請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8853
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林居正 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsiu Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉毓修 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:02:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:02:38Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Alt W, Lohrer H, Gollhofer A. Functional properties of adhesive ankle taping: neuromuscular and mechanical effects before and after exercise. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:238-45.
2. Amendola A. Controversies in diagnosis and management of syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. Foot Ankle 1992;13:44-50. 3. Bahr R, Lian O, Bahr IA. A twofold reduction in the incidence of acute ankle sprains in volleyball after the introduction of an injury prevention program: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997;7:172-7. 4. Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Swierstra BA, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM. A biomechanical evaluation of the tibiofibular and tibiotalar ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:426-9. 5. Bhairo NH, Nijsten MW, van Dalen KC, ten Duis HJ. Hand injuries in volleyball. Int J Sports Med 1992;13:351-4. 6. Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:294-298. 7. Fallat L, Grimm DJ, Saracco JA. Sprained ankle syndrome: prevalence and analysis of 639 acute injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 1998;37:280-285. 8. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19:653-660. 9. Greene TA, Wight CR. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during, and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;11:453-66. 10. Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, Weller KH. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;9:33-9. 11. Hoefnagels EM, Waites MD, Wing ID, Belkoff SM, Swierstra BA. Biomechanical comparison of the interosseous tibiofibular ligament and the anterior tibiofibular ligament. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:602-4. 12. Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 1990;10:325-330. 13. Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Jones PW, Ong BN, Dawes PT. The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. Rheumatology. 2000;39:382-8. 14. Kiter E, Bozkurt M. The crossed-leg test for examination of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Int.2005;26:187-188 15. Lindenfeld T, Parikh S. Clinical tip: heel-thump test for syndesmotic ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:406-408. 16. Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P. Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:372-84. 17. Lin JJ, Hanten WP, Olson SL, Roddey TS, Soto-Quijano DA, Lim HK, Sherwood AM. Functional activities characteristics of shoulder complex movements: Exploration with a 3-D electromagnetic measurement system. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:199- 210. 18. Liu YH, Hung CJ, Lin JJ, Chai H. Reliability of Measurement of Ankle Syndesmosis Mobility Using an Electromagnetic Device. 10th International Congress of the Asian Confederation for Physical Therapy. 2008, Tokyo, Japan. 19. Morris HH, Musnicki W 3rd. The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1983;23:422-6. 20. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Physical Rehabilitation. Mosby, 2002, pp.483-485. 21. Nussbaum ED, Hosea TM, Sieler SD, Incremona BR, Kessler DE. Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:31-35. 22. Pienkowski D, McMorrow M, Shapiro R, Caborn DN, Stayto J. The effect of ankle stabilizers on athletic performance. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:757-62. 23. Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG. The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:107-11. 24. Sarsam IM, Hughes SP. The role of the anterior tibio-fibular ligament in talar rotation: an anatomical study. Injury 1988;19:62-4. 25. Scranton PE. Isolated syndesmotic injuries: diastasis of the ankle in the athlete. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2002;1:88-93. 26. Sora MC, Strobl B, Staykov D, Förster-Streffleur S. Evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis: a plastination slices study. Clin Anat 2004;17:513-7. 27. Tai JM, Chai H, Hsi WL, Wang SF. Effect of repetition number on first ray mobility test. The 56th academic conference of the Physical Therapy Association of ROC(Taiwan). 2008, Taipei, Taiwan. 28. Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH, 3rd. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopicossification. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:146-150. 29. Umberger BR, Nawoczenski DA, Baumhauer JF. Reliability and validity of first metatarsophalangeal joint orientation measured with an electromagnetic tracking device. Clin Biomech 1999;14:74-6. 30. Werner Kahle, Helmut Leonhardt, Werner Platzer. Color atlas and textbook of human anatomy, v. 1. Thieme Medical Publishers, 1992, pp213. 31. Wilkerson, G.B. Comparative biomechanical effects of the standard method of ankle taping and a taping method designed to enhance subtalar stability. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:588-95. 32. Woodburn J, Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Barker S. A preliminary study determining the feasibility of electromagnetic tracking for kinematics at the ankle joint complex. Rheumatology 1999;38:1260-8. 33. Wuest TK. Injuries to the distal lower extremity syndesmosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997;5:172-181 34. 3 SPACE FASTRAK user’s manual, reversion E. Colchester (VT): Polhemus; 2005 35. 廖文炫,張梅蘭,蔡美文,王淑芬:物理因子治療學—冷、熱、光、水療及機械性治療。台北:合計圖書,2002年,第38頁,第126-127頁。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8853 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 脛腓聯合關節傷害約佔每年發生的腳踝扭傷個案的1%~ 18%,比其他的腳踝扭傷需要較長的休息時間與較多的治療時間。脛腓關節傷害的治療目前多採用運動貼紮或彈性貼紮,而以後者較受運動員的喜愛。然而貼紮對脛腓聯合關節的限制效應,卻未有實證研究。因此本研究欲探討彈性貼紮對於脛腓聯合關節的限制效應。
本研究共徵召30名健康成年人,男女各半,其年齡為24.3 ± 3.1 (20~ 29)歲。受試者於下肢關節黏貼微型接收器,以FASTRAK運動追蹤系統分析全蹲動作。測試狀況有三種,分別為沒有貼紮、彈性貼紮、運動貼紮等。測試次序是隨機的。測試動作為腳跟不離地的全蹲動作,受試者從靜止站立迅速蹲下,再迅速站起,為一個測試動作,每個測試狀況共進行3次測試動作。計算3次雙踝間距的平均值來分析脛腓聯合關節的活動度。每種貼紮狀況結束時,使受試者填寫貼紮時進行全蹲、墊腳尖、單腳站、步行、跑步等五項動作之舒適程度分數。以受試者全蹲時的腳踝角度作為共變數,進行混合式模型統計分析,來比較不同貼紮狀況站立與全蹲時雙踝間距變化的差異;並以魏克森符號排序檢定,分析不同貼布在全蹲、墊腳尖、單腳站、步行、砲步等五項動作的舒適度。 本研究發現在站立或全蹲時FASTRAK運動追蹤系統皆有高的ICC值(ICC= .88~ .99),低SEM%(SEM%<1%)與低SRD%(SRD%<1.5%)。未貼紮之雙踝間距變化為4.8 ± 1.3 mm,彈性貼紮之雙踝間距變化為4.4 ± 1.3 mm,運動貼紮之雙踝間距變化為4.8 ± 1.5 mm,彈性貼紮後雙踝間距雖然有減少的趨勢,但未能達到統計學上的差異(p= .084)。在全蹲、墊腳尖、單腳站、步行、跑步等五個動作的舒適度統計,運動貼紮的舒適度都比彈性貼紮為低(所有p<0.001)。本研究為世界首度使用活體量測脛腓聯合關節動作之研究。本研究之研究對象為健康成年人,或許是無法達到統計差異的主因,未來將進行脛腓聯合關節傷害者的限制效應。此外,彈性貼紮對脛腓聯合關節的限制效應雖然與運動貼紮無統計上的差異,但因其舒適度優於運動貼紮,在臨床治療是一個較佳的選擇。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Ankle syndesmosis injury has been reported approximately 1%~ 18% of patients with ankle sprain. Compared with patients with other ankle sprains, ankle syndesmosis injury takes more period of time to get recovery. The common intervention of ankle syndesmosis injury is to apply either athletic or elastic taping onto the injured joint in order to bind the tibia and the fibula together. Although the confinement effect of such taping is appreciated by the injured athletes, there are no solid evidences provided yet. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to examine the effect of either athletic or elastic taping on motion of the ankle syndesmosis joint.
Thirty young healthy adults were recruited in this study, 15 men and 15 women with mean age of 24.3 ± 3.1 (20~ 29) years. Two sensors were attached onto bilateral malleoli of the ankle to be tested in order to analyze the deep squat task using an electromagnetic device. All participants were tested in three conditions: non-taping, elastic taping, and athletic taping in a random order. The participant was asked to perform deep squat from quiet stance with the fastest speed, and then to stand up immediately with the fastest speed. Three trials were collected for each condition. An average of three trials of bilateral malleoli distance was used to represent the mobility of the ankle syndesmosis, and the ankle angle at the deep squat moment served as a covariate. After completing the test of each condition, all participants were asked to point out the degree of comfortability during performing deep squat, heel rise, one-leg stance, walking, and running when either elastic or athletic taping was applied. For statistical analyses, A mixed model ANOVA was used to compare the differences of the changes of bilateral malleoli distance from quiet stance to deep squat among three different conditions. Additionally, the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for examining the comfortability in performing deep squat, heel rise, one-leg stance, walking, and running between two taping conditions. The results showed that measurement of ankle syndesmosis using the electromagnetic system presented high ICC values(ICC= .88~ .99), lower SEM%( SEM%<1%), and SRD% value (SRD%<1.5%), indicating an excellent intrarater reliability. Changes in bilateral malleoli distance from quiet stance to deep squat was 4.8 ± 1.3 mm for the non-taping condition, 4.4 ± 1.3 mm for elastic taping, and 4.8 ± 1.5 mm for athletic taping, respectively. Although the mean value of change in bilateral malleoli distance tended to be less in the elastic taping condition than the other two conditions, there was no significant differences among these three condition (p= .084). Comfortability in performing deep squat, heel rise, one-leg stance, walking, and running were lower for the athletic taping condition as compared to the elastic taping one (p<0.001). This research is the first study to quantify the ankle syndesmosis motion during deep squat test using FASTRAK motion analysis system and to compare the confinement effect of taping for ankle syndesmosis motion. Since this research recruited healthy adults only, the effect of elastic taping to restrict ankle syndesmosis motion is not visible. However, using elastic taping in syndesmosis provides more comfortability than using athletic taping, indicating another better treatment alternative in clinic. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:02:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R92428007-1.pdf: 4670624 bytes, checksum: 32aa07ad573b694fe1de56b5492be099 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ----------------------------------------------------------------i
致謝 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii 中文摘要 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------iii 英文摘要 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------v 圖目錄 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------viii 表目錄 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------x 第一章、前言------------------------------------------------------------------------1 第一節、研究背景與動機------------------------------------------------------1 第二節、研究目的---------------------------------------------------------------3 第三節、研究問題與假說------------------------------------------------------3 第四節、名詞解釋---------------------------------------------------------------4 第二章、文獻回顧 ----------------------------------------------------------------6 第一節、脛腓聯合關節的特性------------------------------------------------6 第二節、脛腓聯合關節傷害的臨床症狀與治療方法---------------------9 第三節、關節穩定度研究-----------------------------------------------------13 第四節、FASTRAK運動追蹤系統於運動學的研究---------------------14 第三章、研究方法----------------------------------------------------------------15 第一節、研究設計-------------------------------------------------------------15 第二節、受試者----------------------------------------------------------------16 第三節、量測工具-------------------------------------------------------------17 第四節、量測變項與介入變項----------------------------------------------19 第五節、實驗步驟-------------------------------------------------------------20 第六節、統計分析-------------------------------------------------------------22 第四章、結果----------------------------------------------------------------------23 第一節、信度研究結果-------------------------------------------------------23 第二節、雙踝間距的變化----------------------------------------------------25 第三節、貼紮時的舒適度分數----------------------------------------------26 第五章、討論----------------------------------------------------------------------28 第一節、研究結果-------------------------------------------------------------28 第二節、與其他研究結果的比較--------------------------------------------29 第三節、研究限制-------------------------------------------------------------33 第六章、結論----------------------------------------------------------------------34 參考文獻----------------------------------------------------------------------------35 圖-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------39 表-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------60 附錄一-------------------------------------------------------------------------------67 附錄二-------------------------------------------------------------------------------69 附錄三-------------------------------------------------------------------------------71 附錄四-------------------------------------------------------------------------------76 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 彈性貼紮對脛腓聯合關節動作之限制效應 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effect of Elastic Taping on Motions of Ankle Syndesmosis Joint | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 柴惠敏 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林銘川,黃長福,李恆儒 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 脛腓聯合關節,貼紮,動作分析,信度研究,運動傷害, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ankle syndesmosis,elastic taping,motion analysis,reliability,sport injury, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 4.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。