請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94235完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 彭立沛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Pei Peng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 盧詠鋒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wing-Fung Lo | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:22:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 于逸知、廖君達（2021年9月14日）。臺中區農業改良場場區動物資源調查及生態友善棲地營造［論文發表］。配合國土生態綠網發展中部地方特色農業研討會，臺中市，臺灣。
王佳琪、石芝菁、夏榮生（2018）。與自然共存，達成生態友善農業願景2018 友善農業與農田生態國際研討會紀要。農政與農情，315，101-104。 生物多樣性公約［CBD］秘書處（2020）。第五版《全球生物多樣性展望》。https://www.cbd.int/gbo5 行政院農業部林業及自然保育署［林業及自然保育署］（2024）。生物多樣性公約：官方中文譯版。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/0000429 行政院農業委員會［農委會］（2017）。友善環境耕作推廣團體審認要點。https://www.afa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=308&article_id=25696 行政院農業委員會［農委會］（2018）。國土生態保育綠色網絡建置計畫（107 年至 110 年）。https://www.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=69497 行政院農業委員會［農委會］（2021）。國土生態保育綠色網絡建置計畫（111 年至 114 年）。https://www.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=77942 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2008）。台南縣歷年水雉保育計畫成果分析期末報告。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=63092 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2011）。建構保護區之外的保護區研討會手冊。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/0001673 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2012）。互惠互助的自然資源經營－里山倡議精神的實踐研討會手冊。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/0001717 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2014）。官田水雉暨保育類野生動物農田棲地之綠色保育經營管理計畫。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=62338 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2019a）。生態給付與保育政策研析(3-1)。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=74476 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2019b）。苗栗縣友善石虎生態服務給付詴辦計畫期末報告書。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=74507 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］（2020）。瀕危物種及重要棲地生態服務給付推動方案。https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/File.aspx?fno=82264 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］、慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2020）。我們的友善，他們的家：綠色保育農業故事。 行政院農業委員會林務局［林務局］、慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2022）。2022綠色保育大腳印農友精選特輯。 李光中（2016）。地景尺度著眼的里山倡議與生態農業。地景保育通訊，42，12-18。 李光中、孫夏天、羅尤娟、石芝菁、張雅玲、邱雅莘（2021年9月14-15日）2020年後生物多樣性展望及臺灣里山倡議轉型策略架構芻議［論文發表］。配合國土生態綠網發展中部地方特色農業研討會，臺中市，臺灣。 林大利、林湧倫、杜昀珊（2022）。鳥類、兩棲類與爬行類類群多樣性［論文發表］。111年度農業生態系長期生態研究研討會，苗栗縣，臺灣。 林文華、彭冠華、陳季呈（2020年11月4-5日）。蕹菜間作對有機茭白田生產及節肢動物組成之影響。［論文發表］。2020 生態農業國際研討會：技術發展與地景經營，花蓮縣，臺灣。 林哲安、方偉達、袁孝維、陳凱俐、鄭辰旋（2016）。推動臺灣生態農業－以新南田董米為例。宜蘭大學生物資源學刊，12，135-164。https://doi.org/10.6175/job.2016.12.19 郭聆亦、張明輝、鄭智元、簡仲生（2022年8月26日）。不同耕作農法影響土壤微生物菌相之初探［論文發表］。111年度農業生態系長期生態研究研討會，苗栗縣，臺灣。 郭勝豐、黃文伯、譚智宏、許香儀、謝舜安（2020年11月4-5日）。生態農業及慣行農法下水稻田區無脊椎動物與灌溉水量差異比較［論文發表］。2020 生態農業國際研討會：技術發展與地景經營，花蓮縣，臺灣。 陳玠廷（2018）。「再小農化」的有機實踐：以官田水雉綠色保育計畫為例。臺灣鄉村研究，13，57-93。 陳泓如、林家玉、賴瑞聲、王惇彥、郭美華、張素貞（2020年11月4-5日）。苗栗地區水稻生產地景對生物多樣性之影響［論文發表］。2020 生態農業國際研討會：技術發展與地景經營，花蓮縣，臺灣。 陳美惠、薛美莉、黃信勳、孫夏天、李光中（2023）。回顧及前瞻臺灣里山倡議10週年。台灣林業，49，35-42。 陳琦玲、陳炳輝、黃山內、金恒鑣、孫文章、郭鴻裕、陳健忠、林儒宏、楊秋忠、陳尊賢（2009）。亞熱帶農業生態系長期生態研究站之建置與研究展望。作物、環境與生物資訊，6（4），233-246。https://doi.org/10.30061/CEB.200912.0004 陳榮坤（2012）。綠色保育水稻栽培模式〜官田區水雉保育輔導實例。臺南區農業專訊，81，13-17。 陳榮宗、溫婷安、張慧婷、李芃、蘇慕容（2018年9月14日）。綠色保育友善耕作查證系統［論文發表］。有機及友善環境耕作研討會，臺中市，臺灣。 許北辰、董耀仁、石憲宗、李奇峯、曾美容、陳淑佩、李啟陽、許育慈、林立、陳泰元、劉東憲、莊國鴻、陳盈丞（2022年8月26日）。農業生態系長期昆蟲普查［論文發表］。111年度農業生態系長期生態研究研討會，苗栗縣，臺灣。 郭淑娟、郭竹君、劉寶華、温庭安、許靜娟、王中原、石芝菁（2021）。用綠保標章串起國土綠網－織就友善農業保育網絡，帶動山村綠色經濟。台灣林業，47（2），43-50。 許育慈、張繼中、黃文益、蔡恕仁（2021年10月7日）。慣行及有機農法對於水稻田蟲相及土壤之影響：以池上地區為例［論文發表］。110年度農業生態系長期生態研究研討會，臺東縣，臺灣。 許曉華（2015）。支持綠保新生活，確保生物有生機。農政與農情，280。 國家永續發展委員會［永續會］（2021）。2020生物多樣性國家報告。 葛兆年、陳一銘、莊鈴木、邱志明（2014）。農地造林對鳥類群聚及其多樣性之影響。台灣生物多樣性研究，16（3），225-239。 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2014年10月14日）。享用千顆鳳梨 環頸雉的幸福奇蹟。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/case/187-2 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2019a年5月10日）。【行動方案】綠保產品在這裡。https://toaf.org.tw/about/magazine/235-magazine040/883-2019-05-09-07-30-54 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2019b年5月10日）。【認識綠色保育標章】動物們的腳印讓幸福變大。https://toaf.org.tw/about/magazine/235-magazine040/877-2019-05-09-07-09-10 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2020年6月4日）。【花東六級化產業鏈計畫】台東南迴四鄉 喚醒小米千年任務。https://toaf.org.tw/activity/collection/983-2020-05-25-07-29-03 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2021年11月3日）。【綠保十年專輯】綠保八大面向 / 願景：讓生命回到土地。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/case/1257-2021-10-22-05-29-17 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2022年12月14日）。【大腳印獎-入選】善待土地 所有生命都獲得光彩 。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/role-model/article-4/1478-2022-12-14-02-51-53 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2023a）。綠色保育標章使用手冊。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/bulletin/standard/1313-2018-04-30-09-49-29 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2023b年6月1日）。棲地營造與夜觀 守護竹園裡的嬌客—諸羅樹蛙。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/case/1537-2023-06-01-07-27-53 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2023c年6月2日）。2023宜蘭綠色博覽會 綠色保育永續我們的未來。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/case/1539-2023 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2024a）。綠色保育農友通過名單 (2024年6月30日止)。https://toaf.org.tw/conservation/bulletin/list/1671-gc-list-2023-19 慈心有機農業發展基金會［TOAF］（2024b）。慈心由來—我們的宗旨。https://toaf.org.tw/about 廖勁穎（2017）。有機水稻福壽螺綜合管理技術。臺東區農業專訊，99，15-17。 蔡依真、許宏昌、苑美玲、黃鵬、李光中、盧虎生（2015 年 9 月 23 日）。生態農業及里山倡議在台灣之發展與展望［論文發表］。生態農業與里山倡議國際研討會，花蓮縣，臺灣。 謝順景（2010）。臺灣一百多年來的有機農業發展之歷史回顧。臺中區農業改良場研究彙報，107，1-12。 闕河嘉、陳光華（2016）。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。載於項潔（主編），數位人文研究與技藝第六輯（285-313頁）。國立臺灣大學出版中心。 顏愛靜（2020）。推動農業生態方法以實踐生態農業之探究。土地問題研究季刊，19（2），2-14。 羅尤娟（2021年9月14日）。從森林到海岸─織一片國土生態綠網［論文發表］。配合國土生態綠網發展中部地方特色農業研討會，臺中市，臺灣。 Abell, J. (2013). Volunteering to help conserve endangered species: An identity approach to human–animal relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2114 Allen, K. E., Quinn, C. E., English, C., & Quinn, J. E. (2018). Relational values in agroecosystem governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.026 Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2017). Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443 Arias-Arévalo, P., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., & Pérez-Rincón, M. (2018). Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environmental Values, 27(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327118X15144698637513 Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834803 Baldwin, C., Smith, T., & Jacobson, C. (2017). Love of the land: Social-ecological connectivity of rural landholders. Journal of Rural Studies, 51, 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.012 Banack, S. A., & Hvenegaard, G. T. (2010). Motivation of landowners to engage in biodiversity-friendly farming practices in Alberta’s Central Parkland region. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15, 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200903096171 Bataille, C. Y., Malinen, S. K., Yletyinen, J., Scott, N., & Lyver, P. O’B. (2021). Relational values provide common ground and expose multi- level constraints to cross- cultural wetland management. People and Nature, 3(4), 941-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10244 Beery, T. H., & Lekies, K. S. (2021). Nature’s services and contributions: The relational value of childhood nature experience and the importance of reciprocity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 636944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.636944 Berthet, E. T., Bretagnolle, V., & Gaba, S. (2022). Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101426 Biber, D. (2008). Corpus-based analyses of discourse: Dimensions of variation in conversation. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies. (pp.100-114), Routledge, London. Billet, M. I., Baimel, A., Sahakari, S. S., Schaller, M., & Norenzayan A. (2023). Ecospirituality: The psychology of moral concern for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102001 Biondi, A., Desneux, N., Siscaro, G., & Zappalà, L. (2012). Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: Selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere, 87(7), 803-812. Boeraeve, F., Dendoncker, N., Cornélis, J.-T., Degrune, F., & Dufrêne, M. (2020). Contribution of agroecological farming systems to the delivery of ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 109576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109576 Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352-356. https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.v16i3.3107 Brady, E. (2023). Aesthetic Value as a Relational Value. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 81, 81-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpac066Advance Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2017). Connecting students to nature – How intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866 Britto dos Santos, N., & Gould, R. K. (2018). Can relational values be developed and changed? Investigating relational values in the environmental education literature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.019 Buijs, A., Kamphorst, D., Mattijssen, T., van Dam, Rosalie, Kuindersma, W., & Bouwma, I. (2022). Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 114, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105965 Bullock, J. M., McCracken, M. E., Browns, M. J., Chapman, R. E., Graves, A. R., Hinsley, S. A., Hutchins, M. G., Nowakowski, M., Nicholls, D. J. E., Oakley, S., Old, G. H., Ostle, N. J., Redhead, J. W., Woodcock, B. A., Bedwell, T., Mayes, S., Robinson, V. S., & Pywell, R. F. (2021). Does agri-environmental management enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services?: A farm-scale experiment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 320, 107582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107582 Byfuglien, A., Hirons, M., & Milford, A. B. (2024). From values to actions in agriculture: A web of actors shape Norwegian farmers' enactment of relational values. People and Nature, 6(3), 1320-1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10640 Cassman, K. G., & Wood, S. (2005). Cultivated Systems. In R. Hassan, R. Scholes & N. Ash (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends, Volume 1 (pp.745-794). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S. , Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B.. Norton, B.. Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS, 113(6), 1462-1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113 Chapman, M., Satterfield, T., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy, 82, 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017 Chen, K.-L., Kong, W.-H., Chen, C.-C., & Liou, J.-L. (2021). Evaluating benefits of eco-Agriculture: The cases of farms along Taiwan’s East coast in Yilan and Hualien. Sustainability, 13, 10889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910889 Chen, M.-F. (2015). An examination of the value-belief-norm theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12096 Cifuentes, M. L., Vogl, C. R., & Padilla, M. C. (2018). Participatory guarantee systems in Spain: Motivations, achievements, challenges and opportunities for improvement based on three case studies. Sustainability, 10(11), 4081. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114081 Cockburn, J., Cundill, G., Shackleton, S., Cele, A., Cornelius, S. F. (A.), Koopman, V., le Roux, J.-P. , McLeod, N., Rouget, M., Schroder, S., den Broeck, D.V., Wright, D. R., & Zwinkels, M.. (2020). Relational hubs for collaborative landscape stewardship. Society & Natural Resources, 33(5), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1658141 Comberti, C., Thornton, T. F., Wyllie de Echeverria, V., Patterson, T. (2015). Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Global Environmental Change, 34, 247-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.007 Cong, R.-G., Smith, H. G., Olsson, O., & Brady, M. (2014). Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: Will landscape-scale management pay? Ecological Economics, 99, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.007 Cuéllar-Padilla, M., Haro-Pérez, I., & Begiristain-Zubillaga, M.. (2022). Participatory guarantee systems: When people want to take part. Sustainability, 14(6), 3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063325 Cundill, G., Bezerra, J. C., Vos, A. D., & Ntingana, N. (2017). Beyond benefit sharing: Place attachment and the importance of access to protected areas for surrounding communities. Ecosystem Services, 28, 140-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.011 Delaroche, M. (2020). Adoption of conservation practices: What have we learned from two decades of social-psychological approaches? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.004 Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufrêne, M., König, A., & Barnaud, C. (2018). How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions? Ecology and Society, 23(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112 Deplazes-Zemp, A. (2023). Beyond intrinsic and instrumental: Third-category value in environmental ethics and environmental policy. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 27(2), 166-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2166341 Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bukvareva, E., Davies, E., Demissew, S., Erpul, G., Failler, P., Guerra, C. A., Hewitt, C. L., Keune, H., Lindley, S., & Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826 Doehring, K., Longnecker, N., Cole, C., Young, R. G., & Robb, C. (2022). A missing piece of the puzzle of on-farm freshwater restoration: What motivates land managers to record and report land management actions? Ecology and Society, 27(4), 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13562-270425 Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.-A., Justes, E., Journet, E.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.-E., & Sarthous, J. P. (2015). How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4), 1259-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1 Emmerson, M., Morales, M. B., Oñate, J. J., Batáry, P., Berendse, F., Liira, J., Aavik, T., Guerrero, I., Bommarco, R., Eggers, S., Pärt, T., Tscharntke, T., Weisser, W., Clement, L., & Bengtsson, J. (2016). How agricultural intensification affects biodiversity and ecosystem services. Advances in Ecological Research, 55, 43-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.005 Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO]. (2018). The 10 elements of agroecology: Guiding the transition to sustainable food and agricultural systems. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9037EN/ Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO]. (2019). The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en?details=ca3129en Fouilleux, E., & Loconto, A. (2017). Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: A tripartite model of techno-politics. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3 Gans, H. (1999). Participant observation in an age of ‘ethnography’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(5), 540-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023532 Garbach, K., & Morgan, G. P. (2017). Grower networks support adoption of innovations in pollination management: The roles of social learning, technical learning, and personal experience. Journal of Environmental Management, 204(part 1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.077 Giagnocavo, C., de Cara-García, M., González, M., Juan, M., Marín-Guirao, J. I., Mehrabi, S., Rodríguez, E., van der Blom, J., & Crisol-Martínez, E. (2022). Reconnecting farmers with nature through agroecological transitions: Interacting niches and experimentation and the role of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems. Agriculture, 12, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020137 Gomiero, T. (2018). Food quality assessment in organic vs. conventional agricultural produce: Findings and issues. Applied Soil Ecology, 123, 714-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.014 Gould, R. K., Pai, M., Muraca, B., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). He ʻike ʻana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): How one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustainability Science, 14, 1213-1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00721-9 Gries, S. T., & Durrant, P. (2020). Analyzing Co-occurrence Data. In M. Paquot & S. T. Gries (Eds.), A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. (pp.141-160), Springer, Switzerland. Hagen, E. J., & Gould, R. L. (2022). Relational values and empathy are closely connected: A study of residents of Vermont’s Winooski River watershed. Ecology and Society, 27(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13406-270319 Hakim, A. L., Saputra, D. D., Tanika, L., Kusumawati, I. A., Sai, R. R., Andreotti, F., Bagbohouna, M., Abdurrahim, A. Y., Wamucii, C., Lagneaux, E. G., Githinji, M., Suprayogo, D., Speelman, E. N., & van Noordwijk, M. (2023). Protected spring and sacred forest institutions at the instrumental — relational value interface. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 62, 101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101292 Halada, L., Evans, D., Romão, C., & Petersen, J.-E. (2011). Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices? Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 2365-2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-9989-z Hamilton, M., Salerno, J., & Fischer, A. P. (2022). Cognition of feedback loops in a fire-prone social-ecological system. Global Environmental Change, 74, 102519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102519 Himes, A., & Muraca, B. (2018). Relational values: The key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005 Himes, A., & Muraca, B., Anderson, C. B., Athayde, S., Beery, T., Cantú-Fernández, M., González-Jiménez, D., Gould, R. K., Hejnowicz, A. P., Kenter, J., Lenzi, D., Murali, R., Pascual, U., Raymond, C., Ring, A., Russo, K., Samakov, A., Stålhammar, S., Thorén, H., & Zent, E. (2023). Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values. BioScience, 0, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad109 Hirata, A. R., Rocha, L. C. D., Assis, T. R. P., Souza-Esquerdo, V. F., & Bergamasco, S. M. P. P. (2019). The contribution of the participatory guarantee system in the revival of agroecological principles in Southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Sustainability, 11, 4675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174675 Hruschka, N., Kaufmann, S., & Vogl, C. R. (2022). The benefits and challenges of participating in participatory guarantee systems (PGS) initiatives following institutional formalization in Chile. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(4), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1934364 Iannucci, G., & Sacchi, G. (2021). The evolution of organic market between third-party certification and participatory guarantee systems. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10(3), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-10470 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES]. (2022). The methodological assessment report on the diverse values and valuation of nature. Bonn: IPBES secretariat https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522522 International Federation of Agriculture Movements [IFOAM]. (2017). Organic 3.0 - for truly sustainable farming and consumption. https://www.ifoam.bio/why-organic/organic-landmarks/organic-30-truly-sustainable. International Federation of Agriculture Movements [IFOAM]. (2019). PGS guidelines: How to develop and manage participatory guarantee systems for organic agriculture. https://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/2020-05/pgs_guidelines_en.pdf. Jax, K., Calestani, M., Chan, K. M. A., Eser, U., Keune, H., Muraca, B., O’Brien, L., Potthast, T., Voget-Kleschin, L., & Wittmer, H. (2018). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009 Jacobson, S. K., Sieving, K. E., Jones, G. A., & Doorn, A. V. (2003). Assessment of farmer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward bird conservation on organic and conventional Florida farms. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 595-606. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3095377 Jones, K., & Tobin, D. (2018). Reciprocity, redistribution and relational values: Organizing and motivating sustainable agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.001 Jordan, K., & Kristjánsson, K. (2017). Sustainability, virtue ethics, and the virtue of harmony with nature. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1205-1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1157681 Kallio, H., Pietila, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2949-3217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 Kaufman, A. H., & Mock, J. (2014). Cultivating greater well-being: The benefits Thai organic farmers experience from adopting Buddhist eco-spirituality. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9500-4 Kaufmann, S., Hruschka, N., & Vogl, C. R. (2020). Bridging the literature gap: A framework for assessing actor participation in participatory guarantee system (PGS). Sustainability, 12(19), 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198100 Kaufmann, S., Hruschka, N., & Vogl, C. R. (2023). Participatory Guarantee Systems, a more inclusive organic certification alternative? Unboxing certification costs and farm inspections in PGS based on a case study approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1176057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176057 Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466 Keleman, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.-P., Choisis, N. , Paoletti, M. G., Podmaniczky, L., Ryschawy, J., Sarthou, J.-P., Herzog, F., Dennis, P., & Balázs, K. (2013). Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study. Land Use Policy, 35, 318-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.005 Kim, H., Shoji, Y., Tsuge, T., Kubo, T., & Nakamura, F. (2021). Relational values help explain green infrastructure preferences: The case of managing crane habitat in Hokkaido, Japan. People and Nature, 3, 861-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10231 King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2018). Interviews in qualitative research (2th Edition). SAGE Publications Limited. Klain, S. C., Olmsted, P., & Chan, K. M. A. (2017). Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0183962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183962 Knippenberg, L., T. de Groot, W., J. G. van den Born, R., & Knights, P. (2018). Relational value, partnership, eudaimonia: A review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.022 Kreitzman, M., Chapman, M., Keeley, K. O., & Chan, K. M. A. (2021). Local knowledge and relational values of Midwestern woody perennial polyculture farmers can inform tree-crop policies. People and Nature, 4, 180-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10275 Krishnan, V. R. (2008). The impact of transformational leadership on followers’ duty orientation and spirituality. Journal of Human Values, 14(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580701400103 Kross, S. M., Ingram, K. P., Long, R. F., & Niles, M. T. (2018). Farmer perceptions and behaviors related to wildlife and on-farm conservation actions. Conservation Letters, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12364 Lee, D. Y. W. (2008). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies. (pp.86-99), Routledge, London. Lee, K.-C., Karimova, P. G., & Yan, S. Y. (2019). Towards an integrated multi-stakeholder landscape approach to reconciling values and enhancing synergies: A case study in Taiwan. In The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability & The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (Eds.), Understanding the multiple values associated with sustainable use in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol. 5). (pp.118-135), United Nations University, Tokyo. Leifeld, J. (2012). How sustainable is organic farming? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 150(15), 121-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.020 Leite, A. E., Castro, R. D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Batalha, M. O., & Govindan, K. (2014). Agricultural production and sustainable development in a Brazilian region (Southwest, São Paulo State): Motivations and barriers to adopting sustainable and ecologically friendly practices. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(5), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.956677 Lestar, T., & Böhm, S. (2020). Ecospirituality and sustainability transitions: Agency towards degrowth. Religion, State and Society, 48(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2019.1702410 Letourneau, A. M., & Davidson, D. (2022). Farmer identities: Facilitating stability and change in agricultural system transitions. Environmental Sociology, 8(4), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2064207 Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2020). Understanding landowners’ intention to restore native areas: The role of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 44, 101121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101121 Limprapoowiwattana, C. (2022). The art of Buddhist connectivity: Organic rice farming in Thailand. Agriculture and Human Values, 40(3), 1087-1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10363-w Lliso, B., Arias-Arévalo, P., Maca-Millán, S., Engel, S., & Pascual, U. (2022). Motivational crowding effects in payments for ecosystem services: Exploring the role of instrumental and relational values. People and Nature, 4(2), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10280 Loconto, A., & Hatanaka, M. (2017). Participatory guarantee systems: Alternative ways of defining, measuring, and assessing ‘sustainability’. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(2), 412-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12187 Lopes, G. R., & Lima, M. G. B. (2023). Eudaimonia in the Amazon: Relational values as a deep leverage point to curb tropical deforestation. Conservation, 3(1), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3010016 Maas, B., Fabian, Y., Kross, S. M., & Richter, A. (2021). Divergent farmer and scientist perceptions of agricultural biodiversity, ecosystem services and decision-making. Biological Conservation, 256, 109065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109065 Manolchev, C., & Foley, S. (2021). Participant observation: A practical field guide for students and lecturers. In Sage Research Methods Cases Part 1. SAGE Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529759266 Marchetti, L., Cattivelli, V., Cocozza, C., Salbitano, F., & Marchetti, M. (2020). Beyond sustainability in food systems: Perspectives from agroecology and social innovation. Sustainability, 12, 7524. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187524 Mattijssen, T. J. M., Ganzevoort, W., van den Born, R. J. G., Arts, B. J. M., Breman, B. C., Buijs, A. E., van Dam, R. I., Elands, B. H. M., de Groot, W. T., & Knippenberg, L. W. J. (2020). Relational values of nature: leverage points for nature policy in Europe. Ecosytems and People, 16(1), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1848926 McCarthy, J., Meredith, D., & Bonnin, C. (2022). ‘You have to keep it going’: Relational values and social sustainability in upland agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 63(3), 588-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12402 McNeely, J. A., & Scherr, S. J. (2001). Common ground, common future: How ecoagriculture can help feed the world and save wild biodiversity. Future Harvest US and IUCN. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/8854 McNeely, J. A., & Scherr, S. J. (2003). Ecoagriculture: Strategies to feed the world and save biodiversity. Island Press. Mehrabi, S., Perez-Mesa, J. C., & Giagnocavo, C. (2022). The role of consumer-citizens and connectedness to nature in the sustainable transition to agroecological food systems: The mediation of innovative business models and a multi-level perspective. Agriculture, 12, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020203 Monroy‑Sais, S., García‑Frapolli, E., Casas, A., Mora, F., Skutsch, M., & Gerritsen, P. R. W. (2022). Relational values and management of plant resources in two communities in a highly biodiverse area in western Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(4), 1231-1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10313-6 Morizet-Davis, J., Vidaurre, N. A. M., Reinmuth, E., Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Schlecht, V., Schmidt, S., Singh, K., Vargas-Carpintero, R., Wagner, M., & von Cossel, M. (2023). Ecosystem services at the farm level—Overview, synergies, trade-offs, and stakeholder analysis. Global Challenges, 7, 2200225. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200225 Nelson, E., Tovar, L. G., Rindermann, R. S., & Cruz, M. Á. G. (2010). Participatory organic certification in Mexico: An alternative approach to maintaining the integrity of the organic label. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9205-x Nelson, E., Tovar, L. G., Gueguen, E., Humphries, S., Landman, K., & Rindermann, R. S. (2016). Participatory guarantee systems and the re-imagining of Mexico’s organic sector. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(2), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9615-x O'Rourke, E., & Finn, J.A. (2020). Farming for Nature: The role of results-based payments. Teagasc and National Parks and Wildlife Service. https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/ffn-ebook-complete.pdf Orenstein, D. E. (2021). The cultural ecosystem services of Mediterranean pine forests. In G. Ne’eman & Y. Osem (Eds.), Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin (pp.631-658), Springer, Switzerland. Osei-Owusu, Y., & Frimpong, A. (2019). Empowering communities for natural resource management: The case of Community Resource Management Areas (CREMA) in Western Ghana. In The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability & The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (Eds.), Understanding the multiple values associated with sustainable use in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol. 5). (pp.47-56), United Nations University, Tokyo. Palomo-Campesin, S., González, J. A., & García-Llorente, M. (2018). Exploring the connections between agroecological practices and ecosystem services: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10, 4339. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124339 Pape, T. (2023). Utilizing relational values to investigate a federally administered soil conservation programme in the US Northwest. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 10(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2023.2168565 Peachey, B. (2008). Environmental stewardship—What does it mean? Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86(4), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2008.02.006 Peroff, D. M., Morais, D. B., & Sills, E. (2022). The role of agritourism microentrepreneurship and collective action in shaping stewardship of farmlands. Sustainability, 14, 8116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138116 Penz, H., & Fill, A. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 232-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008 Pérez-Ramírez, I., García-Llorente, M., Saban de la Portilla, C., Benito, A., & Castro, A. J. (2021). Participatory collective farming as a leverage point for fostering human-nature connectedness. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1912185 Phalan, B., Balmford, A., Green, R. E., & Scharlemann, J. P. W. (2011). Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy, 36, S62-S71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.008 Poole, E. (2022). Corpus-Assisted Ecolinguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing. Pratson, D. F., Adams, N., & Gould, R. K. (2023). Relational values of nature in empirical research: A systematic review. People and Nature, 5(5), 1381-1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10512 Pywell, R. F., Heard, M. S., Woodcock, B. A., Hinsley, S., Ridding, L., Nowakowski, M., & Bullock, J. M. (2015). Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification. Proceedings of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 282, 20151740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740 Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Robinson, G. M. (2011). The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: A test of two behavioural models. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 323-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.006 Reimer, A. P., Thompson, A. W., & Prokopy, L. S. (2012). The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z Rezaei‑Moghaddam, K., Vatankhah, N., & Ajili, A. (2020). Adoption of pro-environmental behaviors among farmers: application of Value–Belief–Norm theory. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0174-z Riechers, M., Bala´zsi, A., Jiren, T. S., & Fisher, J. (2020). The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification. Landscape Ecology, 35, 2601-2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01012-w Riechers, M., Balázsi, Á., Engler, J.-O., Shumi, G., & Fischer, J. (2021a). Understanding relational values in cultural landscapes in Romania and Germany. People and Nature, 3(5), 1036-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10246 Riechers, M., Pătru-Dușe, I. A., & Balázsi, Á. (2021b). Leverage points to foster human – nature connectedness in cultural landscapes. Ambio, 50, 1670-1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01504-2 Riechers, M., Martín‑López, B., & Fischer, J. (2021c). Human–nature connectedness and other relational values are negatively affected by landscape simplification: Insights from Lower Saxony, Germany. Sustainability Science, 17, 865-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00928-9 Riley, R. B. (1992). Attachment to the ordinary landscape. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. (pp.13–35). Plenum Press. Rodriguez, J. M., Molnar, J. J., Fazio. R. A., Sydnor, E., & Lowe, M. J. (2008). Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectives. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 24(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170508002421 Roggio, A. M., & Evans, J. R. (2022). Will participatory guarantee systems happen here? The case for innovative food systems governance in the developed world. Sustainability, 14(3), 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031720 Rose, D., Bell, D., & Crook, D. A. (2016). Restoring habitat and cultural practice in Australia’s oldest and largest traditional aquaculture system. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 26, 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9426-1 Russell, S., Ens, E., & Rangers, N. Y. (2020). Connection as Country: Relational values of billabongs in indigenous northern Australia. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101169 Sacchi, G. (2019). Social innovation matters: The adoption of participatory guarantee systems within Italian alternative agri-food networks. Strategic Change, 28(4), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2265 Saito, T., Hashimoto, S., & Basu, M. (2022). Measuring relational values: do people in Greater Tokyo appreciate place‑based nature and general nature differently? Sustainability Science, 17, 837-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00898-4 Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carrol, N., Goldstein, A., & Jenkins, M. (2018). The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability, 1, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0 Sands, B., Machado, M. R., White, A., Zent, W., & Gould, R. (2023). Moving towards an anti-colonial definition for regenerative agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10429-3 Sánchez-Bayo, F., & Wyckhuys, K. A. G. (2019). Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological Conservation, 232, 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 Scheer, S. J., & McNeely, J. A. (2008). Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: Towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’ landscapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1491), 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2165 Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental Issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174 Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp.89-211). Erlbaum. Shein, P. P., & Sukinarhimi, P. (2022). Taboos as a social mechanism keeping the human-nature balance: Core values and practices of Rukai Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Water. Sustainability, 14, 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042032 Sheldrake, P. (2012). Spirituality: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199588756.001.0001 Sheremata, M. (2018). Listening to relational values in the era of rapid environmental change in the Inuit Nunangat. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.017 Shishany, S., Al-Assaf, A. A., Majdalawi, M., Tabieh, M., & Tadros, M. (2020). Factors influencing local communities relational values to forest-protected areas in Jordan. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 41(8), 659-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020.1847665 Spaling, H., & Kooy, K. V. (2019). Farming God’s way: Agronomy and faith contested. Agriculture and Human Values, 36(3), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09925-2 Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge. Studley, J. & Horsley, P. (2019). Spiritual governance as an indigenous behavioural practice. In B. Verschuuren & S. Brown (Eds.), Cultural and spiritual significance of nature in protected areas (pp.72-84). Routledge London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108186 Tisovec‐Dufner, K. C., Teixeira, L., Marin, L., Coudel, E, Morsello, C., & Pardini, R. (2019). Intention of preserving forest remnants among landowners in the Atlantic Forest: The role of the ecological context via ecosystem services. People and Nature, 1(4), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10051 Torkar, G., & Krašovec, U. (2019). Students’ attitudes toward forest ecosystem services, knowledge about ecology, and direct experience with forests. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100916 Tscharntke, T., Grass, I., Wanger, T. C., Westphal, C., & Batáry, P. (2021). Beyond organic farming: Harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(10), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.010 Tsuge, T., Nakamura, S., & Usio, N. (2014). Assessing the difficulty of implementing wildlife-friendly farming practices by using the best–worst scaling approach. In N. Usio, & T. Miyashita (Eds.), Social-ecological restoration in paddy-dominated landscapes (pp.223-236). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55330-4 Uehara, T., Sakura, R., & Tsuge, T. (2020). Cultivating relational values and sustaining socio‑ecological production landscapes through ocean literacy: A study on Satoumi. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1599-1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0226-8 Uehara, T., Sakurai, R., & Hidaka, T. (2022). The importance of relational values in gaining people’s support and promoting their involvement in social-ecological system management: A comparative analysis. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1001180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1001180 Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). Place attachment and the value of place in the life of the users. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.243 Underwood, T., McCullum-Gomez, C., Harmon, A., & Roberts, S. (2011). Organic Agriculture Supports Biodiversity and Sustainable Food Production. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 6(4), 398-423. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., & Hayati, D. (2018). A comparative analysis of behavioral theories towards farmers’ water conservation. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 9(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.292562 van Noordwijk, M., Villamor, G. B., Hofstede, G. J., & Speelman, E. N. (2023). Relational versus instrumental perspectives on values of nature and resource management decisions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101374 Vaughan, D. (1998). Biodiversity and agricultural practice: Why should agriculturists care? Agricultural Research and Extension Network. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/5160.pdf Veisi, H., Carolan, M. S., & Alipour, A. (2017). Exploring the motivations and problems of farmers for conversion to organic farming in Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(3), 303-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1312095 Viktoria, F., Dierkes, P. W., & Kleespies, M. W. (2023). The different values of nature: A comparison between university students’ perceptions of nature’s instrumental, intrinsic and relational values. Sustainability Science, 18, 2391-2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01371-8 Wang, C.-M. (2021). Performing and counter-performing organic food markets in East Asia: The role of ahimsa, scientific knowledge and faith groups. The Geographical Journal, 187(4), 285-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12338 Willer, H., Trávníček, J., Meier, C., & Schlatter, B. (2021). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2021. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, & IFOAM-Organics International. Worrell, R., & Appleby, M. C. (2000). Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 263-277. Wu, H., Ji R., & Jin, H. (2023). Parental factors affecting children’s nature connectedness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101977 Yerbury, R. M., & Lukey, S. J. (2021). Human–animal interactions: Expressions of wellbeing through a “nature language”. Animals, 11, 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040950 Yuliani, E. L., Moeliono, M., Labarani, A., Fisher, M. R., Tias, P. A., Sunderland, T. (2022). Relational values of forests: Value- conflicts between local communities and external programmes in Sulawesi. People and Nature, 5(6), 1822-1838. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10389 Zabala, J. A., Martínez-Paz, J. M., & Alcon, F. (2021). A comprehensive approach for agroecosystem services and disservices valuation. Science of the Total Environment, 768, 144859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859 Zabel, F., Delzeit, R., Schneider, J. M., Seppelt, R., Mauser, W., & Václavík, T. (2019). Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity. Nature Communications, 10, 2844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z., & Swisher, M. E. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408 Zhang, S., Zhao, M., Ni, Q., & Cai Y. (2021). Modelling farmers’ watershed ecological protection behaviour with the value-belief-norm theory: A case study of the Wei River Basin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18095023 Zhu, G., Cao, X., Wang, B., Zhang, K., & Min, Q. (2022). The importance of spiritual ecology in the Qingyuan forest mushroom co-cultivation system. Sustainability, 14, 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020865 Zilberman, D., Kaplan, S., & Gordon, B. (2018). The political economy of labeling. Food Policy, 78, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.008 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94235 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 慣行農業的持續擴展導致全球生物多樣性面臨重大危機，各地正積極推行政策鼓勵農民投入生態友善農法，但是農民需要克服的轉型阻力繁多。大自然的多元價值，包括感知大自然為人類供應基本生活所需的工具價值，以及人類個人或集體跟大自然之間存在具意義關係的關係價值，可望成為農民轉型生態友善耕作的重要推動力，而轉型後收獲的生態回饋亦可能深化農民對大自然價值的感知。同時，納入多方利害關係人參與農地查證的參與式保障系統具備潛力包容和建構行動者的大自然多元價值，提升生態友善農地集體治理的成效。
本研究以臺灣綠色保育標章參與式保障系統為案例，透過半結構式深度訪談發現了友善耕作推廣團體抱持宗教靈性和關愛生命的關係價值，而生態友善農民亦抱持了多種大自然價值，驅動他們決心投入生態友善農業。本研究又以語料庫為基礎的文本分析法探勘綠色保育標章文本中使用的各類型行動者和大自然價值主題詞彙，再通過共現關係分析觀察主題詞彙類目之間的緊密程度，從而辨識到農地棲地服務和關愛大自然這兩項核心傳播的大自然價值。通過進一步參與觀察綠色保育標章的參與式查證，本研究發現觀察農地和農業技術交流的機會提升了行動者對大自然工具價值的感知，而行動者跟野生動物和生態友善農民直接互動回饋的過程中，大自然關係價值亦得以建立和彼此渲染。再者，友善耕作推廣團體積極利用參與式查證宣導大自然價值，並願意扮演長期夥伴的角色陪伴生態友善農民，形塑共享關係價值的群體，最終達至長期有效的農地治理。因此，本研究確立參與式保障系統是擁抱行動者大自然多元價值的集體治理工具，並根據研究發現提出推動生態友善農業發展的建議，冀可促進臺灣農糧系統生態友善轉型。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The continued expansion of conventional agriculture poses a significant threat to global biodiversity. Worldwide has actively implemented policies to encourage farmers to adopt eco-friendly farming practices, yet farmers face numerous challenges in making such a transition. The plural values of nature, including the instrumental values in providing essential needs for humans and the relational values in building meaningful relationships between nature and individuals or collectives, are expected to become the crucial drivers for farmers’ transition, and the ecological feedback gained from this transition may further deepen farmers' perception of the values of nature. Meanwhile, The inclusion of multiple stakeholders in a Participatory Guarantee System has the potential to incorporate and construct the plural values of nature among actors, thereby enhancing the collective governance of eco-friendly farmland.
This study takes Taiwan’s Green Conservation Label as a case study. Through semi-structured in-depth interviews, we uncovered the religious spirituality and life-caring values held by the eco-friendly farming promotion group. Eco-friendly farmers also hold various values of nature, motivating them to firmly engage in eco-friendly agriculture. Moreover, this study employed corpus-based text analysis to explore the thematic vocabulary of different actors and values adopted in the texts of the Green Conservation Label. We investigated the features of these thematic groups of vocabularies via co-occurrence analysis and identified the two core values of nature — agricultural habitat services and caring for nature. We further observed the participatory inspection process, revealing that farmland observation and exchange of farming skills increased actors' recognition of the instrumental values of nature. In addition, through the direct interactions and feedback processes with wildlife and eco-friendly farmers, relational values of nature were established and mutually rendered among actors. Furthermore, the eco-friendly farming promotion group actively utilized participatory inspection processes to advocate for the value of nature and is willing to play the role of a long-term partner to accompany eco-friendly farmers, thereby shaping a community of shared relational values and ultimately achieving long-term effective farmland governance. To conclude, this study endorses the Participatory Guarantee System as a collective governance tool embracing the plural values of nature among actors. We then propose recommendations for promoting the development of eco-friendly agriculture based on our research findings, aiming to facilitate the eco-friendly transition of the Taiwan’s food system. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:22:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:22:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目次 vi 圖次 ix 表次 xi 縮寫詞表 xii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 生態友善農業 5 2.1.1 農業與生物多樣性 5 2.1.2 生態友善農業 6 2.1.3 投入生態友善農法之阻力 9 2.1.4 臺灣生態友善農業政策 10 2.2 大自然多元價値 12 2.2.1 大自然多元價值評價 12 2.2.2 大自然工具價值 14 2.2.3 大自然關係價値 16 2.3 農民生態友善行為 23 2.3.1 農民親環境行為決策 23 2.3.2 大自然工具價值與生態友善行為決策 24 2.3.3 大自然關係價值與生態友善行為決策 25 2.3.4 生態友善耕作行為與生態回饋 27 2.3.5 大自然多元價值與集體生態友善行為治理 28 2.4 參與式保障系統 29 2.4.1 PGS源起 29 2.4.2 PGS集體行動 30 2.4.3 PGS與大自然價值建構 32 2.5 研究理論框架 32 第三章 研究方法 35 3.1 研究個案 35 3.1.1 綠色保育標章發展 35 3.1.2 綠色保育標章認證流程 37 3.2 研究問題 38 3.3 研究方法及設計 39 3.3.1 半結構式深度訪談法 39 3.3.2 語料庫文本分析法 42 3.3.3 參與觀察法 46 第四章 研究發現及討論 49 4.1 生態友善耕作從業者抱持之大自然價值 49 4.1.1 推廣團體：慈心基金會 49 4.1.2 生產者：綠色保育標章認證農民 51 4.2 大自然價值於綠色保育標章文本的呈現 64 4.2.1 綠色保育標章語料庫 64 4.2.2 行動者與大自然價值主題詞彙 64 4.2.3 行動者與大自然價值主題類目關係網絡 70 4.2.4 大自然價值於文本中的呈現特徵 73 4.3 建構大自然價值之綠色保育參與式保障系統 81 4.3.1 近距離觀察農地的工具價值 81 4.3.2 促進農地工具價值的技術交流與串接 85 4.3.3 走近大自然而產生的關係價值 88 4.3.4 行動者關係價值的互相渲染與共嗚 90 4.3.5 長期夥伴形塑共享關係價值 95 第五章 結論及建議 101 5.1 擁抱大自然價值之參與式保障系統 101 5.2 推動生態友善農業建議 104 5.3 研究限制 105 5.4 未來研究建議 106 參考文獻 108 附錄 137 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 參與式保障系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生態友善耕作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大自然多元價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 綠色保育標章 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | eco-friendly farming | en |
| dc.subject | Green Conservation Label | en |
| dc.subject | Participatory Guarantee System | en |
| dc.subject | plural values of nature | en |
| dc.title | 擁抱大自然多元價値之生態友善參與式保障系統：以綠色保育標章為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Embracing plural values of nature in eco-friendly Participatory Guarantee System: A case study of Green Conservation label | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 闕河嘉;林華慶 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ho-Chia Chueh;Hwa-Ching Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 大自然多元價值,生態友善耕作,綠色保育標章,參與式保障系統, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | eco-friendly farming,Green Conservation Label,Participatory Guarantee System,plural values of nature, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 141 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403105 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-10-09 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 5.1 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。