請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91746完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉奇璋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-Chang Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許智勛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Hsun Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-22T16:31:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (一)中文文獻
行政院農委會（2023）。陸域保育類野生動物名錄。 沈世傑（1993）。臺灣魚類誌。國立臺灣大學動物學系。台北，臺灣。 林敬育（2014）。從環境開發到環境正義：關西118外環道爭議。國立中央大學客家社會文化研究所碩士論文。 張秀美（2007）。環境衝突管理案例分析─以中部科學工業園區后里基地開發為例。 莊樺英（2009）。衝突治理對公共建設過程之重要性：后里科學園區為例。 陳兼善、于名振（1986）。臺灣脊椎動物誌（上冊）。臺灣商務印書館。台北，台灣。 陳義雄、方力行（1999）。臺灣淡水及河口魚類誌。國立海洋生物博物館籌備處。屏東，臺灣。 陳義雄、張詠青（2005）。臺灣淡水魚類原色圖鑑第（一）卷 鯉形目。水產出版社。基隆，臺灣。 陳義雄（2019）。瀕危淡水魚種的繁養殖保種規劃與生態調查研究期末報告，行政院農業委員會林務局。 經濟部水利署（1996）。水資源政策白皮書。 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2005）。後龍溪水系沙河溪（含支流飛鳳溪）治理基本計畫。 經濟部水利署（2006）。新世紀水資源政策綱領。 經濟部水利署（2020）。重大水資源規劃作業計畫。 經濟部水利署（2020）。後龍溪水系治理規劃計畫檢討。 經濟部水利署第二河川局（2020）。沙河溪沙河橋下游左岸護岸工程核定、規劃設計階段生態檢核作業成果 楊淑安（2006）。環境衝突利害關係人互動之研究：以坪林交流道開放爭議為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。 潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。心理出版社。台北市，臺灣。 劉奇璋、廖德裕（2023）。新竹林區管理處飯島氏銀鮈族群生態調查與保育行動計畫，行政院農業委員會林務局新竹林區管理處。 賴弘智、熊文俊、林翰揚、施志昀（2009）。飯島氏銀鮈Squalidus iijimae（Oshima,1919）人工繁養殖及幼苗發育。 (二)外文文獻 Adil Salhi, Sara Benabdelouahab, El Ouazna Bouayad, Tarik Benabdelouahab, Ihsan Larifi, Mhamed El Mousaoui, Noeman Acharrat, Mahjoub Himi, Albert Casas Ponsati. (2021). Impacts and social implications of landuse-environment conflicts in a typical Mediterranean watershed. Ahmet Faruk Aysan, Yassine Bakkar, Shajara Ul-Durar, Umar Nawaz Kayani. (2023).Natural resources governance and conflicts: Retrospective analysis. Amy, D. (1987). The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press. Arnim Scheidel, Daniela Del Bene, Juan Liu, Grettel Navas, Sara Mingorría, Federico Demaria, Sofía Avila, Brototi Roy, Irmak Ertör, Leah Temper, Joan Martínez-Alier. (2020). Environment conflicts and defenders: A global overview. Begüm Özkaynak, Roldan Muradian, Paula Ungar, Diana Morales. (2023). What can methods for assessing worldviews and broad values tell us about socio-environment conflicts? Bingham, G. (1986). Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience.Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation. Bob, U., & Bronkhorst, S. (2011). Environment conflicts: Key issues and management implications. South African Journal of Science, 107(5/6), 1-8. Chen, I. S. (2008). Threatened fishes of the world: Squalidus iijimae (Oshima, 1919). Chen, I. S., & Chang, Y. C. (2007). Taxonomic revision and mitochondrial sequence evolution of the Cyprinid genus Squalidus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in Taiwan with description of a new species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 14, 69-76. Daniels, S., & Walker, G. (2001). Working through environment conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications. Di Gregorio, M. (2012). Networking in environmental movement organization coalitions: interest, values, or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21(1), 1–25. Elias, A. A. (2017). Systems thinking and modelling for stakeholder management. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 6(2), 123–131. Elias, A. A., Laurie Skuba Jackson, and Robert Y. Cavana. (2004). Changing positions and interests of stakeholders in environment conflict: A New Zealand transport infrastructure case. Flint, C. (2005). The Geography of War and Peace: From Death Camps to Diplomats. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Freeman, R. Edward. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.Boston: Pitman. Freeman, R. Edward. (2023). Stakeholder Management: Framework and Philosophy. Glasbergen, P. (1995). Environmental dispute resolution as a management issue: Towards new forms of decision making. In P. Glasbergen (Ed.), Managing environmental disputes: Network management as an alternative (Environment & Management, Vol. 5, pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gleick, P.H. (1996). Water Resources. In S.H. Schneider (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather (Vol. 2, pp. 817-823). New York: Oxford University Press. Jackson, L. S., & Pradubraj, P. (2004). Introduction: Environment conflict in the Asia Pacific. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 45(1), 1-11. Jackson, Robert B., Stephen R. Carpenter, Clifford N. Dahm, Diane M. McKnight, Robert J. Naiman, Sandra L. Postel, & Steven W. Running. (2001). Water in a Changing World.Janos J. Bogardi, Jan Leentvaar, & Zita Sebesvári. (2020). Biologia Futura: integrating freshwater ecosystem health in water resources management. J.C. Young, D.C. Rose, H.S. Mumby, F. Benitez-Capistros, C.J. Derrick, T. Finch, C. Garcia, C. Home, E. Marwaha, C. Morgans. (2018). A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C.M. Nicholls, R. Ormston. (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage. Ksenija Hanaček, Markus Kröger, Arnim Scheidel, Facundo Rojas, & Joan Martinez Alier. (2022). On thin ice – The Arctic commodity extraction frontier and environment conflicts. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Kunurat, P., S. Panyasing, M. Sa-mart, P. Kenviset, & P. Vithantiravat. (1997). Rai ngan kan vijai rueng kan suksa kwuam kadyang kong kanchai sappayakorn tang thammachat nai pak tawan awk chiang nue [Research Report on Conflict in Natural Resource Utilisation]. Lee, K. (1993). Compass and gyroscope. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lune, Howard & Bruce L. Berg. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 69-70. Mahdi Kolahi, Mohammadali Jannatichenar, Kirsten Davies, & Caitlyn Hoffmann.(2021). Legal conflicts among natural resources stakeholders in Iran. Maria João Costa, Gonçalo Duarte, Pedro Segurado, Paulo Branco. (2021). Major threats to European freshwater fish species. Mark Granovetter. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. Mark S. Reed, Steven Vella, Edward Challies, Joris de Vente, Lynne Frewer, Daniela Hohenwallner-Ries, Tobias Huber, Rosmarie K. Neumann, Elizabeth A. Oughton, Julian Sidoli del Ceno, Hedwig van Delden. (2017). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Maser, C., & Pollio, C. A. (2012). Resolving environment conflicts. Michael Quinn Patton. (2002). Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis. (3rd ed.). Pearson Australia Group. Mitchell, B. (2001). Resource and environmental management. Essex: Longman. Mitchell, R.K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, N. (2022). Development of Qualitative Semi-Structured Interview Guide for Case Study Research. Competitive Social Sciences Research Journal (CSSRJ), 3(2), 42-52. Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatised water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 423(5), 526–538. Omolola, A., & Nicole, L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Orr, S.K. (2014). Environmental Policymaking and Stakeholder Collaboration: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge. Oshima, M. (1919). Contributions to the study of the freshwater fishes of the Island of Formosa. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 12, 169-328. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Paola Vesco, Shouro Dasgupta, Enrica De Cian, & Carlo Carraro. (2020). Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Sachihiko Harashina. (1995). Environmental dispute resolution process and information exchange. Sandford, R. (1996). Building bridges: Culture, environment and conflict management. In R. Sultan, P. Josif, C. Mackinolty, & J. Mackinolty (Eds.), The Ecopolitics IX. Perspectives on Indigenous Peoples management of Environment Resources (pp. 146–158). Darwin: Northern Land Council. Shollenberger, H., Dressler, E., & Mallinson, D.J. (2019). Invasive snakehead and introduced sport fish illustrate an environmental health paradox of invasive species and angler demand. Case Studies in Environmental, 3(1), 1–10. Tillett, G. (1999). Resolving conflict: A practical approach (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. United Nations. (2009). World water development report: Water in a changing world. United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs. Y. Fu, C. Tan, X. Liu, X. Sun, Z. Yuan, Y. Zheng. (2022). Definition, classification, observation and monitoring of natural resources and their application in territorial planning and governance. Z. Khan, M. Hussain, M. Shahbaz, S. Yang, & Z. Jiao. (2020). Natural resource abundance, technological innovation, and human capital nexus with financial development: a case study of China. Zikargae, H.M., Woldearegay, A. G., & Skjerdal, T. (2022). Empowering rural society through non-formal environmental education: An empirical study of environment and forest development community projects in Ethiopia. Heliyon , 8(3). (三)網頁與網站文獻 公共工程生態檢核注意事項（2020）。行政院公共工程委員會-主管法規查詢系統。1091102修正總說明及對照表.pdf。https://lawweb.pcc.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000049 (最後查閱時間:2024/01/29) 公共工程生態檢核注意事項（2021）。行政院公共工程委員會-主管法規查詢系統。1101006修正總說明及對照表.pdf。https://lawweb.pcc.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000049 (最後查閱時間:2024/01/29) 公共工程生態檢核注意事項（2023）。行政院公共工程委員會-主管法規查詢系統。https://lawweb.pcc.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000049 (最後查閱時間:2024/01/29) 苗栗縣政府水利處水利科（2022）。本府「沙河溪沙河橋改建工程」因應工區上游發現飯島氏銀鮈，於111 年1月21日暫停工程施作，並將依公共工程生態檢核注意事項之相關 環境生態異常狀況處理原則辦理生態減輕及補償作業。https://www.miaoli.gov.tw/economic_affairs/News_Content.aspx?n=566&s=495641(最後查閱時間:2024/01/29) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91746 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以生物多樣性保育的角度探討飯島氏銀鮈與苗栗縣沙河橋相關工程之間的環境衝突事件。透過向該事件中的利害關係人進行半結構式訪談，並運用質性資料編碼分析。旨在深入理解此環境衝突事件以及事件的利害關係人對事件的立場、採取的行為及彼此的互動頻率。研究結果呈現因生態檢核作業未盤點到飯島氏銀鮈而導致的沙河溪事件之過程。本研究將本次環境衝突事件之利害關係人分為五大類，分別為政府部門、環保團體、當地居民、專家學者和生態檢核團隊，並發現同一大類的利害關係人，可依照其各自立場及行為的不同，再進行更詳細的分類。本次事件利害關係人的互動頻率中，除專家學者以外，絕大部分利害關係人彼此之間的互動頻率稍顯薄弱。研究結果亦對本次環境衝突事件列舉三大關鍵議題:生態檢核制度與作業問題、利害關係人之間資訊不對等以及生態保育觀念不普及進行討論。最後，本研究提出五項針對環境衝突事件的預防策略及三項未來展望，預防策略分別為強弱聯繫的應用、社會資本的應用、生態檢核的專業整合、生物資料資訊有條件公開以及增加利害關係人間的互動與溝通。未來展望方面則是提升當地居民對飯島氏銀鮈的認知與情感連結、提升強弱聯繫以及增強社會資本，以提供未來類似的環境衝突事件做為參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examined the environmental conflict between the conservation of Squalidus iijimae and engineering projects related to the Shahe Bridge in Miaoli County, Taiwan, from the perspective of biodiversity conservation. Through semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in a conflict incident and qualitative data coding analysis, the study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of this environmental conflict and the stakeholders’ stance on the incident, their actions, and the frequency of their interactions with each other.
The results showed the detailed process of the Shahe River incident, in which S. iijimae was omitted from the procedure of ecological consideration for engineering projects. The stakeholders involved in this environmental conflict were categorized into five major groups: government departments, environmental organizations, local residents, experts, scholars, and the team responsible for the procedure of ecological consideration for engineering projects. The study found that each major stakeholder group could be further divided based on the differences in their stances and behaviors. The interaction frequency between the majority of stakeholders, except for the experts and scholars, appeared to be relatively low. We also discuss three crucial issues highlighted in this environmental conflict, including issues of the industry and the system of the procedure of ecological consideration for engineering projects, information asymmetry among stakeholders, and the lack of popularization of ecological conservation concepts. Finally, the study proposed five preventive strategies and three future prospects for environmental conflict incidents. The preventive strategies include the application of strong ties and weak ties, the application of social capital, professional integration of the procedure of ecological consideration for engineering projects, conditional disclosure of biological information, and an increase in interaction and communication among stakeholders. Future prospects aim to enhance local residents’ awareness and their emotional connection to S. iijimae, strengthen strong and weak ties, and increase social capital to provide references for similar succeeding environmental conflicts. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-22T16:31:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-22T16:31:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
謝辭 I 摘要 II Abstract III 目次 IV 圖次 VI 表次 VII 第壹章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 5 第貳章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 飯島氏銀鮈 6 第二節 環境衝突 8 第三節 利害關係人 11 第四節 生態檢核 15 第五節 相關研究結果 18 第參章 材料與方法 20 第一節 研究對象 20 第二節 資料蒐集 25 第三節 資料分析 28 第四節 研究嚴謹度 29 第五節 研究限制 30 第肆章 結果與討論 31 第一節 沙河溪事件 31 第二節 利害關係人分類、立場與行為 43 第三節 利害關係人互動頻率 54 第四節 沙河溪事件關鍵點探討 60 第五節 環境衝突事件之預防及未來展望策略 66 第伍章 結論與建議 70 第一節 結論 70 第二節 建議 71 參考文獻 73 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 環境衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 飯島氏銀鮈 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生態檢核 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然資源保育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder | en |
| dc.subject | Natural resource conservation | en |
| dc.subject | Procedure of ecological consideration for engineering project | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental conflict | en |
| dc.subject | Squalidus iijimae | en |
| dc.title | 從利害關係人之立場、行為與互動探討生物多樣性保育與地方工程之環境衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Environmental Conflicts between Biodiversity Conservation and Engineering Projects from the Perspective, Behavior, and Interactions of Stakeholders | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張子超;廖桂賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tzu-Chau Chang;Kuei-Hsien Liao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 飯島氏銀鮈,環境衝突,利害關係人,自然資源保育,生態檢核, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Squalidus iijimae,Environmental conflict,Stakeholder,Natural resource conservation,Procedure of ecological consideration for engineering project, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400406 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。