漁村地方創生執行方案評選之研究-以七股為例

Abstract

基於行政院的地方創生觀念與政策推動，本研究以七股漁村為例，建立漁村發展的評選模式，期能理解地方創生發展經驗後，能更有效地運用各種資源，並創造經濟價值。藉由文獻探討，本研究釐清台灣漁村現況發展之可能關鍵影響因素，經由模糊德爾菲法（Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM）的專家問卷調查方式，並結合利益、機會、成本、風險（Benefit, Opportunity, Cost, Risk, BOCR）又稱為FDM with BOCR，以獲得台灣漁村發展的關鍵因子以及可能的策略條件。本研究透過七股區地方創生的共識會所形成討論方案共識，確定七股區的五項執行方案彙整作為本研究案的方案內容。進而採用專家問卷方式進行調查以獲得各專家問卷的評分，之後使用熵（Entropy）與BOCR的結合計算方式，將策略準則、關鍵影響因素、執行方案等不同層面影響內容，進行完整的計算，獲得專家評選的最佳方案。本研究分析實證對象規劃出1.鏈結觀光景點及空間活化、2.以空間規劃強化生活機能、3.創造科技養殖的地方企業、4.強化初級與二級加工漁業、5.新創漁產品牌的行銷推廣等5種執行方案，結果發現鏈結觀光景點及空間活化為地方創生於漁村發展評選模式發展之最佳策略方案。本研究過程與結果顯示，本分析架構能系統且確切地針對命題核心，有效處理漁村地方創生模型建構與應用評比時所涉及的相關不確定性問題。

This study is based on the Executive Yuan's policy to promote the concept of regional revitalization and uses Ciqu Fishing Village as an example to establish a selection model for the development of fishing villages, with the aim of better understanding the development experience of regional revitalization, exploiting resources more effectively, and ultimately creating economic value. Through a series of literature reviews, this study identifies the potential key factors influencing the status quo of fishing villages in Taiwan. It employs the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) questionnaire survey on experts, which is combined with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (also known as FDM with BOCR), to identify key factors and potential strategic conditions for the development of fishing villages in Taiwan. This study incorporated the consensus of development alternatives forged by the Ciqu District Regional Revitalization Consensus Conferences, as well as five confirmed alternatives for Cigu District, into the content of this study. Then it adopted the expert questionnaire to conduct a survey and collect data for each expert questionnaire. Following that, it used the Entropy and BOCR combined calculation method to perform a comprehensive calculation of the influence of various aspects, such as policy criteria, key influencing factors, and implementation plans, in order to obtain the best alternatives selected by experts. The empirical objects examined in this study developed five alternatives: 1.) linking tourist attractions and spatial rehabilitation; 2.) improving convenience of living through spatial planning; 3.) establishing local enterprises that use science and technology breeding; 4.) strengthening primary and secondary processing fisheries; and 5.) marketing and promotion of newly created fishery brands. The results show that linking tourist attractions and spatial rehabilitation is the best strategy for regional revitalization alternatives in the fishing villages. The process and results of this study demonstrate that this analysis framework can systematically and accurately target the core of the proposition while effectively addressing the relevant uncertainties involved in the construction and application evaluation of the regional revitalization model of fishing villages.