請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8925
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳書梅 | |
dc.contributor.author | Duan-Gui Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張端桂 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:04:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:04:17Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 大學多元入學升學網(民100)。大學多元入學介紹-入學管道。上網日期:民100年4月30日,檢自http://nsdua.moe.edu.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=92
大學招生委員會聯合會(民98a)。大學甄選入學招生辦法。上網日期:民98年10月10日,檢自http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/info/data/98appendix01.pdf 大學招生委員會聯合會(民98b)。入學管道:甄選入學。上網日期:民98年1月20日,檢自http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/left-33.htm 大學招生委員會聯合會、大學甄選入學委員會編(民97)。九十八學年度大學甄選入學招生簡章彙編。臺北市:編者。 王世英主持(民96)。大學甄選入學實施成果追蹤之研究第三期:系所甄選入學策略變革之分析。臺北市:教育資料館。 王世英主持(民97)。大學甄選入學實施成果追蹤之研究第四期:各類入學途徑之利基分析。臺北市:教育資料館。 王秀槐(民95)。大學生的科系選擇-正視學生志趣不合問題。上網日期:民98年7月30日,檢自http://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex2.php?no=2 王秀槐(民98)。多元入學管道下大學生科系選擇的確定度與滿意度。在張雪梅、彭森明編著,台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁49-73)。臺北市:師大教評中心。 王彩鸝(民98年12月1日)。100學年 大學推甄推薦與繁星合併。聯合晚報,A7版。 吳怡君(民89)。高中新生的生涯困擾與實施團體輔導之改變效果。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學心理學研究所,臺北市。 批踢踢實業坊(民98)。What is Ptt。上網日期:民98年10月2日,檢自http://www.ptt.cc/index.html 沈俊毅(民98)。大學生選擇就讀學校與科系的考量因素。在張雪梅、彭森明編著,台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁75-101)。臺北市:師大教評中心。 林詠茹(民89)。金山中學高中部普通班學生資訊需求之硏究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 林幸臺(民79)。從生涯規劃談經社變遷中就業服務工作的走向。就業與訓練,8(6),頁8-11。 邱卉綺(民94)。高中生生涯決定困難、生涯自我效能與焦慮憂鬱情緒之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,臺北市。 金樹人(民80)。眾裡尋他千百度-大學科系與高中學生的生涯規劃。輔導通訊,25,14-23。 高淑芬(民97)。選填科系大哉問。幼獅文藝,651,98-101。 張世惠(民80)。從北一女圖書出納記錄談青少年喜歡的讀物。臺北市立圖書館館訊8( 3),頁28-31。 張雪梅(民98)。序言-大學生的學習歷程與高教品質。在張雪梅、彭森明編著,台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁1-23)。臺北市:師大教評中心。 張瑞麟(民93)。考生對大學甄選入學制度之認知與因應策略之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。 張錦弘(民95年9月28日)。「我選錯系了嗎?半數大一生徬徨:1/3認為選錯系 1/4想轉系轉學 甄選入學者所讀較符合所願」。聯合報,C8。 教育部(民92)。高級中學圖書館設立及營運基準。上網日期:民100年5月8日,檢自:http://www.ncl.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1226&ctNode=1341&mp=2 教育部(民98a)。高級中學法。上網日期:民98年10月5日,檢自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=H0060001 教育部(民98b)。98學年度大學繁星計畫彙辦中心-招生辦法。上網日期:民98年10月10日,檢自http://www.star.ccu.edu.tw/star98/rule_01.php 莊珮真(民92)。高中生因應大學多元入學方案生涯決策之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所,高雄市。 郭蓓蓉(民96)。臺北市高中生生涯自我概念、生涯自我效能與生涯決定困難之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所,臺北市。 陳向明(民91)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。 陳智華(民98年9月19日)。大學甄選入學比率 明年提高為60%。聯合報,A6版。 楊朝祥(民91)。多元入學方案面面觀。國家政策論壇,1,223-232。 楊曉雯(民84)。高中生閱讀行為研究:以臺北市立建國高級中學學生為例。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學教育資料科學研究所,臺北市。 劉鳳珍(民94)。16萬考生的心事:分數、學費、就業。上網日期:民98年3月20日,檢自http://www.cheers.com.tw/doc/page.jspx?id=40288aad136c45b401136c6c435b0006 蔡宗明(民95年10月28日)。近半大學生自覺念錯系。聯合報,C4版。 鄧志平(民85)。高中生選擇大學主修科系決策歷程之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所,高雄市。 魯賓 (Allen Rubin, Earl Babbie)著(2000)。硏究方法:社會工作曁人文科學領域的運用(Research methods for social work )(趙碧華,朱美珍編譯)。臺北市:學富文化。 韓楷檉、王世英、洪寶蓮(民96)。高中生涯輔導工作成效對大學生生涯決定狀態之影響研究。臺北市:教育資料館。 蘇玉龍、葉連祺、吳京玲、陳恭(民95)。大學甄選入學實施成果追蹤。教育資料與研究,68,101-118。 蘇玉龍主持(民95)。大學甄選入學實施成果追蹤之研究第一期。臺北市:教育資料館。 蘇惠慈(民94)。高中輔導教師生涯輔導專業能力之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學諮商與教育心理研究所,臺中市。 Adomi, E. E. (2001). Patterns of occupational information use among senior high school students in Benin city, Nigeria. Education Libraries Journal, 44(1), 29-31. Agosto, D. E., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2005). People, places, and questions: An investigation of the everyday life information-seeking behaviors of urban young adults. Library and Information Science Research, 27(2), 141-163. Agosto, D., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2006). Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers, Part 2: Empirical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(11), 1418-1426. Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information-seeking. In I. P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (Vol. 2, pp. 205-242). Beverly Hills: CA: Sage. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books, as cited in Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic. Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous state of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143. Beyer, J. & Trice, H. (1982). The utilization process: a conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 591-622, as cited in Todd, R. J. (1999). Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 851-870. Brookes, B.(1980). The foundations of information science, Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2, 125-133, as cited in Todd, R. J. (1999). Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 851-870. Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic. Derr, R. L. (1983). A conceptual analysis of information need. Information Processing & Management, 19(5), 273-278. Dervin, B. (1976). Strategies for dealing with human information needs: Information or communication? Journal of Broadcasting, 20(3), 324-351, as cited in Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic. Dervin, B. (1977). Useful theory for librarianship: Communication not information. Drexel Library Quarterly, 13, 16-32. as cited in Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York: Academic. Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The Sense-Making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In: Dervin, B, Foreman-Wernet & L Lauterbach, E. (Eds.). (2003). Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 269-292). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. Dixon, P., & Shenton, A. K. (2003a).Models of young people's information seeking. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(1), 5-22. Dixon, P., & Shenton, A. K. (2003b). Youngsters' use of other people as an information-seeking method. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(4), 219-233. Dixon, P., & Shenton, A. K. (2004). Issues arising from youngsters' information-seeking behavior. Library and Information Science Research, 26(2), 177-200. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15, 237-247. Ellis, D., Cox, D. & Hall, K. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49, 356-369. Fourie, J. A. (1999). Educational and vocational information needs of high school learners: Implications for youth information services in South Africa. Mousaion, 17(2), 66-81. Fourie, J. A. (2007). Educational and vocational guidance and information services for the youth in public libraries. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 73(1), 51-63. Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students' career-related decision-making difficulties. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79(3), 331-40. Julien, H. E. (1997). How career information helps adolescents' decision-making. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context. proceedings of the international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, 14-16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland (pp. 371-385). London: Taylor Graham. Julien, H. E.(1999). Barriers to adolescents’information seeking for career decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 38-48. Julien, H. E.(2004). Adolescent decision-making for careers: An exploration of information behavior. In Mary K. Chelton & Colleen Cool (Eds.), Youth Information Seeking Behavior: theories, models, and issues (pp. 321-352). Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow. Krikelas, J. (1983). Information seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2),5-20. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371. Latrobe, K., & Havener, W. M. (1997). The information-seeking behavior of high school honors students: An exploratory study. Journal of Youth Services in Libraries, 10, 188-200. Machlup, F. (1979). Uses, value, and benefits of knowledge. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(1), 62-81, as cited in Todd, R. J. (1999). Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 851-870. Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194. Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environment. In B. Dervin, & Melvin J. Voigt (Eds), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 217-254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Todd, R. J. (1999). Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 851-870. Weiler, A. (2004). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(1), 46-53. Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15. Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behaviour: An interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 551-572. Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8925 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 高中生最主要之生涯任務便是透過各種大學入學管道升學。現行大學升學制度為多元入學方案,由甄選入學與考試入學兩種管道組成,其中甄選入學又包括個人申請與繁星推薦兩種入學方式。相關文獻指出,高中生於準備甄選入學過程中常遇有資訊不足之困擾。然而綜觀文獻,目前仍未見有學生於大學甄選入學過程資訊行為之相關研究。
爰此,本研究以14名國立臺灣大學之大學一年級個人申請入學錄取生為對象,利用半結構式之深度訪談法進行探索性研究,藉以瞭解大學一年級學生於高中階段之大學申請入學資訊行為。本研究之目的包括探討大學申請入學生之資訊需求與資訊來源管道、使用資訊後產生之改變、遭遇之資訊困境,並分析影響大學申請入學生資訊行為之因素。期藉由本研究之發現,作為高中學校、大學校系等單位提供大學申請入學相關輔導工作與服務之參考。 本研究之主要發現可歸納為以下四項: 一、大學申請入學生之資訊需求、偏好之資訊來源管道與資訊行為型態可由三階段分析之,包括建立升學方向、選擇申請科系,以及準備第二階段甄試。 二、大學申請入學生使用資訊後於認知與情感狀態皆產生正面與負面之改變。在認知層面之改變包括更了解、改變認知、擴展認知、獲得驗證、獲得定位、認知衝突;情感層面之改變則有引發興趣、強化動機、舒緩焦慮心情、感到困惑等。 三、大學申請入學生遭遇之資訊困境包括內在困境與外在困境。內在困境包括認知偏誤、無法理解科系內涵、不知道如何撰寫備審資料等三項;外在困境則有資訊不足、資訊過多、資訊不明確、資訊不一致、資訊可信度不高、資訊不適切,以及取用資訊時遭遇障礙。其中,取用資訊時所遭遇的障礙又包括因空間距離、資料數量有限等實體環境障礙,以及取用權限不足等之網路環境障礙。 四、大學申請入學生之資訊行為受心理、環境因素,以及對風險與報酬評估之影響。心理因素包括受訪者個人有限的經驗與認知,以及以錄取為最高目標之心理;環境因素則係指申請入學各項制度特性,影響了受訪者之資訊行為,包括學科能力測驗成績決定科系選擇,以及第二階段甄試準備時間緊湊;而對風險與報酬之評估,則是指受訪者認為相較於其他升學管道,申請入學為風險較低但錄取機率較高的入學方式。 根據本研究結果,研究者提出如下三項建議: 一、高中學校方面:1. 宜規劃具體且長期性之教案,引導高中生有目標地探索個人性向與大學校系內涵;2. 宜協助高中生建立大學學科分工與業界關聯之認知架構;3. 宜將第二階段甄試相關資料數位化,並建立多校資源整合共享之平台。 二、大學校系方面:宜針對高中生族群設計專屬之科系網站介面,網站資訊也宜具體明確,並以高中生易理解吸收之文字與形式呈現。 三、圖書館實務界方面:1. 高中圖書館可舉辦主題書展,並配合課程教案提供相關資訊;2. 公共圖書館可舉辦大學申請入學之主題書展與相關講座。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The main task for senior high school students in their current stage of life is to pursue higher education through various university entrance channels. The existing university admission system, or the Multiple-Entrance Program, is made up of two channels, including “admission via application or recommendation screening” and “admission via entrance examination”, of which, “admission via application or recommendation screening” is further divided into two types: personal application and Stars Program Recommendation. According to literatures, senior high school students often encounter the problem of insufficient information during the “admission via application or recommendation screening” process. However, as far as the existing literatures are concerned, studies on information behavior during the university “admission via application or recommendation screening” process are not yet available.
In view of this, with the 14 freshmen of National Taiwan University who applied for admission and were enrolled as the study subjects in this study, the in-depth interview was adopted in the exploratory research in order to determine the freshmen’s university admission information behaviors during their senior high school years. The purposes of this study are to explore the information needs and information sources and channels of the university applicants, the changes that took place after the information use, and the information related problems encountered in order to analyze the factors affecting the university applicants’ information behaviors. The research findings shall serve as a reference for senior high schools, university departments, and other units when offering university admission application related guidance and services. The main findings can be summarized into four items, as follows: 1.The information needs of university applicants, preferred information sources and channels, and information behavior types, which were analyzed through three stages: the development of the direction of the pursuit of higher studies, the selection of departments to apply for, and the preparation of the stage-2 examination. 2.The university applicants’ cognitive and emotional states after the information use produced positive and negative changes. The cognitive changes include better understanding, cognitive changes, cognitive expansions, access to validation, access to orientation, and cognitive conflict; the emotional changes include triggered interest, strengthened motivation, relieved anxiety, confusion, etc. 3.The university applicants’ information-related problems encountered include the internal and external problems. The three internal problems include: cognitive bias, inability to understand the contents of the departments, and not knowing how to write materials to be reviewed; the external problems include insufficient information, excessive information, unclear information, inconsistent information, lack of information credibility, information inappropriateness, and obstacles encountered during information access. The obstacles encountered during information access also include obstacles in the physical environment, such as space, distance, and limited quantity of data, as well as obstacles in the network environment, such as lack of access authorization. 4.University applicants’ information behaviors are affected by psychological and environmental factors and risk and reward assessments. The psychological factors include the respondents’ limited experiences and knowledge, and their adherence to the idea of “enrollment” is the highest goal; the environmental factors on the other hand refer to the characteristics of the various admission application systems that affect the respondents’ information behaviors, including the General Scholastic Ability Test scores determine the selection of departments and the time constraint when preparing for the stage-2 screening test; in terms of risk and reward assessments, the respondents believed that compared to other channels for the pursuit of higher education, “admissions via application” involved relatively lower risks, while the enrollment rate was relatively higher. Based on the study results, the researcher proposed three suggestions, as follows: 1.For senior high schools: (1) It is suggested that specific and long-term lesson plans be developed to guide senior high school students in exploring their personal aptitudes and the university department contents; (2) it is suggested that assistance be offered to senior high school students in establishing a cognitive framework of university discipline division and association with the industry; and (3) it is suggested that the stage-2 screening test related information be digitized and inter-school resources integration and sharing platforms be established. 2.For university departments: It is suggested that departmental website interfaces exclusively for the senior high school group be designed. The website information should be specific and clear, which should be presented in texts and forms that can be easily understood and absorbed by senior high school students. 3.For library practitioners: (1) Senior high school libraries can organize theme book fairs and provide relevant information in accordance with the curriculum lesson plans; and (2) public libraries can organize university application admission related theme book fairs and related lectures. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:04:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R94126003-1.pdf: 724221 bytes, checksum: 589e80d6b9589e901961e21f598d1f5c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract iii 目次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 資訊行為之內涵 7 第二節 高中生資訊行為 15 第三節 高中生生涯決策之相關研究 19 第三章 研究設計與實施 29 第一節 研究方法 29 第二節 研究對象 31 第三節 資料分析與處理 33 第四節 研究實施步驟 35 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 37 第一節 大學申請入學生之資訊需求與資訊來源管道 37 第二節 大學申請入學生使用資訊後產生之改變 64 第三節 大學申請入學生遭遇之資訊困境 70 第四節 影響大學申請入學生資訊行為之因素 78 第五節 綜合討論 83 第五章 結論與建議 98 第一節 結論 98 第二節 建議 101 參考文獻 107 附錄一 98學年度大學甄選入學作業流程圖 115 附錄二 98學年度大學甄選入學作業時程 116 附錄三 訪談大綱 118 附錄四 訪談資料謄錄示例 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 大學申請入學生之資訊行為研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Information Behavior of University Applicants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳明德,黃慕萱,藍文欽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 資訊行為,大學申請入學生, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | information behavior,university applicants, | en |
dc.relation.page | 123 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 707.25 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。