請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89933
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳家麟 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chia-Lin Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪耕燦 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Geng-Tsann Hong | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:44:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
[1] 游育蓁、何美玉(1999)。核心專長留下其餘外包。管理雜誌,298期,60-82。 [2] 劉得禎(2005)。外包關鍵因素與經營績效關係之研究 – 以台灣家庭用紙為例。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 [3] 侯鎂玲(2008)。外包管理及外包績效關聯之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。 [4] 王忠宗(1990)。採購Q&A。商周文化。 [5] 新村敏(1993)。外包業務管理。楊平吉譯。臺華工商圖書。 [6] 梁淑麗(2000)。協力外包制度下暫時性人力管理之分析 – 以中鋼公司及其協力廠商為例。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 [7] 林信惠、黃明祥、王文良(2002)。軟體專案管理。智勝文化出版。 [8] 陳韋珺(2008)。外包商合作關係之評估模式 – 以PCB產業為例。東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文。 [9] 林隆儀、李蔚芬(2005)。台灣石化產業外包策略與外包管理對製造績效的影響。輔仁管理評論,第十二卷,第三期,95-116。 [10] 林雅琦(2003)。探討不同組織文化下影響台灣中小企業外包程度之關鍵因素。國立成功大學工業管理科學研究所碩士論文。 [11] 陳昭宏、湯志暉(2005)。以理論觀點分析企業和第三者專業物流合作關係對運籌績效之影響。運籌管理評論,1卷,1期,67-86。 [12] 吳壽進、方文昌(2008)。心理距離、夥伴關係成因、特徵與合作程度之研究:以大陸市場買方夥伴關係為例。商管科技季刊,第九卷,第三期。 [13] 黃延聰(2009)。策略聯盟夥伴配適的管理:臺灣廠商之實證研究。管理與系統,第14期,第2卷,147-178. [14] 梁耀庭(2009)。外包作業評估之研究。國立高雄第一科技大學。運籌管理系碩士論文。 [15] 林瑩瑄(2015)。外包決策之研究。The Study of Outsourcing。大同大學事業經營研究所。 [16] 甘岱右(2021)。疫情延燒/NDAA規範雙重夾擊,智慧影像監控市場重新洗牌。新通訊元件雜誌。 [17] 盧懿娟(2005)。銷售業務也吹外包風。經理人月刊, 2005年2月號。 [18] J. Brain Heywood(2003)。企業外包致勝。余峻瑜譯。台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司。 [19] Charles L. Gay & James Essinger(2001)。企業外包模式: 如何利用外部資源提升競爭力。盧娜譯。商周出版。 英文文獻 [1] Anderson E. (1985). The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis. Marketing Science, v4(n2), 234-254. [2] Atallah G. (2002). Vertical R and D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(3), 179-209. [3] Barney J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, v17(nl), 99-120. [4] Clouser Gary. (2002). Why Outsource? The Economics of Outsourcing. 1-3. [5] Collis D.J. & C.A. Montgomery. (1995). Competing on Resources: Strategies in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, Jul.-Aug., 118-128. [6] Coyne K.P., Hall S. J.D. & P.G. Clifford. (1997). Is your Core Competence a Mirage? Mckinsey Quarterly, n1, 41-54. [7] David Pollitt. (2007). Touch Acxiom connects training with business success; Partnership approach brings a wide range of benefits. Human, 15(1), 29. [8] Grant R.M. (1991). The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, v33(n3), 114-135. [9] Henry Chesbrough & David J. Teece. (2002). When is Virtual Virtuous? Harvard Business Review, August 2002 issue. [10] Kanter R.M. (1994). Collaborative Advantage: The Art of Alliance. Harvard Business Review, Jul.-Aug., v72(n4), 96-108. [11] Kotter J.P. (1989). Managing External Dependence. Academy of Management Review, v4(n1), 87-92. [12] Security World Market. Video surveillance market set to register $76 billion by 2027. Northbrook, II USA, Sep. 1, 2022. [13] Masten S.E., J.W. Meehan, Jr. & E.A. Snyder. (1989). Vertical Integration in the U.S. Auto Industry: A Note on the Influence Of Transaction Specific Assets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, v12(n10), 265-273. [14] Morgan Robert M & Hunt & Shelby D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-39. [15] Parise S. & Henderson, J.C. (2001). Knowledge resource exchange in strategic alliance. IBM System Journal, 40(4). [16] Platts K.W., Probert, D.R. & Canes, L. (2002). Make vs. buy decisions: A process incorporating multi-attribute decision-making. International Journal of Production Economics, 77(3), 247-257. [17] Quinn J.B. & Hilmer, F.G. (1994). Strategic Outsourcing, Sloan Management Review. 35(4), 43-55. [18] Rindfleisch Aric & Jan B. Heide. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present and future applications. Journal of Marketing, v61(n4), Oct. 30-54. [19] Robert J Vokurka. (1998). Supplier partnerships: A case study. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 39(1), 30-36. [20] Ronald Coase. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 6, 386-405. [21] Sarah, Erwin, Jone. (2008). Choose your partners. Community Care, 1725, 26-27. [22] Teng J.T.C., Cheon M.J. & V. Grover. (1995). Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions. Decision Science, v26(n1), 75-103. [23] Tim R. Holcomb & Michael A. Hitt. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 464-481. [24] Williamson O.E. (1991a). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science quarterly, v36, 269-296. 網路文獻 [1] A&S. (2022). 2022全球安防50大揭曉。現象及趨勢快速掌握。全球安防科技網。 [2] Johan Paulsson (2022)。2023年影響安防產業的六大趨勢。Secure Insight, AXIS Communication。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89933 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究藉由外包理論的探討,並以L企業為例,探討企業是否藉由外包活動,來增加策略的彈性與靈活度,並且提升企業在實務運作的效能。
研究內容探討企業在評估外包活動時,要將自主創新和系統創新兩種不同類型的創新需求列入策略考量。 企業在調整組織以因應外包活動時,虛擬公司和整合型企業兩種組織各有優點和缺點。虛擬公司可以保有策略靈活性和快速回應市場變化的能力,但只能支持某些類型的創新。整合型企業則可以從外部購買或合作獲得技術,但需要承擔開發技術的成本。 研究內容以IBM和NIKE的例子來說明虛擬和整合的混合方式,可以保持自主開發技術的能力,並通過與外部供應商組成聯盟或合資企業的方式,以提高企業效能並應對市場變化。 針對L企業的影像事業部門在追求每年至少50%的業績成長時應考慮的策略和組織調整,為了達到業績成長目標,影像事業部門需要密切關注影像監控攝影機市場的成長趨勢,並基於外部環境和產業趨勢制定未來三到五年的成長策略。根據這些策略,組織需要進行相應的調整,包括研發團隊、業務和客服團隊的規劃,並建立一個支持持續成長的企業文化氛圍,針對環境對策略的影響來建立組織需要的人才和企業文化的適配性。 建議L企業影像事業部門先提升規模經濟,並針對消費者對消費型影像監視攝影機的需求逐漸提升,適時介入新市場並建立成長的第二曲線的機會,開拓專業型監控攝影機市場以外新的消費型產品市場。 研究建議L企業可以在後台發揮核心競爭優勢,與外包廠商建立結盟關係,緊密合作,並將工廠轉變為專業的代工服務中心,提供高品質的代工服務。或將影像事業部門核心優勢集中在前台,著重於設計服務的提供,以滿足客戶的特定需求,例如客製化新產品或擴展到不同市場區隔。利用設計優化的概念,開發公版硬體並提供客製化設計服務,以降低成本並滿足客戶的需求。 另外L企業可以考慮轉向硬體租賃服務或訂閱制服務的可能性,與保全公司合作提供影像監控系統的硬體租賃服務,這樣可以減低客戶的成本並為影像事業部門帶來新的市場機會。 最後,將銷售業務外包給專業的銷售公司也可以成為外包策略的考量之一。在面對靈活性需求和預算壓力的情況下,建議L企業在盤點銷售團隊和業務核心能耐後,考慮將銷售業務外包作為整體外包策略的一部分。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines whether enterprises, using the example of Company L, increase strategic flexibility and agility and enhance operational efficiency through outsourcing activities.
The research explores the evaluation of outsourcing activities by considering two different types of innovation requirements: autonomous innovation and systemic innovation, which should be included in the strategic considerations. When adjusting the organization to respond to outsourcing activities, both virtual companies and integrated enterprises have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Virtual companies can maintain strategic flexibility and rapidly respond to market changes, but they may only support certain types of innovation. On the other hand, integrated enterprises can acquire technology through external purchasing or collaboration but need to bear the costs of technology development. The study illustrates the hybrid approach of virtual and integrated organizations using examples such as IBM and NIKE, which can retain the capability for autonomous technological development. They achieve this through alliances or joint ventures with external suppliers to enhance operational efficiency and respond to market changes. Regarding the surveillance business department of Company L, strategies and organizational adjustments are suggested to achieve a minimum of 50% annual revenue growth. To reach this growth target, the surveillance business department needs to closely monitor the market trends of surveillance cameras and formulate growth strategies for the next three to five years based on external environmental and industry trends. Organizational adjustments, including planning for research and development teams, sales, and customer service teams, should be made in alignment with these strategies. Additionally, it is essential to establish an organizational culture that supports continuous growth by aligning talent and corporate culture with the impact of the environment on the strategy. It is recommended that the surveillance business department of Company L first focuses on economies of scale and capitalizes on the increasing demand for consumer surveillance cameras. Seizing the opportunity to enter new markets and establish a second growth curve beyond the professional surveillance camera market is advised. The study suggests that Company L should leverage its core competitive advantages by collaborating closely with outsourcing partners, forming alliances, and transforming its facilities into professional contract manufacturing centers to provide high-quality manufacturing services. Alternatively, the company can concentrate its core strengths in the front-end operations, emphasizing design services to meet specific customer demands, such as customization of new products or expanding into different market segments. Utilizing the concept of design optimization, developing standardized hardware and providing customized design services can help reduce costs and meet customer requirements. Furthermore, Company L can explore the possibility of shifting towards hardware leasing services or subscription-based models. Collaborating with security companies to offer hardware leasing services for surveillance systems can reduce customer costs and present new market opportunities for the image business department. Lastly, outsourcing sales activities to specialized sales companies can also be considered as part of the outsourcing strategy. Considering the need for flexibility and budgetary pressures, it is suggested that Company L assess its sales team and core competencies and consider outsourcing sales as part of an overall outsourcing strategy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:44:08Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:44:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝辭 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的與對象 1 1.3 研究範圍與方法 2 1.4 研究限制 2 第二章 文獻探討 4 2.1 自製、外購和外包理論基礎 4 2.1.1 資源基礎理論 6 2.1.2 資源依賴理論 7 2.1.3 交易成本理論 7 2.2 外包的夥伴關係 10 2.3 外包的利益 12 2.4 外包的風險 12 2.5 外包的合作方式 14 2.6 因應創新需求的組織類型對外包決策的探討 17 2.7 L企業的策略考量 23 第三章 產業分析 26 3.1 影像安全監控攝影機產業現況 26 3.2 影像安全監控產業的發展趨勢 33 3.2.1 從資訊洞察到行動方案 33 3.2.2 智慧型的架構所帶來的應用 33 3.2.3 網路傳輸安全的重要性 33 3.2.4 在安全監控之外更多的應用 34 3.2.5 隱私權的保護 34 3.3 L企業的影像監控事業五力分析 35 第四章 個案研究分析 38 4.1 個案公司簡介 38 4.2 理念與文化 40 4.3 重大發展與歷程整理 40 4.4 主要業務與營運 48 4.5 L企業是否調整組織來因應外包策略 51 4.6 L企業外包的策略分析 52 4.6.1 事業成長的第二曲線 52 4.6.2 外包為提升效率之必要 53 4.6.3 跨業合作:影像硬體廠商與資訊安全軟體廠商的合作 57 4.6.4 銷售業務外包的策略 58 4.6.5 其他可行性分析 59 4.6.6 風險評估 60 4.6.7 其他建議 60 第五章 結論與建議 62 5.1 研究結論 62 5.2 研究建議 64 參考文獻 66 圖目錄 圖 2.1 自製或外購的決策程序 4 圖 2.2 外包或是自製的三個觀點 6 圖 2.3 找到集中式策略的最適性 19 圖 2.4 創新所需匹配的組織型態 22 圖 3.1 2020~2025年全球智慧影像監控市場規模 29 圖 3.2 影像產業的五力分析 35 圖 4.1 主要產品之產製過程 50 圖 4.2 發揮後台的競爭優勢 55 圖 4.3 發揮前台的競爭優勢 56 圖 4.4 收費機制改變的競爭優勢 57 表目錄 表 2.1 聯盟夥伴間配適的研究 16 表 3.1 其他監控產業廠商概況 36 表 4.1 最近二年度每股市價、淨值、盈餘、股利及相關資料 49 表 4.2 最近五年財務資料 50 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 外包策略選擇對企業效能之探討-以L企業影像事業為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Outsourcing Strategy for Organizational Performance - A case study of L Company | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾智揚;胡凱焜 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Yang Tseng;Kae-Kuen Hu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 自製,外購,外包,自主性創新,系統性創新, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Make,Buy,Outsourcing,Autonomous Innovation,Systemic Innovation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303572 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-12 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。