Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 機械工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87259
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor楊鏡堂zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJing-Tang Yangen
dc.contributor.author魯以樂zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYi-La Luuen
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-18T16:41:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-05-11-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-02-16-
dc.identifier.citationAlexander, D. E. (1986). Wind tunnel studies of turns by flying dragonflies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 122, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.122.1.81
Ancel, A. O., Eastwood, R., Vogt, D., Ithier, C., Smith, M., Wood, R., & Kovač, M. (2017). Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots. Interface Focus, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0087
Birch, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2001). Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 412(6848), 729–733.
Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., & Yang, J. T. (2020). Enhanced lift and thrust via the translational motion between the thorax-abdomen node and the center of mass of a butterfly with a constructive abdominal oscillation. Physical Review E, 102(6), 062407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062407
Chin, D. D., & Lentink, D. (2016). Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology, 219(7), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.042317
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F. O., & Sane, S. P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect right. Science, 284(5422), 1954–1960. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5422.1954
Eldredge, J. D., & Jones, A. R. (2019). Leading-edge vortices: mechanics and modeling. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51, 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040334
Ellington, C. P., den Berg, C. van, & Willmott, A. P. (1996). Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 384(6610), 626–630.
Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2016). Importance of body rotation during the flight of a butterfly. Physical Review E, 93(3), 033124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.033124
Florian T. Muijres, Michael J. Elzinga, Johan M. Melis, M. H. D. (2014). Flies evade looming targets by executing rapid visually directed banked turns. Science, 344(6180), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315081595-1
Fujikawa, T., Sato, Y., Makata, Y., Yamashita, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2009). Motion analysis of butterfly-style flapping robot for different wing and body design. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2008, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2009.4913006
Fujikawa, T., Sato, Y., Yamashita, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2010). Development of a lead-lag mechanism using simple flexible links for a small butterfly-style flapping robot. 2010 World Automation Congress, 5–10.
Hedrick, T. L., Cheng, B., & Deng, X. (2009). Wingbeat time and the scaling of passive rotational damping in flapping flight. Science, 324(5924), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168431
Henningsson, P., & Johansson, L. C. (2021). Downstroke and upstroke conflict during banked turns in butterflies. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 18(185), 20210779. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0779
Jantzen, B., & Eisner, T. (2008). Hindwings are unnecessary for flight but essential for execution of normal evasive flight in Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(43), 16636-16640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807223105
Jardin, T. (2017). Coriolis effect and the attachment of the leading edge vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 820, 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.222
Jardin, T., & David, L. (2014). Spanwise gradients in flow speed help stabilize leading-edge vortices on revolving wings. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 90(1), 013001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.013011
Jardin, T., & David, L. (2015). Coriolis effects enhance lift on revolving wings. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 91(3), 031001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.031001
Johansson, L. C., & Henningsson, P. (2021). Butterflies fly using efficient propulsive clap mechanism owing to flexible wings. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(174), 20200854. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0854
Kåsa, I. (1976). A circle fitting procedure and its error analysis. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, IM–25(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1976.6312298
Lai, Y.-H., Chang, S.-K., Lan, B., Hsu, K.-L., & Yang, J.-T. (2022). Optimal thrust efficiency for a tandem wing in forward flight using varied hindwing kinematics of a damselfly. Physics of Fluids, 34, 061909. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093208
Lentink, D., & Dickinson, M. H. (2009a). Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212(16), 2691–2704. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.022251
Lentink, D., & Dickinson, M. H. (2009b). Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212(16), 2705–2719. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.022269
Li, C., & Dong, H. (2017). Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in turning flight. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 12(2), 026001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa5761
Lin, Y. J., Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., & Yang, J. T. (2021). Beneficial wake-capture effect for forward propulsion with a restrained wing-pitch motion of a butterfly. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), 202172. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202172
Lua, K. B., Lee, Y. J., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2016). Aerodynamic effects of elevating motion on hovering rigid hawkmothlike wings. Journal of Aircraft, 54(8), 2247–2264. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054326
Ozawa, Y., Fujikawa, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2018). Analysis of turning motion for developing a butterfly-style flapping robot. MM Science Journal, 2198–2204. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2018_03_201765
Pines, D. J., & Bohorquez, F. (2006). Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. Journal of Aircraft, 43(2), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4922
Pratt, V. (1987). Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 21(4), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/37402.37420
Ros, I. G., Bassman, L. C., Badger, M. A., Pierson, A. N., & Biewener, A. A. (2011). Pigeons steer like helicopters and generate down-and upstroke lift during low speed turns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 19990–19995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107519108
Sane, S. P. (2003). The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(23), 4191–4208. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00663
Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2001). The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(15), 2607–2626. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204.15.2607
Sunada, S., Kawachi, K., Watanabe, I., & Azuma, A. (1993). Performance of a butterfly in take-off flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 183(1), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.183.1.249
Sun, M., & Tang, J. (2002). Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(16), 2413–2427. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.205.16.2413
Yarger, A. M., & Fox, J. L. (2016). Dipteran halteres: perspectives on function and integration for a unique sensory organ. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56(5), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw086
Yokoyama, N., Senda, K., Iima, M., & Hirai, N. (2013). Aerodynamic forces and vortical structures in flapping butterfly’s forward flight. Physics of Fluids, 25(2), 021902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4790882
Zeyghami, S., Babu, N., & Dong, H. (2016). Cicada (Tibicen linnei) steers by force vectoring. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 6(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2015.12.006
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., Huang, W., & Weng, Q. (2021). Kinematic and aerodynamic investigation of the butterfly in forward free flight for the butterfly-inspired flapping wing air vehicle. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(6), 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062620
李哲安 (2017)。利用翅膀掃掠動態控制蝴蝶拍撲飛行之研究。碩士論文,國立臺灣大學機械工程研究所,臺北市。
費約翰 (2017)。蝴蝶身體俯仰動態之飛行動力機制與飛行操控研究。博士論文,國立臺灣大學機械工程研究所,臺北市。
張勝凱 (2022)。蝴蝶翅膀形狀、翅膀撓曲變形與翅膀身體耦合運動之飛行動力機制。博士論文,國立臺灣大學機械工程研究所,臺北市。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87259-
dc.description.abstract本文探討蝴蝶身體姿態和左右翅膀拍撲與偏移動作對轉彎軌跡與空氣動力的影響,透過觀察大白斑蝶(Idea leuconoe)飛行動態,建構三維運動數值模擬,歸納蝴蝶高操控性飛行的不對稱流場結構與重要動作參數。
首先以三台高速攝影機建立生物動態實驗,觀測五隻大白斑蝶的轉彎飛行,並計算動作角度函數,分別為身體姿態的偏航、俯仰與滾轉角,以及左右翅膀的拍撲、掃掠、旋轉與前翅偏移角。結果顯示身體於0.3週期時開始向右偏轉,俯仰姿態與前飛動態有相同趨勢,滾轉角則無明顯變化。左右翅膀可看作以對稱掃掠及旋轉動作飛行;然而一週期內翅拍撲幅度相對外翅增加20.31%,並且外翅會先向前再向後偏移,內翅則有相反趨勢;兩翅不對稱拍撲和偏移角為轉彎關鍵的飛行參數。
由真實生物動態給定物理模型動作函數,建構六自由度運動之三維數值模型,模擬與實驗量測飛行速度具一致性。研究結果顯示,滾轉角為影響空氣作用力方向的主要因素,而與固定翼傾斜轉彎有相似機制;外翅於下拍提供法向力,內翅提供垂直力,兩翅於上拍共同產生水平推力。進一步分析流場結構,研究發現翅膀不對稱動作以及側向來流速度為影響流場結構的兩大因素。拍撲幅度差異使內翅先產生較大動力,而不對稱偏移動作和側向來流則透過影響展向流傳遞方向,提高外翅翼前緣渦漩強度與穩定貼附時間,進而使兩翅先後產生最大升力。下拍初期內翅升力為外翅之1.53倍,下拍後期外翅升力則為內翅之1.93倍。
最後針對翅膀拍撲和偏移動作進行參數分析,由空氣動力矩結果顯示,拍撲幅度差異可透過產生負滾轉力矩穩定滾轉姿態,避免過度傾斜;不對稱偏移動作改變翅膀面積和壓力中心位置,產生順偏航力矩以降低逆偏航效應。
本研究使用數值模擬,由不對稱流場結構觀點分析蝴蝶的飛行力學,提供轉彎飛行一嶄新解釋方式。蝴蝶於轉彎透過翅膀拍撲和偏移動作,調控偏航和滾轉姿態穩定的動作機制,可提供微飛行器對於高操控性飛行設計上之重要參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis analyzes how the body motion, wing flapping, and forewing-deviation motion affect turning trajectories and aerodynamic forces. Through observing the flight posture of Idea leuconoe, a three-dimensional numerical simulation is established to discuss the asymmetric flow structure and vital wing parameters of butterflies’ maneuvering flight.
In the biological experiment, three high-speed cameras are used to capture the feature points of butterflies. The posture of a butterfly is defined by yaw, pitch, and roll angles. Also, the wing motion is expressed by flapping, sweeping, rotation, and deviation angles. The flight dynamic indicates that in turning flight, the yaw angle increases at 0.3 period, and the pitch postures are similar to those in forward flight. In wing motion analysis, the sweeping and rotation motion between the left and right wings are symmetric during turning. However, compared to the outer wing, the flapping amplitude of the inner wing increases by 20.31%. In addition, the outer forewing deviates forward and backward during the flight. In contrast, the inner forewing has the opposite deviation motion. In summary, the crucial flight parameters are asymmetric flapping and deviation wing motion.
With the analysis results of the biological experiment, a three-dimensional simulation model with six degrees of freedom is developed to analyze flight performance. The flight velocity calculated by simulation conforms with the experiment results. The simulation results reveal that the roll angle has a significant influence on the direction of aerodynamic forces, which is similar to the banked turn mechanism of aircraft. During the downstroke, the outer wing mainly provides the centripetal force, and the vertical force is mostly produced by the inner wing. During the upstroke, the inner and outer wings both generate thrust for acceleration. Also, the results indicate that asymmetric wing motion and lateral velocity have main implications on the flow field structure. The flapping amplitude difference results in stronger force generation by the inner wing. Besides, the forewing-deviation motion and lateral inflow increase the strength of the leading edge vortex and extend the attachment time due to the direction change of spanwise flow. The flow mechanism makes the inner wing generate a force 1.53 times larger than the outer wing in the early stage of the downstroke, contributing to the force increase of the outer wing in the later stage of the downstroke.
Parameter analyses of flapping and deviation motion are applied in the discussion of flight stability. The aerodynamic moment results show that the difference in the flapping amplitude between wings results in a negative roll moment, stabilizing the roll posture. Asymmetric forewing-deviation motion changes the wing area and the center of pressure, counteracting adverse yaw by producing a yaw moment.
This research analyzes the flight mechanics of butterflies from the perspective of asymmetric flow field structure with numerical simulation, offering a different explanation for turning flight. The asymmetric wing motion control can be applied to stabilize the roll and yaw posture, providing new insights into the stability design of flapping micro aerial vehicles in maneuvering flight.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:41:06Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:41:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
符號說明 vi
目錄 ix
表目錄 xii
圖目錄 xiv
第一章 前言 1
第二章 文獻回顧 3
2-1 飛行器與背景知識 4
2-1.1 微飛行器介紹 4
2-1.2 固定翼理論 5
2-2 拍撲翼飛行理論 11
2-2.1 名詞定義與動作 11
2-2.2 翼渦漩 15
2-2.3 空氣動力學機制 20
2-3 昆蟲飛行研究 24
2-3.1 蝴蝶飛行特色 24
2-3.2 向前飛行 25
2-3.3 轉彎飛行 28
2-4 研究動機 33
第三章 研究方法 35
3-1 生物實驗 36
3-1.1 研究對象 36
3-1.2 動態實驗設置 38
3-1.3 座標系與角度定義 41
3-1.4 動態計算 44
3-1.5 轉彎軌跡分類 47
3-2 因次分析 50
3-3 數值模擬 53
3-3.1 物理模型 53
3-3.2 統御方程式與邊界條件 55
3-3.3 網格設置 56
3-3.4 求解器與自定義函數 58
3-3.5 獨立性測試 59
第四章 結果與討論 61
4-1 動作函數分析 61
4-1.1 身體姿態 62
4-1.2 翅膀動作 63
4-1.3 模擬函數 67
4-2 數值模擬 68
4-2.1 動態驗證 68
4-2.2 空氣動力 71
4-2.3 下拍階段流場機制 74
4-2.4 上拍階段流場機制 81
4-3 拍撲動作參數 84
4-3.1 僅有拍撲與平均動作 86
4-3.2 拍撲幅度效應 92
4-4 偏移動作參數 96
4-4.1 僅有偏移與平均動作 98
4-4.2 偏移幅度效應 100
第五章 結論與未來展望 108
5-1 結論 108
5-2 未來展望 110
5-3 甘特圖 111
第六章 參考文獻 112
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject蝴蝶飛行zh_TW
dc.subject身體姿態zh_TW
dc.subject轉彎飛行zh_TW
dc.subject前翅偏移角zh_TW
dc.subject飛行穩定性zh_TW
dc.subjectturning flighten
dc.subjectbody motionen
dc.subjectforewing-deviation angleen
dc.subjectbutterfly flighten
dc.subjectflight stabilityen
dc.title蝴蝶轉彎之飛行動態與流場機制zh_TW
dc.titleFlight Kinematic and Flow Mechanism in Turning Flight of Butterfly (Idea leuconoe)en
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王安邦;葉思沂;陳志鴻zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeAn-Bang Wang;Szu-I Yeh;Chih-Hung Chenen
dc.subject.keyword蝴蝶飛行,轉彎飛行,身體姿態,前翅偏移角,飛行穩定性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordbutterfly flight,turning flight,body motion,forewing-deviation angle,flight stability,en
dc.relation.page116-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202300570-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-02-18-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept機械工程學系-
顯示於系所單位:機械工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-1.pdf9.42 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved