請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87415
標題: | 論外國法院裁判承認與執行制度上之公序良俗—以實體法上公序良俗為中心 A Comparative Study on Substantive Public Policy in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments |
作者: | 高至鴻 Chih-Hung Kao |
指導教授: | 陳瑋佑 Wei-Yu Chen |
關鍵字: | 外國法院裁判承認與執行,公序良俗,實體公序,國際公序,外國法院離婚裁判之承認,外國法院金錢給付裁判之執行,美國法院懲罰性賠償金裁判之執行, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments,public policy (ordre public),substantive public policy,international public policy (ordre public international),recognition of foreign divorce judgments,enforcement of foreign money judgments,enforcement of U.S. punitive damages awards, |
出版年 : | 2023 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 於外國法院裁判承認與執行制度上,「公序良俗」係核心概念。論者多依照公序良俗所涉者,係外國法院裁判之實質內容或於外國法院進行之程序,區分為「程序公序」與「實體公序」。相較於程序公序,實體公序之內涵較不明確,於實務上亦鮮少發揮阻卻外國法院裁判承認或執行之作用。本論文一方面整理我國法之規範狀態及實務運作情形,另方面亦參考法國法、歐盟法之狀態,呈現於實務上,實體公序之概念於各該法秩序上係如何發揮作用,並針對我國學說相關討論、實務運作情形,參輔法國法、歐盟法之狀態,進行評論。針對我國學說相關討論,本論文主張公序良俗之概念無須再加以類型化,尤其是我國不少學者所提倡之國際公序概念應予揚棄或正名。針對我國實務運作情形,本論文觀察到法院往往依照結論係「違反公序」或「未違反公序」,而異其論證模式,本論文嘗試論證實務此種不同論證模式之正當性。 Ordre public (public policy) is a core concept in the context of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Most commentators divide the concept into substantive public policy (ordre public de fond) as well as procedural puclic policy (ordre public de procédure), according to whether it is the substantive content of a foreign judgment or the procedure taking place in foreign courts that is involved. Compared with procedural puclic policy, the concept of substantive public policy is less clear, and in practice, it rarely plays a role in rejecting the recognition or enforcement of foreign judgments. This thesis, on the one hand, presents the norms and practice of Taiwanese law, and on the other hand, it refers to French law and European Union regulations to demonstrate how the concept of substantive public policy functions in each of those legal orders. This thesis then tries to comment on the scholarly discussions as well as the judicial practice in Taiwan. As to the former, this thesis argues that the concept of public policy requires no further distinction. In particular, the concept of international public order (ordre public international) advocated by many should be discarded. As to the latter, this thesis observes that Taiwanese courts often differ in their reasoning depending on whether the conclusion is “violating public policy” or “not violating public policy.” This thesis attempts to justify such difference in legal reasoning. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87415 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202300380 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。