請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93120完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳冠銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuan-Ming Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳菀錚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Zheng Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-17T16:31:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Altonji, J. G., Arcidiacono, P., and Maurel, A. (2016). The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. In Handbook of the Economics of Education, volume 5, pages 305–396. Elsevier.
Andrews, R. J., Imberman, S. A., Lovenheim, M. F., and Stange, K. M. (2022). The returns to college major choice: Average and distributional effects, career trajectories, and earnings variability. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. Berg, I. (1970). Education for jobs; the great training robbery. Berger, M. C. (1988). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. ILR Review, 41(3):418–429. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45:5–32. Cebula, R. J. and Lopes, J. (1982). Determinants of student choice of undergraduate major field. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2):303–312. Choi, S.K. and Hur, H. (2020). Does job mismatch affect wage and job turnover differently by gender? Education Economics, 28(3):291–310. Clark, B. R. et al. (1987). The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings. Univ of California Press. Davies, S. and Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social forces, 75(4):1417–1438. Deming, D. J. and Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and stem careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4):1965–2005. Duncan, G. J. and Hoffman, S. D. (1981). The incidence and wage effects of overeducation. Economics of education review, 1(1):75–86. Freeman, R. (1976). The overeducated american. Freeman, R. B. (1975). Overinvestment in college training? Journal of human resources, pages 287–311. Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociology of Education, pages 375–397. Hearn, J. C. (1984). The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education, pages 22–30. Hearn, J. C. (1990). Pathways to attendance at the elite colleges. The highstatus track:Studies of elite schools and stratification, 121:145. Hearn, J. C. (1991). Academic and nonacademic influences on the college destinations of 1980 high school graduates. Sociology of education, pages 158–171. Kaufmann, K. M. (2014). Understanding the income gradient in college attendance in mexico: The role of heterogeneity in expected returns. Quantitative Economics, 5(3):583–630. Kiker, B. F., Santos, M. C., and De Oliveira, M. M. (1997). Overeducation and undereducation: Evidence for portugal. Economics of Education Review, 16(2):111–125. Kinsler, J. and Pavan, R. (2015). The specificity of general human capital: Evidence from college major choice. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4):933–972. Kirkeboen, L. J., Leuven, E., and Mogstad, M. (2016). Field of study, earnings, and selfselection. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3):1057–1111. Liu, V. Y., Belfield, C. R., and Trimble, M. J. (2015). The mediumterm labor market returns to community college awards: Evidence from north carolina. Economics of Education Review, 44:42–55. Minaya, V. and ScottClayton, J. (2022). Labor market trajectories for community college graduates: How returns to certificates and associate’s degrees evolve over time.Education Finance and Policy, 17(1):53–80. Rumberger, R. W. (1987). The impact of surplus schooling on productivity and earnings.Journal of Human resources, pages 24–50. Rumberger, R. W. and Thomas, S. L. (1993). The economic returns to college major, quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates. Economics of Education Review, 12(1):1–19. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, pages 1–17. Schweri, J., Eymann, A., and Aepli, M. (2020). Horizontal mismatch and vocational education. Applied Economics, 52(32):3464–3478. Sicherman, N. (1991). ” overeducation” in the labor market. Journal of labor Economics, 9(2):101–122. Sicherman, N. and Galor, O. (1990). A theory of career mobility. Journal of political economy, 98(1):169–192. Somers, M. A., Cabus, S. J., Groot, W., and van den Brink, H. M. (2019). Horizontal mismatch between employment and field of education: Evidence from a systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2):567–603. Spence, M. A. (1973). 0job market signaling1. quarterly Journal of Economics, 87:355–74. Stevens, A. H., Kurlaender, M., and Grosz, M. (2019). Career technical education and labor market outcomes: Evidence from california community colleges. Journal of Human Resources, 54(4):986–1036. Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Eroğlu, E., Özer, M., and Gür, B. S. (2020). Horizontal skills mismatch in vocational education in turkey: The reasons for outoffield employment. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2):931–955. Verdugo, R. R. and Verdugo, N. T. (1989). The impact of surplus schooling on earnings: Some additional findings. Journal of human resources, pages 629–643. Verhaest, D., Sellami, S., and Van der Velden, R. (2017). Differences in horizontal and vertical mismatches across countries and fields of study. International Labour Review, 156(1):1–23. 呂虹霖 (2019). 臺灣高等教育 [學用落差] 之探究. 張苙雲 (2003). 台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：資料使用手冊【2011.12.01 版】、第一波(2001) 國中學生問卷. 中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫【管理、釋出單位】. 施溪泉 (2017). 大學教育與學用落差. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 6(8):49–50. 林俊彥與陳幼珍 (2017). 縮小 [學用落差] 是產官學共同的責任. 楊孟麗, 譚康榮, and 黃敏雄 (2003). 台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：心理計量報告：teps2001 分析能力測驗【第一版】. 中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫【管理、釋出單位】. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93120 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究使用臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查(TEPS-B)，探討水平學用落差與薪資報酬的關聯，將學習領域分成「社會組」和「自然組」時，發現隨著學歷的提升，轉組的比例逐漸減少；以及私立大學的學生傾向直接就業，而國立大學尤其是自然組的學生則較多選擇繼續升學。此外，本研究利用隨機森林選出關鍵變數及主要教育路徑進行子樣本分群。接著根據挑選出的變數進行迴歸分析，研究結果顯示，工作社會組與自然組之間在薪資方面無顯著差異，反而是學歷對薪資的關聯更甚。進一步分析發現，學用落差整體而言與薪資呈現顯著負相關，但不同教育路徑也同樣會影響學用落差與薪資的相關程度，以及相同學位下，不同類組的學生在面臨學用落差時，薪資表現可能會有所差別。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper uses the Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond (TEPS-B) to explore the relationship between horizontal job mismatch and salary returns. Dividing majors into "social sciences" and "natural sciences," we find that higher education levels correspond to fewer students changing fields. Additionally, private university students tend to enter the job market directly, while public university students, especially in natural sciences, are more likely to pursue further education. Moreover, this paper uses random forest analysis to identify important variables and primary educational paths for sub-sample grouping. Regression analysis shows no significant salary difference between social sciences and natural sciences fields, but a stronger correlation between educational attainment and salary. Further analysis reveals that job mismatch proportions vary by degree and significantly correlate with salary. Within the same degree, students from different fields show varying salary performance when facing job mismatch. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-17T16:31:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-17T16:31:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 iii
中文摘要 v 英文摘要 vii 目次 ix 圖次 xi 表次 xiii 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 學用落差的相關議題 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 科系與報酬的關係 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 第三章 資料來源︑變數定義 7 3.1 資料來源 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2 變數定義 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.1 學習領域及職業領域 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.2 學用落差 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.3 從眾程度 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 第四章 研究方法 11 4.1 計量實證架構 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2 決策流向 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.3 樣本分群 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4.4 敘述統計 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 4.5 迴歸分析 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.5.1 主要迴歸 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.5.2 子樣本迴歸 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 第五章 研究結果 27 5.1 主要迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.2 子樣本迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 第六章 結論 39 參考文獻 41 附錄A 47 A.1 能力測量 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 A.2 薪資 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 A.3 學習領域及職業領域 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 附錄B 51 附錄C 59 圖次 4.1 高中到大學流向 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.2 大學到研究所流向 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.3 決策流向 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.4 教育路徑 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.5 教育路徑與工作薪資 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.6 決策樹：第一份工作的薪資 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.7 決策樹：30 歲時工作的薪資 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A.1 高中到學士領域 (按學門排序) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 A.2 學門分類 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 C.3 問卷中的學用落差 (在工作上，我可以發揮我的所學) . . . . . . . . . 59 C.4 國私立類組與薪資和能力間的關係 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 C.5 頂大與薪資和能力的關係 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 C.6 大學學門對收入的影響 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 C.7 研究所學門對收入的影響 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 C.8 簡化後的工作類組與學用落差 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 表次 5.1 第一份工作薪資取對數的主要迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5.2 30 歲工作薪資取對數的主要迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5.3 第一份工作薪資取對數的子樣本迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5.4 30 歲時工作薪資取對數的子樣本迴歸結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 B.1 高中類組定義 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 B.2 大學與研究所類組定義 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 B.3 工作類組定義 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 B.4 重要性排序 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 B.5 敘述統計 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 B.6 敘述統計 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 B.7 敘述統計 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 B.8 近年來相關研究整理 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 高等教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學用落差 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 隨機森林 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 薪資報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 領域選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Job Mismatch | en |
| dc.subject | Higher Education | en |
| dc.subject | Random Forest | en |
| dc.subject | Salary Returns | en |
| dc.subject | Field Selection | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣學用落差之探究：科系與報酬關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Job Mismatch in Taiwan: Major and Return Relationship | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳由常 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yu-Chang Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 賴建宇;李浩仲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chien-Yu Lai;HAO-CHUNG LI | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 學用落差,高等教育,領域選擇,薪資報酬,隨機森林, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Job Mismatch,Higher Education,Field Selection,Salary Returns,,Random Forest, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401767 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。