請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94314
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉秋婉 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chiu Wan Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳映汝 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ying Ju Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:46:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文
于曉平、林幸台(2010)。〈角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究〉。《教育科學研究期刊》,55(1),27-61。 王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。〈教師張權益能的概念與實施策略〉。《教育研究集刊》,44,173-224。 行政院(2011)。《性別平等政策綱領》。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/FD420B6572C922EA。2021/04/17檢索。 行政院(2013)。〈提升女孩權益行動方案〉。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/5CB183E10FB053AE。2021/04/17檢索。 行政院性別平等會(2022)。〈提升女孩權益重要議題〉。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/84122D546225E9D5。2024/7/25檢索。 行政院性別平等會(2023)。《2023年性別圖像》。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/8996A23EDB9871BE。2023/7/29檢索。 行政院青少年事務促進委員會(2005)。《青少年政策白皮書綱領》。https://www.yda.gov.tw/upload/cont_att/4cdb53a4-9f78-42dc-99c2-38b5dfe64944.pdf。2023/09/09檢索。 宋麗玉(2006)。〈增強權能量表之發展與驗證〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,10 (2),49-86。 宋麗玉(2008)。〈增強權能策略與方法:台灣本土經驗之探索〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》 ,12(2),123-194。 李建霆(2018)。〈男同志的身體展演-以同志友善機構空間為例〉。《國立彰化師範大學文學院學報》,(18),171-200。 杜承嶸、官有垣(2019)。〈從非營利組織與政府的互動觀點審視臺灣社會福利民營化發展〉。《社區發展季刊》,(166),28-41。 林慧芬(2010)。〈台灣女性創業者之解析:女性主義充權觀點的探討〉。南投:國立暨南國際大學人文學院社會政策與社會工作學系,博士論文。 畢恆達(2004)。〈女性性別意識形成歷程〉。《通識教育季刊》,11(1&2),117-146。 畢恆達(2004)。《空間就是性別》。臺北:心靈工坊。 許義忠(2007)。〈青少女眼中性別化的運動與遊憩空間〉。《觀光研究學報》,13(3),193-211。 陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 陳杏容(2021)。〈探索成年初顯期特徵、家庭經濟與心理健康之關聯〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,34(3),193-227。(TSSCI) 游美惠(2002)。〈身體、性別與性教育:女性主義的觀點〉。臺北:女學學誌。 鈕文英(2003)。《質性研究方法與論文寫作》。臺北:雙葉書廊有限公司。 黃麗鈴(2019)。〈從社會科學研究典範質量之辯探析混合研究〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》,8(6),163-177。 廖小雯、程景琳(2011)。〈成年初顯期的自我認同狀態、自我定義記憶之解釋歷程與心理幸福感之關係探討〉。《應用心理研究》,(51),79-110。 臺中市政府社會局(2023)。〈臺中市政府社會局112年性別主流化執行成果報告〉。https://www.society.taichung.gov.tw/media/1074447/臺中市政府社會局112年性別主流化執行成果報告.pdf。2024/07/25檢索。 臺中市政府社會局(2023)。〈臺中市政府社會局112年度婦女福利施政計畫〉。https://www.society.taichung.gov.tw/media/891962/112年婦女福利年度施政計畫.pdf。2024/07/25檢索。 劉淑瓊(2019)。〈我們不一樣—論小型在地非營利組織承接政府社服委外的挑戰與機會〉, 《社區發展季刊》,(166),170-188。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。臺北:心理出版社。 聯合國(2022)。〈國際女童日〉。https://www.un.org/zh/observances/girl-child-day。2023/5/22檢索。 聯合國兒童基金會(2018)。〈三個機會之窗——利用科學為青少年和年輕人的規劃提供信息〉。https://www.unicef-irc.org/evidence-for-action/three-windows-of-opportunity-for-adolescents/。2023/4/17檢索。 簡正鎰 (2005) 。〈進行質性訪談研究有關倫理議題之探討〉。《輔導季刊》,41:1卷,47-57。 貳、英文 Allen, A. (1999). The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance, solidarity. Westview Press. Arnett, J. J. (1994). “Are college students adults? Their conceptions of the transition to adulthood.” Journal of Adult Development, 1(4), 213-224. Arnett, J. J. (1997). “Young people’s conceptions of the transition to adulthood.” Youth & Society, 29(1), 3-23. Arnett, J. J. (1998). “Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in Cultural and Historical Context.” Human Development, 41, 295-315. Arnett, J. J. (2000). “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.” American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. Arnett, J. J. (2007). “Emerging Adulthood: What Is It, and What Is It Good For?” Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 68-73. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co. Benson, M. and Jackson, E. (2013). “Place-Making and place maintenance: performativity, place and belonging among the middle classes”, Sociology, 47(4), 793-809. Beyes, T. and Steyaert, C. (2012). “Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space”, Organization, 19(1), 45-61. Bidar, M., Pakzad, J., Kazemi, A. V. (2022). “Gendered space: Women's presence and use of space in Sabzeh-meydan of Tehran Bazaar.” Cities, 126, 103673. Boehm, A., & Staples, L. (2004). “Empowerment: The Point of View of Consumers. Families in Society.” The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85, 270-280. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Pearson A & B. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity. Routledge. Carr, E. S. (2003). “Rethinking empowerment theory using a feminist lens: the importance of process.” Affilia, 18(8), 8-20. Cheah, C. S. L., Trinder, K. M., & Gokavi, T. N. (2010). “Urban/rural and gender differences among Canadian emerging adults.” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(4), 339-344. Dahl, R. A. (1957). “The concept of power.” Behavioral Science, 2, 201-215. De La Fuente, R., Parra, Á., Sánchez-Queija, I., & Lizaso, I. (2020). “Flourishing During Emerging Adulthood from a Gender Perspective.” Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(8), 2889-2908. Elmhirst, R. (2007). “Tigers and gangsters: masculinities and feminised migration in Indonesia.” Population, Space and Place, 13, 225-238. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Co. Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton. Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment. The politics of an alternative development. Basil Blackwell. Gilbert, N., Terrell, P. (2005). Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy. Pearson Allyn and Bacon. Gregson, N. and Rose, G. (2000). “Taking butler elsewhere: performativities, spatialities and subjectivities.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(4), 433-452. Grosz, E. (2010). “The practice of feminist theory.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21(1), 95-107. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. SAGE Publications. Gutierrez, L. M., Parsons, R. J., & Cox, E. O. (1998). Empowerment in Social Work Practice. A Sourcebook. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Ip, P.-K. (2014). “Harmony as happiness? Social harmony in two Chinese societies.” Social indicators research, 117(3), 719-741. Isaac, J. C. (1987). “On the Subject of Political Theory.” Political Theory, 15(4), 639-645. Jalil, M. M. (2023). “State versus Market Debate and Shaping of the Gender Empowerment Agenda.” Review of Development and Change, 28(1), 45-66. Jayawardena, D. (2020). “Other’s place or othering space: Reframing the performativity of the neoliberalized space(s) of factory women in a free trade zone in Sri Lanka.” Gender in Management, 35(5), 405-421. Kabeer, N. (1999). “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment.” Development and Change, 30, 435-464. Kabeer, N. (2005). “Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1.” Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24, Kelan, E.K. (2010). “Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work.” Gender, Work and Organization, 17(2), 174-194. Kuang, J., Zhong, J., Arnett, J. J., Hall, D. L., & Chen, E. (2022). “Conceptions of Adulthood among Chinese Emerging Adults.” Journal of adult development, 31(1), 1-13. Lee, J. A. B. (2001). The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice. University Press. Levinson, D. J. (1978). The Seasons of a man’s life (1st ed). Knopf. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills. Lukes, S. (1972). Power: a radical review(1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Harvard University Press. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. SAGE Publications. Miley, K., & DuBois, B. (2007). “Ethical Preferences for the Clinical Practice of Empowerment Social Work.” Social work in health care, 44, 29-44. Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Peters, K. (2015). “The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals.” Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465-483. Morriss, P. (2002). Power: A Philosophical Analysis, Second Edition. University Press. Omwami, E. M. (2011). “Relative‐change theory: Examining the impact of patriarchy, paternalism, and poverty on the education of women in Kenya.” Gender and Education, 23(1), 15-28. Padilla-Walker, L., Nelson, L., Madsen, S., & Barry, C. (2008). “The Role of Perceived Parental Knowledge on Emerging Adults’ Risk Behaviors.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 847-859. Pansardi, P. (2012). “Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power?” Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 73-89. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. Jossey-Bass Inc. Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. University of California Press. Poorman, P. B. (2003). Microskills and theoretical foundations for professional helpers. Allyn and Bacon. Raths, L. E. (1945). Improving classroom discussion. Educational Research Bulletin, 24 (1), 6-13+28. Solomon, B. B. (1987). “Empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities.” Journal of Social Work Practice, 2(4), 79-91. Spanger, M. (2013). “Gender performances as spatial acts: (fe)male Thai migrant sex workers in Denmark”, Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 20(1), 37-52. Taylor, S. and Spicer, A. (2007). “Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces.” International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 325-346. Theberge, N. (1995). “Playing with the Boys: Manon Rheaume, Women’s Hockey, and the Struggle for Legitimacy.” Canadian Woman Studies Les Cahiers De La Femme, 15(4), 37-41. Townsend, J., Zapata, E., Rowlands, J., Alberti, P. and Mercado, M. (1999). Women and power: fighting patriarchies and poverty. Zed Books. Turner, S. G., & Maschi, T. M. (2014). “Feminist and empowerment theory and social work practice.” Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(2), 151-162. Tyler, M. and Cohen, L. (2010). “Spaces that matter: gender performativity and organizational space”, Organization Studies, 31(2), 175-198. UNICEF (2003). The state of the world’s children 2004. UNICEF. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Prentice Hall. Wright, M. W. (2004). “From protests to politics: sex work, women’s worth and Ciudad Juarez modernity”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 369-386. Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). “Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations.” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 182-194. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94314 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 行政院自2013年推動的「提升女孩權益行動方案」於2023年年初軋然而止,然而,年輕女性位處父權結構中的從屬地位,無論在空間或文化脈絡中皆受到性別規範之宰制,而女孩權益在方案推動近10年後是否確實提升,仍有待商榷。
本研究以性別友善空間——「臺中女兒館」作為旨揭行動方案的實際操作場域,探究成年初顯期女性在此空間經歷何種面向的充權過程,以及如何在此空間進行性別認同探索。透過深入訪談女兒館的8名服務對象和5名工作人員,分別以成年初顯期理論、空間與性別展演理論以及女性主義發展研究/社會工作的充權觀點,聚焦於服務對象在個體、互動以及結構層面的充權歷程,並以空間的性別與政治觀點探究政府與民間團體在共同推動女兒館的結構性障礙。 研究結果發現,成年初顯期女性在女兒館展演出個體層次的強烈能動性與認同探索的企圖;且於互動層次透過互惠、團結感與連結感的團體中發展出選擇的能力、觸發角色楷模效應並與同儕構成緊密的夥伴關係;於結構層次中,成為社會變革的力量,積極地進行小規模倡議。臺中女兒館的表徵結構性困境為人力與經費的限制,真正導致受託單位無法繼續合作的原因是政府對民間團體的權力宰制關係。 在總結與討論中,本研究認為臺中女兒館獨樹一格的服務模式能作為國內外年輕女性充權工作者的參考,而為了使政策制定者更瞭解年輕女性的充權必要性,未來研究可以加入充權量表等工具進行測量與評估,並納入更多女兒館受託單位之觀點,以及不同族群文化背景的受訪對象,俾利達到更具代表性之研究結果。然而在將性別充權作為政策表述時,也須注意是否有將性別充權淪為工具化的情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study uses the gender-friendly space of the “Taichung Girls’ Pavilion” as the practical field for implementing the targeted action plan. It explores the aspects of empowerment processes experienced by emerging adult women in this space and how they conduct gender identity exploration within it. Through in-depth interviews with eight service recipients and five staff members of the Pavilion, the study employs emerging adulthood theory, spatial and gender performativity theory, and feminist development/social work empowerment perspectives. It focuses on the empowerment processes at the individual, interactional, and structural levels of the service recipients and examines the structural barriers faced by the government and non-profit organizations in jointly promoting the Pavilion from a power perspective.
The findings reveal that emerging adult women at the Pavilion exhibit strong agency and identity exploration at the individual level. At the interactional level, they develop decision-making abilities, role model effects, and form close peer relationships within the group. At the structural level, they become proactive agents. Operational challenges at the Taichung Girls' Pavilion include limitations in manpower and funding, compounded by the power dynamics between the government and NGOs, which contributed to the termination of the collaboration with the Garden of Hope Foundation. In the conclusion and discussion, this study suggests that the unique service model of the Pavilion can serve as a reference for empowerment workers of young women both domestically and internationally. To help policymakers better understand the necessity of empowering young women, future research could incorporate empowerment scales and other tools for measurement and evaluation. Additionally, it would be beneficial to include perspectives from more entrusted units of the Pavilion and interview subjects from different cultural backgrounds to achieve more representative research results. However, when framing gender empowerment as a policy statement, it is also important to be mindful of the potential for gender empowerment to become instrumentalized. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:46:16Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:46:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 I 誌謝 II 中文摘要 III Abstract IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起與背景 1 壹、被停止的「提升女孩權益行動方案」 1 貳、研究者之研究關懷 5 第二節 研究問題與研究目的 6 第三節 本論文章節結構 7 第二章 文獻回顧與理論框架 9 第一節 成年初顯期 9 壹、 成年初顯期的內涵 9 貳、 青少女?女孩?以成年初顯期定義女兒館的權利主體 13 第二節 性別展演理論 15 壹、 性別展演的內涵 15 貳、 空間與性別認同 18 第三節 充權理論 20 壹、 充權的定義與內涵 20 貳、 女性主義發展研究/社會工作的充權觀點 23 第四節 理論框架與概念操作化 29 壹、理論框架 29 貳、概念操作化 31 第三章 研究設計 33 第一節 研究方法與研究步驟 33 第二節 研究對象與資料來源 33 第三節 研究規範倫理 36 第四節 資料分析方法 39 第四章 臺中女兒館的沿革與困境 41 第一節 臺中女兒館發展脈絡 41 壹、國內外女孩權益之發展軌跡 41 貳、臺中女兒館之成立與重點方案活動 44 第二節 女兒館的結構性困境與委託契約崩解之原因 48 壹、誰的女兒?——宰制與從屬的互動關係 48 貳、委託契約崩解之原因探討 52 第三節 本章總結 57 第五章 成年初顯期女性於女兒館之充權歷程 61 第一節 性別友善空間對性別認同探索的影響 61 壹、對性別友善空間的感受 62 貳、在女兒館得以自由探索 65 參、性別友善空間觸發了性別認同的探索 72 第二節 互惠團體對充權的影響 73 壹、 在互惠的團體中構成夥伴關係 74 貳、 能夠做出選擇並提升自尊與自我效能感 76 參、產生角色楷模效應 79 第三節 成為積極行動者 81 第四節 本章總結 84 第六章 總結與討論 87 第一節 本論文主要研究發現及其經驗性與理論性意涵 87 壹、 主要研究發現 87 貳、 經驗性意涵 89 參、 理論性意涵 91 第二節 研究者反思 93 壹、投資女孩的實質策略究竟為何? 93 貳、對政府而言,充權女性真正的目的為何? 96 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 98 參考文獻 101 壹、中文 101 貳、英文 102 附錄 107 圖次 圖1-1:臺中女兒館、臺中山海屯區女孩培力計畫歷年標案預算金額 4 圖4-1:提升女孩權益行動方案政策架構圖………………………...…44 表次 表1-1:歷年臺中女兒館與臺中山海屯區女孩培力據點經營團隊 4 表2-1:不同成年初顯期詮釋角度與特徵 11 表2-2:女性主義充權理論與女性主義社會工作充權理論 28 表2-3:本研究之概念操作化 32 表3-1:8位成年初顯期女性受訪者基本資料表 35 表4-1:國際女孩日歷年主題 42 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 以性別研究視角分析成年初顯期女性於「臺中女兒館」之充權歷程 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Examining Female Emerging Adults’ Empowerment Process at “Taichung Girls’ Pavilion” through the Gender Perspective | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳毓文;何浩慈 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu Wen Chen;Hao Tzu Ho | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 臺中女兒館,成年初顯期,性別充權觀點,展演性,認同探索, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taichung Girls’ Pavilion,Emerging Adulthood,Gender Empowerment Perspective,Performativity,Identity Exploration, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403234 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-09 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.89 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。