請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87283完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳良治 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Liang-Chih Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 趙政諺 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jheng-Yan Jhao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:49:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-18 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
Abernathy, William J., And James M. Utterback, 1978, "Patterns of Industrial Innovation." Technology Review 80(7): 40-47. Amsden, Alice H., 1991, "Diffusion of Development: The Late-Industrializing Model And Greater East Asia." The American Economic Review 81(2): 282-286. Amsden, Alice H., 1992, “Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization.” London: Oxford University Press. Amsden, Alice H., 2001, “The Rise of” The Rest’ ”: Challenges To The West From Late-Industrializing Economies.” London: Oxford University Press. Amsden, Alice H., And Wan-Wen Chu, 2003, “Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies.” Boston: MIT Press. Arnold, Nadine, And Raimund Hasse. 2015, “Escalation of Governance: Effects Of Voluntary Standardization On Organizations, Markets And Standards In Swiss Fair Trade.” Sociological Research Online 20(3): 94-109. Arthur, W. Brian, 1994, “Increasing Returns and Path Dependence In The Economy.” Michican: University of Michigan Press. Baru, Sanjaya, 2012, “Geo-Economics and Strategy.” Survival 54(3): 47-58. Bell, Martin, And Keith Pavitt., 1993, “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries.” Industrial And Corporate Change 2(2): 157-210. Bell, Martin. 2006, “Time and Technological Learning in Industrialising Countries: How Long Does It Take? How Fast Is It Moving (If at All)?” International Journal of Technology Management 36(1-3): 25-39. Blind, Knut., 2004, The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Blind, Knut., 2017, “The Economic Functions of Standards In The Innovation Process.” Pp. 38-62 In the Handbook of Innovation And Standards, Edited By Richard Hawkins, Knut Blind, And Robert Page. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Boschma, Ron, 2004, “Competitiveness of Regions from An Evolutionary Perspective.” Regional Studies 38(9): 1001-1014. Boschma, Ron, And Ron Martin, 2010, “The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography.” Pp. 3-39 In the Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Edited by Ron Boschma, And Ron Martin. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Brusco, Sebastiano, 1982, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6(2): 167-184. Cheng, Lu-Lin, 2007, “Surviving in The Middle: Embedded Learning and Managed Dependency Among Taiwanese Automakers.” Pp. 61-90 In Competition and Cooperation Among Asian Enterprises In China, Edited By Yukihito Sato And Momoko Kawakami. Tokyo: Institute of Development Economies, JETRO. Chinitz, Benjamin, 1960, “The Effect of Transportation Forms on Regional Economic Growth." Ekistics 10(57): 12-15. Choi, Hyung-Sup, 1986, “Science and Technology Policies for Industrialization of Developing Countries.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 29(3): 225-239. Choi, Young-Jin, And Jim Glassman, 2018, “A Geopolitical Economy of Heavy Industrialization and Second Tier City Growth In South Korea: Evidence From The ‘Four Core Plants Plan’.” Critical Sociology 44(3): 405-420. Dahlman, Carl J., Bruce Ross-Larson, And Larry E. Westphal, 1987, “Managing Technological Development: Lessons from The Newly Industrializing Countries.” World Development 15(6): 759-775. Dicken, Peter, 2007, Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of The World Economy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete, 1988, Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pisa: Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies. Doucette, Jamie, And Bae-Gyoon Park, 2018, “Urban Developmentalism in East Asia: Geopolitical Economies, Spaces of Exception, And Networks of Expertise.” Critical Sociology 44(3): 395-403. Gereffi, Gary, 1994, “The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How US Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks.” Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism: 95-122. Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey, And Timothy Sturgeon. 2005, “The Governance of Global Value Chains.” Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78-104. Gereffi, Gary. 1999, “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in The Apparel Commodity Chain.” Journal of International Economics 48(1): 37-70. Haraway, Donna, 2013, Simians, Cyborgs, And Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge. Harrison, Bennett, 1992, “Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles?" Regional Studies 26(5): 469-483. Hobday, Mike, 1995, “East Asian Latecomer Firms: Learning the Technology of Electronics.” World Development 23(7): 1171-1193. Hsu, Jinn-Yuh, 1997, A Late-Industrial District? Learning Networks in The Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park, Taiwan. Geography in the Graduate Division, University of California, Berkeley. Hsu, Jinn‐Yuh, 2004, “The Evolving Institutional Embeddedness of A Late‐Industrial District In Taiwan.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 95(2): 218-232. Hsu, Jinn-Yuh, Dong-Wan Gimm, And Jim Glassman, 2018, “A Tale of Two Industrial Zones: A Geopolitical Economy of Differential Development in Ulsan, South Korea, And Kaohsiung, Taiwan.” Environment And Planning A: Economy and Space 50(2): 457-473. Humphrey, John, And Hubert Schmitz, 2002, “How Does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading In Industrial Clusters?” Regional Studies 36(9): 1017-1027. Humphrey, John, And Hubert Schmitz, 2004, "Chain Governance and Upgrading: Taking Stock.” Chapter 13 In Local Enterprises in The Global Economy, Edited by Hubert Schmitz. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Jacobs, Jane, 2016, The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage. Kaplinsky, Raphael, And Mike Morris, 2000, A Handbook for Value Chain Research. Vol. 113. Brighton: University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies. Katz, Jorge M., 1984, “Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Further Reflections on A Comparative Case-Study Program.” Journal Of Development Economics 16(1-2): 13-37. Katz, Michael L., And Carl Shapiro, 1985, “On the Licensing of Innovations.” The RAND Journal of Economics 16(4): 504-520. Kim, Linsu, 1997, Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kvale, Steinar, 1995, "The Social Construction of Validity." Qualitative Inquiry 1(1): 19-40. Lall, Sanjaya, 1987, Learning to Industrialize: The Acquisition of Technological Capability by India. Berlin: Springer. Lall, Sanjaya, 1992, “Technological Capabilities and Industrialization." World Development 20(2): 165-186. Lall, Sanjaya, 1996, Learning from The Asian Tigers: Studies in Technology and Industrial Policy. Berlin: Springer. Lee, Keun, And Franco Malerba, 2017, “Catch-Up Cycles and Changes In Industrial Leadership: Windows of Opportunity and Responses of Firms and Countries in the Evolution of Sectoral Systems.” Research Policy 46(2): 338-351. Lee, Kun, Mani, Sunil, and Mu, Qing, 2012, “Explaining Variations in The Telecommunication Equipment Industry in Brazil, China, India and Korea.” Chapter2 in Economic Development as A Learning Process: Variation Across Sectoral Systems, Editer by Franco Malerba and Richard Nelson. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Lee, Seung-Ook, Joel Wainwright, And Jim Glassman, 2018, “Geopolitical Economy and The Production of Territory: The Case Of US–China Geopolitical-Economic Competition In Asia.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50(2): 416-436. Luttwak, Edward N., 1990, “From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce.” The National Interest 20: 17-23. Luttwak, Edward N., 1993, “The Coming Global War for Economic Power: There Are No Nice Guys on the Battlefield of Geo-Economics.” The International Economy 7(5): 18-67. Malerba, Franco, And Richard Nelson, 2011, “Learning and Catching Up in Different Sectoral Systems: Evidence from Six Industries.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20(6): 1645-1675. Marshall, Alfred, and Mary Paley Marshall, 1920, The Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan and Company. Martin, Ron, and Peter Sunley, 2006, “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution.” Journal of Economic Geography 6(4): 395-437. Martin, Ron, and Peter Sunley, 2007, “Complexity Thinking and Evolutionary Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 7(5): 573-601. Martin, Ron, and Peter Sunley, 2010, “the Place of Path Dependence in An Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape.” Chapter3 in the Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Edited by Ron Martin and Peter Sunley. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Maskell, Peter, and Anders Malmberg, 1999, “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(2): 167-185. Maskell, Peter, and Anders Malmberg, 1999, “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(2): 167-185. Mathews, John A., 2002, “The Origins and Dynamics of Taiwan’s R&D Consortia.” Research Policy 31(4): 633-651. Mathews, John A., 2006, “Catch-Up Strategies and the Latecomer Effect in Industrial Development.” New Political Economy 11(3): 313-335. Mathews, John A., and Dong-Sung Cho, 2000, Tiger Technology: The Creationo of A Semiconductor Industry In East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morrison, Andrea, Carlo Pietrobelli, and Roberta Rabellotti, 2008, “Global Value Chains and Technological Capabilities: A Framework to Study Learning and Innovation in Developing Countries.” Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 39-58. Niosi, Jorge, Suma Athreye, and Ted Tschang, 2012, “The Global Computer Software Sector.” Chapter3 in Economic Development as A Learning Process: Variation Across Sectoral Systems, Editer by Franco Malerba and Richard Nelson. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Noble, Gregory. W., 2000, "Conspicuous Failures and Hidden Strengths of the ITRI Model: Taiwan's Technology Policy Towards Hard Disk Drives and CD-Roms,” The Information Storage Industry Center, University of California. Öniş, Ziya, 1991, “The Logic of The Developmental State.” Comparative Politics 24(1): 109-126. Porter, Michael E., 2000, “Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in A Global Economy.” Economic Development Quarterly 14(1): 15-34. Ramani, Shyama V., And Samira Guennif, 2012, “Catching Up in the Pharmaceutical Sector: Lessons from Case Studies of India and Brazil.” Chapter5 in Economic Development as A Learning Process, Edited by Franco Malerba and Richard Nelson. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Sato, Yuri, and Mai Fujita, 2009, Capability Matrix: A Framework for Analyzing Capabilities in Value Chains. Tokyo: Institute of Development Economies, JETRO. Saxenian著，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，1999，《區域優勢：矽谷與一二八公路的文化與競爭》。臺北：天下文化。 Shapiro, Carl, 2000, “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 119-150. Shapiro, Carl, and Hal R. Varian, 1999, “The Art of Standards Wars.” California Management Review 41(2): 8-32. Shieh, Gwo-Shyong, 1992, “Boss” Island: The Subcontracting Network and Micro-Entrepreneurship in Taiwan's Development. New York: P. Lang. Stubbs, Richard, 2009, “What Ever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State? the Unfolding Debate.” The Pacific Review 22(1): 1-22. Sturgeon, Timothy J., 2008, "From Commodity Chains to Value Chains: Interdisciplinary Theory Building in An Age of Globalization." Paper Presented at the Industry Studies Association,（ISA）. Swann, GM Peter, 2000, The Economics of Standardization: Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate. Manchester: Department of Trade and Industry, Manchester Business School. Sydow, Jörg, Georg Schreyögg, and Jochen Koch, 2009, “Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box.” Academy of Management Review 34(4): 689-709. Tassey, Gregory, 2017, “Standards and Expansion Paths in High-Tech Industries.” Pp. 135-161 in the Handbook of Innovation And Standards, Edited by Richard Hawkins, Knut Blind, and Robert Page. Cheltenham, UK And Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Vernon, Raymond, 2013, Metropolis 1985. Manchester: Harvard University Press. 王振寰，2007，〈從科技追趕到創新的經濟轉型：南韓、台灣與中國〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》68: 177-226。 王振寰，2010，《追趕的極限：臺灣的經濟轉型與創新》。臺北：巨流。 吳明澤、林谷合、鄧天強、陳昱辰，2018，〈紅色供應鏈下台商網絡的解構與重組：以電子廠商的訪談為例〉。《國家發展研究》18(1): 39-71。 李世暉，2017，〈近代戰爭下的日本與台灣地緣經濟學的觀點〉。《臺灣國際研究季刊》13(2): 67-87。 林國勝、黃志伸、陳貴欽，2013，〈國防科技工業技術移轉機制之探究－中科院現況與研析〉。《管理與系統》20(3): 407-424。 胡太山、解鴻年、賈秉靜、羅欣玫，2013，〈產業區的知識型態與空間演化：以新竹為例〉。《建築與規劃學報》14(2/3: 147-166。 胡太山、賈秉靜、解鴻年、賴玫樺，2008，〈從社會資本觀點探討社群網絡於創新環境中之角色扮演－以新竹地區爲例〉。《建築與規劃學報》9(2): 77-99。 徐進鈺、鄭陸霖，2001，〈全球在地化的地理學：跨界組織場域的統理〉。《都市與計畫》28(4): 391-411。 陳介玄，1994，《協力網絡與生活結構：台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析》。臺北：聯經。 陳良治，2012，〈國家與公共研究機構在產業技術升級過程中的角色及演化：台灣工具機業〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》24(1): 19-50。 陳良治、朱凌毅，2016，〈技術變遷：後進國家的技術學習〉。頁239-265，收錄於簡旭伸、王振寰編，《發展研究與當代臺灣社會》。臺北：巨流。 陳明惠、邱文宏、張家維，2015，〈法人研究機構之技術商品化合作模式：以中科院為例〉。《科技管理學刊》20(1): 55-91。 陳東升，2003，《積體網路：臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。臺北：群學。 蔡渭水、毛禮忠，1999，〈研究機構技術分殖現象之研究－以工研院與中科院為例〉。《管理評論》18(1): 1-21。 瞿宛文，2006，〈台灣後起者能藉自創品牌升級嗎？〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》 63: 1-52。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87283 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著行動通訊世代演進、資訊技術（IT）與通訊技術（IC）匯流趨勢，以及基地台架構解耦（de-couple）趨勢之下，使基地台市場領先者地位受到挑戰。本研究以臺灣網通產業的小型基地台（small cell）為例，探討臺灣網通產業如何轉型至電信產業。具體而言，本研究嘗試回答以下兩個問題：（1）後進者如何建立及升級其技術能力？他們又如何抓住擴大市場的機會之窗？（2）公共研發機構在臺灣網通廠進入電信產業的過程中扮演了什麼角色，以及對這個過程產生了什麼影響？
本研究採質性研究方法，主要透過與臺灣網通廠、公共研發機構及電信運營商進行深度訪談以蒐集資料。研究發現：臺灣網通廠利用長年鑽研電腦周邊設備製造以及深耕數據傳輸（datacom）技術優勢，使其達成「少量多樣」的範疇經濟生產模式，進而實現以下三方面的演化：（1）市場：從OEM、ODM／零售網通市場，轉向白牌／解決方案供應者的電信市場；（2）技術：從單一產品及產品內系統整合，轉向產品間系統整合及提供整體解決方案；（3）區位：從基於臺灣的研發生產、跨境生產體系轉向空間佈局更加全球化的生產體系。此外，本研究亦發現公共研發機構在臺灣追求進入具有更高技術、資本門檻的電信市場方面發揮了重要作用。公共研發機構透過提供各種自上而下的技術與制度支持，促進臺灣網通廠的轉型。然而由於電信市場具有屬地性及穩定性的特點，公共研發機構和臺灣網通廠仍需要等待其他機會以有效挑戰先行者的優勢。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Given the evolution of mobile communication technology generations, the trends of information technology and communication technology convergence, and the decoupling of radio access network hardware and software architectures, leaders in the base station sector have faced greater challenges in the market. Using the small cell products in Taiwan's network communication (Netcom) industry as the case, this study explores how transformation from the Netcom industry to the Telecom industry was made possible in Taiwan. Specifically, it seeks to answer two questions: (1) How do latecomers build up and upgrade their technological capabilities? How can they seize the window of opportunities for market expansion? (2) What are the roles of public research institutes (PRIs) in and their influences on the processes through which Taiwanese Netcom firms were allowed to step into the Telecom industry?
This study adopts qualitative research methods and collects its data mainly through conducting in-depth interviews with relevant actors in Taiwan’s Netcom and Telecom industries, and public research institutes. It is found that, being able to take advantage of their existing capacities in computer peripherals manufacturing and data transmission (datacom) technologies, and to achieve economies of scope in production, i.e. small volume and high mix, Taiwan’s Netcom firms evolution manifested in the following dimensions: (1) Market: from the OEM/retail Netcom markets to the white-box/solution-provider telecom markets; (2) Technology: from the production of single products and intra-product system integration to the inter-product system integration and the provision of total solution; (3) Location: from Taiwan-based R&D and production, and a cross-border production system to a more spatially-globalized production system. In addition, this study found that PRIs have played important roles in Taiwan’s pursuit of entering the telecom market with higher technology and capital thresholds. PRIs facilitated the transformation of Taiwan’s Netcom firms through providing various top-down technological and institutional supports. However, based on this study, it is suggested that, owing to the telecom market is characterized by territoriality and stability, PRIs and Taiwan’s Netcom firms still need to wait for other opportunities to challenge forerunners’ advantages. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:49:36Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:49:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
第一章、 前言 1 第一節、 研究動機 1 一、 經驗現象探索 1 二、 綜觀臺灣網通產業 1 三、 回到理論層面 2 第二節、 研究內容與發問 3 第三節、 文獻回顧 5 一、 後進追趕理論 5 二、 地方尺度的技術學習 7 三、 區域尺度的技術學習 9 四、 全球尺度的技術學習 10 第四節、 研究方法 12 一、 資料蒐集 12 二、 訪談設計 14 三、 研究對象 14 第二章、 全球行動通訊與小型基地台之技術與產業發展 17 第一節、 全球行動通訊技術軌跡與產業發展 19 一、 行動通訊市場特性與服務型態變化 19 二、 全球行動通訊技術軌跡 22 三、 全球行動通訊產業發展變化 24 第二節、 小型基地台產業發展 28 一、 無線接取網路佈署（基地台系統）發展變化 29 二、 無線接取網路（RAN）開放化、標準化與白牌化 34 第三節、 本章結論 38 第三章、 臺灣網通產業的發展 41 第一節、 臺灣網路通訊廠商成員及成立背景 41 一、 臺灣網通廠成員 41 二、 臺灣網通廠成立背景 42 第二節、 臺灣網通廠設廠區位變化 45 一、 1990年代至2000年代：設址新竹科學園區一帶 45 二、 2000年代：西進中國設廠 46 三、 2000年代起：臺灣網通廠的全球佈局 51 四、 2018年後：臺灣網通廠南進與鮭魚返鄉策略 53 五、 「臺灣網通廠設廠區位變化」結論 56 第三節、 臺灣網通廠之市場與機會 58 一、 有線網通到無線網通 58 二、 從無線網通到標準投入 59 三、 從網通市場轉型至電信及專網市場 62 四、 彈性化布局：中美貿易戰及疫情席捲的風險控管 69 五、 「臺灣網通廠之市場與機會」結論 70 第四節、 臺灣網通廠技術能力建立、學習與升級 72 一、 硬技術（hard technology）：生產與研發的技術能力積累 73 二、 軟技術（soft technology）：生產管理的技術能力拓展 83 三、 「臺灣網通廠技術能力建立、學習與升級」結論 89 第五節、 本章結論 91 第四章、 公共研發機構對臺灣網通產業的影響 92 第一節、 公共研發機構在臺灣網通廠代工期的角色與影響 92 一、 工研院與資策會：科專計畫扶植臺灣廠商轉型 93 二、 中科院：電信自由化趨勢促使人才擴散 94 第二節、 公共研發機構嘗試投入標準階段 97 一、 工研院：標準提案、基站技術與終端設備研發 98 二、 資策會：標準制定、通訊協定研發與投入測試驗證工作 100 三、 中科院：嘗試系統整合基站與淡出WiMAX研發之列 103 第三節、 公共研發機構投入電信基礎設施階段 104 一、 工研院：基地台技術儲備與猜標準 105 二、 資策會：基地台研發與測試驗證 107 第四節、 本章結論 109 第五章、 結論與建議 111 第一節、 研究結論與發現 111 一、 技術積累與範疇經濟是臺廠從網通跨入電信的重要因素 111 二、 公共研發機構因應臺廠的不同階段而有不同的執行策略 113 第二節、 研究貢獻 114 一、 補足後進發展理論的未竟之處 114 二、 提供產業政策擬定的未來方向 115 第三節、 研究限制與未來研究建議 115 一、 研究對象限制：田野的時間問題與困難之處 115 二、 研究對象限制：倖存者偏誤 116 三、 研究內容限制：電信國家型科技計畫執行人員 117 參考文獻 118 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 小型基地台 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共研發機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 後進追趕 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 技術學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網通產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | latecomer catch-up | en |
| dc.subject | public research institutes | en |
| dc.subject | small cell | en |
| dc.subject | Netcom industry | en |
| dc.subject | technological learning | en |
| dc.title | 從網通到電信：臺灣網通廠的發展及追趕 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Netcom to Telecom: The Development and The Catch-Up of Taiwanese Network Communications Manufacturers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾聖文;呂學錦;丁邦安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Sheng-Wen Tseng;Shyue-Ching Lu;Pang-An Ting | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網通產業,小型基地台,技術學習,後進追趕,公共研發機構, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Netcom industry,small cell,technological learning,latecomer catch-up,public research institutes, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 125 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300627 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 建築與城鄉研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 3.64 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。