澳洲中國研究的多元性：以安戈及何包鋼的學思歷程為例

Abstract

本文旨在探討澳洲中國研究的多元性，並檢視澳洲漢學界是否確實多元寬容，讓來自各地的學者得以在此自在發展研究。本文分別從微觀層次及宏觀層次來對澳洲中國研究的多元性作檢視。在微觀層次，以安戈及何包鋼兩位學者的學思歷程來考察外地學者在當地的研究情況；在宏觀層次，則就澳洲漢學界中具影響力的研究主張及其它整體性因素來對此多元性作分析。最後，本文認為澳洲漢學界確實展現出寬鬆多元的特性，並有利外地學者的加入。但此多元性仍壟罩在一層西方屬性的薄紗之下，允為薄紗下的多元。

This thesis focuses on the multiple agendas of Australia’s China studies, therefore the English name of this thesis is “Away from centrism”, which also means pluralism. This thesis examines the issue through both microcosmic and macroscopic terms. In the microcosmic term, I take two sinologists, Jonathan Unger and Baogang He as the central figures of my research. Through studying their research, we can observe the situations of immigrant sinologists in Australia. In the macroscopic term, I look into the multiple agendas of Australia's China Studies through introducing three influential methodology views in this field and other holistic factors of Australia. I conclude that Australia’s China studies indeed highly present pluralism tendency, but still covered by a gauze of western color.