Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92734
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王衍智zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYan-Zhi Wangen
dc.contributor.author歐葳zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWei Ouen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T16:08:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-18-
dc.date.copyright2024-06-17-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-06-14-
dc.identifier.citation1. Brockman, P., Howe, J. S., & Mortal, S. (2008). Stock market liquidity and the decision to repurchase. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 446-459.
2. Chai, D., Faff, R., & Gharghori, P. (2010). New evidence on the relation between stock liquidity and measures of trading activity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19(3), 181-192.
3. Chang, K. W., Wang, G. Y., & Lu, C. H. U. N. W. E. I. (2013). The effect of liquidity on stock returns: A style portfolio approach. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 12(2), 170-179.
4. Charoenwong, C., Chong, B. S., & Yang, Y. C. (2014). Asset liquidity and stock liquidity: International evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(3-4), 435-468.
5. Chen, A., Chen, L. W., & Kao, L. (2010). Leverage, liquidity and IPO long‐run performance: evidence from Taiwan IPO markets. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 18(1), 31-38.
6. Dey, M. K. (2005). Turnover and return in global stock markets. Emerging Markets Review, 6(1), 45-67.
7. Easley, D. and O''Hara, M. (1992) Time and the process of security price adjustment. Journal of Finance 47: 577–605.
8. ElBannan, M. A. (2017). Stock market liquidity, family ownership, and capital structure choices in an emerging country. Emerging Markets Review, 33, 201-231.
9. Engle, R.F. and Russell, J.R. (1998) Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica 66: 1127–1162.
10. Fang, V. W., Noe, T. H., & Tice, S. (2009). Stock market liquidity and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 150-169.
11. Frieder, L., & Martell, R. (2006). On capital structure and the liquidity of a firm''s stock. Available at SSRN 880421.
12. Gabrielsen, A., Marzo, M. and Zagaglia, P. (2011) Measuring market liquidity: an introductory survey. SSRN Electronic Journal.
13. Gopalan, R., Kadan, O., & Pevzner, M. (2012). Asset liquidity and stock liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(2), 333-364.
14. Griffin, C. H. (2010). Liquidity and dividend policy: international evidence. International Business Research, 3(3), 3.
15. Ho, C. C., Lee, C. C., Lin, C. T., & Wang, C. E. (2005). Liquidity, volatility and stock price adjustment: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings in an emerging market. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 8(01), 31-51.
16. Johnson, H., Van Ness, B. F., & Van Ness, R. A. (2017). Are all odd-lots the same? Odd-lot transactions by order submission and trader type. Journal of Banking & Finance, 79, 1-11.
17. Kale, J. R., & Loon, Y. C. (2011). Product market power and stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2), 376-410.
18. Le, H., & Gregoriou, A. (2020). How do you capture liquidity? A review of the literature on low‐frequency stock liquidity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 1170-1186.
19. Lee, C.M. and Swaminathan, B. (2000) Price momentum and trading volume. Journal of Finance 55: 2017−2069.
20. Lipson, M. L., & Mortal, S. (2009). Liquidity and capital structure. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(4), 611-644.
21. O''Hara, M., Yao, C., & Ye, M. (2012). What’s not there: The odd-lot bias in TAQ data. Johnson School Research Paper Series, (16-2012).
22. Wang, L. H. (2022). Ownership Structure and Stock Liquidity: A Taiwan Study. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 12(2), 325-339.
23. Ze-To, S. Y. M. (2016). Asset liquidity and stock returns. Advances in Accounting, 35, 177-196.
24. 李翊瑀(2022)。盤中零股交易對股票流動性與超額報酬率影響。碩士論文。亞洲大學。
25. 陳緯寧(2022)。實施盤中零股交易制度對股票流動性與波動性的影響。碩士論文。健行科技大學。
26. 鄭舜仁(2004)。探討影響股票流動性的因素-以時間數列橫斷面探討公司規模、股權結構與資訊不對稱。管理科學與統計決策,1(1),85-97。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92734-
dc.description.abstract本研究以臺灣排除金融業之上市櫃公司為研究對象,並以盤中零股交易制度實施前後五個交易日,即2020年10月19日至2020年11月2日為主要樣本區間,採用雙重差分法配合最鄰近匹配法,分析「盤中零股交易制度之實施對股票流動性之影響」。研究結果顯示,盤中零股交易制度僅於實施前後五個交易日對股票流動性具顯著之正向關聯性,且具體而言該效果係反映於實施當日;而進一步分析政策實施前後十至三十個交易日資料則能發現,長期而言盤中零股交易制度對股票流動性並無顯著影響力;最後,本研究透過使用採用其他參數之最鄰近匹配法所得資料,重現政策實施前後五個交易日之迴歸分析,發現所有結果顯示盤中零股交易制度確於該時間範圍內具提升股票流動性之政策效果。總體而言,盤中零股交易制度在當日與股票流動性具正向關聯性,且該影響力於實施隔日便逐漸消弭,顯示該政策僅於當日對市場具較為強烈之激勵效果,顯著提升投資人之交易意願,進而提升股票之流動性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the relationship between intraday odd-lot trading policy and stock liquidity by analyzing all listed companies in Taiwan excluding the financial industry from October 19, 2020 to November 2, 2020. Utilizing Difference-in-Differences with Nearest Neighbor Matching method, we observe a positive relationship between intraday odd-lot trading policy and stock liquidity during this time period. Specifically, this effect is significant only on the day the policy implemented, that is October 26, 2020. In addition, we also extend the sample period to include 10, 15, 20, and 30 trading days before and after the policy implementation day respectively. The empirical results indicate that in the long term, intraday odd-lot trading policy doesn’t have influence on stock liquidity. Last, by reprocessing the analysis by applying alternative parameters during matching, we consistently find that in the short term, intraday odd-lot trading policy indeed contributes to an increase in stock liquidity. This suggests robustness in our research findings. In summary, there exists a short-term positive association between intraday odd-lot trading policy and stock liquidity, with the policy’s impact being significant only on the day of implementation, implying that the incentive effect of this policy is short-lived.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-06-17T16:08:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-06-17T16:08:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
第壹章 前言 1
第貳章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 研究背景 5
第二節 相關文獻回顧 7
第參章 研究資料與方法 11
第一節 研究資料 11
第二節 實證模型 12
第三節 組間樣本匹配 14
第肆章 實證結果與分析 15
第一節 敘述統計量 15
第二節 迴歸分析 18
第伍章 結論 24
第陸章 研究未來精進方向 25
參考文獻 27
附錄 31
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject股票流動性zh_TW
dc.subject盤中零股交易制度zh_TW
dc.subject雙重差分法zh_TW
dc.subject臺灣上市櫃公司zh_TW
dc.subject政策效果zh_TW
dc.subjectPolicy Effectsen
dc.subjectTaiwan Listed Companyen
dc.subjectDifference-in-Differencesen
dc.subjectStock Liquidityen
dc.subjectIntraday Odd-Lot Trading Policyen
dc.title臺灣實施盤中零股交易制度與上市櫃公司股票流動性之關聯性實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Intraday Odd-Lot Trading Policy and Stock Liquidity: An Empirical Study for Taiwan Listed Companyen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張景宏;連振廷zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChing-Hung Chang;Chen-Ting Lienen
dc.subject.keyword盤中零股交易制度,股票流動性,政策效果,臺灣上市櫃公司,雙重差分法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordIntraday Odd-Lot Trading Policy,Stock Liquidity,Policy Effects,Taiwan Listed Company,Difference-in-Differences,en
dc.relation.page51-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202401158-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-06-14-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學系-
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved