請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87426
標題: | 區分所有建築物地下停車空間之研究 A Research on Underground Parking Garage of Condominium Building |
作者: | 高湘琦 Hsiang-Chi Kao |
指導教授: | 吳從周 Chung-jau Wu |
關鍵字: | 區分所有建築物,停車空間,停車位,專用使用權,處分一體性,預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項, condominium building,apartment building,parking garage,parking spaces,exclusive use right,disposal integration,pre-sale house dealings,mandatory and prohibitory provisions of standard contracts for pre-sale housing, |
出版年 : | 2022 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 公寓大廈已為我國常見之建築物態樣,其中,更多有設置地下停車空間之必要,若公寓大廈係屬區分所有之關係,則關於地下停車空間所有權之歸屬以及使用權之約定,在實務上向來均衍生不少爭議。 在釐清該些爭議之前,須先了解關於區分所有建築物內停車空間之性質。關於停車空間之種類,雖然於我國法上並未有明文之規定,然而依據停車空間設置之法源,若以是否需強行設置為分類標準,大抵可分作法定停車空間、自行增設停車空間以及獎勵增設停車空間三種態樣。根據停車空間種類之不同,其登記方式亦有所差別,並與停車空間所有權之歸屬有密切關聯。而與停車空間相較,單一停車位之性質及登記方式亦須另外釐清。 本文所欲探討關於區分所有建築物內停車空間之實務爭議,依序可分為地下停車空間專用權之約定、地下停車空間處分以及車道及其他必要空間之所有權及使用權應如何分配三部分,並基於前述所介紹之停車空間之性質以及登記態樣等基本概念,輔以實務判決為例,討論各部分之重要爭點,其中,更不乏介紹相關之行政函釋見解,以了解我國實務上之運作情況,比較法上則以日本法為參考對象。 而除了學說及實務見解外,在探討關於停車空間所有權之歸屬及使用權分配之爭議時,亦須參考行政主管機關所公告之《預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項》,以協助釐清個案中當事人間所作之約定是否適法,並且,該應記載及不得記載事項亦於2020年12月25日修正,使其內之各條款更貼近民法之相關規定。 Apartment buildings have become a common type of buildings in Taiwan, and it is necessary to set up underground parking garages. Also, if the apartment buildings are condominium building, the ownership of the underground parking garages and the setting of the right to use it have always led to many disputes in practice. Before straighting out these disputes, it is important to understand the essence of the distinction between parking garages in condominium building. Although there is no express provision in ROC’s law, if the classification standard is whether compulsory setting is required, it can be roughly divided into three types: statutory parking garage, self-added parking garage and rewarded for additional parking garage according to the legal source of parking garage setting. Moreover, the registration method of different parking garages is also different, and is closely related to the ownership of the parking garage. Compared with the parking garage, the essence and registration method of a single parking space must also be clarified. This thesis intends to discuss the practical disputes on the distinction of parking garages in condominium buildings, which can be divided into three parts in sequence, namely, the establishment of exclusive rights of underground parking garages, the disposal of underground parking garages, and the ownership and how to distribute rights of using driveways and other necessary spaces. Also, based on the concepts such as the essence of the parking garages and the registration form stated above, supplemented by practical judgments as an example to discuss important crux of in each part of disputes. This dissertation also look into administrative rule in order to gain a better insight in practice. And introduce Japanese law from the perspectives of comparative law. In addition to academic theories and practical opinions, when discussing disputes over the ownership of parking garages and the distribution of the right to use, it is also necessary to refer to the " Mandatory and Prohibitory Provisions of Standard Contracts for Pre-sale Housing" which promulgated by the administrative competent authority to help clarify whether the agreement between the parties in the case is legal. Moreover, the mandatory and prohibitory provisions in which were also amended on December 25, 2020, so that the terms in it are more apposite to the relevant provisions of civil code. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87426 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202204177 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(限校園內公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 3.52 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。