請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88008完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙儀珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yee-San Teoh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳葶芸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yun Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-01T16:22:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-01 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 朱瑞玲（1991）：〈「面子」壓力與其因應行為〉。《國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學》，1（1），14-31頁。
毛連塭（1994）：《生活教育與道德成長》。台北：心理出版社有限公司。 潘淑滿（2003）：《質性研究－理論與運用》。台北：心理出版社。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（2005）：〈質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析〉。《身心障礙研究季刊》，3（2），122-136頁。 韓貴香（2012）：〈沒面子與情緒: 事件歸咎對象與相對權力的影響效果之探討〉。《應用心理研究》，53，131-152頁。 蔡明昌（2013）：〈大學生在死亡相關詞彙的 Stroop 干擾效應之前導性研究〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》，38，91-115頁。 卓淑玲、陳學志、鄭昭明（2013）：〈台灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫─中文情緒詞常模研究〉。《中華心理學刊》，55（4），493-523頁。 鄭瑞隆、合使用（2017）：〈NICHD 司法詢問技術於兒少性侵害案件之運用〉。《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集》，271-288頁。 江文玉（2017）：《大學生性騷擾與性侵害之盛行率、風險因子與通報概況》。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，台北。 楊國樞（2019）：〈華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點〉。《楊國樞文集（第八冊）：華人本土化心理學 (二) 》。新北：Airiti Press。 吳啟誠、張瓊云（2019）：〈主題分析在教育研究上的應用〉。《特殊教育發展期刊》，69，29-42頁 。 趙儀珊（2020）：〈探尋對台灣兒童進行司法訪談的最佳實務〉。《應用心理研究》，72，1-45頁。 法務部全國法規資料庫（2022）：性侵害犯罪防治法，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=D0080079&flno=2 查詢日期 2022年9月5日。 法律百科網（2022）：什麼是偵訊？跟形式訴訟法的訊問或詢問，有什麼不一樣？，https://www.legis-pedia.com/article/remedy-procedure/533 查詢日期 2022年 9月19日。 American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Shame. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved September 3, 2022, from https://dictionary.apa.org/shame Ahrens, C. E., Campbell, R., Ternier-Thames, N. K., Wasco, S. M., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00329.x Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological., 2, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004 Blasbalg, U., Hershkowitz, I., & Karni-Visel, Y. (2018). Support, reluctance, and production in child abuse investigative interviews. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 518. Campbell, R., Adams, A. E., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., & Sefl, T. (2009). Training interviewers for research on sexual violence: A qualitative study of rape survivors’ recommendations for interview practice. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331248 Cimbora, D. M., & McIntosh, D. N. (2003). Emotional responses to antisocial acts in adolescent males with conduct disorder: A link to affective morality. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(2), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3202_16 Crombez, G., Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Eccleston, C., & Van Damme, S. (2013). Attentional bias to pain-related information: A meta-analysis. Pain, 154(4), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.013 Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 3, 222-248. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. F. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 93–109). Sage Publications, Inc. Deblinger, E., & Runyon, M. K. (2005). Understanding and treating feelings of shame in children who have experienced maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 10(4), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559505279306 Fung, H. (1999). Becoming a moral child: The Socialization of shame among young Chinese children. Ethos, 27(2), 180–209. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1999.27.2.180 Gilbert, P., Bhundia, R., Mitra, R., McEwan, K., Irons, C., & Sanghera, J. (2007). Cultural differences in shame-focused attitudes towards mental health problems in Asian and non-Asian student women. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 10(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13694670500415124 Hamilton, G., Brubacher, S. P., & Powell, M. B. (2016). Expressions of shame in investigative interviews with Australian Aboriginal children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 51, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.11.004 Hershkowitz, I. (2009). Socioemotional factors in rapport building in interviews of children. Child Maltreatment, 14(2), 172–181. Hershkowitz, I., Lanes, O., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.004 Imbir, K. K., & Jarymowicz, M. T. (2013). The effect of automatic vs. Refl ective emotions on cognitive control in antisaccade tasks and the emotional stroop test. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0016 Krettenauer, T., & Eichler, D. (2006). Adolescents’ self-attributed moral emotions following a moral transgression: Relations with delinquency, confidence in moral judgment and age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X50825 Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., & Yudilevitch, L. (1996). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children’s responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 627–637. Lamb, M. E., & Brown, D. A. (2006). Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X57657 Lewy, J., Cyr, M., & Dion, J. (2015). Impact of interviewers’ supportive comments and children’s reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse and Neglect, 43, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.002 McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive Cognitions: An Investigation of the Emotional Stroop Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1595 Schimmenti, A., Starcevic, V., Gervasi, A. M., Deleuze, J., & Billieux, J. (2018). Interference with processing negative stimuli in problematic internet users: Preliminary evidence from an emotional stroop task. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7070177 Sippel, L. M., & Marshall, A. D. (2011). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, intimate partner violence perpetration, and the mediating role of shame processing bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(7), 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.05.002 Somer, E., & Szwarcberg, S. (2001). Variables in delayed disclosure of childhood sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(3), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.71.3.332 Spiecker, B. (1988). Psychopathy: The Incapacity to have Moral Emotions. Journal of Moral Education, 17(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724880170203 Spring, T., Saltzstein, H. D., & Peach, R. (2012). Children’s eyewitness identification as implicit moral decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 139–149. Scheffler, I. (1977). In praise of the cognitive emotions. Teachers College Record, 79(2), 1-10. Sabag-Cohen, S. (2009). Implicit shame and the emotional stroop task: Regulation of shame in relation to attachment style and interpersonal rejection [Doctoral dissertation, Long Island University, The Brooklyn Center]. Teoh, Y. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Preparing children for investigative interviews: Rapport-building, instruction, and evaluation. Applied Developmental Science, 14(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2010.494463 Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 171–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20447224 Ullman, S. E., Starzynski, L. L., Long, S. M., Mason, G. E., & Long, L. D. M. (2008). Exploring the relationships of women’s sexual assault disclosure, social reactions, and problem drinking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1235–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314298 Werbart Törnblom, A., Werbart, A., & Rydelius, P. A. (2015). Shame and gender differences in paths to youth suicide: Parents’ perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 25(8), 1099–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315578402 Wittekind, C. E., Muhtz, C., Moritz, S., & Jelinek, L. (2017). Performance in a blocked versus randomized emotional Stroop task in an aged, early traumatized group with and without posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.06.003 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88008 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要目的為探討羞恥情緒及其信念於通報及揭露歷程中所扮演之角色，望能為未來台灣司法訪談之提問規範制定提供一己之力。本研究一共分為兩個子研究，研究對象皆為曾歷經通報程序之女性性暴力倖存者，研究一同時採用實驗法與結構式訪談法，進行訪談提示（interviewer reminders）操弄，並以情緒叫色作業（Emotional Stroop Task）與羞恥狀態量表分別觀察羞恥情緒及信念的改變，再以內容分析法（Content Analysis）進行訪談資料分析；研究二採用半結構式訪談法針對參與研究一之受試者進行訪談，著重探討：（1）實驗情境中揭露受害經驗意願之變化，（2）羞恥情緒及信念對真實通報經驗之影響，並以主題分析（Thematic Analysis）進行資料分析。自研究一發現，接收與恥相關之訪談提示後，受試者羞恥情緒及信念皆出現上升之趨勢；且傾向需要花費較多時間甫能開始陳述遇害經驗。自研究二發現：（1）建議在未能明確斷定訪談中使用涵蓋「恥」相關字詞能提高訪談意願前，應避免使用，（2）訪談者與環境的友善程度乃是受試者認為可提升揭露意願之重要因素，（3）在尋求司法途徑協助之過程中，羞恥信念之於倖存者仍是求助的一大阻礙，且信念主要來源為家庭與非特定單位之社會群體。本研究作為初探性研究，望能為未來相關研究聚焦出更為清晰的研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous research has indicated a gap in the regulation of the use of terminology regarding "shame" in investigative interviewing in Taiwan. This study aims to investigate the influence of shame emotions and beliefs on the reporting process of sexual assault survivors in the context of an East Asian culture. The current study consists of two sub-studies, in which participants were female sexual violence survivors who had previously paticipated in either formal or informal reporting processes. Study 1 employed a mixed-methods design, combining experimental manipulation through interviewer reminders with structured interviews. Subjective shame state and non-subjective shame bias were subsequently measured and recorded utilizing the State Shame Scale and the Emotional Stroop task (EST), respectively. Subsequent interview statements were correspondingly recorded for textual and content analysis. In Study 2, semistructured interviews were conducted with participants who had participated in Study 1. Interviews were conducted with a focus on (a) subject interview reminder elicited emotions and impact on willingness to disclose victimization experience (b) the role of shame in past disclosure experiences. From the findings of Study 1, it was observed that the presentation of interview prompts related to shame resulted in an increase in both the affective experience of shame and related beliefs among participants. Moreover, participants tended to require more time before initiating the recounting of their experiences of victimization. Study 2 revealed several notable findings. First, it is recommended to refrain from using terms related to shame in interviews where there is no clear indication that using such terms would increase the willingness to disclose. Second, the friendliness of the interviewer and the environment were identified as important factors that can enhance participants' willingness to disclose information. Lastly, the study found that belief in shame constituted a significant impediment for survivors seeking legal assistance, with family and non-specific social others emerging as the main sources of this belief. By adopting both qualitative and quantitative approaches, this study aims to provide further perspectives for the development of investigative interview standards in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-01T16:22:25Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-01T16:22:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 審定書 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 名詞釋義 2 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 恥感情緒之定義 4 第二節 恥感情緒之於通報揭露 7 第三節 研究問題及目的 9 第三章 研究方法 11 第一節 研究倫理 11 第二節 研究對象 11 第三節 研究設計 13 第四節 研究工具 15 第五節 研究程序 19 第六節 資料分析 20 第四章 研究結果 24 第一節 訪談提示操弄結果 24 第二節 結構式訪談之內容分析 28 第三節 半結構式訪談結果—— 羞恥字詞於實驗及真實訪談情境之影響 31 第五章 討論與建議 45 第一節 結果討論 45 第二節 研究限制 52 第三節 研究貢獻 53 第四節 未來研究方向 54 第五節 結論 56 參考文獻 57 附錄 63 附錄一、訪談大綱版本一 63 附錄二、羞恥狀態量表 64 附錄三、受試者基本資料問卷 64 附錄四、無母數與相關性檢定之結果 65 附錄五、共用通報單：由倖存者試繪 69 附錄六、知情同意書 70 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 通報 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 倖存者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性侵害 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我意識情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 羞恥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 揭露 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sexual assault report | en |
| dc.subject | Self-conscious emotion | en |
| dc.subject | Survivor | en |
| dc.subject | Shame | en |
| dc.subject | Disclosure | en |
| dc.title | 通報揭露過程中恥感情緒角色之初探研究——自性暴力倖存者觀點出發 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Preliminary Research on the Role of Shame in Notification and Disclosure Process: A Perspective from Sexual Violence Survivors | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪素珍;呂信慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Su-Chen Hung;Hsin-Hui Lu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自我意識情緒,羞恥,性侵害,倖存者,揭露,通報, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sexual assault report,Self-conscious emotion,Shame,Survivor,Disclosure, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301325 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。