請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91236完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王俊傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chun-Chieh Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃玫瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Mei-Hsuan Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-12T16:20:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-12-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-09-25 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 台灣蘭協官網（2023年3月30日）。月例會審查準則。檢自：https://www.toga.org.tw/product/審查準則
行政院農業委員會（2007年10月1日）。如何幫蘭花取名字。農業知識入口網。檢自：https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/subject.php?id=13612 行政院農業委員會（2023年3月30日）。農業統計資料查詢。檢自：https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/trade/TradeCoa.aspx 余民寧（2005）。心理與教育統計學（修訂二版）。台北：三民。 余民寧、謝進昌（2005）。首屆國際認證理財規劃顧問專業能力測驗心理計量特質分析。教育研究與發展期刊，1（3），51-82 。 吳文欽、林茂森（2008）。臺灣水稻品種之譜系分析：Ⅰ.日本引種間之親緣關係. 作物, 環境與生物資訊，5（4），248-257。 周文賢（2004）。多變量統計分析─SAS/STAT使用方法。台北：智勝文化。 周瑛琪、顏炘怡、顏如妙（2016）。應用AHP建構蘭花需求導向品種檢核指標蘭花計畫。科技管理學刊，21（3），1-26。 林巧敏（2009）。臺灣地區資訊組織文獻書目計量分析。圖書資訊學刊，7（1-2），101-123。 林聚任（2009）。社會網絡分析：理論、方法與應用。北京，北京師範大學出版社。 祝朋芳（2013）。主要花卉育種技術。北京：北京師範大學。 張俊一、劉照金、陳萬光（2019）。羽球休閒運動社團互動型態之社會網絡分析。體育學報，52（4），485-501。 許淑媖、羅竹平（2012）。臺灣與荷蘭蝴蝶蘭產業的競爭策略──最低品質標準或品質改進補貼？。農業與經濟，48，107-138。 陳文輝（2007）。台灣如何成為蝴蝶蘭王國？科學人，69，76-82。 陳建男、陳淑玲、吳佳欣（2015）。個體的友誼網絡認知正確性與其網絡位置之關聯。管理與系統，22（4），459-486。 游昇俯（2022年3月29日）。新品種小白花蝴蝶蘭將問世！適合組盆銷售 「臺南1號」年底可望完成栽培測試，檢自：https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/78584 黃敏展（1985）。蘭花栽培藝術。臺北：銀禾文化。 黃瀚諄（2013）。台糖公司組織制度變遷與蝴蝶蘭產業的形成。管理實務與理論研究，70（2），115-138。 楊政樺、盧衍良、姚釋超（2018）。影響乘客選擇搭乘平價航空公司之研究-多元尺度法的應用。航空安全及管理季刊，5（2），101-123。 葉志新（2012）。參觀蘭展必須知道的事-蘭花競賽與個體審查。桃園區農業專訊，8213-15。 蔡東明、莊耿彰、戴廷恩（2020）。公部門之參與是育種－以文心蘭為例。農業試驗所技術服務季刊，124，14-19。 蔡漢生（2018）。台灣蝴蝶蘭產業的在地文化、創新、路徑依賴與地方性。南臺人文社會學報，18，109-144。 蔡漢生、吳連賞（2015）。解析台灣蝴蝶蘭產業之創新與空間組織的辯證關係。環境與世界，31，59-96。 賴本智（2016）。蘭展及月例會的蘭花審查與國際市場接軌探討。蝴蝶蘭育種與品種管理策略研討會專刊。 賴至慧（2022）。社會網絡分析於傳播科技領域的應用與發展。資訊社會研究，（43），19-24。 Aguilar, R., Cristobal-Perez, E. J., JacBalvino-Olvera, F. J., Aguilar-Aguilar, M. D., Aguirre-Acosta, N., Ashworth, L., Lobo, J. A., Marten-Rodriguez, S., Fuchs, E. J., Sanchez-Montoya, G., Bernardello, G., & Quesada, M. (2019). Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: A global synthesis. Ecology Letters, 22(7), 1163-1173. Alves, G. A. C., Hoshino, R. T., Bertoncelli, D., Colombo, R. C., Stegani, V., & de Faria, R. T. (2018). New Cattleya orchid hybrid, Ornamental Horticulture, 24(2), 145-148. American orchid society. (2022, December). Orchid awards & judging. Retrieved from https://www.aos.org/orchid-awards-judging/judging-handbook.aspx Ando, K., Giorgianni, F. E., Danthinne, E. S., & Rodgers, R. F. (2021). Beauty ideals, social media, and body positivity: A qualitative investigation of influences on body image among young women in Japan. Body Image, 38, 358-369. Arends, J. C. (1970). Cytological observations on genome homology in eight interspecific hybrids of Phalaenopsis. Genetica, 41(1), 88-100. Australian Orchid Council. (2022, May). Judging & Awards. Retrieved from https://orchidsaustralia.com.au/index.php/judging-awards2/downloads Bertan, I., Carvalho, F. I. F., & Oliveira, A. C. (2007). Parental selection strategies in plant breeding programs. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 10(4), 211-222. Birchler, J. A., Yao, H., Chudalayandi, S., Vaiman, D., & Veitia, R. A. (2010). Heterosis. The Plant Cell, 22(7), 2105-2112. Cardoso, J. C. (2021). Dendrobium 'Brazilian Fire 101' - New option of color of flowers for the orchid market. Horticultura Brasileira, 30(3), 561-564. CARVALHO, M. G. D., RÊGO, E. R., COSTA, M., DO PERPETUO, S. D., PESSOA, A., DOS SANTOS, M. A. R. I. A., & RÊGO, M. M. (2021). Selection among segregating pepper progenies with ornamental potential using multivariate analyses. Revista Caatinga, 34, 527-536. Chang, Y. K., Veilleux, R. E., & Iqbal, M. J. (2009). Analysis of genetic variability among Phalaenopsis species and hybrids using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 134(1), 58-66. Chen, W. H., Kao, Y. L., Tang, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, T. Y. (2013). Estimating nuclear DNA content within 50 species of the genus Phalaenopsis Blume (Orchidaceae). Scientia Horticulturae, 161, 70-75. Chen, F. C., Chin, S. W., & Huang, J. Z. (2020, December). Novel orchid breeding to meet future market demands. In III Asian Horticultural Congress-AHC2020 1312 (pp. 1-8). Chien, K.W., Agrawal, D. C., Tsay, H. S., & Chang, C. A. (2015). Elimination of mixed Odontoglossum ringspot and Cymbidium mosaic viruses from Phalaenopsis hybrid “V3” through shoot-tip culture and protocorm-like body selection. Crop Protection, 67, 1-6. Christenson, E. A. (2001). Phalaenopsis: a monograph. Timber Press (OR). Chuang, H. T., Hsu, S. T., & Shen, T. M. (2008). Breeding barriers in yellow Phalaenopsis orchids. J. Taiwan Soc. Hort. Sci, 54, 59-66. Contandriopoulos, D., Larouche, C., Breton, M., & Brousselle, A. (2018). A sociogram is worth a thousand words: proposing a method for the visual analysis of narrative data. Qualitative Research, 18(1), 70-87. De, L. C., Pathak, P., Rao, A. N., & Rajeevan, P. K. (2015). Global orchid industry. In Commercial orchids (pp. 13-19). De Gruyter Open Poland. Drewe, J. A. (2010). Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1681), 633-642. Enoki, S., & Takahara, Y. (2022). Applications of Biotechnological Approaches in the Product and Breeding of Phalaenopsis Orchids. Feng, L., Tang, H., Pu, T., Chen, G., Liang, B., Yang, W., & Wang, X. (2022). Maize–soybean intercropping: A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research publications. Agronomy Journal, 114(6), 3377-3388. Freeman, L. C. (2002). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social network: critical concepts in sociology. Londres: Routledge, 1, 238-263. Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social networks, 2(2), 119-141. Giguère, G. (2006). Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 2(1), 27-38. Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & information science research, 18(4), 323-342. Hinsley, A., de Boer, H. J., Fay, M. F., Gale, S. W., Gardiner, L. M., Gunasekara, R. S., Kumar, P., Masters, S., Metusala, D., Roberts, D. L., Veldman, S., Wong, S., & Phelps, J. (2018). A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation, The Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 186, 4, 435-455. Hsu, C. C., Chang, Y. L., & Chen, W. H. (2021). The Breeding Achievements of Phalaenopsis equestris. In Orchid Biotechnology Iv (pp. 1-14). Hsu, C. C., Chen, H. H., & Chen, W. H. (2018). Phalaenopsis. Ornamental Crops, 567-625. Huang, H., Yao, L., Chang, J. S., Tsai, C. Y., & Kuo, R. J. (2019). Using product network analysis to optimize product-to-shelf assignment problems. Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1581. Jaworska, N., & Chupetlovska-Anastasova, A. (2009). A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 5(1), 1-10. Khaki, S., Khalilzadeh, Z., & Wang, L. (2020). Predicting yield performance of parents in plant breeding: A neural collaborative filtering approach. Plos one, 15(5), e0233382. Khush, G. (2005). What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Molecular Biology, 59, 1-6. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1-27. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling (Vol. 11). Sage. Kuo, S. Y., Hu, C. C., Huang, Y. W., Lee, C. W., Luo, M. J., Tu, C. W., Lee, S. C., Lin, N. S., & Hsu, Y. H. (2021). Argonaute 5 family proteins play crucial roles in the defense against Cymbidium mosaic virus and Odontoglossum ringspot virus in Phalaenopsis aphrodite subsp. Formosana. Molecular Plant Pathology, 22, 6, 627-643. Lee, Y. I., Tseng, Y. F., Lee, Y. C., & Chung, M. C. (2020). Chromosome constitution and nuclear DNA content of Phalaenopsis hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae, 262, 109089. Li, C. R., Dong, N., Zhao, Y ., Wu, S. S., Liu, Z. J., & Zhai, J. (2021). A review for the breeding of orchids: Current achievements and prospects, Horticultural Plant Journal, 7(5), 380-392. Mitchell, J. C. (Ed.). (1969). Social networks in urban situations: analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns. Manchester University Press. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics Theory, Practice and Problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65-66. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics/theory, practice and problems. Evaluation review, 18(1), 65-76. Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review, 45(2), 167-256. OrchidWiz. (2022). OrchidWiz Encyclopedia Version X9.0(CO80027). OrchidWizDatabase. https://www.orchidwiz.com/ Pincot, D. D. A., Ledda, M., Feldmann, M. J., Hardigan, M. A., Poorten, T. J., Runcie, D. E., ... & Knapp, S. J. (2021). Social network analysis of the genealogy of strawberry: retracing the wild roots of heirloom and modern cultivars. G3, 11(3), jkab015. Pramanik, D., Spaans, M., Kranenburg, T., Bogarin, D., Heijungs, R., Lens, F., Smets, E., & Gravendeel, B. (2022). Inflorescence lignification of natural species and horticultural hybrids of Phalaenopsis orchids, Scientia Horticulturae, 295, 110845. Rombach, M., Widmar, N., Byrd, E., & Bitsch, V. (2018). Understanding preferences of German flower consumers: the desire for sustained beauty, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(6), 560-576 Sengupta, I. (1985). The growth of biophysical literature. Scientometrics, 8(5-6), 365-375. Sengupta, I. N. (1985). Bibliometrics: A bird’s eye view. IASLIC Bulletin, 60, 167-174. Shaharudin, M. R., Hotrawaisaya, C., Rashid, N. R. N. A., Srisawat, S., & Adzahar, K. A. (2021). Collaborative, Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment in Orchid Supply Chain: A Conceptual Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 1459–1468. Shaw J.M.H. (2015). Phalaenopsis hygrochila. Orchid Rev, 123(1309), 23. Shaw, P. D., Graham, M., Kennedy, J., Milne, I., & Marshall, D. F. (2014). Helium: visualization of large scale plant pedigrees. BMC bioinformatics, 15(1), 1-15. Silva, A. R. D., Cecon, P. R., Dias, C. T. D. S., Puiatti, M., Finger, F. L., & Carneiro, A. P. S. (2014). Morphological phenotypic dispersion of garlic cultivars by cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling. Scientia Agricola, 71, 38-43. Steyn, J. W., Neser, F. W. C., Hunlun, C., & Lubout, P. C. (2012). Preliminary report: Pedigree analysis of the Brangus cattle in South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science, 42(5), 511-514. Stopar, K., Trdan, S., & Bartol, T. (2021). Thrips and natural enemies through text data mining and visualization, Plant Protection Science, 57(1), 47-58. Tang, C. Y., & Chen, W. H. (2007). Breeding and development of new varieties in Phalaenopsis. In Orchid biotechnology (pp. 1-22). Tomaél, M. I., & MARTELETO, R. (2013). Two-mode social networks: conceptual aspects. Transinformação, 25(3), 253-245. Vo, T. C., Seo, J. W., Kim, C. K., Kim, H. Y., & Lim, K. B. (2019). Breeding of the mini-type Phalaenopsis cultivar 'Yellow Green' having Deep-yellow Flowers with a red lip. Horticultural Science & Technology, 37(4), 540-547. Wang, J. Y., Liu, Z. J., Zhang, G. Q., Niu, S. C., Zhang, Y. Q., & Peng, C. C. (2020). Evolution of Two Ubiquitin-like System of Autophagy in Orchid, Horticultural Plant Journal, 6, 5, 321-334. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Xiang, N., Hong, Y., & Lam-Chan, L. T. (2003). Genetic analysis of tropical orchid hybrids (Dendrobium) with fluorescence amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 128(5), 731-735. Yuan, S. C., Bolaños-Villegas, P., Tsao, C. Y., & Chen, F. C. (2021). The Breeding of Phalaenopsis Hybrids. The Orchid Genome, 29-40. Yue, C., Dennis, J. H., Behe, B. K., Hall, C. R., Campbell, B. L., & Lopez, R. G. (2011). Investigating consumer preference for organic, local, or sustainable plants. HortScience, 46(4), 610-615. Zhang, X. Q., & Gao, J. Y. (2020). Colchicine-induced tetraploidy in Dendrobium cariniferum and its effect on plantlet morphology, anatomy and genome size. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 144(2), 409-420. Zhao, G.C. (2009). Humanistic feelings of plum, orchid, bamboo and chrysanthemum painting. Academic Exchange, 2, 191-192. Zheng, B. Q., Zhu, S. L., Li, K., Miao, K., & Wang, Y. (2018). Analysis on breeding value of native Dendrobium species in China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 40(4), 102-108. Zhou, D., Chen, W., Lin, Z., Chen, H., Wang, C., Li, H., ... & Deng, X. W. (2016). Pedigree‐based analysis of derivation of genome segments of an elite rice reveals key regions during its breeding. Plant biotechnology journal, 14(2), 638-648. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91236 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 蝴蝶蘭是全球最受歡迎的花卉，由於複雜的親緣組成，導致育種難度較高，需要釐清親緣組成，以提升育種效率。本研究以近三十年的得獎蝴蝶蘭作為研究對象，採用書目計量學，釐清經蘭花協會認可具備優良性狀的蝴蝶蘭，其背後的原生種親緣聚集表現、前三代親本的組成偏好，以及原生種與前三代親本的相互呼應。自OrchidWiz資料庫，收集3,186個得獎蝴蝶蘭的原生種親緣，以及前三代親本的資料，進行多元尺度分析及社會網絡分析，結果顯示近30年的得獎蝴蝶蘭，其原生種親緣呈聚集現象，尤其14個核心原生種親緣，在得獎蝴蝶蘭的後代數量上顯著較高；而得獎蝴蝶蘭的標準類前三代親本偏好由雜交種組成，珍奇類迷你多花的前三代親本偏好由原生種組成，珍奇類橙＼黃色、丑花的前三代親本，則分別偏好為原生種為主及雜交種為主的取徑。本研究亦發現原生種經常涉入於得獎蝴蝶蘭的前三代親本，並應用於珍奇類得獎蝴蝶蘭之育成，且得獎蝴蝶蘭的親緣結構偏好呼應市場需求。藉由分析原生種親緣在得獎蝴蝶蘭的涉入概況，及得獎蝴蝶蘭前三代譜系的常見親本，了解近代得獎蝴蝶蘭的育種發展。此研究結果可以作為擬定蝴蝶蘭育種計畫的參考，藉此培育所需性狀特徵的蝴蝶蘭。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Phalaenopsis is the most popular flower in the world, but breeding is difficult due to its complex kin composition. It is necessary to clarify the kin composition to improve breeding efficiency. Based on bibliometrics, this study takes the award-winning Phalaenopsis for nearly 30 years as the research object to investigate the performance of kin aggregation of species, the composition preference of parents within three generations, and the situation of species involved in three generations. From the OrchidWiz database, 3,186 award-winning Phalaenopsis are collected with kin aggregation of species and parents within three generations. By multidimensional scaling analysis and social network analysis, research results showed that the species kin in award-winning Phalaenopsis in the past 30 years displayed an aggregation phenomenon. In particular, the influence of the core species kin is mainly reflected in the number of offspring. The characteristics of the preference of parent within three generations are divided into 3 types: standard flowers consist of hybrid; multiple flowers are composed of species; orange, yellow, and harlequin flowers are mainly species or hybrids respectively. The finding found that the species is involved in the first three generations, and tends to be applied to novelty breeding. Besides, the results also pointed out that the kin aggregation of the award-winning Phalaenopsis responds to market demand. This study aims to understand the modern breeding development of the award-winning Phalaenopsis by examining the involvement of species and the parents within three generations. Given the research results, as a reference for drawing up a Phalaenopsis breeding plan. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-12-12T16:20:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-12-12T16:20:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝 誌 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目 錄 iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 ix 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 4 第四節 名詞定義 5 第貳章 文獻探討 9 第一節 蝴蝶蘭 9 一、蝴蝶蘭介紹 9 二、蘭花協會評鑑 11 三、OrchidWiz 18 第二節 蝴蝶蘭親緣研究 21 一、蝴蝶蘭原生種 21 二、蝴蝶蘭雜交種 24 三、蝴蝶蘭譜系分析 27 第三節 書目計量與育種親緣分析 30 一、書目計量學 30 二、育種親緣的多元尺度分析 31 三、育種親緣的社會網絡分析 33 第參章 研究方法 37 第一節 資料蒐集 37 一、資料來源 37 二、研究樣本 44 三、樣本敘述 45 四、蝴蝶蘭分類及特徵描述 47 第二節 多元尺度分析 51 一、多元尺度分析 51 二、資料處理 53 三、評估指標 54 第三節 社會網絡分析 56 一、社會網絡分析 56 二、資料處理 57 三、評估指標 58 第肆章 研究結果 61 第一節 原生種應用在得獎蝴蝶蘭育種上的聚集表現 61 一、1990-2000年得獎蝴蝶蘭的原生種分布特徵 61 二、2001-2010年得獎蝴蝶蘭的原生種分布特徵 65 三、2011-2022年得獎蝴蝶蘭的原生種分布特徵 69 四、原生種應用在得獎蝴蝶蘭育種的分布變化 72 第二節 前三代親本在得獎蝴蝶蘭育種上的組合偏好 76 一、1990-2000年得獎蝴蝶蘭的前三代親本組合偏好 76 二、2001-2010年得獎蝴蝶蘭的前三代親本組合偏好 80 三、2011-2022年得獎蝴蝶蘭的前三代親本組合偏好 86 四、前三代親本於得獎蝴蝶蘭育種的組合偏好變化 91 第三節 原生種及前三代親本在得獎蝴蝶蘭育種上的相互呼應 96 一、前三代核心親本內的原生種在親緣應用的表現 96 二、親緣應用佳的原生種於前三代親本的使用趨勢 99 第伍章 結論與建議 102 第一節 研究結論 102 第二節 研究建議 104 第三節 研究限制 105 參考文獻 106 附錄一、57種原生種圖片列表 115 附錄二、各時期親本組合之圖片 118 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 得獎蝴蝶蘭的原生種及前三代親本之親緣聚集與特徵分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Kin Aggregation and Characteristic Analysis of Species and Parents within Three Generations in Award-Winning Phalaenopsis Breeding | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 薛招治;董蕙茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chao-Chih Hsueh ;Huei-Ru Dong | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 得獎蝴蝶蘭,原生種,前三代親本,親緣聚集,親本組合, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | award-winning Phalaenopsis,species,parents within three generations,kin aggregation,parent combination, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 126 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304260 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-09-27 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.71 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。