Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87210Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wei Jeng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃寶霈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pao-Pei Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:23:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 邱炯友（2006）。學術傳播與期刊出版。遠流。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。五南。 陸怡靖、柯浩仁（2020）。學者研究資料管理認知與實踐之研究。圖書資訊學刊，18(2)，103-137。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.202012_18(2).103 國立臺灣大學圖書館參考服務部落格（2021）。JCR 衡量期刊影響力的 2021 年新指標：Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)。http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/archives/28025 Ali-Khan, S. E., Jean, A., & Gold, E. R. (2018). Identifying the challenges in implementing open science [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. MNI open research, 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/mniopenres.12805.1 Akers, K. (2013, December 12). Data journals: Incentivizing research data dissemination. https://connect.clir.org/blogs/katherine-akers/2013/12/12/data-journals-incentivizing-research-data-dissemination Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., & Tani, A. (2016). Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing? Data Science Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2016-006 Austin, C. C., Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Khodiyar, V. K., Murphy, F., Nurnberger, A., Raymond, L., Stockhause, M., Tedds, J., Vardigan, M., & Whyte, A. (2017). Key components of data publishing: Using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2 Barton, C. J., & Merolli, M. A. (2019). It is time to replace publish or perish with get visible or vanish: Opportunities where digital and social media can reshape knowledge translation. British journal of sports medicine, 53(10), 594-598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098367 Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Murphy, F., Austin, C. C., Whyte, A., Tedds, J., Nurnberger, A., Raymond, L., Stockhause, M., & Vardigan, M. (2015). Workflows for research data publishing: Models and key components (Submitted Version). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20308 Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park: Sage. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press. Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634 Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data : Scholarship in the networked world. The MIT Press. Breeze, J. L., Poline, J. B., & Kennedy, D. N. (2012). Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging. GigaScience, 1(1), 2047-217X-1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-9 Burbules, N. C. (2020). Why Publish? Journal of philosophy of education, 54(3), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12436 Callaghan, S., Donegan, S., Pepler, S., Thorley, M., Cunningham, N., Kirsch, P., Ault, L., Bell, P., Bowie, R., Leadbetter, A., Lowry, R., Moncoiffé, G., Harrison, K., Smith-Haddon, B., Weatherby, A., & Wright, D. (2012). Making data a first class scientific output: Data citation and publication by NERC’s environmental data centres. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.218 Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., & Callaghan, S. (2017). On research data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 73-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0213-y Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., & Tani, A. (2015). Data journals: A survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1747-1762. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23358 Cao, X. (2022). Data papers: An important type of academic articles. Resources Data Journal, 1, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.50908/rdj.1.0_10 Center for Research Libraries. (2007). Trustworthy repositories audit & certification (TRAC) criteria and checklist. https://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf Chavan, V., & Penev, L. (2011). The data paper: A mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinformatics, 12 Suppl 15(S15):S2, . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2 Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2019). Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004 Chen, Y. (2016). An analysis of characteristics and structures embedded in data papers: A preliminary study. Libellarium, 9(2). 145-156. https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i2.266 Chou, C. P., & Chan, C. F. (2017). Governance and academic culture in higher education: Under the influence of the SSCI syndrome. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 6(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2017.6.2.63 Cook, D. A., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical education, 50(10), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 Costello, M. J. (2009). Motivating Online Publication of Data. BioScience, 59(5), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.5.9 Costello, M., Michener, W., Gahegan, M., Zhang, Z., & Bourne, P. (2013). Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(8), 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002 Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 39-80). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60130-6 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press. Digital Curation Centre. (2009). Digital repository audit method based on risk assessment – DRAMBORA. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/ repository-audit-and-assessment/drambora Dubnjakovic, A. (2017). Information seeking motivation scale development: A self-determination perspective. Journal of documentation, 73(5), 1034-1052. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2017-0032 Earl Babbie (2019)。研究方法：基礎理論與技巧〔蔡毓智譯，第3版〕。新加坡商聖智學習。（原著出版年：2011） Elsevier (2021, August 6). Publication Options. https://journalinsights.elsevier.com/journals/2352-3409/publication_options FORCE 11. (2014). The FAIR data principle. https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples Gagné, M., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to work motivation and organizational behavior. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Organizational psychology (pp. 97-121). Sage Reference. Gorgolewski, K., Margulies, D., & Milham, M. (2013). Making data sharing count: A publication-based solution. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00009 Hangel, N., & Schmidt-Pfister, D. (2017). Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 529-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0019 Heaton, R., Burns, D., & Thoms, B. (2019). Altruism or self-interest? Exploring the motivations of open access authors. College and Research Libraries, 80(4), 485-507. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.485 Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1-2), 14-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007 Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2019). Publishers’ responsibilities in promoting data quality and reproducibility. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (pp. 319-348). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_290 Huang, X., Hawkins, B., & Qiao, G. (2013). Biodiversity data sharing: Will peer-reviewed data papers work? BioScience, 63(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.2 Inchcoombe, S. (2017). The changing role of research publishing: A case study from Springer Nature. Insights, 30(2), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.355 Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 Laurance, W. (2006). Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists. Nature, 442, 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/442026d Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: A qualitative study. Science Editing, 8(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.246 Li, K., Greenberg, J., & Dunic, J. (2019). Data objects and documenting scientific processes: An analysis of data events in biodiversity data papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(2), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24226 Jeng, W., He, D., & Oh, J. (2016). Toward a conceptual framework for data sharing practices in social sciences: A profile approach. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301037 Jiao, D., & Darch, P. (2020). The role of the data paper in scholarly communication. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.316 Kamerlin, S.C.L., Allen, D.J., de Bruin, B., Derat, E., & Urdal, H. (2021), Journal open access and Plan S: Solving problems or shifting burdens? Development and Change, 52, 627-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12635 Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006 Kim, J. (2020). An analysis of data paper templates and guidelines: Types of contextual information described by data journals. Science editing, 7(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.185 Kling, R. (2005). The internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 591–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380113 Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 50, 890-906. Klump, J. (2017). Data as social capital and the gift culture in research. Data Science Journal, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-014 Klump, J., Bertelmann, R., Brase, J., Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Schindler, U., Sens, I., & Wächter, J. (2006). Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5, 79-83. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.5.79 Kotti, Z., Kravvaritis, K., Dritsa, K., & Spinellis, D. (2020). Standing on shoulders or feet? An extended study on the usage of the MSR data papers. Empirical Software Engineering, 25(5), 3288-3322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09834-7 Kratz, J. E., & Strasser, C. (2015). Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data. PloS ONE, 10(2), e0117619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117619 Kratz, J., & Strasser, C. (2014). Data publication consensus and controversies. F1000 Research, 3, 94. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.3 Lawrence, B., Jones, C., Matthews, B., Pepler, S., & Callagham, S. (2011). Citation and peer review of data: Moving towards formal data publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 4-37. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205 Lee, S. T., & Lin, J. (2016). A self-determination perspective on online health information seeking: The internet vs. face-to-face office visits with physicians. Journal of Health Communication, 21(6), 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1157651 Li, K., Greenberg, J., & Dunic, J. (2019). Data objects and documenting scientific processes: An analysis of data events in biodiversity data papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(2), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24226 Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2018). Seeking health information on social media: A perspective of trust, self-determination, and social support. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2018010101 Lin, J., & Strasser, C. (2014). Recommendations for the role of publishers in access to data. PLoS Biology, 12(10), e1001975. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001975 Maxwell, J. A. (2018). 質性研究設計：互動取向的方法〔陳劍涵譯，初版〕。心理出版社。（原著出版年：2013） Mayernik, S., Callaghan, S., Leigh, R., Tedds, J., & Worley, S. (2015). Peer review of datasets: When, why, and how. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-13-00083.1 Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design ad implementation. Sacramento, CA: Jossey-Bass. Netcoh, S. (2017). Students’ experiences with personalized learning: An examination using self-determination theory (Publication No. 738) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont]. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/738 Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318 Open Knowledge Foundation (2021). Open definition. https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/ Owen, K., Smith, J., Lubans, D. R., Ng, J. Y., & Lonsdale, C. (2014). Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 67, 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.033 Paisley, W. (1984). Communication in the Communication Science. In B. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences- v.5 (pp.23-35). Ablex Pub. Corp. Parsons, M. A., & Fox, P. A. (2013). Is Data Publication the Right Metaphor? Data Science Journal, 12, WDS32-WDS46. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.WDS-042 Piwowar, H. (2013). Value all research products. Nature, 493, 159. https://doi.org/10.1038/493159a Pouchard, L., Barton, A., & Zilinski, L. (2014). Data narratives: Increasing scholarly value. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101088 Quadt, F., Düsterhus, A., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Hense, A. V., Hense, A. N., & Dames, M. (2012). Atarrabi - A workflow system for the publication of environmental data. Data Science Journal, 11, 89-109. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.012-027 Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reilly, S., Schallier, W., Schrimpf, S., Smit, E., & Wilkinson, M. (2011). Report on integration of data and publications. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2011_12_5_ODE_Report_On_Integration_of_Data_and_Publications.pdf Roosendaal, H. E., & Geurts, P. A. T. M. (1997, Sep 1-3). Forces and functions in scientific communication: An analysis of their interplay [Paper presentation]. Co-operative Research in Information Systems in Physics, Oldenburg, Germany. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of personality, 63(3), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (pp.13-51). Academic Press. Savolainen, R. (2018). Self-determination and expectancy-value: Comparison of cognitive psychological approaches to motivators for information seeking about job opportunities. Aslib journal of information management, 70(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2017-0242 Sayogo, D. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S19-S31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011 Schöpfel, J., Farace D., Prost, H., & Zane, A. (2019). Data papers as a new form of knowledge organization in the field of research data. Knowledge Organization, 46(8), 622-638. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-8-622 Shin, N., Shibata, H., Osawa, T., Yamakita, T., Nakamura, M., & Kenta, T. (2020). Toward more data publication of long-term ecological observations. Ecological Research, 35(5), 700-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12115 Smith, D. R. (2017). Goodbye genome paper, hello genome report: The increasing popularity of ‘genome announcements’ and their impact on science. Briefings in Functional Genomics, 16(3), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elw026 Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. The Academy of Management review, 31(4), 889-913. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527462 Stuart, D. (2017). Data bibliometrics: Metrics before norms. Online information review, 41(3), 428-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2017-0008 Stuart, D., Baynes, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Allin, K., Penny, D., Lucraft, M., & Astell, M. (2018). Whitepaper: Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5975011.v1 Stvilia, B., Hinnant, C. C., Wu, S., Worrall, A., Lee, D. J., Burnett, K., Burnett, G., Kazmer, M. M., & Marty, P. F. (2017). Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.004 Swan, A. & Brown, S. (2008). To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/266742/ Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Frame, M., Birch, B., Baird, L., Sandusky, R., Langseth, M., Hughes, D., & Lundeen, A. (2015). Research data services in academic libraries: Data intensive roles for the future? Journal of escience librarianship, 4(2), e1085. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085 Thelwall, M. (2020). Data in Brief: Can a mega-journal for data be useful? Scientometrics, 124(1), 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03437-1 Tian, M., Su, Y., & Ru, X. (2016). Perish or publish in China: Pressures on young Chinese scholars to publish in internationally indexed journals. Publications, 4(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020009 UK Data Archive. (2013). Data life cycle & data management planning. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/187718/dmplanningdm24apr2013.pdf Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001018 Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2 Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004, September). Rethinking scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). Retrieved November 21, 2022, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html Wallis, J. C., & Borgman, C. L. (2011). Who is responsible for data? An exploratory study of data authorship, ownership, and responsibility. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801188 Walters, W. H. (2020). Data journals: incentivizing data access and documentation within the scholarly communication system. Insights, 33(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.510 Wang, X., Clay, P. F., & Forsgren, N. (2015). Encouraging knowledge contribution in IT support: Social context and the differential effects of motivation type. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 315-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2014-0356 Warlick, S. E., & Vaughan, K. T. L. (2007). Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 4, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-4-1 Wasserman, T., & Wasserman, L. (2020). Motivation, Effort, and the Neural Network Model. Springer International Publishing. Winters, J. (2018). What does an author want from a university publisher? Learned Publishing, 31(S1), 318-322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1170 Zhang, Y. (2016). Understanding the sustained use of online health communities from a self-determination perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2842-2857. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23560 Zhao, Y. C., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on participation in crowdsourcing contest: A perspective of self-determination theory. Online information review, 38(7), 896-917. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2014-0188 Ziobrowski, A., & Gibler, K. (2000). Factors academic real estate authors consider when choosing where to submit a manuscript for publication. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 3(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2000.12091565 Zuiderwijk, A., Shinde, R., & Jeng, W. (2020). What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption. PloS one, 15(9), e0239283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239283 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87210 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為增進分享交流科研資料的動能與活絡資料再用，資料論文 (data paper) 作為一種學術傳播之途徑，兼具學術成果出版與科研資料集描述之特色，投稿形式則與一般期刊論文相似，往往被學界視為能激勵學者分享研究資料的「正確」誘因。此學術出版品以論文形式正式將資料出版，予以後續被引用的歸功機會，同時，亦提供豐富的資料產製脈絡提升再用可能性，承襲同儕審查制度以確保品質。
然而，作為新興學術出版品的資料論文，其有效性與背後激勵制度仍有待檢驗，且其於學術傳播功能亦鮮為圖書資訊學界探索。引此，本研究採用質性研究之深度訪談途徑，以半結構式訪談大綱，蒐集16位曾有資料論文發表經驗，且以廣義自然科學領域為主的臺灣學者訪談資料，藉由事先研擬的訪談前問卷與訪談大綱引流，探討學者投稿資料論文的動機及其認定資料論文所展現的學術傳播功能。 本研究利用自我決定論 (Self-Determination Theory, SDT) 與其延伸的微型理論、階層框架等方法，剖析學者於投稿動機組成與其相互作用的影響。而探討資料論文所展現之學術傳播功能方面，本研究亦以Borgman等前人研究所點出的四大學術傳播功能作為框架，觀察學者對於資料論文位居學術傳播體系的認知評價。 本研究發現，學者於資料論文投稿行為是由層層堆疊的認知信念所建立，此受到個體基本心理需求與內外在動機所驅動，這種投稿動機常來回於「他者與自身」的利益考量上，資料論文可謂為一種學者於互惠善意與自身利弊通盤權衡下的決策產物。資料論文於學術傳播的多功能性被學者所肯認，除了能作為權威性學術紀錄、資料散佈管道、保存策管 (curate) 資料方法與潛在獎勵外，亦可作為一種協助驗證他方研究真確性的工具，藉此回應開放科學 (open science) 與研究通透度的願景。 本研究透過探究學者於投稿資料論文的動機與其所認知的學術傳播功能展現，發現學者投稿資料論文的動機與研究論文相似，且部分驅動力可能是為支援研究論文而起。同時，本研究在理解資料集類型差異會影響學者看待資料論文的觀點後，揭示資料論文目前的現況與挑戰：資料論文與其他資料出版管道間為共生共榮局面，雖然其提供資料分享的誘因機會，然仍待學術政策承接以發揮效益。此外，本研究亦發覺期刊方於資料出版機制中的幽微角色，值得未來研究深入探究。希望藉本研究探索資料論文驅動力與其學術傳播功能的發現，能促進學界及相關利害關係者對彼此與整體動向的理解，提供未來相關制度訂定或調整的參考方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to explore the effectiveness and incentive mechanisms of data papers, as well as their performance in scholarly communication, which have yet to be verified.
Data papers are emerging scholarly publications that formally publish research data as an article, providing opportunities for subsequent citations. Furthermore, data papers also provide rich contextual information on data production to enhance the reusing possibility and implement the peer review process to ensure quality. An in-depth semi-structured interview approach was conducted to collect the experiences and opinions of 16 Taiwanese data paper authors. Participants mainly come from the natural science discipline. Self-determination theory (SDT) along and its framework and extended micro theories were used to analyze researchers’ motivation components and interactions. Meanwhile, four scholarly communication functions pointed out by Borgman and previous studies were also used as a framework to capture scholars' cognitive evaluation of data papers in the scholarly communication system. Through this study, it has been found that the decision to submit data papers is influenced by researchers’ multiple cognitive beliefs, which are driven by both essential psychological needs and internal/external motivations. In general, data papers could be described as decision-making tradeoffs of researchers who evaluate the interests of others and themselves. Additionally, data papers serve multiple functions in scholarly communication, including authoritative academic records, data dissemination channels, data storage and management approaches, and even potential rewards. Moreover, they could also be used as verification tools for authenticating research. Overall, this study finds that the motivations for submitting data papers are similar to those for submitting research papers, with a driving force to support the status of the latter. However, researchers’ perceptions of data papers vary depending on the type of data involved, highlighting the current status and challenges of data papers. While data papers co-exist and enjoy co-prosperity with other data publishing channels, they still need to be adopted by academic policies to fully leverage their benefits. Additionally, the subtle role of journal publishers in the data publication system warrants further research. Through the discovery of the driving force of data papers and their scholarly communication functions, this study hopes to raise awareness of data papers’ status among academic communities and related stakeholders. By doing so, it provides insights that can guide the formulation or adjustment of relevant governance systems in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:23:24Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:23:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iv 圖目次 viii 表目次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 資料出版 5 第二節 資料論文 12 第三節 學術傳播下的資料論文 16 第四節 資料出版的動機理論 24 第三章 前導研究 37 第一節 研究目的與方法 37 第二節 研究發現 38 第三節 前導研究小結與啟發 42 第四章 研究設計與實施 45 第一節 研究架構與執行流程 45 第二節 研究對象與抽樣 49 第三節 研究工具與設計 51 第四節 資料蒐集 53 第五節 資料處理與分析 54 第五章 研究結果與發現：學者於資料論文的投稿動機 63 第一節 受訪者基本資訊與背景 63 第二節 概覽資料論文投稿行為之建立基礎 66 第三節 資料論文投稿動機組成與其相互影響 84 第六章 研究結果與發現：資料論文的學術傳播功能認定 103 第一節 資料論文之學術傳播功能認定 103 第二節 學者投稿資料論文動機與學術傳播功能認定的對應關係 113 第七章 綜合討論 117 第一節 研究結論 117 第二節 未來研究方向與建議 122 參考文獻 127 附錄一 前導研究訪談大綱 138 附錄二 訪談前問卷 140 附錄三 訪談大綱與流程 145 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 學術傳播 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我決定論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料出版 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料分享 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Data publication | en |
| dc.subject | Data sharing | en |
| dc.subject | Data paper | en |
| dc.subject | Scholarly communication | en |
| dc.subject | Self-Determination Theory | en |
| dc.title | 從自然科學學者資料論文投稿動機觀察其學術傳播之角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Observing the Role of Data Papers in Scholarly Communication from the Motivation of Nature Scientists' Work Submission | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊東謀;王繼娟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tung-Mou Yang;Chi-Chuan Wang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資料分享,資料出版,資料論文,自我決定論,學術傳播, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Data sharing,Data publication,Data paper,Self-Determination Theory,Scholarly communication, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 150 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300528 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 圖書資訊學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 3.9 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.