請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89980完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡宜妮 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | I-Ni Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉瀞蓮 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Lian Liou | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:55:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-29 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李慧君(2018)。中文言語不禮貌會話分析:以台灣電視劇為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
張之琳(2020)。獨白式「吐槽」話語設計及緩和策略:以脫口秀節目為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。 張碩修(2016)。卡米地喜劇俱樂部發展策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。 張碩修(2021)。喜劇攻略:現場喜劇教父的脫口秀心法。臺北:時報出版。 陳俊光,& 劉欣怡(2009)。漢語「好」的多視角分析與教學應用。華語文教學研究,6(2), 45-98. 蔡宜妮(2014)。華語正反附加問句的會話分析:烹飪節目的個案考察。語教新視野,(1),66-77。https://doi.org/10.6751/NVLA.201403_(1).0005 蔡宜芬(2013)。華語「所以」言談篇章語用功能探析 ─以口語語料庫為本(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter. Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159-179). Amsterdam, Netherlands Antilles: IOS Press. Attardo, S. (2020). The linguistics of humor : an introduction (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. Bilmes, J. (1988). The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis Language in Society. Language in Society, 17(2). pp.161-181. Brodie, I. (2008). Stand-up Comedy as a Genre of Intimacy. Ethnologies, 30 (2), 153-180. Brodie, I. (2014). A Vulgar Art: A New Approach to Stand-Up Comedy. University Press of Mississippi. Chain, S. (2018). Teasing as audience engagement: Setting up the unexpected during television comedy monologues. In Villy, T., Jan ,C. (Eds), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor, (pp. 127–152). John Benjamins. Dore, M. (2018) - Laughing at you or laughing with you Humor negotiation in intercultural stand-up comedy. In V. Tsakona & J. Jan Chovanec (Eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor, (pp. 105-126). John Benjamins. Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25, 219-253. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work (pp. 3-65). Cambridge University Press. Dynel, M., & Sinkeviciute, V. (2021). Conversational Humour. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 408-429). Cambridge University Press. Filani,I. (2015). Discourse types in stand-up comedy performances: An example of Nigerian stand-up comedy. The European Journal of Humour Research, 3(1), 41-60. Ge, L., & He, Y. (2019). Humor in Chinese. In C. R. Huang, Z. Jing-Schmidt, & B. Meisterernst (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese Applied Linguistics (1st ed., pp.295-308). New York: Routledge. Glenn, P. (1989). Initiating shared laughter in Multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 127-149. Glenn, P., & Holt, E. (2017). Conversational Analysis of Humor. In A. Salvatore (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 345-359). New York: Routledge. Glenn, P., & Holt, E.(Eds.). (2013). Studies of Laughter in Interaction. Bloomsbury. Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation. Text, 6, 283-316. Hassaine, N. (2014). Linguistic Analysis of Verbal Humor in Algerian Stand-up Comedy. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 2(2), 90-98. Hay, J. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55-82. Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 103-147). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Heritage, J. (2013). Language and Social Institution: The Conversation Analytic View. 外國語(Journal of Foreign Language), 36(4), 2-27. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Dimensions of institutional talk. In J. Heritage & S. Clayman (Eds.) ,Talk in action : interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell. Ikram, FD.,& Hati, G. (2018). Rhetorical analysis of stand-up comedy performances by three famous American comics. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET). 2(4), pp. 103-119. Ilie, C. (2001). Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (4), 209-254. Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 79-96). Irvington. Jefferson, G. (1985). An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25-34). London: Academic Press. Katayama, H. (2009). A cross-cultural analysis of humor in stand-up comedy in the United States and Japan. The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 2(2), 125-142. Koziski, S. (1984). The Standup Comedian as Anthropologist Intentional Culture Critic. The Journal of Popular Culture, 18, 57-76. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lockyer, Sharon., & Mayers, Lynn (2011). Its about expecting the unexpected Live stand-up comedy from the audiences perspective. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 8(2), 165-188. Mandelbaum, J. (1989). Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 114-126. McIlvenny, P., Mettovaara, S. & Tapio, R. (1993). ‘I really wanna make you laugh: stand-up comedy and audience response’, in Suojanen, M. K. & Kulkki-Nieminen, A. (Eds.), Folia, Fennistica and Linguistica: Proceedings of the Annual Finnish Linguistic Symposium May 1992, Tampere University Finnish and General Linguistic Department Publications 16, pp. 225-247 . Mintz, L. E. (1985). Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly, 37(1), 71-80. Norrick, N. R. (2001). On the conversational performance of narrative jokes: toward an account of timing. Humor 14, 255-274. Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7 Norrick, N. R. (2009). A Theory of Humor in Interaction. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 261-284. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press. Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013) Preference. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 210-229). Wiley-Blackwell. Rutter, J. (2000). The stand-up introduction sequence: Comparing comedy compères. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(4), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00059-4 Rutter, J. (2001). Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer audience interaction. Stylistyka, 10, 307–325. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, (2nd ed., pp. 337– 353). Cambridge University Press. Scarpetta, F., & Spagnolli, A (2009) The Interactional Context of Humor in Stand-Up Comedy, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(3), 210-230. Schwarz, J. (2009). Linguistic aspects of verbal humor in stand-up comedy. [Doctoral dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes]. SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes. http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-23545 Tsakona, V. (2003). Jab line in narrative jokes. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 16(3), 315-329. Tsang, W. K. & Wong. M. (2004). Constructing a shared 'Hong Kong identity' in comic discourses. Discourse & Society, 15, 767-785. Yus, F. (2004). Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El Club de la Comedia, In: Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish( pp.320-344 ). John Benjamins: Amsterdam. Zajdman, A. (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 325-339. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89980 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近二十年,台灣的現場單口喜劇表演在前人的引進、摸索及開創當中逐漸成形,而相較其他的語言表演藝術,單口喜劇打破了台上表演者對台下觀眾單向演出的方式,允許觀眾參與、回應台上表演的話語及內容。
本研究以單口喜劇表演者在開放麥(open-mic)的演出過程及表演者與現場觀眾的互動內容為研究對象,相較於正式的大型表演,開放麥的形式更偏向作為喜劇演員練習及測試段子的場所,台上台下拋接互動的性質強烈。本文從機構型談話的特質出發,觀察單口喜劇開放麥特殊的互動情境;以觀眾回應以及幽默互動研究的特點,整理單口喜劇當中所特有的與機構性談話及隨意談話兩者特質,以會話分析為方法論,分析台灣單口喜劇開放麥的表演中,喜劇演員如何表演當中及時運用觀眾偏好(如笑、掌聲)或非偏好(如沉默、噓聲)的回應,在互動的序列中來建構或延續幽默效果,探看在單口喜劇的表演當中,喜劇演員在表演策略及笑話敘事之外,如何以現場的即時互動作為資源,呈現單口喜劇表演的多變及複雜性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Through the efforts of predecessors' introduction, exploration, and innovation, the area of live solitary stand-up comedy performances in Taiwan has gradually taken shape over the past 20 years. Solo stand-up comedy challenges the typical one-way performance paradigm where performers address the audience without active engagement, in contrast to other verbal performance arts. Instead, it enables audience participation and reactions to the performer's speech and material.
The process of solitary stand-up comedians during open-mic performances and the interaction between performers and live audiences are the main topics of this study. In contrast to formal large-scale performances, the open-mic format emphasizes significant bidirectional connections between the stage and the audience and leans more toward being a place for comedians to develop and try out their routines. Departing from the characteristics of institutional discourse, this research observes the distinctive interactive context of solitary stand-up comedy open-mic settings. In order to construct or extend humorous effects, comedians in Taiwan's solitary stand-up comedy open-mic performances strategically utilize audience preferences (such as laughing and applause) or non-preferences (such as silence and booing) in the interaction sequences. This study explores how real-time interactions are used by comedians during solitary stand-up comedy performances as a resource besides performance methods and joke narratives, highlighting the richness and variety of solitary stand-up comedy presentations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:55:28Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:55:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 單口喜劇與機構語言 6 一、 機構性話語 6 二、 單口喜劇的話語形式 7 三、 單口喜劇的架構與表演策略 8 第二節 觀眾回應及參與 12 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節 語料來源、語料選取標準 15 一、 語料說明 15 二、 語料選取 15 第二節 轉寫規則及符號 16 第四章 非偏好回應後的推進策略 18 第五章 偏好回應之後的延續策略 29 第六章 結論 44 參考文獻 46 附錄 52 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 機構語言 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 笑話回應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 開放麥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 會話分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 單口喜劇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | stand-up comedy | en |
| dc.subject | open-mic | en |
| dc.subject | conversation analysis | en |
| dc.subject | joke responses | en |
| dc.subject | institutional discourse | en |
| dc.title | 笑話回應與幽默延續策略之互動序列研究:以台灣單口喜劇開放麥為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Interaction sequences of joke responses and humor support: An analysis of Stand-up Comedy Open Mic in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪媽益;呂佳蓉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Michael Tanangkingsing;Chia-Rung Lu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 單口喜劇,開放麥,會話分析,機構語言,笑話回應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | stand-up comedy,open-mic,conversation analysis,institutional discourse,joke responses, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303833 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-12-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 1.94 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
