請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92057
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃舒楣 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Shu-mei Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 韓潔希 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Xhesjana Haxhiu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-04T16:19:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-05 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-04 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | AACRAO EDGE. (2023). Palau.
https://www.aacrao.org/edge/country/palau#:~:text=Palau%20was%20part%20of%20the,Japan%20fo llowing%20World%20War%20I (Accessed 8/11/2023). Amnesty International. (2021, June 18). Why saying ‘Aborigine’ isn’t OK: 8 facts about Indigenous people in Australia. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2015/08/why-saying-aborigineisnt-ok-8-facts-about-indigenous-people-inaustralia/#:~:text='Aborigine'%20is%20generally%20perceived%20as,or%20'Torres%20Strait%20Isl ander (Accessed 27/10/2023). Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. Animikii Indigenous Technology. (2020) Why we say “Indigenous” instead of “Aboriginal” https://animikii.com/insights/why-we-say-indigenous-instead-of-aboriginal (Accessed 27/10/2023). Basaw M.D.L (2023) We are Seediq (En version), 開放博物館 Open Museum. https://openmuseum.tw/muse/exhibition/a3f6f7c52600271766faaa0050b9e7cb (Accessed 23/09/2023). Belk, R.W. (1990) “The Role of Possessions in Constructing and Maintaining a Sense of Past”, NA - Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 17, pp. 669-676. Bendix, R. F., Eggert, A., & Peselmann, A. (Eds.) (2013). Heritage Regimes and the State. Göttingen University Press. Bennett, Tony (1995) The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London; New York: Routledge. Bourdieu, P., & Nice, R. (1980). The aristocracy of culture. Media, Culture & Society, 2(3), 225–254. Carhed, M. (2020) Taiwan’s Battle of Recognition An analysis of the withdrawal of state recognition in practice. Department of Political Science, Lund University. Castillo, M.M & Strecker, A, (2017) Heritage and Rights of Indigenous Peoples Patrimonio y Derechos de Los Pueblos Indígenas. (eds), Leiden University Press. Čeginskas, V.L.A. & Lähdesmäki, T. (2023) “Introduction: reflecting on heritage diplomacy”, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29:1, 1-8, Chen, Y. (1992) “Museums and Nationalism: The Political Discourse of the National Palace Museum in Taiwan”, National Museum of Taiwan History, pp. 133-140. Chiang, L.K. (1991) “Report on the human rights situation of Taiwan’s indigenous peoples”, Meeting of the United Nations Committee of Indigenous Peoples, Geneva. Switzerland. Council of Indigenous People (March 4, 2020), The Origin and Significance of August 1st, the Indigenous Peoples’ Day. https://www.cip.gov.tw/en/news/datalist/673CBF7B0C3D2700/2D9680BFECBE80B6221E4CC7D09E1357-info.html (Accessed 23/09/2023). Yeung, J. (April 2, 2021). “Passenger train carrying 490 derails in Taiwan, killing at least 50 and injuring dozens” , CNN.com https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/01/asia/taiwan-train-derail-intlhnk/index.html (Accessed 23/11/2023). Davies, D. (2021) “The Austronesian narrative. The role of Indigenous heritage in Taiwanese diplomacy” in (ed.) Chia-yuan Huang, Daniel Davies, Dafydd Fell, Taiwan’s Contemporary Indigenous Peoples, p. 256-274. De Cesari, C. (2013). “Thinking Through Heritage Regimes”. in (ed.) R. Bendix, A. Eggert, & A. Peselmann, Heritage regimes and the state. - 2nd, revised edition (pp. 399-413). Universitätsverlag Göttingen. Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). New southbound policy. https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/2ec7ef98-ec74-47af-85f2-9624486adf49 (Accessed 28/10/2023). Fairclough, N. (1992). “Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis”. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman. Figueira, C. (2020). “Indigenous Peoples as Non-State Diplomatic Actors in the Public/Cultural Diplomacy of Taiwan: a Case Study of Dispossessions: Performative Encounter(s) of Taiwanese Indigenous Contemporary Art”, International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 3(1), 62-92. Focus Taiwan (2023, May 19) 'Discriminatory' banner at NTU raises ire of Indigenous students https://focustaiwan.tw/culture/202305190025 (Accessed 26/09/2023). Global Times, (Jul 18, 2021). Unveiling Liberty Times, DPP’s secessionist mouthpiece and bellwether. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202107/1228955.shtml (Accessed 16/10/2023). Gustafsson, K. (2016) “The Struggle over the Meaning of Chinese Patriotism in the 21st Century”, China: An International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 133-152, NUS Press Pte Ltd. Hall, S. (1997) “The Work of Representation” in Hall, S. (ed.) Representation. Cultural representation and signifying practices, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 15-74. Harrison R. (2010). Understanding the politics of heritage. Manchester University. Harrison, R., (2020) “Heritage as future-making practices” in (ed.) Harrison, R., DeSilvey, C., Holtorf, C., Macdonald, S., Bartolini, N., Breithoff, E., Fredheim, H., Lyons, A., May, S., Morgan, J., Penrose, S., Högberg, A., & Wollentz, G. (2020). Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices. UCL Press. Huang, Shu-mei (2022) “Indigenous Heritage in Diplomacy: Repositioning Taiwan in the Austronesian Network and its Cultural Implication”, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. Emerald Publishing Limited. Jacobs, J. (2013). “Whither Taiwanization? The Colonization, Democratization and Taiwanization of Taiwan”. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 14(4), 567-586. Jorgensen, M.W. & Phillips, L.J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE Publications. Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/Index.aspx (Accessed 23/09/2023). Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). Indigenous Languages Development Act (June 14, 2017), https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0130037 (Accessed 25/09/2023). Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). The Indigenous People Basic Law (February 2, 2005), https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0130003 (Accessed 25/09/2023). Liberty Times News. (2023) Liberty Times News | About Us https://service.ltn.com.tw/about (Accessed 16/10/2023). Liou, H.-C. (2006). “A Real Multicultural Society? Contemporary Racism Towards Stereotyped Taiwanese Indigenous People”. 真理大學 人文學報 第四期, pp. 336-367. Liu, Z. (2015) Repatriation of cultural objects: The case of China, University of Amsterdam. Lowenthal, D. (1997). “History and Memory”. The Public Historian, 19(2), 30–39. Ma, S. (2022, August 10). “The threat to Taiwan’s Indigenous peoples’ land” FairPlanet. https://www.fairplanet.org/editors-pick/the-threat-to-taiwans-indigenous-peoples-land/ (Accessed 25/09/2023). Mcintosh, W. D. & Schmeichel, B. (2004) “Collectors and Collecting: A Social Psychological Perspective”, Leisure Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 1, 85-97. McIntyre (2021) “The public rise and exhibition of Taiwan Indigenous art and its role in nationbuilding and reconciliation” in (ed.) Chia-yuan Huang, Daniel Davies, Dafydd Fell, Taiwan’s Contemporary Indigenous Peoples, p. 105-127. McNaught (2021) “The state of the nation: Contemporary issues in Indigenous language education in Taiwan” in (ed.) Chia-yuan Huang, Daniel Davies, Dafydd Fell, Taiwan’s Contemporary Indigenous Peoples, p.128-146. Medium (2022, November 14). CULTURE & HERITAGE | Singing Ink: Indigenous Wisdom of Life https://medium.com/@shaopeng.wanders/singing-ink-an-indigenous-wisdom-of-life-15deb7e4c3d7 (Accessed 28/10/2023). Meskell, L. (2002) “Negative Heritage and Past Mastering in Archaeology”, Anthropological Quarterly, 75(3), 557-574. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of China (Taiwan) (MOFA) URL: https://en.mofa.gov.tw/Default.aspx (Accessed 18/09/2023). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2023). News websites https://en.mofa.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=3405 (Accessed 16/10/2023). New York Times. (2000, February 22) “The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue.”. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/asia/022200china-taiwan-text.html (Accessed 01/11/2023). Norihito M. (2015) “An Attempt of Reconciliation over History: The Case of the 1871 Ryukyu Shipwreck Incident” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 5, No. 2. Nornes 14.& Yeh (2014) “Staging Memories: Hou Hsiao-hsien’s A City of Sadness” Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library. Nye, J. S. (2008). “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power”. The Annals of the AmericanAcademy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94–109. Oxford English Dictionary. (2023) “tantalizing” https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=tantalizing&tl=true (Accessed 31/10/2023). Peycam, P., Wang, S.-L., & Yew-Foong, H. (2020). “Heritage As Aid and Diplomacy in Asia”, in ed. Heritage as a Aid and Diplomacy (2020). ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute; International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS); and Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica. Rawnsley, G.D., (2014), “Taiwan’s Soft Power and Public Diplomacy”. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43, 3, 161–174. Rawnsley, G.D., (2017). “Soft Power Rich, Public Diplomacy Poor: An Assessment of Taiwan’s External Communications”. The China Quarterly, 232, 982-1001. Rawnsley, G.D., (2019) “Cultural Diplomacy: What is it? What is it not? And why should Taiwan care?” University of Nottingham Ningbo China, presented at the Taiwan’s Cultural Diplomacy - A Decade of Intercultural Discovery” conference in Vienna, Austria, in October 2019. Rowen, I. (2017) Touring in heterotopia: Travel, sovereignty, and exceptional spaces in Taiwan and China, Asian Anthropology, 16:1, 20-34. Ryan, Chris, Janet Chang, and Tzung Cheng Huan. 2007. “The aboriginal people of Taiwan: discourse and silence.” In Richard Butler and Tom Hinch (eds), Tourism and Indigenous Peoples: Issues and Implications, pp. 188-200. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Scheufele, D. (1999) “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects”, The Journal of Communication. Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 103-122. Simon, S. (2023, July 13) The underside of a miracle: industrialization, land, and Taiwan’s indigenous peoples. Cultural Survival. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/culturalsurvival-quarterly/underside-miracle-industrialization-land-and-taiwans (Accessed 25/09/2023). Smith L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Smith. C.A, (2008) “Taiwan’s 228 Incident and the Politics of Placing Blame”, Past Imperfect (14) pp. 143-163. Stevenson, K. (2012). The Festival of Pacific Arts: celebrating 40 years. Secretariat of the Pacific Community. Sullivan, K.E. (2014), “Representations of Pacific identity at the 2012 Festival of Pacific Arts”, Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Taiwan News. (2023). Taiwan News | About us. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/page/aboutUs (Accessed 16/10/2023). Taiwan Plus (2023, April 9). Taiwan Indigenous Group Wants Sweden To Keep Their Ancestors’ Artifacts. [Video]. https://www.taiwanplus.com/news/taiwan-news/indigenous- issues/230904016/taiwan-indigenous-group-wants-sweden-to-keep-their-ancestors-artifacts (Accessed 23/09/2023). Taking Care (2023). Ethnographic and World Cultures Museums as Spaces of Care. https://takingcareproject.eu/ (Accessed 23/09/2023). The Diplomat. (2023) The Diplomat | About us. https://thediplomat.com/the-diplomat/ (Accessed 23/10/2023). Wang, A. (2012) Chinese Antiquities: An Introduction to the Art Market, Handbooks in International Art Business, Lund Humphries. Wang, H.L. (2004). “National Culture and Its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan”, 1949–2003. Comparative Studies in Society and Histor,. 46. We are Seediq. (2023). Etnografiska Museet. https://www.etnografiskamuseet.se/en/exhibitions/weare-seediq/ (Accessed 23/09/2023). Winter, T. (2015) “Heritage diplomacy”, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21:10, 997-1015. 南島民族論壇| AUSTRONESIAN FORUM. (2020, November 8)., History of the Forum https://austronesianforum.org/en/menu/92C9FA5FDC5FA166FCE0C2A2CD32E578/info.html#:~:tex t=The%20Council%20of%20Indigenous%20Peoples,a%20cooperative%20platform%20for%20the (Accessed 23/09/2023). 台北時報 Taipei Times (2008, May 12). INTERVIEW: New envoy to Fiji reveals special tricks of the trade https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/05/12/2003411755 (Accessed 21/01/2024). 台北時報 Taipei Times (2020, July 5). University to return four Paiwan skulls from 1874. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2020/05/05/2003735855 (Accessed 23/09/2023). 台北時報 Taipei Times (2019, December 1). Taiwan in Time: Remembering the ‘Big Beard.’ https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2019/12/01/2003726747 (Accessed 26/09/2023). 台北時報 Taipei Times, (2013, September 18). Academics urge action on World Heritage sites. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/09/18/2003572437 (Accessed 25/09/2023). | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92057 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探索台灣原住民遺產在遺產外交框架內的微妙動態,以2007年8月至2023年 9 月為研究範疇區間,分析該動態於國內和國際媒體中的呈現。該研究運用對三家國內媒體(即《台灣今日》、《台北時報》和《台灣新聞》)和兩家國際媒體(《外交家》和《島嶼時報》)的文章進行論述分析。在對國內媒體的分析中浮現了三個主要主題:(1)政治參與與代表;(2)襲產保護與身份認同;以及(3)文化多樣性與文化交流。第一主題探討了媒體偏見、歷史背景和政治目標如何互動,塑造了台灣原住民遺產的呈現方式。這一研究強調了媒體在台灣處理國家認同、外交和文化保護等問題時的複雜性。第二主題涉及台灣原住民社群在身份認同和襲產保護之複雜性。它顯示了與語言、文化和教育相關的項目既提供機會又帶來困難,而媒體報導在提供明確和不明確敘述方面發揮了關鍵作用。第三主題強調了台灣政府政策、文化認同和歷史敘述在台灣是如何相互關聯的。對文化多樣性的強調挑戰了刻板印象,糾正了歷史遺漏,承認建設性的舉措,但同時也指出了諸如制度歧視和在社會不公正面前保存文化的挑戰等複雜問題。台灣外交努力的微妙性體現在國際媒體的報導中,這些報導考慮到文化多樣性和南島語系的聯繫。媒體來源對原住民襲產及其可能的政治含義表現出不同程度的敏感性,儘管台灣仍在爭取國際承認。該研究為未來後續研究奠定基礎,有望提高我們對台灣原住民遺產背後政治、媒體和文化關係多層次的理解。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The research aims to explore the intricate dynamics of Taiwanese Indigenous heritage within the framework of heritage diplomacy, analyzing its representation in domestic and international media from August 2007 to September 2023. The study employs discourse analysis on articles from three domestic media, namely Taiwan Today, Taipei Times and Taiwan News, and two international media outlets, The Diplomat and Island Times. In the analysis of the domestic media, three primary themes emerge: (1) Political Engagement and Representation; (2) Heritage Preservation and Identity; and, (3) Cultural Diversity and Cultural Exchange. The first theme examines how media biases, historical contexts, and political goals interact to shape how Taiwanese Indigenous heritage is portrayed. This examination highlights the intricacies in media representations as Taiwan struggles with matters of national identity, diplomacy, and cultural conservation. The second theme addresses the subtle complexities that Taiwan’s Indigenous communities face, regarding identity and heritage preservation. It shows that programs related to language, culture, and education offer opportunities as well as difficulties, and media coverage plays a key role in providing both clear and unclear narratives. The third theme emphasizes how government policies, cultural identity, and historical narratives are interconnected in Taiwan. The emphasis on cultural diversity challenges stereotypes and corrects historical omissions, acknowledging constructive initiatives but drawing attention to complex issues like institutional discrimination and the challenge of preserving culture in the face of social injustices. The intricate nature of Taiwan’s diplomatic efforts appears in the international media coverage, which takes into consideration the cultural diversity and Austronesian connection. Media sources show differing degrees of sensitivity to Indigenous heritage and its possible political implications, despite Taiwan’s ongoing struggle for international recognition. The research establishes the foundation for future investigation that hold the potential to improve our comprehension of the multifaceted relationships among politics, media, and culture in the context of Taiwanese Indigenous heritage. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-04T16:19:09Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-04T16:19:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Literary excursus of Taiwan’s heritage diplomacy strategy and the employment of . 6 its Indigenous heritage ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Taiwan’s soft power and its efforts in heritage diplomacy ......................................... 6 2.2 Taiwanese Indigenous People and their ongoing struggle with the national ........... 8 government over land ownership ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 Nation-branding and identity-building through cultural artifacts.......................... 10 3. Taiwan’s historical journey through political history, foreign diplomacy, and ......... 12 Indigenous relics .................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Taiwanese political history and Indigenous people policies ..................................... 12 3.2 The Austronesian narrative and Taiwan’s diplomatic initiatives ............................ 15 3.3 Repatriation and expatriation of Indigenous cultural relics .................................... 17 4. Methods & Data ................................................................................................................ 20 4.1 Discourse analysis and media representation ............................................................ 20 4.2 Taiwanese and international newspapers ................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Domestic media ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 International media ................................................................................................. 22 4.3 Research materials and process .................................................................................. 22 4.4 Limitation of the research ........................................................................................... 25 5. Analysis of the research material .................................................................................... 26 5.1 Discourse analysis of the domestic newspapers ......................................................... 26 5.1.1 Political Engagement and Representation .............................................................. 26 5.1.2 Heritage Preservation and Identity ......................................................................... 33 5.1.3 Cultural Diversity and Cultural Exchange ............................................................. 39 5.2 Discourse analysis of the international newspapers .................................................. 44 6. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 53 6.1 Research questions, objectives of the study and methodology ................................. 53 6.2 Discussion of the findings ............................................................................................ 54 6.2.1 Findings in Theme (1) ............................................................................................. 54 6.2.2 Findings in Theme (2) ............................................................................................. 56 6.2.3 Findings in Theme (3) ............................................................................................. 58 7. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 62 References............................................................................................................................... 65 Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 70 Appendix A: articles from domestic media ...................................................................... 70 Appendix B: articles from international media ............................................................... 77 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 揭示敘事:在文化襲產外交領域中的台灣原住民襲產。國內和國際媒體視角的論述分析。 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Unveiling Narratives: Taiwanese Indigenous Heritage in the Realm of Heritage Diplomacy. A discourse analysis of Domestic and International Media Perspectives. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃麗玲;陳怡萱 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Li-ling Huang;Yi-xuan Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 臺灣原住民襲產,襲產外交,文化外交,媒體表徵,國際認同,國家身分, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taiwanese Indigenous heritage,heritage diplomacy,cultural diplomacy,media representation,international recognition,national identity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 78 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400436 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-14 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-01-31 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 建築與城鄉研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 14.46 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。