請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89345完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 顏宇岑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Tsen Yen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-07T16:37:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 胥愛琦(譯)(2020)。計量經濟學,第七版。臺灣,臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。(J. M. Wooldridge, 2019)
EBA. EBA Report on Management and Supervision of ESG Risks for Credit Institutions and Investment Firms. Available online: https://www.eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-its-report-management-and-supervision-esg-risks-credit-institutions-and-investment 哈佛商業評論(2022)。《全方位打造高效ESG企業》。參閱日期:2023年03月20日。 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142 Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967 Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609 Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284 Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using Corporate Social Responsibility to Win the War for Talent (SSRN Scholarly Paper 期 2333549). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2333549 Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press. Business, society, and the future of capitalism | McKinsey. (不詳). 讀取於 2023年6月16日, 從 https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/business-society-and-the-future-of-capitalism Caruana, R. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.222 Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994 Crifo, P., & Forget, V. D. (2015). The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm-Level Perspective Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12055 E, P. M. (2006). A Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 0, 78–92. Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7 Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10, 149–178. Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010322009 Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300205 Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M. J., & Sequeira, S. (2015). Consumer Demand for Fair Trade: Evidence from a Multistore Field Experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00467 Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314 Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. SAGE. Khaled, R., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127599 Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663 Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.018 Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001 Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629 Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302 Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers? Green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x Peattie, K. (2001a). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(4), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.292 Peattie, K. (2001b). Towards Sustainability: The Third Age of Green Marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347012569869 Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Simon and Schuster. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988 Rahman Belal, A., & Owen, D. L. (2007). The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: An engagement‐based study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748599 Schultz, P. W. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174 Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630 Sheldon, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. Pitman. Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F., & Gao, L. (2019). The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects. Sustainability, 11(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158 Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166188 The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation - 國立臺灣大學 (不詳). 讀取於 2023年6月15日, 從 https://ntu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/321947 Topple, C., Donovan, J. D., Masli, E. K., & Borgert, T. (2017). Corporate sustainability assessments: MNE engagement with sustainable development and the SDGs. Transnational Corporations, 24(3), 61–71. Scopus. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. (1999). A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2, 1–15. Vildåsen, S. S. (2018a). Corporate sustainability in practice: An exploratory study of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Business Strategy & Development, 1(4), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.35 Vildåsen, S. S. (2018b). Corporate sustainability in practice: An exploratory study of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Business Strategy & Development, 1(4), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.35 Widyawati, L. (2020). A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393 Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302 Ziolo, M., Filipiak, B. Z., Bąk, I., & Cheba, K. (2019). How to Design More Sustainable Financial Systems: The Roles of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in the Decision-Making Process. Sustainability, 11(20), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205604 新時代呼喚管理理論創新——大衛·梯斯與動態能力理論_清華管理評論. (不詳). 微文庫. https://www.gushiciku.cn/dc_tw/105496821 教育學習補習資源網—永續發展目標的評價費用和推薦,EDU.TW、FACEBOOK和網紅們這樣回答. https://learning.mediatagtw.com/article/%e6%b0%b8%e7%ba%8c%e7%99%bc%e5%b1%95%e7%9b%ae%e6%a8%99 SDGs 是什麼?SDGs 懶人包一次掌握17項永續發展目標. http://eportfolio.lib.ksu.edu.tw/~T098000002/blog?cv=1&node=000000626 PricewaterhouseCoopers. ESG是什麼?為什麼企業要重視?解密企業淨零轉型重要關鍵. PwC. https://www.pwc.tw/zh/topics/trends/what-is-esg.html 王昱舜. (2022). 公共藝術之「藝術審美-社會功能-文化體制-介面關係」整合模型:假說與實證 [Master’s Thesis, 國立臺灣大學]. 收入 臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文 (期 2022年). https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202201970 ESG是什麼?一次讀懂CSR、ESG、SDGs差別,為何企業要做ESG? (2022, 十月 25). DOMI EARTH. https://www.domiearth.com/post/what-is-esg-csr | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89345 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | ESG(Environmental, Social, and Governance)為評估企業在環境、社會和治理層面的表現,並以此評估其永續經營績效,具有永續性和協調發展的價值。自2008年的金融危機至近年來的疫情和全球性天災等事件的影響,全球對於永續性發展的關注日益提高,聯合國提出的永續發展目標(SDGs)不僅成為各國努力的方向,企業更被視為實現全球永續發展的重要合作夥伴,因此,環境、社會和治理(ESG)被越來越多地視為企業競爭優勢的來源。本研究目的探討企業如何與永續發展目標同步進行,並將其納入企業策略中,以保持其競爭優勢,研究旨在提供有關企業在ESG準則和永續發展目標下制定策略的洞察和建議,以促進全球永續發展的實現。
首先進行文獻回顧,以公司ESG舉措為核心,收集國內與國外ESG與競爭優勢相關文獻個案,並分析建立公司ESG持續競爭優勢的概念架構。接著,以計量實證分析方法,探討影響消費者對於ESG優良公司產品購買意願的因素和層面關係,研究構建相應的計量模型、變數和假說,並設計調查問卷來收集數據;接著,研究分析各因素對消費者購買意願的影響程度,並驗證和比較研究的假說與實證數據。 根據研究結果,當公司制定策略時,不僅要關注傳統的產業結構定位,還要考慮企業在永續發展項目上的競爭方向,公司應重視ESG本身所帶來的核心價值,將其視為長期競爭優勢的來源,企業更應意識環境永續性、社會責任和良好的治理對於營運績效和品牌形象的重要性,並考慮與環境和社會的互動關係,滿足消費者期望的同時,並創造持續的競爭優勢與促進社會、環境和經濟的協調發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) is a framework used to assess a company's performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects, with a focus on sustainable business practices and coordinated development. The global concern for sustainable development has grown significantly since the 2008 financial crisis, as well as the impact of recent events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have become a guiding direction for countries, and companies are seen as crucial partners in achieving global sustainability. Consequently, ESG is increasingly recognized as a source of competitive advantage.
The objective of this study is to investigate how companies can align their sustainability goals with their corporate strategies to maintain a competitive edge. The study aims to provide valuable insights and recommendations on developing strategies within the framework of ESG guidelines and sustainability goals, ultimately contributing to global sustainability. To begin, the study conducts a comprehensive literature review, focusing on domestic and international cases that relate to ESG and competitive advantage, particularly emphasizing corporate ESG initiatives. This review serves as the foundation for establishing a conceptual framework that explores sustainable competitive advantage within the realm of ESG. Furthermore, an econometric empirical analysis is undertaken to examine the factors and relationships influencing consumers' willingness to purchase products from companies with high ESG scores. The study develops relevant econometric models, variables, and hypotheses, and employs questionnaires to collect data. Subsequently, the study assesses the impact of each factor on consumers' purchasing intentions, validating, and comparing the hypotheses with empirical evidence. Based on the study's findings, it is imperative for companies to consider not only traditional industrial structure positioning but also the competitive direction of sustainability initiatives when formulating strategies. Recognizing ESG's core values as a source of long-term competitive advantage, companies should prioritize environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and effective governance to enhance operational performance and bolster their brand image. Moreover, companies should foster an interactive relationship with the environment and society, satisfying consumer expectations while simultaneously creating sustainable competitive advantages and promoting the harmonious integration of society, environment, and economy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-07T16:37:17Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-07T16:37:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 論文架構 3 第二章 研究方法與步驟 6 2.1 研究方法 6 2.2 研究步驟 7 第三章 文獻回顧 9 3.1 永續發展與企業ESG 9 3.1.1 全球永續發展目標(Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs) 9 3.1.2 永續發展理論(Sustainable Development Theory) 11 3.1.3 企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) 12 3.1.4 環境社會公司治理(Environmental, Social and Governance, ESG) 13 3.2 企業社會責任與ESG之主流理論基礎 17 3.2.1 合法性理論(Legitimacy Theory) 17 3.2.2 利害關係者理論(Stakeholder Theory) 19 3.2.3 制度理論 (Institutional Theory) 21 3.2.4 ESG各主流理論之分析與問題 22 3.3 ESG與企業競爭優勢 25 3.3.1 ESG與企業績效(Corporate Performance) 25 3.3.2 競爭優勢(Competitive Advantage) 26 3.3.3 資源基礎理論(Resource-Based Theory) 27 3.3.4 創造共享價值(Creating Shared Value) 29 3.3.5 企業ESG成功個案回顧 32 3.3.6 ESG與企業競爭優勢 38 第四章 持續競爭優勢觀點之ESG理論基礎建立與假說推導 41 4.1 持續競爭優勢觀點之ESG理論模型 41 4.1.1模型關係:公司ESG舉措與創造持續競爭優勢 43 4.1.2模型關係:公司ESG舉措與永續制度環境 44 4.1.3模型關係:公司ESG舉措與消費者 45 4.2 理論模型所隱含之實證假說 46 4.2.1 理論模型所隱含之消費者行為 46 4.2.2 經濟層面之假說 49 4.2.3 公司ESG識別層面之假說 50 4.2.4 永續道德層面之假說 52 4.2.5 社會心理層面之假說 55 4.2.6 假說整理 56 第五章 實證研究設計 59 5.1 計量實證研究 59 5.2 實證模型 59 5.2.1 模型一 59 5.2.2 模型二 60 5.3 變數定義與量化方式 60 5.3.1 應變數 60 5.3.2 自變數 61 5.3.3 控制變數 64 5.4 數據收集 65 5.4.1 問卷處理 65 第六章 實證分析結果與討論 66 6.1 敘述性統計 66 6.2 模型檢定 69 6.3 迴歸分析與實證討論 76 6.3.1 模型一之迴歸運算結果 77 6.3.2 模型二之迴歸運算結果 81 6.3.3 模型一與模型二迴歸結果比較 83 6.3.4 模型一與模型二假說驗證 85 6.3.5 企業ESG競爭優勢之策略 89 第七章 研究結論與建議 91 7.1 研究結論 91 7.2 範圍與限制 92 7.3 後續建議 93 參考文獻 94 附錄 100 附錄一、問卷格式與題目內容 100 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 環境社會治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 購買意願 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業競爭優勢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 計量分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | competitive advantage | en |
| dc.subject | purchase willingness | en |
| dc.subject | empirical study | en |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | econometric analysis | en |
| dc.title | 以競爭優勢觀點做為企業ESG之理論基礎:理論推導與實證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Taking the Viewpoint of Competitive Advantage as the Theoretical Basis of Corporate ESG: Theoretical Derivation and Empirical Evidence | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許耀文;王全三;連勇智 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yao-wen Hsu;Chuan-San Wang;YUNG-CHIH Lien | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 環境社會治理,企業競爭優勢,購買意願,計量分析,實證研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ESG,competitive advantage,purchase willingness,empirical study,econometric analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302492 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 4.02 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
