請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94402完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 盧道杰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dau-Jye Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳忠峻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jhong-Jyun Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T17:17:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文書目
王建臺、姜穎 (2012)。布農族的狩獵-歷史、空間與權利。行政院原住民族委員會國史館臺灣文獻館。 李美良 (2004) 。法國山岳活動的發展現況與登山教育制度。2004全國登山研討會論文集,271-284。 沙力浪 Salizan (2019) 。用頭帶揹起一座座山:嚮導背工與巡山員的故事。健行。 林宜龍 (2020) 。山林開放政策回顧與展望。2020全國登山研討會論文集,25-44。 林玫君 (2010)。既抗拒又協助-日治時期臺灣原住民與登山活動之糾葛。楊南郡先生及其同世代臺灣原住民研究與臺灣登山史國際研討會,花蓮。 林玫君 (2006)。從探險到休閒-日治時期臺灣登山活動之歷史圖像。博揚文化。 林玫君 (2008)。臺灣登山一百年。玉山社。 林政翰、王士豪 (2012) 。活化登山協作產業暨登山協作產業導入野外緊急救護初探。雪霸國家公園管理處。 沼井鐵太郎 (1997)。臺灣登山小史。(吳永華譯)。晨星。(原著出版於1939、1941年)。 海樹兒.犮剌拉菲 (2006)。布農族部落起源及部落遷移史。行政院原住民族委員會國史館臺灣文獻館。 畢恆達 (2020)。教授為什麼沒告訴我。小畢空間。 陳永龍、鄭安晞 (2013)。臺灣登山史-總論。內政部營建署。 鳥居龍藏 (2021)。台灣中央山脈之橫斷。載於楊南郡 (譯註),探險台灣-鳥居龍藏的台灣人類學之旅 (357-418頁)。遠流出版。 鹿野忠雄 (2000)。山、雲與蕃人 : 臺灣高山紀行。(楊南郡譯)。玉山社。(原著出版於1941年)。 鈕文英 (2019)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。 黃信富、鄭伊娟 (2020) 。向山致敬,因為山就在那裡–山林開放之政策省思、意涵及階段成果。臺灣林業,46(1),5-12。 黃福森 (2023)。台灣供餐協作產業現況分析與改善建議。2023全國登山研討會論文集,67-74。 黃應貴 (1992)。東埔社布農人的社會生活。中央研究院民族學研究所。 楊南郡、徐如林 (2016)。尋訪月亮的腳印。晨星。 楊凱琳 (2018) 。嘉明湖國家步道與在地原住民族協作產業發展。臺灣林業,44(5),33-36。 董威言 (2021)。登一座人文的山。奇光出版。 榮秀蘭 (2019)。揹工產業永續經營之研究 : 以海端鄉為例 (碩士論文)。明新科技大學。 劉立文、石裕川 (2019) 。揹工揹負作業生物力學研究。勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。 潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究理論與應用。心理。 蔡文科 (2006)。臺灣高山地區原住民挑夫工作經驗傳承之研究 (碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。 蔡文科 (2006)。臺灣高山地區職業技能教育之關係初探─以原住民挑夫工作為例。http://ie011.ez-go.com.tw/ezcatfiles/ie011/img/img/6/110405-4.pdf 蔡文科、陳永龍 (2010) 。臺灣原住民登山協作與就業保障初探。2010全國登山研討會論文集。 Erve Chambers (2019)。觀光人類學:旅行對在地文化的深遠影響。(李宗義、許雅淑譯)。游擊文化。(原著出版於2009年)。 英文書目 Beedie, P., & Hudson, S. (2003). Emergence of mountain-based adventure tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 625-643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(03)00043-4 Blasco, D., Guia, J., & Prats, L. (2016). Mountain tourism supply-chain networks in cross-border settings: the case of Intercerdanya, Spain. In Mountain tourism: experiences, communities, environments and sustainable futures (pp. 235-245). CABI Wallingford UK. Bodega, D., Cioccarelli, G., & Denicolai, S. (2004). New inter‐organizational forms: evolution of relationship structures in mountain tourism. Tourism Review, 59(3), 13-19. Deuchar, C., & Milne, S. (2016). Rural tourism and small business networks in mountain areas: integrating information communication technologies (ICT) and community in Western Southland, New Zealand. In Mountain tourism: experiences, communities, environments and sustainable futures (pp. 280-289). CABI Wallingford UK. Hadfield, L. A. (2020). Historical Change in Porter Work on Kilimanjaro. Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania: Local Communities, Land Use Change, and Management Challenges, 29-44. Kaukal, M., Werthner, H., & Hoepken, W. (2000). An approach to enable interoperability in electronic tourism markets. ECIS 2000 Proceedings, 121. Loewenstein, G. (1999). Because it is there: The challenge of mountaineering… for utility theory. Kyklos, 52(3), 315-343. Muller, T. E., & Cleaver, M. (2000). Targeting the CANZUS baby boomer explorer and adventurer segments. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 6(2), 154-169. Nepal, S. K. (2016). Tourism and change in Nepal's Mt Everest region. In Mountain tourism: Experiences, communities, environments and sustainable futures (pp. 270-279). CABI Wallingford UK. Ortner, S. B. (1999). Life and death on Mt. Everest: Sherpas and Himalayan mountaineering. Princeton University Press. Panzeri, D., Caroli, P., & Haack, B. (2013). Sagarmatha Park (Mt Everest) porter survey and analysis. Tourism management, 36, 26-34. Pomfret, G. (2006). Mountaineering adventure tourists: a conceptual framework for research. Tourism management, 27(1), 113-123. Richins, H., & Hull, J. S. (2016). Mountain tourism: Experiences, communities, environments and sustainable futures. Cabi. Richins, H., Johnsen, S., & Hull, J. S. (2016). Overview of mountain tourism: substantive nature, historical context, areas of focus. In Mountain tourism: Experiences, communities, environments and sustainable futures (pp. 1-12). CABI Wallingford UK. Smith, G. A., & Kiesinger, C. D. (2023). mountaineering. . https://www.britannica.com/sports/mountaineering Tapper, R., & Font, X. (2004). Tourism supply chains. Report of a desk research project for the travel foundation, 23. UNWTO. (2018). Sustainable Mountain Tourism – Opportunities for Local Communities, Executive Summary. UNWTO. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284420285 UNWTO. (2023). Understanding and Quantifying Mountain Tourism. FAO/UNWTO. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284424023 Zhang, X., Song, H., & Huang, G. Q. (2009). Tourism supply chain management: A new research agenda. Tourism management, 30(3), 345-358. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94402 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 臺灣的原住民,尤其是居住在中央山脈的布農族,傳統生活與山林活動密不可分。在登山活動中,他們經常扮演帶路、背負重物、烹煮食物及確保安全等角色。當代,這樣的角色被稱為高山協作。它是原鄉少有的產業自主發展機會,然而,對於臺灣高山協作的深入研究仍然有限,因此,本研究旨在填補這一研究缺口。本文透過深度訪談和參與觀察等質性研究方法,以南投縣信義鄉及臺東縣海端鄉為田野地點,探討高山協作的產業歷史、運作機制,以及其在山岳旅遊產業鏈的位置、網絡關係。
早在清領與日治時期,布農族人已經開始為外來者提供山區嚮導與挑夫的服務。光復後,百岳運動帶動了登山風潮,族人的背負能力獲得許多揹工的工作機會,卻多為商業隊壓榨。隨著登山管制解除後,登山活動成為熱門的戶外活動之一,布農族人也合作形成團體,將高山協作產業化並進行專業分工:有協助縱走的高山協作、專門背負物資的揹工、及駐點提供伙食的駐點協作等。高山協作產業既可透過駐點在登山路線,提供高山伙食及裝備租借服務;也可以透過人力派遣與商業登山隊的嚮導及領隊配合。 本研究以Zhang et al. (2009) 的旅遊產業鏈討論臺灣的山岳旅遊。發現高山協作產業在產業鏈中屬供給者的角色,提供登山活動的後勤和人力支援。商業登山隊則為旅行社的角色,負責市場行銷、整合其他關係產業如:交通接駁、民宿和在地餐飲。兩者共同建構商業登山活動的核心。這種以商業登山隊為主導運作的山岳旅遊,在Bodega et al. (2004) 所提出的四種分析阿爾卑斯山地區的山岳旅遊模式中,屬於中心化程度低、關係密度高的「治理模式」。而在一些個案中,能看到在地高山協作產業跨足商業登山隊的業務範疇,發展出一條龍的商業模式。這種模式透過在地的社會凝聚力及信任,形成互相合作的網絡,類似「群集模式」,具有高關係度的特性。 最後,本研究也發現高山協作產業的可持續發展,很大程度取決於和主管機關的互動。而登山活動中在地部落的位置及參與,也是討論整個山岳旅遊議題時需思考的方向。通過公私協力模式,可以確保協作產業合法運營,提高服務品質和經營穩定性。山林開放後,大量人潮湧入山林,公私協力模式除了替協作產業帶來工作機會,也能妥善治理登山路線、協助山難救援、進行登山教育,是主管機關的第一線夥伴。值政府益見重視山村發展與夥伴關係,高山協作不僅是政府培力部落的重要管道,也是部落參與山林治理的路徑之一,勢必在部落永續發展論述上佔有關鍵的位置。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's indigenous peoples, particularly the Bunun people residing in the Central Mountain Range, have a lifestyle deeply intertwined with mountain activities. In hiking, they often play roles such as guides, porters, cooks, and safety enforcers. In contemporary times, these roles are referred to as mountain collaborator. This is one of the few opportunities for industrial self-development in indigenous regions. However, there is limited research on Taiwan's mountain collaborator. This study aims to fill this research gap. Through qualitative research methods such as in-depth interviews and participant observation, this study explores the industrial history, operational mechanisms, and network relationships of mountain collaborator Industry in Xinyi Township, Nantou County, and Haiduan Township, Taitung County.
As early as the Qing dynasty and Japanese colonial periods, the Bunun people began to provide guiding and porter services for outsiders in mountainous areas. After the retrocession of Taiwan, the Centuple Mountains movement spurred a hiking trend, and the Bunun people's ability to carry heavy loads secured them many porter jobs, although they were often exploited by commercial teams. With the lifting of mountain restrictions, hiking became one of the most popular outdoor activities. The Bunun people also formed groups to industrialize and professionalize mountain collaborator: there are mountain collaborator assisting with long distance trekking, porters specializing in carrying supplies, and catering collaborator providing meals at specific locations. Mountain collaborator teams can offer on-site services such as high-altitude catering and equipment rentals along trail or collaborate with commercial hiking teams as guides and leaders through labor dispatch. This study discusses Taiwan's mountain tourism industry using the tourism supply chain framework of Zhang et al. (2009). The high mountain cooperation industry acts as a supplier within the supply chain, providing logistical and manpower support for mountaineering activities. Commercial climbing teams serve the role of travel agencies, responsible for market promotion and integrating other related industries such as transportation, accommodations, and local dining. Together, these two components form the core of commercial mountaineering activities. According to the four mountain tourism models proposed by Bodega et al. (2004) for the Alps region, this type of mountain tourism, dominated by commercial climbing teams, falls under the "governed model" characterized by low centralization and high relationship density. In some cases, the local high mountain cooperation industry has expanded into the realm of commercial climbing team operations, developing a one-stop-shop business model. This model, built on local social cohesion and trust, forms a cooperative network similar to the "constellation model" characterized by high relational density. Lastly, this study also finds that the sustainable development of the mountain collaborator industry largely depends on its interaction with regulatory authorities. The role and participation of local communities in mountaineering activities are also crucial considerations when discussing the broader issue of mountain tourism. Through public-private partnership models, the legal operation of the cooperation industry can be ensured, service quality and business stability can be improved. After the opening of mountain areas, the influx of large crowds necessitates effective governance of climbing routes, assistance in mountain rescue operations, and the provision of mountaineering education, positioning the cooperation industry as a key partner for regulatory authorities. As the government increasingly values mountain village development and partnerships, the high mountain cooperation industry not only serves as a vital channel for governmental support of tribes but also as a pathway for tribal participation in mountain governance, thus playing a crucial role in the discourse on sustainable development for indigenous communities. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T17:17:56Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T17:17:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 iii Abrasct v 目次 vii 圖次 ix 表次 ix 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究動機 1 第二節、研究目的與提問 4 第二章、文獻回顧 5 第一節、登山活動 5 一、 登山 (mountaineering) 的本質 5 二、 近代登山活動的源起 5 三、 臺灣的登山活動與登山史 6 第二節、山岳旅遊和產業鏈 11 一、 山岳旅遊的定義 11 二、 山岳旅遊的發展與影響 11 三、 山岳旅遊產業網絡 12 第三節、臺灣的高山協作產業 15 一、 高山協作性質與工作內容 15 二、 布農族與高山協作的關聯 18 三、 高山協作的產業發展與困境 19 第三章、研究方法與參與對象 22 第一節、研究方法 22 一、 深度訪談 22 二、 參與觀察 22 第二節、研究場域與對象 24 一、 研究者的位置 24 二、 研究地點 24 三、 訪談對象 27 第四章、高山協作的發展歷史與團隊運作 30 第一節、高山協作的名稱演變與歷史: 30 一、 清領到日治時代的山林探險 (1874-1935):引路的嚮導,登山活動的隱形開拓者。 31 二、 光復初期到百岳熱潮 (1950-1980):從嚮導到山青,休閒登山活動的興起。 34 三、 百岳熱潮後 (1980-2000):是揹工還是「悲」工? 36 四、 登山管制解除 (2000-2010):從個人到團體,從被支配導找回自主權。 38 五、 高山協作的新時代 (2010-):成為商業登山活動的主角。 42 第二節、高山協作運作與團隊分工 44 一、 高山協作產業的運作機制 44 二、 公司與跑單幫 46 三、 高山協作產業的角色分工 51 小結 60 第五章、山岳旅遊產業鏈與高山協作發展機會 61 第一節、臺灣的山岳旅遊產業鏈 61 一、 山岳旅遊產業鏈的角色 61 二、 在地高山協作產業的一條龍機制與轉型 67 第二節、高山協作產業議題與發展機會 74 一、 高山協作產業的議題與困境 74 二、 從嘉明湖到戒茂斯:主管機關、高山協作團體、在地部落的三角關係 76 小結 85 第六章、結論 86 第一節、研究發現與貢獻 86 一、 高山協作的名稱演變與發展歷史 86 二、 高山協作產業運作機制與山岳旅遊產業鏈互動 87 三、 高山協作的一條龍發展與主管機關互動關係 87 第二節、研究限制與建議 89 參考文獻 91 附錄、訪綱 94 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 山林治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公私協力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 商業登山活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 山岳旅遊產業鏈 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高山協作產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Social Network | en |
| dc.subject | Mountain Tourism Industrial Chain | en |
| dc.subject | Commercial hiking Activities | en |
| dc.subject | Mountain Collaborator Industry | en |
| dc.subject | Forest Management | en |
| dc.subject | Public-Private Partnership | en |
| dc.title | 揹行山林:高山協作產業運作機制與產業鏈 -以臺東縣海端鄉及南投縣信義鄉為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Carrying the Mountain: The Operational Mechanism and Industry Chain of Mountain Collaborator Industry - A Case Study of Haiduan Township in Taitung County and Xinyi Township in Nantou County | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林靖修;趙芝良;葉美智 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jing-Siou Lin;Chin-Liang Chao;Mei-Chih Yeh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 山岳旅遊產業鏈,商業登山活動,高山協作產業,山林治理,公私協力,社會網絡, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Mountain Tourism Industrial Chain,Commercial hiking Activities,Mountain Collaborator Industry,Forest Management,Public-Private Partnership,Social Network, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 96 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403604 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-06 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.71 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
