請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87183完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang-chih Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃浩碩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hao-Shuo Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:13:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
（一） 書籍 匹田剛（2018），《俄語文法大全》。新北：臺灣廣廈有聲。 姜皇池（2013）。《國際公法導論》，修訂3版。臺北：新學林。 姜皇池（2018）。《國際海洋法（上冊）》，修訂2版。臺北：新學林。 姜皇池（2018）。《國際海洋法（下冊）》，修訂2版。臺北：新學林。 （二）期刊論文 丁樹範（2004），〈美國調整全球軍事部署之意涵〉，《展望與探索》，第2卷第9期，頁3-4。 封帥（2014），〈悲劇的誕生：身份認同困境與克裡米亞的命運〉，《俄羅斯研究》，第187期，頁10。 姜皇池 (1999)。<由國際海峽制度論臺灣海峽與澎湖水道法律定位問題－基線劃定之可能與影響，兼論《領海法》相關條文>，《臺大法學論叢》，28卷3期,頁 89-178。 姜皇池 (2019)。<論克赤海峽事件所涉部分國際法議題>，《軍法專刊》，65卷4期，頁20-52。 張愷致 (2020)。<海洋法公約「軍事活動」管轄例外條款研析──論克赤海峽爭端案及中菲南海爭端之分歧>，《臺灣海洋法學報》，第28期，頁1-24。 楊朋 (2020)。 <從刻赤海峽事件看《聯合國海洋法公約》下“軍事活動”之認定>，《中華海洋法學評論》，第33期，頁130-139。 顧志文 (2021)。<由克赤海峽法律地位衝突論臺灣海峽通行權問題>，《問題與研究》，60卷4期，頁139-181。 外文文獻 （一） 書籍 David Bederman, International Law Frameworks (3d ed. 2010) 226 Klein, Natalie, Dispute Settlement in the UN convention on the Law of the sea (2005). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press US Naval War College, International Status and Navigation of Warships and Military Aircraft Part I - Law of Peacetime Naval Operations: Chapter 2. (1999). Int'l L. Stud. Ser. US Naval War Col., 73, 109-212. Yoshifumi Tanaka, The International Law of the Sea 401 (2012). (二)期刊論文 Alan E. Boyle, Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction, 46 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 37(1997). Alisa Gdalina, Crimea and the Right to Self-Determination: Questioning the Legality of Crimea's Secession from Ukraine Note, 24 CARDOZO J. INT'L & COMP. L. 531(2015). Anatoly Pronin, Republic of Crimea: A Two-Day State Comment, 3 RUSS. L.J. 133(2015). Andriy Portnov, Ukraine's Eurorevolution: Chronology and Interpretations The Maidan: A Ukrainian Revolution, 53 RUSSIAN POL. & L. 6(2015). Anna-Sophie Maass, From Vilnius to the Kerch Strait: wide-ranging security risks of the Ukraine crisis, 20 EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS (2019). Anton Bebier, Crimea and the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict, 15 ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS 35(2015). Bing Bing Jia, The Question of Juridiction in the 2019 Arbitration between Ukraine and Russia, 19 CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (2021). BorenZganec-Brajsa Petrinec, Leon, Passage through Straits Using as an Example Russian-Ukrainian Relations regarding the Sea of Azov Original Scientific Paper, 174 POREDBENO POMORSKO PRAVO 39(2020). Borys Babin, Attempt of Annexation the Crimea and Maritime Administration: Legal Aspects of Asymmetric Response, 17 LEX PORTUS (2019). BorysPleshko Babin, Eduard, On the Issue of Restitution of Ukraine's Rights as a Coastal State in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov Ukraine and United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 6 LEX PORTUS 22(2017). Brad Fisher, The Kremlin’s Malign Legal Operations on the Black Sea: Analyzing the Exploitation of Public International Law Against Ukraine, 5 KYIV-MOHYLA LAW AND POLITICS JOURNAL (2019). Christian Marxsen, The Crimea Crisis – An International Law Perspective, 74 HEIDELBERG JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 367(2014). Christopher Greenwood, International Humanitarian Law and the Tadic Case Symposium: The International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia Comes to Age, 7 EUR. J. INT'L L. 265(1996). Christopher Mirasola, Historic Waters and Ancient Title: Outdated Doctrines for Establishing Maritime Sovereignty and Jurisdiction, 47 JOURNAL OF MARITIME LAW AND COMMERCE 29(2016). David B Knight, Territory and people or people and territory? Thoughts on postcolonial self-determination, 6 INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (1985). Diane A. Desierto, China's Maritime Law Enforcement Activities in the South China Sea, 96 INT'L L. STUD. SER. US NAVAL WAR COL. 257(2020). Dmytro Koval, The Award concerning Jurisdiction in the Coastal State Rights Dispute between Ukraine and Russia: What Has Been Decided and What to Expect next, 7 LEX PORTUS (2021). Ihor Kabanenko, The Kerch Strait Bridge: A New Threat to Regional Stability, 14 EURASIA DAILY MONITOR (2017). Ion Galea, The Interpretation of Military Activities, as an Exception to Jurisdiction: The ITLOS Order of 25 May 2019 in the Case concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels, 21 ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (2019). Iryna Panchenko, Problems of Delimitation of the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait The Legal System of Ukraine and International Law, Comparative Legal Studies, 2020 LAW REV. KYIV U.L. 365(2020). James Kraska, The Kerch Strait Incident: Law of the Sea or Law of Naval Warfare? (EJIL:Talk! 2018). John Panina-Burke Burke, Svetlana, The Reunification of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol with the Russian Federation Special Issue: Third Anniversary of the Referendum in Crimea, 5 RUSS. L.J. 29(2017). Lawrence Hill-Cawthorne, International Litigation and The Disaggregation of Disputes: Ukraine/Russia as a Case Study, 68 INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY (2019). Lori Fisler Damrosch, Military Activities in the UNCLOS Compulsory Dispute Settlement System: Implications of the South China Sea Arbitration for U.S. Ratification of UNCLOS, 110 AJIL UNBOUND (2016). Michael White, Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels (Ukraine v Russian Federation) (Provisional Measures) (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Case No 26, 25 May 2019) Case Note, 33 AUSTL. & N.Z. MAR. L.J. 19(2019). Michelle Viandy Huang, The Kerch Strait Incident: Is There a Breach Of International Law?, 4 LEGAL STANDING JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (2020). Mikhail Smirnov, Like a Sack of Potatoes: Who Transferred the Crimean Oblast to the Ukrainian SSR in 1952-1954 and How It Was Done, 53 RUSSIAN POLITICS AND LAW (2015). Natalie Klein, The Effectiveness of the UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Regime: Reaching for the Stars The Dispute Settlement System of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: An Assessment after 20 Years, 108 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. PROC. 359(2014). Natasha Balendra, Defining Armed Conflict, 29 CARDOZO L. REV. 2461(2007). Nilüfer Oral, Ukraine v. The Russian Federation: Navigating Conflict over Sovereignty under UNCLOS, 97 INTERNATIONAL LAW STUDIES (2021). Peng Yang, The Determination of the Military Activities under the UNCLOS in the Kerch Strait Incident, 2020 CHINA OCEANS LAW REVIEW (2020). Peter Tzeng, Ukraine v. Russia and Philippines v. China: Jurisdiction and Legitmacy, 46 DENV. J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 1(2017). R.J. Delahunty, The Crimean Crisis, 9 UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY (2014). S. A. Usov, The Status of the Republic of Crimea, 34 RUSSIAN POL. & L. 59(1996). Skirmantė Klumbytė Saulius Katuoka, Kerch Strait incident in the light of UNCLOS, 145 PROBLEMS OF LEGALITY (2019). T. Haydabrus, International Legal Aspects of Determining the Status of the Kerch Strait The Legal System of Ukraine and International Law, Comparative Legal Studies, 2012 LAW REV. KYIV U.L. 386(2012). Thomas D. Grant, Annexation of Crimea Current Developments, 109 AM. J. INT'L L. 68(2015). Valentin Johannes Schatz, The Status of Crimea and the Sea of Azov as a Jurisdictional Hurdle in Ukraine v. Russia, 46 REVIEW OF CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN LAW (2021). Vladimir Lafitsky, "Crimea Acts" of 1954: International Legal Principles, 8 RUSS. L.J. 4(2020). Vladislav Tolstykh, Reunification of Crimea with Russia: A Russian Perspective Letter to the Editors, 13 CHINESE J. INT'L L. 879(2014). Yen-Chiang Chang Xinxiang Shi, Order of Provisional Measures in Ukraine versus Russia and Mixed Disputes concerning Millitary Activities, 11 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (2020). Yoshifumi Tanaka, Release of a Detained Warship and Its Crew through Provisional Measures: A Comparative Analysis of the ARA Libertad and Ukraine v. Russia Cases, 96 INTERNATIONAL LAW STUDIES 223(2020). Yurika Ishii, Case Concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation): Provisional Measures Order (ITLOS), 58 Ziyun Li, Starting from the Case Concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Vessels and Deriving Suggestions and Examining the Definition of Military Activities as Well as Three Possible Consequences, 586 SOCIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH (2021). （三）俄文文獻 Гудев, П. (2020). Керченский Инцидент: Интересы Безопасности И Международное Право. Пути к миру и безопасности(1), 78-102. Малышев, Д. В. (2019). Керченский Кризис и Статус Азовского Моря. Постоветские исследования, 2(2), 982-989. （四）網絡文獻 Åslund, A. (2018). HOW IT HAPPENED (KREMLIN AGGRESSION IN UKRAINE:, Issue. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep16775.4 EuroMaidan Press, Ukrainian prosecutors publish reconstruction of Russian attack on Ukrainian ships in Black Sea, http://euromaidanpress.com/2018/12/07/ukraine-prosecutors-show-reconstruction-of-russian-attack-on-ukrainian-vessels-near-kerch-strait/ Kraska, J. (2018). The Kerch Strait Incident: Law of the Sea or Law of Naval Warfare? Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-kerch-strait-incident-law-of-the-sea-or-law-of-naval-warfare/ Schatz, V. (2020). The Award concerning Preliminary Objections in Ukraine v. Russia : Observations regarding the Implicated Status of Crimea and the Sea of Azov. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Valentin-Schatz-2/publication/340050651_The_Award_concerning_Preliminary_Objections_in_Ukraine_v_Russia_Observations_regarding_the_Implicated_Status_of_Crimea_and_the_Sea_of_Azov/links/5e7484b3299bf1c76a201295/The-Award-concerning-Preliminary-Objections-in-Ukraine-v-Russia-Observations-regarding-the-Implicated-Status-of-Crimea-and-the-Sea-of-Azov.pdf | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87183 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 2018年11月24日爆發了克赤海峽衝突事件。俄羅斯和烏克蘭在克赤海峽一帶展開了一系列衝撞，開火等武力對抗。隨後俄羅斯強制扣押了烏克蘭軍艦上的水手和船艦。烏克蘭就本次事件尋求國際海洋法的協助。本次事件可以追溯至俄羅斯烏克蘭的歷史積怨，克里米亞半島的兼併以及頓巴斯戰爭，而現今俄羅斯亦在2022年2月對烏克蘭展開入侵。
本文希望透過分析俄羅斯與烏克蘭在克里米亞半島的衝突背景，延伸到克赤海峽的海域法律定性分析，並試圖從兩國之間簽署的條約或《海洋法公約》系統觀察在各種海域法律定性下烏克蘭軍艦所可能適用的通行制度。再針對2019年仲裁庭對本案的臨時措施裁決，討論在克赤海峽的兩軍衝突事件的本案管轄權是否應被《海洋法公約》第298條第1項（b）款所排除，試圖研究第298條的排除管轄例外在本案的適用，並嘗試找尋本案仲裁庭其他的判決方式。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | On November 24, 2018, the Kerch Strait conflict broke out. Russia and Ukraine launched a series of collisions, firing and other armed confrontations occurred in the Kerch Strait. Russia then forcibly seized the sailors and ships of the Ukrainian warship. Ukraine has sought the assistance of international law of the sea regarding this incident. This incident can be traced back to the historical grievances of Russia and Ukraine, the annexation of the Crimea Peninsula and the Donbass War, and now Russia has also launched an invasion of Ukraine since February 2022.
The study aims to analyze the background of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in the Crimea Peninsula, delicated to analyze the sea area in the Kerch Strait, and tries to systematically observe the law in various sea areas from the treaties signed between the two countries or under the provisions of the UNCLOS. At the same time, it tries to search qualification of the passage system that may be applicable to Ukrainian warships. Then, the study focuses on the 2019 arbitral tribunal’s ruling on provisional measures in this case, discusses whether the jurisdiction of this case over the conflict between the two armies in the Kerch Strait should be excluded by Article 298, paragraph 1 (b) of the UNCLOS, tries to study the application of jurisdictional exceptions (Article 298) in this case, and tries to find other ways for the arbitral tribunal to make a judgment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:13:58Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:13:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究方法 1 第二章 克赤海峽衝突始末 3 第一節 衝突始末 3 第二節 烏克蘭與北約國家之反應 8 第三節 俄羅斯聯邦之反應 10 第四節 其他國家及國際組織之反應 11 第五節 後續事件及小結 12 第三章 克赤海峽衝突之背景 15 第一節 克赤海峽之地理背景 15 第二節 俄羅斯及烏克蘭就克赤海峽之衝突背景 17 第一項 克里米亞週邊之衝突背景 17 第二項 克里米亞之歸屬問題 27 第四章 克赤海峽及亞速海之法律定位 35 第一節 蘇聯時期 35 第二節 蘇聯解體後 36 第一項 2003年《有關亞速海和克赤海峽使用合作雙邊協定》 36 第二項 亞速海與克赤海峽作爲「歷史上權利的多國海灣」而成爲兩國「共同內水地位」 38 第三節 克里米亞事件後 42 第一項 繼續「共同內水說」 43 第二項 適用「用於國際航行的海峽」之可能性 47 第三項 適用「死巷例外型海峽」之可能性 49 第四節 烏克蘭船舶通行之合法性分析 51 第一項 2003年《雙邊合作協定》有效 51 第二項 2003年《雙邊合作協定》失去效力 53 第三項 小結暨本文見解 54 第五章 克赤海峽衝突雙方之合法性分析 60 第一節 相關爭端解決機制及程序 60 第一項 《海洋法公約》之爭端解決機制 60 第二項 爭端解決程序之排除適用條款 69 第二節 國際海洋法庭暫時性措施命令之裁決 72 第一項 衝突之定性 72 第二項 國際人道法中之「武裝衝突」 79 第三項 本案適用之可能 82 第四項 國際海洋法法庭暫時性措施命令 84 第六章 結論與展望 104 參考書目 107 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 克赤海峽衝突事件之國際法議題 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | International Law Issues Concerning the Conflict in the Kerch Strait | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張文貞;張愷致 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-Chen Chang;Kai-Chih Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 軍艦,共同內水,歷史性海灣,克赤海峽,軍事活動,臨時措施,適用第二節的任擇性例外, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | warships,co-ownership of internal waters,historic bays,Kerch Strait,military activities,provisional measures,optional exceptions to applicability of section 2, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 113 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300483 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 3.2 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。