14. CaixaBank. (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). https://www.cdp.net/en/investor/data-and-tools Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) (2023). Finance sector's funded emissions over 700 times greater than its own. CDP. https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/media/finance-sectors-funded-emissions-over-700-times-greater-than-its-own Lam, L., Klein, N., Quant, M., Neelis, M., Eddy, G., Saltzman, D., Cushing, H., & Bartlett, N. (2017). How-to guide to corporate internal carbon pricing: Four dimensions to best practice approaches. Ecofys-A Navigant Company & The Generation Foundation & CDP. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2024a). Carbon Pricing: CDP Disclosure Best Practice. CDP. https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/guidance_docs/pdfs/000/001/567/original/CDP-technical-note-carbon-pricing.pdf?1643645272 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2024b). CDP full corporate questionnaire. CDP. https://www.cdp.net/en/2024-disclosure/cdp-full-corporate-questionnaire Carbon Disclosure Project India (CDP India). (2022). What is internal carbon pricing and how can it help achieve your net-zero goal? CDP India. https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/companies/jsw-energys-internal-carbon-pricing-journey Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 309-328. CHEN, Q. (2019). Has China’s green credit policy been implemented? An analysis of loan scale and costs based on “Two Highs and One Surplus” enterprises. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (03), 1. Chen, Y. J., & Sheu, J. B. (2009). Environmental-regulation pricing strategies for green supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(5), 667-677. Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Goodell, J. W., Paltrinieri, A., & Piserà, S. (2024). Banks’ environmental policies and banks’ financial stability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101927. Ciciretti, R., Kobeissi, N., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: an analysis of bank community responsibility. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 5(4), 342-373. Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF). (2020). Climate Financial Risk Forum Guide 2020: Risk Management Chapter. CFRF. Damert, M., Paul, A., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 123-138. DANMARKS NATIONALBANK. (2020). A gradual green transition supports financial stability. DANMARKS NATIONALBANK. Earth.Org. (2023, January 3). Apple commits to become carbon neutral by 2030. Earth.Org. https://earth.org/apple-carbon-neutral-by-2030/ Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) & International Emissions Trading Association (IETA). (2016). Carbon pricing: The Paris agreement’s key ingredient. EDF & IETA. Emambakhsh, T., Fuchs, M., Kördel, S., Kouratzoglou, C., Lelli, C., Pizzeghello, R., Salleo, C., & Spaggiari, M. (2023). The Road to Paris: Stress testing the transition towards a net-zero economy. European Central Bank, ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 2023/328. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4564374 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4564374 Esun FHC (玉山金控). (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. CDP. European Central Bank (ECB). (2022a). ECB report on good practices for climate stress testing. ECB. European Central Bank (ECB). (2022b). Good practices for climate-related and environmental risk management : Observations from 2022 thematic review. ECB. Fan, J., Rehm, W., & Siccardo, G. (2021). The state of internal carbon pricing. Mckinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-state-of-internal-carbon-pricing Fang, X., & Junqing, L. (2019). Do commercial banks incorporate the environmental risk in loan pricing decision? Evidence from the environmental responsibility score. Journal of Finance and Economics, 45(11), 57-69. Fang, X., & Junqing, L. (2019). Do commercial banks incorporate the environmental risk in loan pricing decision? Evidence from the environmental responsibility score. Journal of Finance and Economics, 45(11), 57-69. Fitch. (2021). Climate change stress tests are becoming mainstream. Fitch. https://www.sustainablefitch.com/banks/climate-change-stress-tests-are-becoming-mainstream-15-03-2021 Gambhir, A., George, M., McJeon, H. et al. Near-term transition and longer-term physical climate risks of greenhouse gas emissions pathways. Nature Climate Chang. 12, 88–96 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01236-x Gates, B. (2021). How to avoid a climate disaster: The solutions we have and the breakthroughs we need. Knopf. Giglio, S., Kelly, B., & Stroebel, J. (2021). Climate finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13, 15-36. Grupo Cooperativo Cajamar (Cajamar). (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. CDP. Haites, E., Bertoldi, P., König, M., Bataille, C., Creutzig, F., Dasgupta, D., ... & Sari, A. (2024). Contribution of carbon pricing to meeting a mid-century net zero target. Climate Policy, 24(1), 1-12. Hoffman, A. J. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21-46. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). (2021). Pilot Banking Sector Climate Risk Stress Test. HKMA. IEA (2023). Global Energy and Climate Model. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-and-climate-model Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. 1535 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Karstensen, J., Peters, G. P., & Andrew, R. M. (2018). Trends of the EU's territorial and consumption-based emissions from 1990 to 2016. Climatic Change, 151(2), 131–142. KBC Global Services NV (KBC). (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. CDP. Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719-745. Kotsantonis, S. and Bufalari, V. 2019. Do sustainable banks outperform? Driving value creation through ESG practices, GABV. KPMG. (2021). Climate risk is financial risk – for banks it’s a board-level issue. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2021/04/climate-risk-printable.pdf KPMG. (2023). ESG Risk Survey for Banks: Market Survey. KPMG. KPMG. (2023). How to get internal carbon pricing right. KPMG. https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2023/how-to-get-internal-carbon-pricing-right.pdf Lee, S. Y. (2012). Corporate carbon strategies in responding to climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 33-48. Leung, K., McHose, C., Lam, L., Klein, N., Eddy, G., Paton, A., Bartlett, N., & Gutu, S. (2019). Internal Carbon Pricing for Low-Carbon Finance. CDP. Lucas, M. T. (2010). Understanding environmental management practices: integrating views from strategic management and ecological economics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(8), 543-556. Ma, J., & Kuo, J. (2021). Environmental self-regulation for sustainable development: Can internal carbon pricing enhance financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 3517-3527 Mann, W. (2018). Internal carbon pricing at Garanti Bank: Invigorating interest in sustainability across Turkey by incorporating environmental concerns into financial decisions. Yale, Center for Business and the Environment. https://cbey.yale.edu/our-stories/internal-carbon-pricing-at-garanti-bank Mikolajczyk, S., Liese, E., Brüning, K., Bartlett, N., & Kaya, G. (2017). Internal Carbon Pricing and Climate Finance Tracking for Banks. Implementation Guidance Report. Mikolajczyk, S., Liese, E., Kaya, G., Brüning, K., & Bartlett, N. (2022). Internal carbon pricing and climate finance tracking in banks: Implementation guidance. Climate Focus. https://climatefocus.com/publications/internal-carbon-pricing-and-climate-finance-tracking-banks-implementation-guidance/ NatWest Group plc(NatWest). (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. CDP. Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2021). Scenarios in action: A progress report on global supervisory and central bank climate scenario exercises. NGFS. https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/scenarios-in-action-a-progress-rep Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2023). NGFS Climate Scenarios for central banks and supervisors - Phase IV. NGFS. https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/ngfs_climate_scenarios_for_central_banks_and_supervisors_phase_iv.pdf Niedziółka, P. (2020). Polish banking sector facing challenges related to environmental and climate protection. Problemy Zarządzania, 18(4 (90)), 32-47. OECD (2017). Small, Medium, Strong. Trends in SME Performance and Business Conditions . OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264275683-en Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green?. California Management Review, 48(2), 127-143. Oxford Analytica. (2020). Firms’ net-zero plans are key to meeting climate goals. Emerald Expert Briefings, (oxan-db). Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF). (2022). Financed Emissions: The Global Accounting & Reporting Standard/Part A. PCAF. Peace, J., Besley, D. J., Rhoades, E. L., Rastogi, N. P., & Prasad, N. (2019). Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Pricing and Competitiveness. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/715631581657071426/Report-of-the-High-Level-Commission-on-Carbon-Pricing-and-Competitiveness Pinkse, J., & Busch, T. (2013). The emergence of corporate carbon norms: Strategic directions and managerial implications. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(6), 633-645. Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). What are the Principles for Responsible Investment? PRI. https://www.unpri.org/ S&P Global. (2024). CSA handbook 2024: Corporate sustainability assessment. S&P Global. https://portal.s1.spglobal.com/survey/documents/CSA_Handbook.pdf S&P Trucost (Trucost). (2019). TCFD Scenario Analysis: Integrating future carbon price risk into portfolio analysis. Trucost. https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/documents/trucost_tfcdscenarioanalysis_carbonear_practiseessentials.pdf Schultz, K., & Williamson, P. (2005). Gaining competitive advantage in a carbon-constrained world:: Strategies for european business. European Management Journal, 23(4), 383-391. Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). (2022). Financial Sector Science-Based Targets Guidance. SBTi. Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi). (n.d.). Target dashboard. SBTi. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/target-dashboard Sitompul, M., Suroso, A. I. , Sumarwan, U. & Zulbainarni, N. (2023). Revisiting the Impact of Corporate Carbon Management Strategies on Corporate Financial Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Economies, 11, 171. Stiglitz, J. E., Stern, N., Duan, M., Edenhofer, O., Giraud, G., Heal, G. M., ... & Winkler, H. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-w2nc-4103 Stroebel, J., & Wurgler, J. (2021). What do you think about climate finance? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 487-498. T.GARANTİ BANKASI A.Ş. (Garanti). (2023). CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2023. CDP. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2017a). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. TCFD. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/ Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2017b). Technical Supplement: The Use of Scenario Analysis in Disclosure of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities. TCFD. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/final-recommendations-rep Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2021). Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. TCFD. https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2021/07/2021-TCFD-Implementing_Guidance Trinks, A., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2022). External carbon costs and internal carbon pricing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112780. Umar, M., Ji, X., Mirza, N., & Naqvi, B. (2021). Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113156. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement Article 2.1(c). UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) and BSR. (2023). Financial Innovation for SME net zero transition: Role of Banks and Buyers. CISL & BSR. van Sluisveld, M. A., de Boer, H. S., Daioglou, V., Hof, A. F., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2021). A race to zero-Assessing the position of heavy industry in a global net-zero CO2 emissions context. Energy and Climate Change, 2, 100051. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press. World Bank & Ecofys. (2018). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018, The World Bank Group, 29687. World Bank. (2022). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37455 Zhao, R., Neighbour, G., Han, J., McGuire, M., & Deutz, P. (2012). Using game theory to describe strategy selection for environmental risk and carbon emissions reduction in the green supply chain. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(6), 927-936. Zhu, Q. H., & Dou, Y. J. (2007). Evolutionary game model between governments and core enterprises in greening supply chains. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 27(12), 85-89. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96014 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討銀行業如何透過內部碳定價來達成放款組合的減碳目標，並分析相關參與者之決策過程。隨著全球暖化和氣候變遷的加劇，許多國家和企業已制定長期的減碳計劃，力求在2050年前實現淨零排放之目標。雖然銀行業本身不是高碳排產業，但其放款和投資可能支持高碳排企業，因此在減碳進程中具有重要地位。科學基礎減碳目標（Science Based Targets, SBT）方法學已成為金融機構設定具體減碳目標的主要依據，而內部碳定價作為管理工具，能將碳排放成本內部化。本研究認為內部碳定價在銀行達成減碳目標中具有核心作用，除了深入探討設計內部碳定價制度時應考量的因素外，還分析制度實施對銀行永續管理單位、銀行放款業務單位及借款企業決策的影響，希望為未來更深入的數據分析提供研究基礎。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explores how banks can achieve carbon reduction targets in their loan portfolios through an internal carbon pricing mechanism. It also analyzes the potential decision-making behaviors of key stakeholders. As global warming accelerates climate change, hundreds of countries and large corporations have pledged to reduce their net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050 or sooner. Although banks are not major carbon emitters themselves, their loans and investments finance industries with varying carbon intensities. Consequently, it is crucial for banks to reevaluate their portfolios and align them with a net-zero economy.
Setting collaborative emissions reduction targets is essential for banks working towards a net-zero future, and science-based targets (SBT) aligned with the Paris Agreement provide a reliable framework for establishing ambitious yet achievable objectives. In pursuing decarbonization, banks can implement internal carbon pricing (ICP) as a management tool to drive sustainable practices within their organizations and foster closer corporate relationships to encourage companies in their lending and investment portfolios to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ICP enables banks to evaluate carbon risks and identify opportunities to redirect capital towards achieving carbon reduction targets. In addition to exploring the factors to consider when designing internal carbon pricing programs, this study also discusses the impact of these programs on the behaviors of banks' sustainability management units, loan business units, and borrowers. The aim is to provide a foundation for more detailed quantitative analysis in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-25T16:37:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-09-25T16:37:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii 目次 v 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒 論 1 第二章 金融業因應氣候變遷之管理作為 5 2.1. 金融業氣候風險管理發展趨勢 5 2.2. 金融業投融資組合財務碳排放之衡量 10 2.3. 氣候情境分析及對金融資產風險之影響評估 14 第三章 金融業投融資組合減碳與內部碳定價 19 3.1. 金融業科學基礎減碳目標 19 3.2. 內部碳定價管理機制 31 第四章 銀行放款組合實施內部碳定價之分析 45 4.1. 相關參與者 46 4.2. 參與者的決策 50 4.3. 參與者的收益 55 4.4. 參與者互動分析 60 第五章 結論與建議 63 參考文獻 65 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 應用內部碳定價於銀行放款組合分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study of Internal Carbon Pricing in Bank Loan Portfolio | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳文智;黃奎隆;黃道宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-Chih Chen;Kwei-Long Huang;Kevin Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 氣候風險,投融資財務碳排放,科學基礎減碳目標,產業減碳法,SBT資產組合覆蓋法,溫度評級法,內部碳定價, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Climate-related risks,PCAF Financed emissions,Science-Based Targets(SBTs),Sectoral Decarbonization Approach(SDA),SBT Portfolio Coverage(PC),Temperature Rating(TR),Internal Carbon Pricing(ICP), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403917 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-08-07 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.59 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。