請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8652
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林中天(Chung-Tien Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Shen Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許國軒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T19:59:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T19:59:21Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-06-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Adams AD. 1979. The morphology of human conjunctival mucus. Arch Ophthalmol 97:730-734.
2. Bolzan AA, Brunelli ATJ, Castro MB, Souza MA, Souza JL, Laus JL. 2005. Conjunctival impression cytology in dogs. Vet Ophthmol 8(6):401-405. 3. Chen WYW, Mui MM, Kao WWY, Liu CY, Tseng SCG. 1994. Conjunctival epithelial cells do not transdifferentiate in organotypic cultures: expression of K 12 is restricted to corneal epithelium. Curr Eye Res 13:765-768. 4. Chifflet S, Hernandez JA, Grasso S. 2005. A possible role for membrane depolarization in epithelial wound healing. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288:C1420-1430 5. Collin HB, Anderson JA, Richard NR, and Binder PS. 1995. In vitro model for corneal wound healing; organ-cultured human corneas. Curr Eye Res 14:331-339. 6. Coster DL, Aggarwal RK, Williams KA. 1995. Surgical management of ocular surface disorders using conjunctival and stem cells allografts. Br J Ophthalmol 79:977-982. 7. Das S, Samant M, Garg P, Vaddavalli PK, Vemuganti GK. 2009. Role of confocal microscopy in deep fungal keratitis. Cornea 28:11-13. 8. Donisi MP, Roma P, Fasolo A, BSc, Ponzin D. 2003. Analysis of limbal stem cell deficiency by corneal impression cytology. Cornea 22(6):533-538. 9. Dua HS, Gomes JAP, Singh A. 1994. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 78:401-408. 10. Dua HS, Joseph A, Shanmuganathan VA, Jones RE. 2003. Stem cell differentiation and the effects of deficiency. Eye 17:877-885. 11. Dua HS, Saini JS, Azuara-Blanco A, Gupta P. 2000. Limbal stem cell deficiency: concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 48(2):83-92. 12. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. 1977. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 84:798-801. 13. Elder MJ, Hiscott P, Dart JKG. 1997. Intermediate filament expression by normal and diseased corneal epithelium. Hum Pathol 28:1348-1354. 14. Erie JC, McLaren JW, Patel SV. 2009. Confocal microscopy in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol. 148:639-646. 15. Franke WW. 1987. Nuclear lamins and cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins: a growing multigene family. Cell 48:3-4. 16. Hatzfeld M, Franke WW. 1985. Pair formation and promiscuity of cytokeratins: formation in vitro of heterotypic complexes and intermediate-sizes filaments by homologous and heterologous recombinations of purified polypeptides. J Cell Biol 101:1826-1846. 17. Hatzfeld M, Webber K. 1990. The coiled coil of in vitro assembled keratin filaments is a heterodimer of typeⅠ and typeⅡ keratins; use of site-specific mutagenesis and recombinant protein expression. J Cell Biol 110:1199-1210. 18. Hermann H, Aebi U. 1998. Structure, assembly, and dynamics of intermediate filaments. In: Hermann H, Harris JR (Eds). Intermediate Filaments. Subcellular Biochemistry, Vol. 31. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 319-362. 19. Hershenfeld S, Kazdan JJ, Mancer K, Feugas P, Basu PK, Avaria M. 1981. Impression cytology in conjunctivitis. Can J Ophthalmol 16:76-78. 20. Huang AJW, Tseng SCG. 1991. Corneal epithelial wound healing in the absence of limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:96-105. 21. Kafarnik C, Fritsche J, Reese S. 2007. In vivo confocal microscopy in the normal corneas of cats, dogs and birds. Vet Ophthal. 10(4):222-230. 22. Kao WWY, Liu CY, Converse RI, Shiraushi A, Kao CWC, Ishizaki M, Doetschman T, Duffy J. 1996. Keratin 12-deficient mice have fragile corneal epithelia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:2572-2584. 23. Kasper M, Moll R, Stosiek P, Karsten U. 1988. Patterns of cytokeratin and vimentin expression in the human eye. Histochemistry 89:369-377. 24. Kenyon KR, Bulusoglu G, Ziske JD. 1990. Clinical pathologic correlations of limbal autograft transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 31:1-12. 25. Kenyon KR, Tseng SCG. 1989. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 96:709-723. 26. Kim EC, Choi JS, Joo K. 2009. A comparison of vitamin A and cyclosporine A 0.05% eye drops for treatment od dry eye syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 147:206-213. 27. Kim JC, Tseng SCG. 1995. Transplantation of preserved human amniotic membrane for surface reconstruction in severely damaged rabbit cornea. Cornea 14:439-449. 28. Kivela T, Uusitalo M. 1998. Structure, Development and function of cytoskeletal elements in non-neuronal cells of the human eye. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 17(3):385-428. 29. Krenzer KI, Freddo TF. 1997. Cytokeratin expression in normal human bulbar conjunctiva obtained by impression cytology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:142-152. 30. Kurpakus MA, StoK EL, Jones JCR. 1992. The role of the basement membrane in differential expression of keratin polypeptides in epithelial cells. Dev Biol 150:243-255. 31. Lauweryns B, vanden Oord JJ, Misotten L. 1993 The transitional zone between limbus and peripheral cornea. An immunohistochemical study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:1991-1999. 32. Lazardes E. 1980 Intermediate filaments as mechanical integrators of cellular space. Nature 283:249-256. 33. Liang H, Baudouin C, Pauly A, Brignole-Baudouin F. 2008. Conjunctival and corneal reactions in rabbits following short- and repeated exposure to preservative-free tafluprost, commercially available latanoprost and 0.02% benzalkonium chloride. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1275-1282. 34. Lopez-Garcia JS, Rivas L, Garcia-Lozano I. 2006. Corneal epithelium squamous metaplasia determination as diagnostic factor in limbal drficiency. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 81:281-288. 35. Lu L, Reinach PS, Kao WW. 2001. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226:653-664. 36. Mamer K. 1980. Snake-like appearance of nuclear chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 58:849-853. 37. Martinez AJ, Mills MB, Jaceldo KB, Tio FO, Aigbivbalu IB, HilsenbeK SB, Yee RW. 1995. Standardization of conjunctival impression cytology. Cornea 14:512-522. 38. Maskin SL, Bode DD. 1986. Electron microscopy of impression-acquired conjunctival epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 93:1518-1523. 39. Mathers WD, Sutphin JE, Folberg R et al.. 1996. Outbreak of keratitis presumed to be caused by Acanthamoeba. Am J Ophthalmol 121:129-142. 40. McLaren JW, Nau CB, Eric JC, Bourne WM. 2004. Corneal thickness measurements by using confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods. Am J Ophthalmol 137:1011-1020. 41. Meridano MD, Costa J, Canals M, Potau JM, Ruano D. 2002. A comparative study of bowman’s layer in some mammals: Relationships with other constituent corneal structures. Eur J Anat. 6(3):133-139. 42. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. 1982. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 31:11-24. 43. Moll R, Pitz S. 2002. Intermediate-filament expression in ocular tissue. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 21:241-262. 44. Moll R, Pitz S, Levy R, Weikel W, Franke WW, Czernobilsky B. 1991. Complexity of expression of intermediate filament proteins, including glial fibrillary protein, in endometrial and ovarian adenocarcinomas. Hum Pathol. 22:989-1001. 45. Nakamura M, Nishida T. 1999. Differential effects of epidermal growth factor and interleukin 6 on corneal epithelial cells and vascular endothelial cells. Cornea 18:452-458. 46. Nelson DJ. 1988. Impression cytology. Cornea 7:71-81. 47. Nelson DJ, Havender VR, Cameron JD. 1983. Cellulose acetate impression of the ocular surface. Dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1869-1872. 48. Nolan GR, Hirst LW, Wright RG, et al.. 1994. Application of impression cytology to the diagnosis of conjunctival neoplasm. Diagn Cytopathol 11:246-249. 49. Osborn M, Weber K. 1989. Current communications in molecular biology: cytoskeletal proteins in tumor diagnosis. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 50. Pfister RR. 1994. Corneal stem cell disease: conceps, categorization, and treatment by auto and homotransplantations of limbal stem cells. CLAO J 20:64-72. 51. Pitz S, Moll R. 2002. Intermediate-filament expression in ocular tissue. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 21:241-262. 52. Revoltella RP, Papini S, Rosellini A, Michelini M. 2007. Epithelial stem cells of the eye surface. Cell Prolif 40:445-461. 53. Rodriquez AE, Rodriquez-Prats JL, Hamdi IM, Galal A, Awaddalla M, Alio JL. 2007.Comparison of goblet cell density after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome in lasik. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2570-2575. 54. Saini JS, Rajwanshi A, Dhar S. 1990. Clinicopathological correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression cytology. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68:65-70. 55. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. 1986. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64k corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol 103:51-62. 56. Singh R, Joseph A, Umapathy T, et al.. 2005. Impression cytology of the ocular surface. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1655-1659. 57. Steinert PM, Roop DR. 1988 Molecular and cellular biology of intermediate filaments. Annu Rev Biochem 57:593-625. 58. Takahashi N, Chikama T, Yanai R, Nishida T. 2009. Structure of the corneal limbus detedted by laser scanning confocal biomicroscopy as related to the palisades of vogt detected by slit lamp microscopy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53:199-203. 59. Thiel MA, Bossart W, Bernauer W. 1997. Improved impression cytology techniques for the immunopathological diagnosis of superficial viral infections. Br J Ophthalmol 81:984-988. 60. Tole D, MKelvie, Daniel M. 2001. Reliability of impression cytology for the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia employing the biopore membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 85-154-158. 61. Tseng SCG. 1985. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology 92:728-733. 62. Tseng SCG. 1989. Concept and application of limbal stem cells. Eye 57:201-209. 63. Tseng SCG, Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Gray T, Meller D. 1995. Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 102:1486-1496. 64. Vadrevu VL, Fullard RJ. 1994. Enhancements to the conjunctival impression cytology technique and examples of application in a clinic-biochemical study of dry eye. CLAO J 20:59-63. 65. Zaidman GW, Billingsley A. 1998. Corneal impression test for the diagnosis of acute rabies encephalitis. Ophthalmology 105:249-251. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8652 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 實驗目的:以捺壓式細胞學(impression cytology, IC)檢查配合外眼照以及活體共軛焦顯微鏡檢查記錄觀察兔眼輪部幹細胞缺損模式下角膜上皮之癒合情況以及細胞形態之變化。
實驗方式:比較使用兩種大小孔徑(3μm,0.45μm)之Nitrocellulose filter paer以及不同之染色方式(PAS stain以及PAS 合併Papnicolau stain,double stain)在健康兔眼部採樣下較佳之採樣及染色呈現方式以決定後續使用方式;將實驗兔麻醉後移除眼輪部組織(包括部分角膜、結膜以及眼輪部上皮)以進行眼輪部幹細胞缺損模式之建立,同時在之後進行免疫組織切片確認模式之成功建立;術後以外眼照、捺壓式細胞學以及活體共軛焦顯微鏡每周一次記錄角膜癒合之病程以及細胞之變化。 實驗結果:在捺壓式細胞學實驗方式方面,使用0.45μm之小孔徑濾紙可以獲得較佳之染色呈現結果,而兩種不同染色方式皆可以獲得良好結果,但由於double stain較繁複費時因此後續決定使用PAS stain;術後進行之免疫組織染色顯示在術後14天即可以看到角膜中央有K4及K13之表現,表示出現角膜結膜化之情形而成功誘導出幹細胞缺損模式;在每周一次的觀察記錄中,術後外眼照顯示出顯著角膜水腫、新生血管以及不平整角膜上皮之情形,捺壓式細胞學染色下顯示初期結膜上皮有侵入角膜之現象並可以觀察到杯狀細胞,在IC之免疫螢光染色下也可以看到K4的表現,隨著上皮癒合過程演進,角膜上皮漸漸重新覆蓋並可以看到IC上K3之染色表現,在外眼照部分也漸恢復清澈之角膜狀態;在共軛焦顯微鏡下則可以看到一開始只有少部分正常角膜樣式之淺層上皮存在,但在第28天已可以觀察到大量正常角膜樣式之之淺層上皮細胞,但基底細胞則從第14天到第28天皆可以看到明顯細胞核且變為較大顆之細胞,顯示其持續處於活躍狀態。 結論:捺壓式細胞學配合免疫螢光染色的使用在進行眼表面的疾病包括眼輪部幹細胞缺損所引起之角膜上皮變化是一項快速、方便且非侵入式的診斷工具,活體共軛焦顯微鏡則可以更進一步且無侵入性地觀察細胞細微之改變,在臨床上可以提供相當重要的資訊以利於快速準確的診斷。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ocular changes of the rabbit limbal deficiency model using external photography, impression cytology (IC), immunocytochemistry stain, and in vivo confocal microscopy.
Methods:Two pore sizes (3μm, 0.45μm) of nitrocellulose filter paper and different staining methods (PAS stain and PAS combined with Papanicolau stain, double stain) were compared to decide which one was superior in sampling and staining; Limbal epithelium of experimental rabbits including partial cornea, conjunctiva were surgically removed to create a limbal stem cell deficiency model under general anesthesia, and immunohistochemical stain was also performed at 14 days and 1 month post-operatively to evaluate the established animal model. External photographs, impression cytology and in vivo confocal microscopy were performed once a week to record the morphological changes during healing process. Results:In the pore size test, smaller pore size (0.45μm) of filter paper presented better staining result; Both PAS stain and double stain provided good staining results, but we finally decide to use PAS stain due to its rapid, simple staining protocol. Immunohistochemical stain at 14 days and 1 month post-operatively showed the successful established rabbit model of limbal stem cell deficiency based on the expression of the K4 and K12 in the central part of the cornea, representing conjunctivalization of the cornea. In the experimental group, the external photography showed corneal edema, irregular ocular surface, and neovascularization. Conjunctival epithelial cells and goblet cells were observed by impression cytology with expression of K4. At healing of corneal epithelium, corneal epithelial cells gradually overlaid the corneal surface and transparent cornea could observed, and K3 could also be detected on IC exam. Initially there was few normal superficial corneal epithelial cells under in vivo microscopy, but lots of normal superficial corneal epithelial cells showed up at 28 days post-operatively. However, the basal corneal epithelial cells still remained in the active phase with obvious cell nucleus and large cell size. Conclusions:It’s a rapid, convenient and non-invasive technique to diagnose ocular surface diseases by using impression cytology with immunofluorescein stain. In vivo confocal microscopy also provided details of cell morphologic changes. All of these techniques can provide rapid and useful information in clinical diagnosis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T19:59:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95629032-1.pdf: 2777708 bytes, checksum: a19be201be02c454313fee8b55e8a1b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 ........................................................... i
致謝 .................................................................... ii 中文摘要 ............................................................... iii 英文摘要 ................................................................. v 第一章 緒論 ............................................................... 1 第一節 眼輪部(limbus)幹細胞 (stem cell)之缺損 .......................... 1 第二節 捺壓式細胞學在眼部病變上之應用 .................................. 1 第三節 實驗目的 ........................................................ 2 第二章 文獻探討 ........................................................... 3 第一節 角膜以及結膜上皮細胞構造及其生理功能之簡介 ...................... 3 第二節 眼角膜以及結膜細胞骨架(cytoskeleton)之結構以及功能 .............. 5 第三節 眼輪部幹細胞缺損所造成之臨床表現、診斷以及治療相關實驗文獻討論 .. 7 第四節 捺壓式細胞學之發展、應用以及實驗方法之探討 ..................... 10 第五節 活體共軛焦顯微鏡之應用、研究及發展 ............................. 12 第三章 實驗材料與方法 .................................................... 15 第一節實驗動物 .................................................. 15 第二節實驗方法 .................................................. 15 第四章 實驗結果 .......................................................... 18 第一節捺壓式細胞學方法之建立 .................................... 18 第二節兔眼輪部幹細胞缺損之模式 .................................. 18 第三節兔眼輪部幹細胞缺損之外眼照進程 ............................ 19 第四節捺壓式細胞學採樣下細胞型態變化 ............................ 19 第五節活體共軛焦顯微鏡(In vivo HRT confocal microscope)對角膜病變之觀察結果 .................................................. 21 第六節綜合比較 .................................................. 22 第五章 討論 .............................................................. 24 第一節捺壓式細胞學在眼輪部幹細胞缺損模式下採樣、染色方式之比較差異 ........................................................... 24 第二節眼輪部幹細胞缺損之病程演進及共軛焦顯微鏡下之細胞變化 ....... 26 第三節捺壓式細胞學以及共軛焦顯微鏡在獸醫方面之應用及未來 ......... 27 2 第六章 結論 .............................................................. 31 參考文獻 ................................................................ 32 附表 .................................................................... 39 附圖 .................................................................... 43 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 捺壓式細胞學及活體共軛焦顯微鏡在眼輪部缺損診斷上之比較研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The role of impression cytology and in vivo confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of limbal insufficiency | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳偉勵(Wei-Li Chen) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉力森(Lih-Seng Yeh),劉振軒(Chen-Hsuan Liu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 角膜,結膜,眼輪部幹細胞,共軛焦顯微鏡,捺壓式細胞學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cornea,conjunctiva,limbal stem cell,impression cytology,in vivo confocal microscopy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 61 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-06-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 獸醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床動物醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床動物醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 2.71 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。