請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86624完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉好迪(Adrian Rauchfleisch) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江玟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-20T00:07:15Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allcock, J. B. (1971). Populism: A Brief Biography. Sociology, 5(3), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857100500305 Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224 Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics: Party Politics, 15(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890 Batto, N. (2019, December 27). Populism and Han Kuo-yu. Frozen Garlic. https://frozengarlic.wordpress.com/2019/12/27/populism-and-han-kuo-yu/ Bimber, B. (2014). Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691 Blassnig, S., Büchel, F., Ernst, N., & Engesser, S. (2019). Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns. Argumentation, 33(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9461-2 Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Engesser, S., & Esser, F. (2019). Populism in Online Election Coverage: Analyzing populist statements by politicians, journalists, and readers in three countries. Journalism Studies, 20(8), 1110-1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1487802 Bobba, G. (2019). Social media populism: Features and ‘likeability’ of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 18(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8 Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology 68(1), 181-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12325 Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2016). Multiple Traditions in Populism Research: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter,26 (12), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2875372 Bonikowski, B., Halikiopoulou, D., Kaufmann, E., & Rooduijn, M. (2019). Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: A scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism, 25(1), 58-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12480 Bronstein, J. (2013). Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages. Online Information Review, 37(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2013-0002 Campbell, C. (2020, January 6). Here’s What’s at Stake in Taiwan’s Presidential Election. Time. https://time.com/5759394/taiwan-election-2020/ Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184 Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500 Canovan, M. (2005). The people. Wiley. Chang, Y.-F., & Wang, T.-L. (2014). Framing in Newspaper Coverage and Candidates’ Facebook: Intermedia Agenda Setting in Taipei Mayoral Election of 2014 (p. 142) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan University. Chang, Y.-T. (2009)。搜尋台灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎。台灣社會研究季刊，75, 85-113. https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200909.0003 Chen, Jefery C. J. (2019, April 27). Han Kuo-Yu: Taiwan’s Populist President? Han is wildly popular, but his policy positions — or lack thereof — should be cause for concern, given Taiwan’s delicate situation. THE DIPLOMAT. https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/han-kuo-yu-taiwans-populist-president/ Chien Y. S. & Wang, Jenn-Hwan (1995)。邁向新國家？民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題。台灣社會研究季刊，20，17-55。https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.199508.0002 Cranmer, M. (2011). Populist Communication and Publicity: An Empirical Study of Contextual Differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 286-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). Campaign communications in U.S. congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 103(03), 343-366. https://doi.10.1017/S0003055409990037 Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697 Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525 Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries. Social Media and Society, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358 Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347-1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333 Fahey, J. J. (2021). Building Populist Discourse: An Analysis of Populist Communication in American Presidential Elections, 1896-2016. Social Science Quarterly, 102(4), 1268-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12951 Freeden, M. (1998). Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology? Political Studies, 46(4), 748-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00165 Gerodimos, R., & Justinussen, J. (2015). Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266 Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). They Did It: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026 Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez Populist?: Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040-1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721 Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497-1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273 Horton, C. (2019, April 16). The Taiwanese Populist Advancing China’s Interests. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/04/taiwanese-populist-han-kuo-yu-china/587146/ Huang, Hong-Yi (2011). The Sources and The Intention of The Taiwan Populism: From The E.A.B. 2010 Taiwan Survey [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan University. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02753 Huang, K.-K. (2003). 民粹亡台論 (三版)。商周。 Huang, Yu-Ting & Tsay, Ruei-Ming (2015)。晚近臺灣民粹主義的發展：「人民」與「他者」想像的形成。人文與社會科學期刊，53(3)，127-163. Huang, Yu-Ting (2014a). The Paradox of Democracy in Taiwan: Revisiting Nationalism and Populism. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tunghai University. Huang, Yu-Ting (2014b)。台灣民粹主義轉變的探討：選舉民粹主義的形成。弘光人文社會學報，17，52-73. Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x Jansen, Chiu-Ti (2019, July 12). Who is Han Kuo-yu: Could Kaohsiung’s populist mayor be Taiwan’s next president? South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/3018052/who-han-kuo-yu-could-kaohsiungs-populist-mayor Jansen, Robert S. (2011). Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism: Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75-96. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x Lin, H.-C. (2017). How political candidates’ use of Facebook relates to the election outcomes. International Journal of Market Research, 59(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-004 Lin, Shu-Fen (2005)。“人民”做主？民粹主義、民主與人民。政治與社會哲學評論，12，141-182。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532005030012004 Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0104-x Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. Palgrave. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x Müller, J.-W. (2017). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press. Nachman, L. (2020, January 13). Taiwan’s Voters Show How to Beat Populism- Mobilization and national identity proved key to Han Kuo-yu’s defeat. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/13/china-tsai-han-trump-boris-taiwans-voters-show-how-to-beat-populism/ Pappas, T. S. (2012). Populism emergent: A framework for analyzing its contexts, mechanics, and outcomes. EUI Working Paper, RSCAS 2012/01, 1-31. https://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/20114 Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317691054 Roberts, K. M. (2006). Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 38(2), 127-148. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/20433986 Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2019). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909 Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Open University Press. Taiwan Fact Check Center (2019, December 29). 2020總統大選電視辯論會查核報告。https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/1718 Trent, J. S., & Friedenburg, R. V. (1991). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices. Praeger. Van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist Parties in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414113 Wang, T. L. (2011). 2 Comparing Communication Strategies of Incumbents and Challengers in Blogs: The Case Study of Taiwan's 2009 Municipal Election. The Journal of Advertising & Public Relations, 36, 31-69. https://doi.org/10.30412/TJAPR.201107_(36).0002 Wang, T. L. (2013)。「臉書選舉」？2012年台灣總統大選社群媒體對政治參與行為的影響。東吳政治學報，31(1)，1-52。 Weyland, K. (1998). The Politics of Corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0034 Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412 Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807 Yang, Hui-Ting (2004). 台灣政治民主化民粹批判論述之歷史形構 [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan University. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2004.00659 Yen, W. (2021). Labor Market, Economic Insecurity, and Populism in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Democracy. 17(1), 161-189. 中國國民黨 KMT (2020, January 4)。【反滲透法人人自危！百工百業給問嗎#1】 蔡英文政府以《社維法》法辦人民 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/131181017972/posts/10157998521362973 中國國民黨KMT (2019, December 16)。【民主倒退！2019公投法修惡】 民進黨政府於2019年6月17日在立法院臨時會 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/131181017972/posts/10157936299387973 王光旭、蔡子弘、陳薇丞 (2019)。政治人物經營臉書策略之研究：以第九屆不分區立法委員為例。民主與治理，6(2)，1-45。https://doi.org/10.3966/2311505X2019080602001 民主進步黨 (2019, December 29)。中國對台灣以各種手段進行滲透、併吞台灣的意圖昭然若揭 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/150336441057/posts/10156394419356058 宋楚瑜找朋友 (2019a, December 17)。【政治麻辣鍋~宋主席來掀鍋】 「我們的領導人叫總統，請問不叫他叫總統叫他叫什麼？」 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/491399324358361/posts/1528035587361391 宋楚瑜找朋友 (2019b, December 26)。權力使人腐化；絕對的權力，絕對的腐化。我們不必再仰視、害怕權力 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/491399324358361/posts/1537691986395751 宋楚瑜找朋友 (2019c, December 31)。【總統心裡面應時時刻刻掛念人民】 今天我和同仁到基隆八斗子漁港廣場經國先生生銅像前致敬 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/491399324358361/posts/1524220507742899 宋楚瑜找朋友 (2020, January)。您曾經有過被霸凌的經驗嗎？諸如：校園霸凌、職場霸凌與網路霸凌都會讓人留下一輩子不愉快的陰影 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2545048532421330 周陽山 (1993)。自由憲政與民主轉型 (初版)。東大發行。 周陽山 (2004)。民粹台灣。時英。 柯皓翔、許家瑜 (2020, January 8)。選舉語言的祕密：解析韓國瑜、蔡英文圈粉術。報導者The Reporter。https://www.twreporter.org/a/2020-election-politician-art-of-speech 胡正光、江素慧 (2020)。民粹主義在台灣─韓國瑜及其支持者。臺灣國際研究季刊，16(3)，155-183。 唐偉峻 (2013)。粉絲專頁經營方式之探討—以歌手、政治人物、通路為例 [未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學。http://doi:10.6342/NTU.2013.01880 高閔琳 (2011)。社群網站與台灣地方選舉之關係—以2010年高雄市長候選人陳菊Facebook經營個案為例 [未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.01664 莊伯仲、金志聿 (2019)。候選人臉書經營和選舉結果之關聯分析：以2016年區域立法委員選舉為例。選舉研究，89-121。 陳方隅(2020, January 4)。陳方隅／總統辯論會後：事實查核興起，與台灣民粹主義危機。思想坦克Voicettank。https://www.voicettank.org/single-post/2020/01/04/010401 蔡明璋、潘欣欣 (2021)。臺灣民粹主義者與反菁英情緒：世界價值觀調查臺灣資料的分析。臺灣社會學刊，69，101-140。 蔡英文 Tsai Ing-wen (2019, December 30)。守護下一代、守護我們的未來！這幾年，我走過市場、學校、工廠，看見我們台灣人的精神 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/46251501064/posts/10156333735386065 蔡英文 Tsai Ing-wen (2020, January 9)。後天就要投票了，1月11日，全世界的媒體都會來到台灣，全世界都在看 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/46251501064/posts/10156359639206065 韓國瑜 (2019a, December 12)。【芒果乾吃完了，《難民法》怎麼還不上桌？！】反對民進黨以現行法規和行政措施 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/1863023523934803/posts/2632792903624524 韓國瑜 (2019b, December 25)。【我們有能力讓下一代翱翔四海，現在不做，何時要做？】我在政見會上再次強調，國家要強大 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/1863023523934803/posts/2648313318739149 韓國瑜 (2020, January 9)。【謝謝今天晚上的每一個你】我曾經見證過，政治家們如何運用他們的遠見與魄力 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/1863023523934803/posts/2667443060159508 韓國瑜(2019c, December 31)。今年7/28，我發出第一支穿雲箭，號召5000萬海外僑胞 [Facebook status update]。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/twherohan/posts/2655305234706624 嚴文廷 (2019, December 29)。【評總統候選人電視辯論會】沈有忠：兩個小孩吵架、長輩談豐功偉業，韓國瑜批媒體讓人大開眼界—報導者。The Reporter。https://www.twreporter.org/a/2020-election-president-television-debate-review | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86624 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究關注到2020年台灣總統大選下，中國國民黨候選人韓國瑜掀起的「韓流」時常被媒體、與論拿來與民粹主義相提議論，然而民粹主義的定義在學術界仍是一個具爭議的概念，西方國家下的民粹主義是否適合套用到台灣的政治語境？以此為問題意識，此研究旨在以2020年台灣總統大選為背景，從政治人物在社群媒體上的發文內容去爬梳且重新審視台灣的民粹主義。本研究蒐集四位總統候選人及三個參選政黨從2019年12月10日到2020年1月10日的臉書發文，各自共266篇及407篇內容，以量化研究結合內容分析法進行探討，驗證出韓國瑜的確是所有候選人當中，民粹傾向最高的政治候選人；本研究也比較其他候選人在競選期間如何採用類似的民粹主義傳播策略，最後研究也發現相較於西方國家的民粹主義討論，台灣在自身政治歷史前提下，確實發展出不太相同的民粹主義定義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The 2020 presidential election in Taiwan brought us to revisit the discussion of populism. Through mass media’s report on politician’s speeches, debates, or talks during the election, Han Kuo-yu was described as a populist with high support from his diehard supporters. However, populism is still a contested concept with ongoing debate of its definition in the academic. In this study, we combined quantitative research with content analysis to examine populism in Taiwan with a careful and deductive approach along with the inclusion of the use of social media. Collecting from prior empirical studies, we adapted and proposed a codebook and measurement for populism. From the research result, we came to the conclusion that Han is proven to be a populist politician among all the candidates. The findings also gave a closer look on how the other candidates applied similar populist communication strategies during the election campaign. The finding also indicates that the difference in political mechanisms might be the reason why the dimension of popular sovereignty is almost absent in our analysis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-20T00:07:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2206202202010900.pdf: 1781853 bytes, checksum: cc7cc86c5e977d7e57c61a57cfcd10cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 Index iv 表目錄 Table Index vi Ⅰ. Introduction 1 Ⅱ. Literature Review 6 1. Fallacy of Populism 6 2. Different Ways of Conceptualizing Populism 8 2.1 Populism as Thin Ideology 9 2.2 Populism as Discourse: Features of Populism 11 2.3 Populism as Strategy: Political Mobilization 16 3. The Ambiguity of Populism 19 4. When to Call it Populism? 21 5. Populism in Taiwan 24 5.1 History Background 24 5.2 Lee Teng-hui’s Era: Populism as Strategy 25 5.3 Chen Shui-bian Era: Populism as Election Mobilization 28 5.4 Populism in Elections: a political mobilization 29 5.5 Populism in Taiwan as Discourse 30 6. Social Media and Populism 31 6.1 Populist Communication: Empirical Studies 35 Ⅲ. Research Question and Hypothesis 38 1. Research Question One (RQ1) 38 2. Research Question Two (RQ2) 40 3. Research Question Three (RQ3) 40 Ⅳ. Research Design and Methods 41 1. Research Design 41 2. Method 41 3. Data and Measurement 43 3.1 Sample 43 3.2 Coding Procedure 44 3.3 Pretest and Intercoder Reliability 51 Ⅴ. Result 57 1. Single Dimension Comparison 57 1.1 Candidates: H1a People centrism 57 1.2 Candidates: H1b Anti-elitism 62 1.3 Candidates: H1c Popular sovereignty 66 1.4 Party: H2a People centrism 67 1.5 Party: H2b Anti-elitism 68 1.6 Party: H2c Popular sovereignty 71 2. Populism and User Interaction 74 3. Two Different Operationalization for Populism 79 Ⅵ. Discussion 83 Ⅶ. Research Limitations and Future Research 88 Reference 89 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 民粹主義與政治傳播：分析2020年總統大選候選人臉書 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Populism and Political Communication on Facebook:2020 Taiwan Presidential Election | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許詩嫺(Shih-Hsien Hsu),謝吉隆(Ji-Lung Hsieh) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 民粹主義,輿論理論,網路政治傳播,社群媒體,內容分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | populism,discourse theory,online political communication,social media,content analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 98 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201053 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-14 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2206202202010900.pdf | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。