請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91269
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chyi-Rong Chiou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張紹逸 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Shao-Yi Chang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-20T16:14:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-21 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-12-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-29 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 江佳純、孫智麗(2022)。企業永續發展前瞻性議題介紹自然資本評估與生物多樣性相關之經濟政策及衡量工具。農業生技產業季刊第六十九期。
林祐翠(2020)。金融業永續發展趨勢 - 以道瓊永續指數領導者為例。存款保險資訊季刊 第 33 卷 第 1 期。https://www.cdic.gov.tw/upload/cont_att/33-1-5.pdf 邱祈榮(2022)。生物多樣性保育挑戰與機會〔專題演講〕。2022海峽兩岸自然保護地建設青年學者專題交流營活動。 金融監督管理委員會(2023)。金管會發布「上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案(2023年)」。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News 國立政治大學商學院信義書院(2023)。第九屆台灣永續現況與趨勢分析發表會。http://syschool.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/news/2023%E7%AC%AC%E4%B9%9D%E5%B1%86%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E8%88%87%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8%E6%9C%83-77674429 國立政治大學商學院信義書院(2022)。第八屆台灣永續現況與趨勢分析發表會。http://syschool.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/news/event_gallery/2022%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AB%E5%B1%86%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E8%88%87%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8%E6%9C%83-76616618 國立政治大學商學院信義書院(2021)。第七屆台灣永續現況與趨勢分析發表會。http://www.syschool.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/news/2021%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%83%E5%B1%86%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E8%88%87%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8%E6%9C%83-19962203 國立政治大學商學院信義書院(2020)。第六屆台灣永續報告分析發表會。https://csrone.com/topics/6059 國立政治大學商學院信義書院(2019)。第五屆台灣永續現況與趨勢分析發表會-突破界線。https://commerce.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/News/2019%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E5%B1%86%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E8%88%87%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8%E6%9C%83%EF%BC%8D%E7%AA%81%E7%A0%B4%E7%95%8C%E7%B7%9A-18230732 彰化銀行(2020)。證券市場「環境、社會和公司治理(ESG)」投資的發展。https://www.bankchb.com/chb_2a_resource/leap_do/gallery/1603939047319/69-9&10%E5%B0%88%E9%A1%8C%E8%AB%96%E8%BF%B0.pdf 謝書書(2012)。企業社會責任的實踐挑戰:宏碁爭取列入道瓊永續性指數個案探討。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。 Adler, R., Mansi, M., Pandey, R., & Stringer, C. (2017). United nations decade on biodiversity: a study of the reporting practices of the Australian mining industry. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 1711-1745. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2028 Adler, R., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top fortune global companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 787-825. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2490 Blanco-Zaitegi, G., Álvarez Etxeberria, I., & Moneva, J. M. (2022). Biodiversity accounting and reporting: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133677 Boiral, O. (2016). Accounting for the unaccountable: biodiversity reporting and impression management. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2497-9 CDP (2023). Scoring Introduction 2023. CDB/COP15 (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf Gaia, S. & John Jones, M. (2017). UK local councils reporting of biodiversity values: a stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 1614-1638. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2367 Gamborg, C. (2002). The acceptability of forest management practices: an analysis of ethical accounting and the ethical matrix. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00007-2 Helm, T. (2022). Biodiversity concerns set to be the next frontier after climate change. IFLR. https://www.iflr.com/article/2a647jipe3beilnnbt0qo/biodiversity-concerns-set-to-be-the-next-frontier-after-climate-change Hrasky, S. & Jones, M. (2016). Lake Pedder: Accounting, environmental decision-making, nature and impression management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.005 Investopedia (2023). The 3 Pillars of Corporate Sustainability. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/100515/three-pillars-corporate-sustainability.asp IPBES (2019). Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Brondízio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., Ngo, H. T. (eds). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1144 pages. ISBN: 978-3-947851-20-1 KPMG (2012). Expect the Unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Kurth, T., Wübbels, G., Portafaix, A., Alexander Meyer zum Felde & Zielcke, S. (2021). The Biodiversity Crisis Is a Business Crisis. Boston Consulting Group. Mathis, S. & Stedman, C. (2023). DEFINITION:environmental, social and governance (ESG). TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-ESG Marco-Fondevila, M. & A ́lvarez-Etxeberría I. (2023). Trends in private sector engagement with biodiversity: EU listed companies' disclosure and indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107864 Microsoft (2021). 2021 Environmental Sustainability Report. https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE4RwfV Principles for Responsible Investment (2020). INVESTOR ACTION ON BIODIVERSITY: DISCUSSION PAPER. PwC (2023)。ESG是什麼?為什麼企業要重視?解密企業淨零轉型重要關鍵 。https://www.pwc.tw/zh/topics/trends/what-is-esg.html Rimmel, G. & Jonäll, K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers’views. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25 (5). pp. 746- 778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1228 Robinson, M., Kleffner, A., & Bertels, S. (2011). Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 493–505. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41475914 Saush, A. & Siskos, I. (2021). Biodiversity Loss: What Does It Mean for Your Business? The Conference Board. S&P Global (2023). CSA Handbook 2023: Corporate Sustainability Assessment. https://portal.csa.spglobal.com/survey/documents/CSA_Handbook.pdf S&P Global (2023). ESG Research 2023 CSA Methodology Updates. https://portal.csa.spglobal.com/survey/documents/CSA_2023_Methodology_Updates_Overview.pdf TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Van Liempd, D. & Busch, J. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 833-872. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ:02-2013-1232 WEF (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023 WEF (2020). Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy. WEF (2010). Biodiversity and business risk: A Global Risks Network briefing. WWF (2022). Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a nature-positive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91269 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著2022年底聯合國《生物多樣性公約》(Convention on Biological Diversity) 第15屆締約方大會(CDB COP15,亦稱聯合國生物多樣性大會)所通過的「昆明—蒙特婁全球生物多樣性框架」(Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, GBF)問世,生物多樣性議題已變得與氣候變遷議題同等重要,奠定未來國際上必須處理的重大環境議題將會是「氣候變遷」與「生物多樣性」雙軌並行之趨勢。
企業作為自然資源的依賴者與影響者(商業行為具外部性),理當脫離不了相關責任;職是之故,本研究將聚焦討論目前台灣企業的生物多樣性相關行動,期望透過企業的生物多樣性相關資訊揭露來瞭解其對於生物多樣性議題之想法、態度與作為。為瞭解企業生物多樣性資訊揭露狀態,本研究選取2022年入圍道瓊永續指數(Dow Jones Sustainability Indices, DJSI)的台灣標竿企業作為主要研究樣本,並採用兩種途徑來為企業的生物多樣性資訊揭露狀態評分。首先將使用DJSI開發的「企業永續發展評估」(Corporate Sustainability Assessment, CSA)法以分析企業相關資訊揭露程度,接著利用「目標」(Goal)、「承諾」(Commitment)、「策略」(Strategy)、「指標」(Indicator)四個評分項目檢視CSA涵蓋範圍以外企業其他額外的生物多樣性保育行動是否能通過可靠度驗證,所通過的評分項目越多,代表該行動越具備可靠的實質保育效果 。此兩大評估途徑將協助企業、外部大眾與利益關係人識別何謂有效之資訊揭露,同時鼓勵企業更主動積極地管理與其直接營運(direct operations)活動相關之生物多樣性影響,使其發展經濟活動的同時,亦帶來「自然正成長」(Nature Positive)。 企業欲投入生物多樣性保育主要有兩個管道,其一是管理因其營運活動所產生之生物多樣性風險與影響,另一管道為發展與其營運活動無直接關聯的其他額外(additional)的生物多樣性保育行動。研究發現,目前較少企業管理與其營運活動相關之生物多樣性風險與影響,雖然如此,但大多數企業已具備相當之保育意識,並且主動投入多元的生物多樣性保育行動。至於行動成效,從案例中可看出部分企業尚不清楚如何判別整個計畫是否具實質效益,亦或未將行動目標、作法與成果完整敘明,因此本研究也提供改善方法與建議,期盼協助企業優化相關資訊揭露品質。此外,本研究亦強調,進行生物多樣性保育應有其優先順序,建議企業優先處理自身營運活動相關之生物多樣性議題,接著才輔以進行其他額外之生物多樣性保育行動,以善盡企業社會責任、完善整體生態保育藍圖。 目前研究企業之於生物多樣性相關資訊揭露的文獻並不多,盼此研究能做出初步貢獻之餘,尚能拋磚引玉,吸引更多學者、企業、實務工作者對此主題之重視,並肩提升資訊揭露品質、接軌國際倡議與行動,加速實現生物多樣性永續發展目標。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the adoption of the "Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework" (GBF) by the United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP15) in late 2022, biodiversity issues have become as important as those of climate change. This trend highlights the major environmental issue that must be addressed internationally in the future will be the dual-track approach of "climate change" and "biodiversity."
Enterprises, as both dependents on and influencers of nature, should be held accountable for their business externalities and bound by their environmental responsibilities. This study thus focuses on the current biodiversity-related actions of Taiwanese companies, aiming to comprehend their thoughts, attitudes, and performances concerning biodiversity issues through information disclosure. In order to gauge the extent of corporate biodiversity-related information disclosure, this study selects benchmark companies in Taiwan that were incorporated into the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI) in 2022 as samples. Two assessment tools are then employed to evaluate their performances in corporate biodiversity-related information disclosure. Firstly, the Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) method developed by the DJSI will be used to evaluate the degree of corporate biodiversity-related information disclosure. Subsequently, the four scoring criteria – Goal, Commitment, Strategy, and Indicator – will be employed to determine whether additional biodiversity conservation actions beyond the scope of the CSA can pass the reliability test. The more scoring criteria are met, the more reliable the actual conservation effects of the action are likely to be. These two assessment tools serve to assist companies, the general public, and stakeholders in identifying effective information disclosure practices, thereby encouraging companies to proactively manage biodiversity risks and impacts linked to their direct operations. This enables them to attain "Nature Positive" outcomes while pursuing business prosperity. Companies have two primary approaches to engage in biodiversity conservation. One is managing the biodiversity risks and impacts arising directly from their operations. The other involves developing additional biodiversity conservation initiatives that aren't directly related to their operations. The study found that while few companies manage the biodiversity risks and impacts associated with their direct operations, most are aware of the importance of conservation and have implemented a wide range of additional biodiversity conservation initiatives. In terms of the effectiveness of these initiatives, it's evident from cases that some enterprises struggle to determine their effectiveness or neglect to provide comprehensive conservation plans, such as outlining objectives, strategies, and results. Therefore, this study also offers methods and recommendations to help enterprises enhance the quality of their information disclosure. Furthermore, to fulfill their corporate social responsibilities and enhance the overall ecological conservation framework, the study suggests that enterprises prioritize biodiversity risks and impacts related to their direct operations before implementing additional biodiversity conservation initiatives. Currently, there is limited literature concerning the disclosure of biodiversity-related information by companies. Thus, this study aims not only to make an initial contribution but also to attract more scholars, enterprises, and practitioners to pay greater attention to this topic. By collectively enhancing the quality of relevant information disclosure and aligning with international initiatives and actions, we can accelerate the achievement of sustainable development goals pertaining to biodiversity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-12-20T16:14:18Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-12-20T16:14:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 III 摘要 IV ABSTRACT VI 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 3 1.3 研究目的 4 1.4 研究價值 4 1.5 論文架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 生物多樣性對企業之重要性 6 2.2 生物多樣性議題發展趨勢 10 2.2.1 重要會議進展與目標 10 2.2.2 資訊揭露指引與評比 13 2.3 國外案例解析:微軟環境永續報告書 19 2.4 研究缺口:企業生物多樣性資訊揭露現況 23 第三章 研究方法 24 3.1 研究資料與工具 25 3.1.1 2022年台灣道瓊永續指數成分股企業永續報告書及官網公開資料 25 3.1.2 2023年DJSI CSA生物多樣性相關題組 30 3.2 研究流程 34 第四章 研究發現與討論 40 4.1 企業於CSA生物多樣性問卷內容揭露狀況 40 4.2 企業其他生物多樣性保育活動與可靠度驗證 48 4.3 企業整體生物多樣性相關資訊揭露狀況 64 第五章 結論 66 文獻參考 69 附錄1:企業CSA生物多樣性題組答覆內容資料來源 73 附錄2:企業其他生物多樣性保育活動資料來源 76 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 企業揭露生物多樣性相關資訊之現況研究—以入圍道瓊永續指數(DJSI)的台灣企業為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Research on the Current Status of Corporate Disclosure of Biodiversity-Related Information: A Case Study of Taiwanese Companies selected in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林士彥;柯佳吟 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shih-Yen Lin;Chia-Ying Ko | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 生物多樣性資訊揭露,生物多樣性喪失,道瓊永續指數,企業社會責任,永續報告書,永續發展,ESG, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Biodiversity-related information disclosure,Biodiversity loss,Dow Jones Sustainability Indices,Corporate Social Responsibility,Sustainability reports,Sustainable development,ESG, | en |
dc.relation.page | 82 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304195 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-29 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf | 19.82 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。