請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95685完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wen-Chen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林祐名 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yoming Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-15T16:47:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
（一）專書 葉俊榮（2015），《氣候變遷治理與法律》，初版，國立臺灣大學出版社。 （二）期刊論文 范建得、楊思源、翁宸隃、黃筱蘋（2013），〈後京都時代的挑戰與機會──自德班會議後的發展看台灣應有的因應方向〉，《台灣國際法季刊》，10卷2期，頁107-44。 張文貞（2010），〈國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流：臺灣施行兩大人權公約之後〉，《台灣人權促進會季刊》，兩公約專輯，頁12-22。 張文貞（2011），〈環境影響評估作為國際法上的義務：國際法院 Pulp Mills (Argentina v. Uruguay) 判決評析〉，發表於：《氣候變遷與國際環境法研討會》。 李仲軒（2023），〈法院如何確立國家對氣候變遷之保護義務？──簡述荷蘭Urgenda v. The Netherlands案之一、二審判決〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，第340 期，頁64-78。 李建良（2021），〈氣候變遷、基本人權與憲法訴訟 ── 2021年德國氣候訴訟裁判釋論〉，《台灣法律人》，第2期，頁1-20。 林春元（2019），〈國際人權法與氣候變遷的匯流〉，《人文與社會科學簡訊》，第20卷4期，頁25-32。 許耀明（2014），〈氣候變遷、氣候訴訟與氣候責任〉，《人文與社會科學簡訊》，第15卷2期，頁4-9。 許耀明（2019），〈國際氣候變遷法制2.0：巴黎協議評析〉，《人文與社會科學簡訊》，第20卷4期，頁14-19。 許耀明（2023），〈氣候訴訟之定義與作用〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，第340期，頁40-49。 蘇義淵（2010），〈以國際氣候變遷法制觀點評論我國溫室氣體減量法草案〉，《興大法學》，第6期，頁113-168。 蘇義淵（2012），〈從國際法觀點檢討後哥本哈根時期氣候變遷談判〉，《全球政治評論》，第37期，頁117-134。 （三）碩博士論文 宋明叡（2022），《氣候訴訟的科學證據：政府間氣候變化專門委員會報告在指標性氣候人權判決的運用比較》，國立陽明交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。 林廷輝（2010），《論國際環境法上越境污染造成損害之國家賠償責任》，臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系博士論文。 林彥廷（2016），《內國氣候難民的國際人權思考：以松鶴社區遷村為例》，臺灣大學科技整合法律研究所碩士論文。 李宜靜（2016），《國際氣候法及國際人權法在氣候訴訟中之適用──以荷比德法案例為中心》，國立政治大學法律學系研究所碩士論文。 何雅琳（2013），《以兩人權公約觀點論我國氣候變遷法制之不足》，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。 邱美蘅（2013），《國際氣候變遷法制發展研究──硬法與軟法的應用》，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。 張嘉珉（2015），《國際氣候變遷法制規範跨國公司之研究》，國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。 顏子涵（2016），《減緩氣候變遷之政策工具－以排放額度交易及其法律性質為中心》，國立臺北大學法律研究所。 （四）網路資料 全國法規資料庫，公民政治與社會權利國際公約，https://law.moj.gov.tw/Law Class/LawAll.aspx?pcode=Y0000039。 全國法規資料庫，經濟、社會和文化權利國際公約，https://law.moj.gov.tw /LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=Y0000038。 全國法規資料庫，兒童權利公約，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.a spx? pcode =Y0000062。 環境部，巴黎協定繁體中文版，https://service.cca.gov.tw/File/Get/cca/zh-tw/uJy1 lO5rcVqWlsG。 環境資訊中心，聯合國要國際法院給「諮詢意見」 國際法如何對抗氣候變遷？，https://e-info.org.tw/node/236534。 联合国气候变化框架公约（氣候變化綱要公約官方中文版），FCCC/INFORMAL /84, GE. 05-62219 (C), https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/ co nvchin.pdf。 二、英文文獻 （一）專書 Atapattu, S., & Schapper, A. (2019). Human rights and the environment: Key issues. England, U.K.: Routledge. Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Rajamani, L. (2017). International climate change law. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Cassese, A. (1995). Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Christiansen, S. (2016). Climate conflicts: A case of international environmental and humanitarian law. New York, U.S.: Springer, Cham. Crawford, J. (2002). The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, Commentaries. England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Crawford, J. (2013). State responsibility: The general part. England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., Khan, D. E., Paulus, A. L., von Schorlemer, S., & Vedder, C. (Eds.). (2011). From bilateralism to community interest: Essays in honour of Bruno Simma. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Fisher, E. (2017). Environmental law: A very short introduction. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Kälin, W., & Künzli, J. (2019). The Law of International Human Rights Protection. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Klein, D., Carazo, M. P., Doelle, M., Bulmer, J., & Higham, A. (Eds.). (2017). The Paris Agreement on climate change: analysis and commentary. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Knox, J. (2019). Bringing human rights to bear on climate change. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Mayer, B. (2022). International law obligations on climate change mitigation. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Schabas, W. A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Shelton, D. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Stephens, T. (2009). International courts and environmental protection. England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Tams, C. J. (2005). Enforcing obligations erga omnes in international law. England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Verheyen, R. (2005). Climate change damage and international law: Prevention duties and state responsibility. Leiden, Neth.: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2019). State responsibility, climate change and human rights under international law. England, U.K.: Hart Publishing. （二）專書論文 Al-Khasawneh, A. S. (2013). The International Court of Justice and human rights. In S. Sheeran & S. N. Rodley (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international human rights law (pp. 353-370). England, U.K.: Routledge. Chang, Wen-Chen. (2017). Institutional leverage of International Human Rights: Discourse in the Age of Climate Change. In Yeh Jiunn-rong (Ed.), Climate change liability and beyond (pp. 139-174). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press. Crawford, J. (2011). Responsibility for breaches of communitarian norms: An appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. In U. Fastenrath et al. (Eds.), From bilateralism to community interest: Essays in honour of Bruno Simma (pp. 224-240). Oxford University Press. Fitzmaurice, M. (2013). The International Court of Justice and international environmental law. In C. J. Tams & J. Sloan (Eds.), The development of international law by the International Court of Justice (pp. 353-374). England, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Hunt, P., & Khosla, R. (2010). Climate Change and the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. In S. Humphreys (Ed.), Human rights and climate change (pp. 238-256). England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Kerbrat, Y. (2017). State responsibility and liability for climate change induced environmental damages. In J. Yeh (Ed.), Climate change liability and beyond. M.A., U.S.A.: Edward Elgar Publishing. Minnerop, P. (2024). Climate causality: From causation to attribution. In M. Wewerinke-Singh & S. Mead (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on climate change litigation (forthcoming). England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Rajamani, L., & Guérin, E. (2017). Central concepts in the Paris Agreement and how they evolved. In D. Klein et al. (Eds.), The Paris Agreement on Climate Change (pp. 74-90). Edward Elgar Publishing. Reetz, N. S. (2023). Through the looking glass: Climate change and the law of state responsibility. In S. Maljean-Dubois & J. Peel (Eds.), Climate change and the testing of international law (pp. 465-490). England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2022). The Rights Turn in Climate Litigation. In Litigating the climate emergency: How human rights, courts, and legal mobilization can bolster climate action (pp. 7-94). England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Sindico, F., et al. (2021). Climate change litigation and the individual: An overview. In F. Sindico & M. M. Mbengue (Eds.), Comparative climate change litigation: Beyond the usual suspects. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 47 (pp. 1-33). New York, U.S.: Springer, Cham. Stoll, P.-T. (2016). The climate as a global common. In D. A. Farber & M. Peeters (Eds.), Elgar encyclopedia of environmental law (pp. 131-141). M.A., U.S.A.: Edward Elgar Publishing. Strauss, A. (2009). Climate change litigation: Opening the door to the International Court of Justice. In W. C. G. Burns & H. M. Osofsky (Eds.), Adjudicating climate change: State, national, and international approaches (pp. 334–356). England, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Voigt, C. (2021). State responsibility for damages associated with climate change. In M. Doelle & S. Seck (Eds.), Research handbook on climate change law and loss & damage (pp. 166-183). M.A., U.S.A.: Edward Elgar Publishing. （三）期刊論文 Arcari, M. (2022). The future of the Articles on State Responsibility: A matter of form or of substance?. Questions of International Law, Zoom-in, 93, 3-21. Bellinkx, V., Casalin, D., Erdem Türkelli, G., Scholtz, W., & Vandenhole, W. (2022). Addressing Climate Change through International Human Rights Law: From (Extra)Territoriality to Common Concern of Humankind. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(1), 69-93. Bodansky, D. (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18(2), 451-558. Buser, A. (2021). Of Carbon Budgets, Factual Uncertainties, and Intergenerational Equity-The German Constitutional Court’s Climate Decision. German Law Journal, 22(8), 1409-1422. Burger, M., et al. (2020). The law and science of climate change attribution. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 45, 57-239. Crawford, J. (1999). Revising the draft articles on state responsibility. European Journal of International Law, 10(3), 435-460. Feria-Tinta, M. (2024). Climate change litigation in the European Court of Human Rights: Causation, imminence and other key underlying notions. European Rights & Liberties, 3, 52-72. Hartmann, J., & Willers, M. (2022). Protecting rights through climate change litigation before European courts. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 13(1), 90-113. Heri, C. (2022). Climate change before the European Court of Human Rights: Capturing risk, ill-treatment and vulnerability. European Journal of International Law, 33(3), 925-955. Hickel, J. (2020). Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: An equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(9), 399-404. Jean, M. (2021). Customary international law and the challenge of climate change: how to deal with the stagnation of the Paris Agreement? N.Y.U. Journal of International Law and Politics, 54, 85-99. Jones, M. W., et al. (2023). National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850. Scientific Data, 10, 155. Knox, J. H. (2019). Bringing human rights to bear on climate change. Climate Law, 9(3), 165-179. Kotzé, L. (2021). Neubauer et al. versus Germany: Planetary climate litigation for the Anthropocene? German Law Journal, 22(8), 1423-1444. Lentner, G. M., & Cenin, W. (2024). Daniel Billy et al v Australia (Torres Strait Islanders Petition): Climate change inaction as a human rights violation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 33, 136-143. Liston, G. (2020). Enhancing the efficacy of climate change litigation: how to resolve the “fair share question” in the context of international human rights law. Cambridge International Law Journal, 9(2), 241-263. Luporini, R., & Kodiveri, A.U. (2021). The role of human rights bodies in climate litigation. (European University Institution Working Paper). Mayer, B. (2019). The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Ruling of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (9 October 2018). Transnational Environmental Law, 8(1), 167-179. Mayer, B. (2021). Climate Change Mitigation as an Obligation Under Human Rights Treaties? American Journal of International Law, 115(3), 409-451. McGaughey, F., et al. (2024). Torres Strait Islanders leading the charge on the human rights implications of climate change: Daniel Billy et al. v Australia. University of Western Australia Law Review, 51(1), 88-89. McMenamin, R. (2023). Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change: Potential Contribution of Human Rights Bodies. Climate Law, 13(3-4), 213-223. Moise, J. (2021). Customary international law and the challenge of climate change: how to deal with the stagnation of the Paris Agreement? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 54, 85-99. Omuko, L. A. (2016). Applying the Precautionary Principle to Address the “Proof Problem” in Climate Change Litigation. Tilburg Law Review, 21(1), 52-71. Otto, F. E. L., et al. (2017). Assigning historic responsibility for extreme weather events. Nature Climate Change, 7, 757-759 . Peel, J. (2011). Issues in climate change litigation. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 5, 15-24. Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A Rights Turn in Climate Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 37-67. Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2020). Climate change litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 21-38. Savaresi, A., & Setzer, J. (2021). Mapping the Whole of the Moon: An Analysis of the Role of Human Rights in Climate Litigation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3787963. Shishlov, I., Morel, R., & Bellassen, V. (2016). Compliance of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol in the first commitment period. Climate Policy, 16(6), 768-782. Stuart-Smith, R. F., et al. (2021). Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation. Nature Climate Change, 11, 651-655. Trouwborst, A. (2009). Prevention, Precaution, Logic and Law—The Relationship Between the Precautionary Principle and the Preventative Principle in International Law and Associated Questions. Erasmus Law Review, 2, 105-127. Urs, P. (2019). Obligations erga omnes and the question of standing before the International Court of Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law, 32(3), 505-528. Voigt, C. (2016). The Paris Agreement: What Is the Standard of Conduct for Parties? Questions of International Law, 26, 17-28. Voigt, C. (2023). The power of the Paris Agreement in international climate litigation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32(2), 237-249. Weiss, E. B. (2002). Invoking state responsibility in the twenty-first century. American Journal of International Law, 96(4), 798-816. Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2019). Remedies for Human Rights Violations Caused by Climate Change. Climate Law, 9(3), 224-243. Wewerinke-Singh, M., & McCoach, A. (2021). The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 30(2), 275-287. （四）判決案例 1. 國際法院案例 Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Congo). (2012, June 19). Compensation, Judgment. International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 332. Application of Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (Gam. v. Myan.). (2020, Jan. 23). Provisional Measures, Order of 23 January 2020. International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 3. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (S. Afr. v. Isr.). (2024, May 24). Provisional Measures, Order, 2024 I.C.J. General List No. 192. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belg. v. Spain). (1970, Feb. 5). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 3. Case concerning East Timor (Portugal v. Australia). (1995, June 30). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 90. Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicar.) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicar. v. Costa Rica). (Dec. 2015). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 665. Corfu Channel (U.K. v. Alb.). (1949, Apr. 9). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 4. Gabčikovo-Nagymaros (Hung. v. Slov.) (1997, Sept. 25). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 7. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion. (2004, July 9). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 136. Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, Advisory Opinion. (2019, Feb. 29). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 95. Nuclear tests case (Austl. v. Fr.). (1974, Dec. 20). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 253. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.). (2010, Apr. 20). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 14. Questions Relating to Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belg. v. Sen.). (2012, July 20). International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 422. Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests case (N.Z. v. Fr.). (1995, Aug. 21). Order. International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 288. Reparations for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. (1949, Apr. 11). Advisory Opinion. International Court of Justice. I.C.J. Reports 174. 2. 歐洲人權法院案例 Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Other Member States. (2024, Apr. 9). European Court of Human Rights. App. No. 39371/20. Greenpeace Nordic and Others v. Norway. (2021, June 15). European Court of Human Rights. App. No. 34068/21. Müllner v. Austria and request for expedite proceedings under Rule 41. (2021, Mar. 25). Communicated Case. European Court of Human Rights. App. No. 5849/72. Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [Grand Chamber]. (2013, Nov. 7). European Court of Human Rights. App. No. 29381/09. Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland. (2024, Apr. 9). European Court of Human Rights. App. No. 53600/20 (Grand Chamber). 3. 聯合國人權公約機構案例 Apirana Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand. (2000, Nov. 15). U.N. Human Rights Committee. Communication No. 547/1993. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993. Chief Bernard Ominayak and Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada. (1990, Mar. 26). U.N. Human Rights Committee. Communication No. 167/1984. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/38/D/167/1984. Daniel Billy et al. v. Australia. (2019, July 21). Human Rights Committee. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/135/D/3624/2019. Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. (2020, January 7). Human Rights Committee. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016. Chiara Sacchi, et al. v. Argentina. (2021, October 8). U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. U.N. Doc. CRC/C/88/D/104/2019. Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Brazil. (2021, Oct. 8). U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. U.N. Doc. CRC/C/88/D/105/2019. Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany. (2021, Oct. 8). U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. U.N. Doc. CRC/C/88/D/107/2019. Chiara Sacchi et al. v. France. (2021, Oct. 8). U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child. U.N. Doc. CRC/C/88/D/106/2019. 4. 國內法院案例 Neubauer et al. v Germany. (2021, March 24). Bundesverfassungsgericht [Federal Constitutional Court]. Case No. BvR 2656/18/1, BvR 78/20/1, BvR 96/20/1, BvR 288/20. The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. (2019, Dec. 20). The Supreme Court of the Netherlands. Case 19/00135. Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment). (Dist. Ct. The Hague June 24, 2015) (Neth.). C/09/456689/HA ZA 13-1396. 5. 其他 Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law. (2024, May 21). Advisory Opinion of 21 May 2024. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Case No. 31. SS “Wimbledon”. (1923, Aug. 17). Permanent Court of International Justice. P.C.I.J. Ser. A No. 1. （五）國際條約與協定 Charter of the United Nations. (1945, June 26). 1 U.N.T.S. 16. Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989, Nov. 20). 1577 U.N.T.S 3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966, December 16). 999 U.N.T.S. 171. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1978). 993 UNTS 3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992, May 9). S. Treaty Doc. No. 102-38. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997, December 10). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2303 U.N.T.S. 162. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2012, December 8). Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol. U.N. Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/13/Add.1, Art. 1A. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015, December 12). Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. T.I.A.S. No. 16-1104. （六）聯合國核心人權公約一般性意見 Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. (1996, August 23). General recommendation no. 21 on the right to self-determination. U.N. Doc. A/51/18. Human Rights Council. (1984, March 13). General comment no. 12: Article 1 (Right to self-determination), The right to self-determination of peoples. U.N. Doc. CCPR/GC/12. Human Rights Council. (1994, April 8). General Comment no. 23: Article 27 (Rights of Minorities). U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5. Human Rights Council. (2019, September 3). General comment no. 36, Article 6 (Right to Life). U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/GC/35. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2000, August 11). General comment no. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health (art. 12 of the Covenant). U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2009, December 21). General comment no. 21: Right of everyone to take part in cultural life (art. 15, para. 1a of the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/21. （七）人權理事會與聯合國大會決議 Human Rights Council. (2008, March 8). Human rights and climate change. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/RES/7/23. Human Rights Council. (2011, October 17). Human rights and climate change. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/RES/18/22. Human Rights Council. (2014, July 15). Human rights and climate change. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/RES/26/27. Human Rights Council. (2015, July 22). Human rights and climate change. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/RES/29/15. United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. Res. 217 A (III). United Nations General Assembly. (1968). Problems of the human environment. G.A. Res. 2398. U.N. Doc. A/RES/2398(XXIII). United Nations General Assembly. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. G.A. Res. 2994. U.N. Doc. A/RES/2994. United Nations General Assembly. (1988). Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind. U.N. Doc. A/RES/43/53. United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind. U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/207. United Nations General Assembly. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I), Annex I. United Nations General Assembly. (2002). Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts. U.N. Doc. A/RES/56/83. United Nations General Assembly. (2007, September 13). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. G.A. Res. 61/295. United Nations General Assembly. (2019). Protection of global climate for present and future generations of humankind. U.N. Doc. A/RES/74/219. United Nations General Assembly. (2020). Protection of global climate for present and future generations of humankind. U.N. Doc. A/RES/75/217. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment: resolution. U.N. Doc. A/RES/76/300. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. U.N. Doc. A/RES/76/300. （八）國際組織報告或出版品 Bennoune, K. (2019, July 30). Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights. U.N. Doc. A/74/255. Crawford, J. (1998). State responsibility, First report on State responsibility by Mr. James Crawford, Special Rapporteur. U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/490 and Add.1-7. Depledge, J. (2000, November 25). Tracing the origins of the Kyoto Protocol: An article-by-article textual history. UNFCCC Secretariat Technical papers. U.N. Doc. FCCC/TP/2000/2. Gros Espiell, H. (1980). The right to self-determination: Implementation of United Nations resolutions, Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/405/Rev.1. Human Rights Council. (1994, July 6). Human rights and the environment: final report prepared by Fatma Zohra Ksentini (Special Rapporteur). U.N. Doc. E/CN.4 /Sub.2/1994/9. Human Rights Council. (2010, September 2). Implementation of Human Rights Council resolution 13/17 of 25 March 2010 entitled “The Social Forum”. U.N. Doc. HRC/SF/2010/2. Human Rights Council. (2016, February 1). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/31/52. Human Rights Council. (2020, December 24). Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, on her mission to Tuvalu. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/46/34/Add.1. International Law Commission. (2001). Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp. IV.E.1. International Law Commission. (2021). Report on the work of its seventy-second session. U.N. Doc. A/76/10. International Law Commission. (2022, April 19). Sea-level rise in relation to international law: Second issues paper by Patrícia Galvão Teles and Juan José Ruda Santolaria, Co-Chairs of the Study Group on Sea-level Rise in Relation to International Law. U.N. Doc A/CN.4/752. International Law Commission. (2022, August 12). Draft conclusions on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) with commentaries. U.N. Doc. A/77/10. International Law Commission. (2001). Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp. IV.E.1. International Law Commission. (2021). Report on the work of its seventy-second session. U.N. Doc. A/76/10. International Law Commission. (2022, April 19). Sea-level rise in relation to international law: Second issues paper by Patrícia Galvão Teles and Juan José Ruda Santolaria, Co-Chairs of the Study Group on Sea-level Rise in Relation to International Law. U.N. Doc A/CN.4/752. International Law Commission. (2022, August 12). Draft conclusions on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) with commentaries. U.N. Doc. A/77/10. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2009, January 15). Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/10/61. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2015). Understanding human rights and climate change: Submission of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https: //www.ohc hr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/ClimateChange/COP21.pdf. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2016). Analytical study on the relationship between climate change and the human right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/32/23. Setzer J. & Higham C. (2021) Global trends in climate change litigation: 2021 snapshot. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. Setzer J. & Higham C. (2022). Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2022 Snapshot. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Emissions gap report 2023: Broken record – Temperatures hit new highs, yet world fails to cut emissions (again). https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43922. United Nations Secretary-General. (2019, July 15). Human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. U.N. Doc. A/74/161. （九）IPCC報告 IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. IPCC, 2023: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. （十）UNFCCC會議報告 Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992, January 29). Report of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change on the work of its fourth session, held at Geneva from 9 to 20 December 1991, Article IV 2.1(b), at 37, U.N. Doc. A/AC.237/15. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1995, June 6). The Berlin Mandate: Review of the adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b), of the Convention, including proposals related to a protocol and decisions on follow-up. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its First Session, Held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995, Decision 1/CP.1. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2011, March 15). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2010, March 30). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009, Decision 2/CP.15. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015, February 2). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twentieth session, held in Lima from 1 to 14 December 2014, Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twentieth session, Decision 1/CP.20, Lima Call for Climate Action. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2016, January 29). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Decision 1/CP.21. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2021, November). Guidance on cooperative approaches referred to in Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement, Decision -/CMA.3. U.N. Doc. FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat. (2023, September 8). Technical dialogue of the first global stocktake: Synthesis report by the co-facilitators on the technical dialogue. U.N. Doc. FCCC/SB/2023/9. （十一）網路資料 Boyd, D. (2018, October 25). Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, Statement on the human rights obligations related to climate change, with a particular focus on the right to life. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Environment/FriendsIrishEnvironment25Oct2018.pdf. Boyd, D. R., & Orellana, M. A. Amicus Curiae Brief [of Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Other States] by UN Special Rapporteurs. Retrieved from http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/youth-for-climate-justice-v-austria-et-al/. Brazil’s high court first to declare Paris Agreement a human rights treaty. (2022, July 7). Yale Environment 360. Retrieved from https://e360.yale.edu/digest/paris-agreement-human-rights-treaty-brazil Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines. (2022, December). National inquiry on climate change report: A report by the Commission en Banc V of the Commission on Human Rights. https://www.escr-net.org/sites/default/files/case law/nicc_report.pdf. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. (2021, May 5). Third party intervention [on Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Other States] by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights under Article 36, paragraph 3, of the European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/youth-for-climate-justice-v-austria-et-al/. Crawford, J. (2001). Articles on Responsibility of State for International Wrongful Act. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. Retrieved from https: //legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/rsiwa/rsiwa_e.pdf. Crawford, James. (2006). State Responsibility. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Retrieved from https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/la w:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1093?prd=EPIL. European Court of Human Rights. The Admissibility of an Application. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/COURtalks_Inad_Talk_ENG.PDF. ESCR-Net. (2019, January 11). Colombian Supreme Court rules to protect future generations and Amazon rainforest in climate change case. Retrieved from https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2019/stc-4360-2018. Gaja, G. Standing: International Court of Justice (ICJ). Oxford Public International Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law. https://op il.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3661.013.3661/law-mpeipro-e3661. Kammerhofer, J. Obligations erga omnes. Oxford Public International Law. Retrieved from https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/978019923169 0/law-9780199231690-e1400#. LSE Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. (2021, January 13). What is climate change ‘Loss and Damage’? Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-is-climate-change-loss-and-damage/. Luporini, R., & Kodiveri, A. U. (2021). The role of human rights bodies in climate litigation. European University Institute, Working Paper No. EUI LAW; 2021/12. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1814/72765. McGrath, M. (2020, November 4). Climate change: US formally withdraws from Paris agreement. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54797743. Nedeski, N., & Nollkaemper, A. (2022, December 15). A guide to tackling the collective causation problem in international climate change litigation. EJIL:Talk!. Retrieved from https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-guide-to-tackling-the-collective-causation-problem-in-international-climate-change-litigation/. Nollkaemper, A. (2024). Causation puzzles in international climate litigation. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2024-17. Forthcoming in 2024 Italian Yearbook of International Law. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=3811486. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2019, September 9). Global update at the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council, Opening statement by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. UN Media Center. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2019/09/global-update-42n d-session-human-rights-council. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Individual communications, human rights treaty bodies. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaty-bodies/individual-communications#whocan. Petition to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States. (2006, November 16). Retrieved from https://earthjustice.org/pre ss/2005/inuit-human-rights-petition-filed-over-climate-change. Request for an advisory opinion on the scope of the state obligations for responding to the climate emergency, Advisory Opinion Request (unofficial English translation). Retrieved from https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/non-us-case-doc uments/2023/20230109_18528_petition-2.pdf Rosenne, S. International Court of Justice (ICJ). Oxford Public International Law. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199 231690-e34. Small Island States Conference. (2007, November 14). Malé Declaration on the Human Dimension of Global Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ciel.org/ Publications/Male_Declaration_Nov07.pdf. United Nations. (2015, December 12). UN chief hails new climate change agreement as “monumental triumph”. UN News Centre. Retrieved from https://www.un.or g/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2015/12/un-chief-hails-new-climate-change-agreement-as-monumental-triumph/. United Nations. (2019, September 23). Greta Thunberg tells world leaders ‘you are failing us’, as nations announce fresh climate action. UN News. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/09/1047052. United Nations Climate Change. Status of ratification of the convention. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-convention/status-of-ratification -of-the-convention. United Nations Climate Change. What is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change? Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/what-is-the-united-nations-framework-convention-on-climate-change. Viñuales, J. (2016, February 7). The Paris climate agreement: An initial examination (Part I of III). EJIL:Talk!. Retrieved from https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-paris-climate-agreement-an-initial-examination-part-i-of-ii/. World Health Organization. (2014). Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death, 2030s and 2050s. Retrieved from https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/134014/9789241507691eng.pdf?seq uence=1 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95685 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 國際氣候變遷治理體系主要由《聯合國氣候變遷綱要公約》、《京都議定書》及《巴黎協定》等國際氣候條約所構築。這樣的治理體系縱然獲得國際社會的廣泛支持，卻因缺乏法律拘束力、強制力與有效監督機制等問題，使國際間溫室氣體減量管制成效不彰，並飽受各界批評。近年來，全球暖化與氣候變遷不斷惡化，促使國際社會開始在氣候條約之外尋找新的氣候變遷治理規範，基此背景，國際間興起一波以國家人權義務為基礎，主張國家氣候變遷減緩政策與措施未能達成國際減排承諾與目標的氣候人權訴訟。本文聚焦氣候變遷減緩的國家義務，探討近年歐洲人權法院與聯合國人權公約機制中的氣候人權訴訟案件，分析氣候變遷對人權的影響與威脅，以及氣候人權訴訟中常見的當事人適格、因果關係、與作為義務標準等訴訟問題。本文發現，近年來的氣候人權訴訟標誌著氣候條約體系橋接具拘束力且提供救濟途徑的人權規範體系的趨勢，氣候減緩的義務以積極人權義務為載體，形成了氣候條約外的治理機制。承接此強化國際氣候條約減緩義務的需求，又鑑於氣候人權訴訟中未解的訴訟障礙，本文進一步提出在氣候條約與國際人權法體系外，從一般國際法之國家責任法框架，強化氣候變遷減緩國際義務的可能性。本文認為，透過《巴黎協定》下的氣候變遷減緩目標與義務，結合氣候人權訴訟中所觀察到的減緩義務之人權保護效力與關聯性，可以建立以《巴黎協定》核心減緩條約義務為「對締約國整體義務」，進而從一般國際法層次強化條約義務效力的論述。並且，透過國家責任法原理原則與案例，能舒緩在國家責任法框架中提起氣候變遷減緩國際訴訟所面對的因果關係舉證難度，亦能在一定程度上避免人權法院與申訴機制中嚴格的訴訟程序要件限制。從一般國際法層次，透過國家責任法框架與《巴黎協定》條約義務建立之氣候變遷減緩國際義務，能在既有的條約義務下與人權法規範外，進一步強化既有氣候條約義務之拘束力與國家氣候責任問責性，形成更全面且完善的國際氣候變遷減緩治理圖像。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The international climate change treaty regime, primarily constructed of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol, and now the Paris Agreement, has received widespread support and is considered a political success within the international community.
However, the treaty regime faces criticism for its lack of binding substantive mitigation obligation, and its ineffective legal mechanisms for enforcement, supervision, and accountability, which results in insufficient greenhouse gas emission control and the aggravation of global warming. The severity and urgency of climate change in recent years have prompted the need to seek new regulatory mechanisms for climate change governance beyond climate treaties. Against this backdrop, there has been a surge in rights-based climate litigation globally. Based on human rights obligations, litigants turn to courts to challenge the overall efforts of a State to mitigate climate change by alleging that its domestic mitigation policies and measures fail to achieve the goals and commitments acknowledged in international climate treaties and, among other focuses, States’ obligations to ensure the enjoyment of fundamental human rights such as the right to life and self-determination. This paper focuses on international obligations on climate change mitigation. While exploring recent rights-based climate litigation cases within the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations human rights mechanisms, this paper analyzes the impact of climate change on human rights and the common hurdles in rights-based climate litigation, such as standing/victim status, causation, the requirement of exhausting local remedies, and the standards of care of obligations to mitigate risk and harm posed by climate change to the enjoyment of human rights. This paper finds that recent rights-based climate litigation marks a trend of bridging climate treaty regimes with the framework of human rights law. The international obligation of climate change mitigation, carried as positive human rights obligations, forms a new governance scheme outside international climate treaties. In response to this shift of regulatory forum and considering unresolved hurdles in rights-based climate litigation, this paper further proposes to reinforce the climate treaty regime, particularly the Paris Agreement, by establishing international obligations for climate change mitigation within the framework of the law of state responsibility. This paper suggests that by integrating the mitigation goals and obligations under the Paris Agreement with the efficacy and relevance of human rights protection observed in rights-based climate litigation, it is possible to establish core mitigation obligations under the Paris Agreement as obligations erga omnes partes. This would form a binding and substantive mitigation obligation under the Paris Agreement, which in turn creates a narrative for standing to initiate climate litigation in the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Moreover, through the law of state responsibility, the burden of proving causation and satisfying strict procedural requirements in rights-based climate litigations can be alleviated. Identifying substantial international obligations on climate change mitigation under the Paris Agreement through the framework of the law of state responsibility, not only allows for a malleable and flexible application of various international obligations, but also reinforces climate change mitigating obligations under the treaty regime, and facilitates mitigation accountability within climate treaties and beyond human rights norms, thereby establishing a more comprehensive and robust international climate change mitigation governance regime. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-15T16:47:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-09-15T16:47:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II Abstract III 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法與範圍 2 第三節 名詞定義 3 第四節 論文回顧 5 第一項 國際氣候變遷減緩義務之相關基礎研究 5 第二項 氣候變遷與人權法相關基礎研究 6 第三項 相關國家責任基礎研究 7 第五節 研究架構 8 第二章 氣候變遷減緩的國際治理 10 第一節 氣候變遷減緩的條約治理 10 第一項 聯合國氣候變遷綱要公約 10 第二項 京都議定書 15 第三項 巴黎協定 19 第四項 氣候變遷條約治理的價值及困境 24 第二節 氣候變遷減緩與國際人權規範 28 第一項 國際人權規範與氣候變遷之連結 28 第二項 氣候變遷議題下的國際人權規範 31 第三項 取逕人權架構的氣候變遷減緩議題 41 第三章 氣候變遷減緩與人權訴訟 45 第一節 氣侯人權訴訟的興起 45 第二節 氣候人權訴訟中的減緩義務 46 第一項 案例研究方法與案例的篩選 47 第二項 國內人權訴訟案例 49 第三項 聯合國人權申訴案例 51 第四項 歐洲人權法院案例 65 第三節 氣候人權訴訟中的主要法律議題 98 第一項 程序問題 98 第二項 實體問題 105 第四節 小結 121 第四章 透過國家責任法框架強化氣候變遷減緩國際義務 123 第一節 國際責任法框架對氣候變遷減緩治理的價值 123 第一項 氣候人權訴訟的限制 123 第二項 國際責任法框架與國家責任的成立 125 第三項 國際責任法框架的彈性與開放性 127 第四項 對世義務與對締約國整體義務的適用 130 第五項 在國際法院中處理氣候變遷減緩治理與人權議題 133 第二節 國家間氣候變遷減緩訴訟：以菲律賓對美國為試想 139 第一項 申請案由 139 第二項 菲律賓之主張 142 第三項 提起訴訟的適格 143 第四項 國家歸責問題 161 第五項 因果關係問題 166 第六項 違反《巴黎協定》減緩義務之國家責任 184 第三節 小結 186 第五章 結論 189 參考文獻 196 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 減緩 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候變遷訴訟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候訴訟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人權訴訟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國家責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對締約國整體義務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候變遷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Obligations Erga Omnes Partes | en |
| dc.subject | Climate Change | en |
| dc.subject | Mitigation | en |
| dc.subject | Climate Change Litigation | en |
| dc.subject | Climate Litigation | en |
| dc.subject | Human Rights Litigation | en |
| dc.subject | State Responsibility | en |
| dc.title | 強化氣候變遷減緩的國際義務 ── 從氣候人權訴訟到國家責任法框架 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Reinforcing International Obligations on Climate Change Mitigation: From Rights-based Climate Change Litigation to the Law of State Responsibility | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉俊榮;林春元 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jiunn-Rong Yeh;Chun-Yuan Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 氣候變遷,減緩,氣候變遷訴訟,氣候訴訟,人權訴訟,國家責任,對締約國整體義務, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Climate Change,Mitigation,Climate Change Litigation,Climate Litigation,Human Rights Litigation,State Responsibility,Obligations Erga Omnes Partes, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 220 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403697 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-13 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。