請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85968
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文(HONG-WUNG Wang) | |
dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文(HONG-WUNG Wang | hongwung@ntu.edu.tw | ), | |
dc.contributor.author | YA-WEN Kao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 高雅雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:30:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-09-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分 口袋國會編輯群(2022)。[國會教室-基礎篇]第十五講:質詢。2014年10月9日,http://xn--6or66eo1t8u6a.tw/part4_1_detail.php?sno=91。 內政部(2001)。內政部90年5月29日台(90)內民字第9004565號函。 內政部(2007)。內政部96年2月16日台內民字第0960031324號函。 內政部(2017)。內政部106年5月19日台內民法字第10611027212號函。 內政部(2018)。內政部107年9月20日台內民字第1070444559號函。 王彥喬、謝懿安(2012)。男女平等了嗎?台灣女性立委問政調查。datajournalismNTU,https://datajournalism.ntu.edu.tw/post/89539288078/%E7%94%B7%E5%A5%B3%E5%B9%B3%E7%AD%89%E4%BA%86%E5%97%8E%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E7%AB%8B%E5%A7%94%E5%95%8F%E6%94%BF%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5-%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E7%8E%8B%E5%BD%A5%E5%96%AC%E8%AC%9D%E6%87%BF%E5%AE%89%E5%A0%B1%E5%B0%8E-2012 王靖興(2009)。立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析:2000 年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷。台灣政治學刊,13(2):113-169。 李嵩賢(1977)。台灣省縣市議會組織之研究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 吳秀華(2004)。我國地方議會質詢權運用之研究-以臺東縣為例,國立臺東大學公共與文化事務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 林妙津(1990)。立法院第七十九至八十四會期施政總質詢之內容分析。國立政治大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。 柯宗緯(2022)。陳其邁防疫備詢兩頭燒 高市議會改書面質詢?藍綠不同調。中國時報,2022年4月27日。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220427004239-260407?chdtv。 張立勳(2021)。創北市議會先例!柯文哲總質詢取消改書面質詢。自由時報,2021年6月22日,https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20210622004756-260407?chdtv。 張宏林(2020)。能喬鬧打 卻不會質詢辯論的立院。蘋果日報,2020年12月3日,https://www.appledaily.com.tw/forum/20201203/YUVQ24XARJAOLABDNJ6YHV3XFE。 張志銘(1991)。各國國會質詢制度之比較。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會編。 許南雄(2018)。各國人事制度─比較人事制度。台北:商鼎數位。 陳民峰(2018)。民進黨和柯文哲「政治戀人」將分道揚鑣。台北一周,2018年5月18日,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB/20180518-%E6%B0%91%E9%80%B2%E9%BB%A8%E5%92%8C%E6%9F%AF%E6%96%87%E5%93%B2%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E6%88%80%E4%BA%BA%E5%B0%87%E5%88%86%E9%81%93%E6%8F%9A%E9%91%A3。 陳政嘉(2022)。基隆市議會改「書面類質詢」 立委痛批:沒收質詢權 內政部出來面對。新頭殼newtalk,2022年5月24日,https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2022-05-24/759850。 盛杏湲(1999)。立法問政與選區服務:第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討。選舉研究,6(2):89-120。 盛杏湲、黃士豪(2006)。台灣民眾為甚麼討厭立法院?台灣民主季刊,3(3):85-128。 黃秀端(1994)。選區服務:立法委員心目中連任之基礎。台北:唐山。 黃揚明、劉榮(2018)。【綠不讓柯】原傾向禮讓 柯因為這2件事惹怒綠營。鏡周刊,2018年5月16日,https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20180515inv013/。 劉文仕(2003)。地方制度改造的憲政基礎與問題。台北:學林。 劉文仕(2020)。地方制度法釋義。台北:五南。 謝宜芳(2002)。分立政府下的府會關係:台北市議會口頭質詢之內容分析(1991-2001)。東海大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文。 鍾維軒(2021)。書面質詢掛0?北市議員:市府「完美」答覆不如索資找問題。聯合報,2021年5月1日,https://udn.com/news/story/6656/5427163。 羅清俊(2002)。立法院常設委員會審查功能之實證研究:資深程度與不分區立委角色對於審查功能的影響。月旦法學雜誌,86:36-61。 二、英文部分 Akirav, O. (2011). The use of parliamentary questions in the Israeli parliament, 1992–96. Israel Affairs, 17(2), 259-277. Bailer, S. (2011). People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 302-314. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts: Pearson College Division. Martin, S. (2011a). Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An Introduction. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 259-270. Martin, S. (2011b). Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case. Political Studies, 59(2), 472-488. Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2017). Parliamentary questions as strategic party tools. West European Politics, 41(2), 496-516. Proksch, S.-O., & Slapin, J. B. (2011). Parliamentary questions and oversight in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 53-79. Rasch, B. E. (2009). Opposition Parties, Electoral Incentives and the Control of Government Ministers: Parliamentary Questioning in Norway. In S. G. H. Stecker (Ed.), Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler (pp. 199-214). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Russo, F., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(2), 215-232. Schiff, S. H., & Smith, S. S. (1983). Generational Change and the Allocation of Staff in the US Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 457-467. Searing, D. D. (1985). The role of the good constituency member and the practice of representation in Great Britain. The journal of Politics, 47(2), 348-381. Van Aelst, P., Thesen, G., Walgrave, S. and Vliegenthart, R. (2014). “Mediatization and Political AgendaSetting: Changing Issue Priorities?” In: F. Esser and J. Strömbäck, eds., Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.200–222. Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., & Zicha, B. (2013). How preferences, information and institutions interactively drive agenda-setting: Questions in the Belgian parliament, 1993-2000. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 390-418. Wiberg, M. (1994). Parliamentary control in the Nordic countries: Forms of questioning and behavioural trends (Vol. 16): The Finnish Political Science Association. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85968 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要是經由對臺北市議會第12屆議員書面質詢的數量分析,輔以訪談5位第12屆的臺北市議員,藉此分析議員特質及影響臺北市議會議員書面質詢之因素。在此必須說明的是,研究期間選擇第12屆臺北市議會的原因,在於該屆市議會其為最接近目前的完整屆期,且市長選舉由當時以政治素人身分參選的柯文哲當選,為求研究分析的完整性就以有完整屆期的第12屆擇優;同時以「屆次」及「會期」為分析主體,避免以「屆次」的樣本數太少,不利於本研究對臺北市議會書面質詢統計分析。 質詢分為口頭質詢與書面質詢兩種形式,兩者法定效力相同,但在實務應用上卻因市議員個人需求而有使用時機與個人偏好上的差異。且面對政黨輪替後的柯文哲市長及市府新團隊等政治生態的變遷,市議員在上任之初大多傾向於以書面質詢方式瞭解市府對相關政策規劃,因此書面質詢件數以成立大會暨第一次會期件數最多,愈到任期將屆之會期,則書面質詢總件數明顯減少,再從個別會期及其休會期間來看,定期會議程期間書面質詢件數皆多於休會期間。 其次是本文發現柯文哲第一任市長任期內,泛藍議員的書面質詢數量較泛綠議員多。雖然柯文哲因2017年發表「兩岸一家親」、「命運共同體」等言論而與泛綠陣營決裂,但泛藍與泛綠議員提出書面質詢的數量對比卻沒有太大差異。 本研究發現,其中在以屆為分析單位的迴歸分析顯示,僅有「泛綠議員」的書面質詢數量是較泛藍議員少,其他變數一概不具統計的顯著程度。至於以會期為分析單位的迴歸分析,有達到統計上的顯著差異者,可得出以下結論: 1.泛藍議員偏多,泛綠議員偏少。 2.女性議員偏多,男性議員偏少。 3.愈資淺的議員愈多,愈資深的議員愈少。 4.選戰險勝的議員偏多,順利當選的議員偏少。 5.中正萬華選區議員比大安文山議員之書面質詢少。 6.第二會期到第八會期都比第一會期少。 最後在第12屆臺北市議員書面質詢的機關方面,泛藍與泛綠市議員所關心的局處很相近,書面質詢件數均以「教育局」最高、「衛生局」次之。 過往研究發現地方議會的書面質詢內容較少人著墨,但地方議會每年所能通過的預算數額也不容小覷,日常之所需也有許多都是與議員的決策有關,除了口頭質詢外,書面質詢亦是強化民意代表公共監督成效的重要工具,經由實證研究,進行量化與質化探討與分析,確實有其理論與實務上的必要性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study is based on a quantitative analysis of the written interrogatories of the 12th Taipei City Council members, supplemented by interviews with five 12th councilors. During the study period, for the completeness of research and analysis, will be selected the 12th Taipei City Council. Because 12th is the recent session and a whole session, at that time, the mayoral election was elected by WENJE Ko, who had no political experience. 'Session' and 'Term' are the subjects of analysis, to avoid 'Session' is too few to statistical analysis. There are two forms of interpellations: oral and written, both of which have the same legal effect. However, in practical applications, there are differences in timing and personal preferences due to the individual needs of councilors. Facing Mayor Ko and the new city government team after the party rotation, councilors learn about the policy of Taipei City Government through written interrogatories, the founding conference and the first session have the largest number of cases, after that, the total number of written interrogatories decreased significantly. The number of written interrogatories during the agenda of the regular session is more than that during the adjournment period. The first term of Mayor Ko, the number of written interrogatories from Pan-Blue councilors is larger than Pan-Green councilors. However, Mayor Ko said that “The two sides of the Taiwan strait be one family” and “Community of destiny” in 2017, which led to a break off with the Pan-Green. There is still no significant difference in the number of written interrogatories raised by Pan-Blue councilors and Pan-Green councilors. Regression analysis by session, this study found that the number of written interrogatories from the “Pan-Green councilors” was lower than that of the Pan-Blue councilors, none of the other variables are statistically significant. Regression analysis by term, statistically significant differences in the following: 1.Pan-Blue councilors have more written interrogatories, and Pan-Green councilors have fewer written interrogatories. 2.Female councilors have more written interrogatories than male councilors. 3.Junior councilors have more written interrogatories than senior councilors. 4.Councilors who narrowly won the election had more written interrogatories than those who won more votes. 5.Councilors from the Chungcheng Wanhua constituency had fewer written interrogatories than those from Daan Wenshan. 6.The second session to the eighth session are fewer than the first session. Finally, the organization for the written interrogatories of the 12th Taipei City members, Pan-Blue and Pan-Green councilors have similar concerns, the number of written interrogatories is ranked first by 'Department of Education' and second by 'Department of Health'. Past research finds less attention is paid to local councils' written interrogatories, but there is also a lot of budget that local councils can pass each year. There are also many daily decisions related to the decision-making of councilors. Except for oral interrogatories, written interrogatories is also an important tool to strengthen the oversight of councilors. Quantitative and qualitative discussion and analysis of empirical research, indeed, it has its theoretical and practical necessity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:30:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2009202213272900.pdf: 2678020 bytes, checksum: 547ce1aa02cfa47fbc02bb0cd66e4fad (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 謝辭 ⅰ 中文摘要 ⅱ 英文摘要 ⅲ 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究架構與章節安排 5 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 議員質詢簡介 8 第二節 臺北市議會質詢制度與實踐 17 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 內容分析法 26 第二節 質化訪談法 31 第四章 臺北市第12屆議會書面質詢數量分析 34 第一節 定期會與休會期間書面質詢數量分析 34 第二節 臺北市議員在不同政黨背景下的書面質詢件數 39 第五章 影響臺北市第12屆議會書面質詢因素分析 44 第一節 市議員特性對書面質詢之影響 44 第二節 局處對市議員書面質詢之影響 59 第三節 臺北市議員提出書面質詢之總體分析 62 第六章 結論 68 第一節 研究結論 68 第二節 研究建議 71 參考書目 73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺北市議會第12屆議員提出書面質詢之數量分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Analysis of Written Interrogatories Raised by the 12th Taipei City Council Members | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅清俊(Ching-Jyuhn Luor),俞振華(Eric Chen-hua Yu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 質詢權,書面質詢,地方議會,第12屆臺北市議員,柯文哲市長,泛藍議員,泛綠議員, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | interpellations,written interrogatories,local council,the 12th Taipei City Council members,Mayor Ko,Pan-Blue councilors,Pan-Green councilors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 76 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203637 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-30 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2009202213272900.pdf | 2.62 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。