請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8583完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 范正成(Jen-Chen Fan) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Hsun Lien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 連琮勛 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T19:58:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-07-15 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T19:58:38Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 米倉亮三、廖洪鈞、林英堂 (2002),“恆久性灌漿材料與其灌漿砂土之動態行為”,地工技術,第93期5-12頁。
2. 地基處理手冊編寫委員會 (1988),“地基礎理手冊”,中國建築工業出版社。 3. 林任峰 (2005),“超細水泥漿液滲透灌漿模式之研究”,碩士論文,台北科技大學土木與防災研究所。 4. 施國琅(2008),“超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿與灌注量之研究”,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所。 5. 徐名顯 (2007),“爐石添加量對超微粒水泥漿體基礎物理性質影響之研究”,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所。 6. 徐至鈞 (2005),“新編建築地基處理工程手冊”,中國建材工業出版社。 7. 倪至寬、林任峰 (2006),“超細水泥漿液滲透灌漿之研究”,臺北科技大學學報,95年09號。 8. 黃亦敏、李維峰、林平全、張東源 (2002),“高細度地質改良材料研發與案例應用分析”,地工技術,第93期13-22頁。 9. 黃兆龍 (2003),“高性能混凝土理論與實務”,台北:詹氏書局。 10. 黃建霖、范正成、楊文仁 (2007),”超微細水泥灌漿材料於砂性粉土層之應用“地工技術 ,第111期71-82頁。 11. 黃室毓 (2008),“地下水資源永續利用規劃與管理模式”,碩士論文,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所。 12. 黃建霖、范正成、施國琅、徐明顯(2009),”超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿與灌注量之研究”,地工技術。 13. 黃聖修 (2009),”超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿於砂性粉土層之可灌性研究”,碩士論文,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所。 14. 簡璿宸 (2002),“低壓灌漿工法之研究”,碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所。 15. 張永佳 (2009),“應用混合式禁忌搜尋法於整合生產與配送之排程問題”,碩士論文,國立交通大學工業工程與管理研究所。 16. 陳正勳、楊式昌、周功台、陳福勝(2001),“既有跨越橋梁基礎之耐震補強工法探討”,中華技術雜誌,第52期。 17. 陳信州 (1994),“水泥混凝土添加爐石提高早期強度策略之研究”,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所。 18. 陳界文 (2002),“細粒料特性對土壤抗液化強度之影響”,碩士論文,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所。 19. 陳嘉裕 (1999),“細粒料含量對砂土液化潛能之影響研究”,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所。 20. 游起亨、廖瑞堂 (1980),“最小及最大乾土單位重之試驗規範研究比較”,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程研究所。 21. 吳泰熙 (1997),”以禁忌演算法則求解推銷員旅行問題”,大葉學報,第六卷,第一期:87-99。 22. Akbulut, S., and A. Saglamer. (2002), “Estimating the groutability of granular soil: a new approach”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology ,v 17,n 4, pp. 371-380. 23. ASTM C136-06 (2006), “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 24. ASTM D422-63 (2007), “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 25. ASTM D4253-00 (2006), “Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 26. ASTM D4254-00 (2006), “Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 27. ASTM D854-02 (2002), “Determination of Specific Gravity of Soils”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 28. Axelsson, M., G. Gustafson, and A. Fransson. (2009), “Stop mechanism for cementitious grouts at different water-to-cement ratio”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24, pp.390-397. 29. Burwell, E. B. (1958), “Cement and clay grouting of foundations”, Practice of the corps of engineering, J. Soil Mech. Foundation Div., ASCE 84, 1551/1-1551/22. 30. Chengzhi, Z., W. Aiqin, and T. Mingshu. (1996), “The Filling Role of PozzolanicMaterial”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp.943-947. 31. Clarke, W. J., Millard, D . B. Maan Helal, A. M. (1992) ,“Ultrafine cement Tests and Dam Test Grouting” Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, pp. 626-637. 32. Du, D.-Z., and Panos M. Pardalos (1998), “Handbook of Combinational Optimization”, Volume 3. 33. Engineer Manual (1995), “Engineering and Design-CHEMICAL GROUTING”, Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 34. Efron, B., (1979), “Bootstrap methods:Another look at the Jackknife”, Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26. 35. Glover, F., (1990), “Tabu search: a tutorial”. Interfaces, 20, pp.74-94. 36. Glover, F. a. L., M (1997), “Tabu Search”, Boston, MA, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 37. Helal, M., and R. J. Krizek. (1992), “Preferred orientation of pore structure in cement-grouted sand ”, Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30,pp. 526-540. 38. Henn, R. W. (1996), ” Practical guide to grouting of underground structures,” New York: ASCE Press, pp. 6-49. 39. Hu, S., X. Guan, and Q. Ding. (2002), “Research on optimizing components of microfine high-performance composite cementitious materals”, Cement and concrete Research,Vol 32, pp. 1871-1875 40. Incecik, M., and I. Ceren. (1995), “Cement grouting model tests”, Bulletin of The technical University of Istanbul, Vol.:48, No.2, pp. 305-317. 41. Khaled S., and Al-Sultan (1995), ”Tabu search approach to the clustering problem”, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1443-1451. 42. Khayat, K. H., and M. Gaudreault. (1997), “High-performance cement grout for underwater crack injection”, Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 24:405-418. 43. Krizek, R. J., H. J. Liao, and R. H. Borden. (1992), “Mechanical Properties of Microfine Cement/Sodium Silicate Grouted sand”, Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, pp. 688-699. 44. Liao, H. J., R. H. Borden, and R. J. Krizek. (1992), “Microfine Cement/Sodium Silicate Grout”, Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, pp. 676-687. 45. Maag, E. (1938), “Ueber die Verfestigung und Dictung des Bangrundes (injektionen) ”, Course on soil mech., Zurich Tech. School. 46. Maan Helal, A. M., and R. J. Krizek. (1992), “Preferred Orientation of Pore Structure in Cement-Grout Sand”, ASCE Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics, pp.526-540. 47. Markou, I. N., and D. K. Atmatzidis. (2003), “Mechanical Behavior of a Pulverized Fly Ash Grouted Sand”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.26, No.4, pp.1-11. 48. Markou, I. N., and D. K. Atmatzidis. (2002), “Properties and Performance of a Pulverized Fly Ash Grout”, Journal of Geotechnical And Geoenvironmental Engineering,Vol.128, No.8, pp.682-691. 49. McKay, M. D. (1988), “ Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using a statistical sample of input values”, Uncertainty Analysis, 145-186. Y. Ronen, Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 50. Mori A., M. Tamura, H. Shibata, and H. Hayashi. (1992), “Some factors related to injected shape in grouting”, ASCE Proc. Conf. Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetic, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30, New Orleans, pp. 313-324. 51. Naudts, A., and E. Landry. (2003), “New On-site Wet Milling Technology for the Preparation of Ultrafine Cement-based Grouts”, American Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 127, pp. 1200-1207. 52. Ozgurel, H. G., and C. Vipulanandan. (2005), “Effect of Grain Size and Distribution on Permeability and Mechanical Behavior of Acrylamide Grouted Sand”, Journal of Geotechnical And Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, Vol.131, No.12, pp.1457-1465. 53. Paoli, D., B. Bosco, R. Granata, and D. A. Bruce. (1992), “Fundamental Observations on Cement Based Grouts (2) : Microfine Cements and The Cemill Process”, Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 30,pp. 486-499. 54. Perret, S., D. Palardy, and G. Ballivy. (2000), “Rheological Behavior and Setting Time of Microfine Cement-Based Grouts”, ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, July-August 2000, pp. 472-477. 55. Perret, S., K.H. Khayat, E. Gagnon, and J. Rhazi. (2002), “Repair of 130-Year Old Masonry Bridge using High-Performance Cement Grout”, JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, Vol7 No.1, JANUARY 1, 2002. ASCE, ISSN, pp 31-38. 56. Reschke, A. E. (2000), “The Development of Colloidal Mixer Based CRF Systems”, (presented at MINEFILL 98, Brisbane, Australia, 1998)Rev.Aug.2000. Page 11. 57. Roy, H. B., D. H. Robert, and J. Ilan. (1992), “Grouting soil improvement and geosynthetics”, Geotechinal Special Publication, No.30, Vol.1. 58. Rumelhart, D. E., and J. L. McClelland. (1986), “Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition”, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 59. Saiyouri, N., Bouasker, M. and Khelidj, A. (2008) ,“Gas permeability measurement on injected soils with cement grout” Cement and concrete Research,Vol. 38,n1,pp.95-103. 60. Schwarz, L. G., and R. J. Krizek. (1992), “Effect of Mixing on Rheological Properties of Microfine Cement Grout”, ASCE Grouting, Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics, pp.512-525. 61. Schwarz, L. G., and R. J. Krizek. (2000), “Evolving morphology of early age microfine cement grout”, Geotechnical Special Publication, n 104, 2000, pp. 181-199. 62. Schwarz, L. G.,and R. J. Krizek. (2006), “Hydrocarbon Residuals and Containment in Microfine Cement Grouted Sand”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 214-228. 63. Schwarz, L. G., and M. Chirumalla. (2007), “Effect of injection pressure on permeability and strength of microfine cement grouted sand” , Grouting for Ground Improvement: GSP 168 Geo- Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechniques. 64. Terzaghi, K., and R. B. Peck. (1948), “Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice”, 1st edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc,m N.Y. 65. Thiessen Team. (2000), “The Development of Colloidal Mixer Based CRF Systems ”, Reschke ,A.E. The Development of Colloidal Mixer Based CRF Systems (present at MINEFILL’98, Brisbane,Australia,1988)Rev. Aug. 2000. 66. Topcu, I. B., and V. B. Elgun. (2004), “Influence of concrete properties on bleeding and evaporation”, Cement and Concrete Research 34:275-281. 67. Tung , C. P., Chou, C. A. (2002), “Application of tabu search to groundwater parameter zonation”, Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp.1115-1125. 68. U.S. EPA. (1992b), “Guidelines for Exposure Assessment” , Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC. 69. Zebovitz, S., R. J. Krizek, and D. K. Atmatzidis. (1989), “Injection of Fine Sands with Very Fine Cement Grout”, Journal Geotechnical Engineering, n12, pp.1717-1733. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8583 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究藉由所收集之240筆現地資料,以傳統相對粒徑比可灌性經驗公式,與禁忌演算法,進行可灌性之預測分析。傳統經驗公式之預測準確率為45%至68%,明顯可看出其對於超微粒水泥滲透灌漿於砂性粉土層無法有效預測。而禁忌演算法以傳統可灌性公式裡的土壤有效粒徑(d10)、土壤有效粒徑(d15)、超微粒水泥粒徑(D85)、超微粒水泥粒徑(D95)重新定義公式的N值範圍,建構一適合台灣地區高細粒料含量之砂性粉土層超微粒水泥滲透灌漿可灌性的預測公式。依據本研究之分析結果顯示,以Krizek et al. (1992)公式修正得知N1>2且N2>1時為可灌,且此預測公式有較佳的預測能力,準確率高達90.83%。
此外,為瞭解資料參數的不確定性,本研究利用拔靴法做不確定性分析,結果顯示N1門檻值與N2門檻值,其1000組拔靴樣本的平均值與標準差皆符合禁忌演算法推估模式求得之結果,顯示參數不確定性極小,且本預測公式應為可行的。 本研究亦進行室內滲透灌漿試驗,採用與現地資料相同之水灰比(3.34、4.0及4.65)、水泥之爐石含量50%及不同細粒料含量(0%、10%、20%、30%、40%)之砂柱試體,用以針對預測公式進行驗證,結果顯示,其可灌性預測準確率可達80%。 由本研究之可灌性預測公式及結果分析,前人所提出之經驗公式,對於超微粒水泥滲透灌漿於砂性粉土層之可灌性,明顯無法有效的推估。而應用禁忌演算法來建立可灌性預測公式,重新訂定公式的門檻值為相當可行之方法。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, 240 sets of field data were collected and analyzed to evaluate the groutability by using two methods, namely the conventional formula with relative particle size ratio and the tabu search algorithm (TS). The accuracy of the conventional formula method ranged from 45% to 68%, i.e., this method can not be successfully used to predict the groutability. Tabu search algorithm used four factors:the effective soil particle size ,(d10), the soil particle size ,(d15), the microfine cement partical size ,(D85) and the microfine cement partical size ,(D95) to redefine the groutability limits of the conventional empirical formula. These factors were used to establish a suitable prediction formula which can predict the groutability of permeation grouting with microfine cement grout to the sandy silt soils with high fines content in Taiwan. From the obtained results, it was found that the microfine cement could grout to the sandy silt soils while N1>2 and N2>1, and the prediction formula showed a better forecast ability with an accuracy as high as 90.83%.
Aside from these, in order to realize the parameter uncertainty, this study used bootstrap method to carry out uncertainty analysis. The results revealed that the mean values and the standard deviations of 1000 bootstrap samples of the groutability limits fit the results derived from tabu search algorithm model. It indicated that the parameter uncertainty can be neglected and the prediction formula is feasible. In this study, the permeation grouting experiments were also conducted in the laboratory. The water-to-cement ratio were controlled to be 3.34, 4.0 and 4.65, which were the same as the value used in the field. The slag content of the microfine cement was 50% and five different contents of fines, namely, 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% and 40%, were used. Using the data obtained from the permeation grouting experiments, the prediction formula were verified and its accuracy reached 80%. According to the results of this study, the conventional formula method could not be successfully used to predict the groutability of the permeation grouting with microfine cement grout to sandy silt soils. However, using tabu search algorithm to construct the prediction formula by redefining the groutability limits showed its superiority and practicality. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T19:58:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97622005-1.pdf: 5458787 bytes, checksum: 56b2b1248c796202668e300a5d7c81de (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目 錄 IV 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 X 第一章 研究動機與目的 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1水泥相關材料之應用與成分配比的影響 4 2.1.1水泥相關材料之應用 4 2.1.2水泥成分配比的影響 5 2.2超微粒水泥研磨攪拌技術發展 12 2.3 滲透灌漿工法 13 2.3.1 灌漿材料的選擇 19 2.3.2 室內滲透灌漿試驗 19 2.4 滲透灌漿可灌性評估 27 2.5 禁忌演算法 30 第三章 研究方法 33 3.1 現地灌漿資料 33 3.2 可灌性預測分析 34 3.2.1 傳統可灌性經驗公式 34 3.2.2超微粒水泥滲透灌漿可灌性預測公式 38 3.2.3禁忌演算法 (TABU SEARCH) 38 3.3 不確定性分析 42 3.3.1 拔靴法 (BOOTSTRAP METHOD) 44 3.4 室內滲透灌漿試驗 45 3.4.1 灌漿材料及性質 45 3.4.2 試驗砂土 47 3.4.2.1 試驗砂土基本性質試驗 51 3.4.3超微粒水泥滲透灌漿模擬試驗 58 3.4.3.1滲透灌漿模擬試驗設計 58 3.4.3.2 滲透灌漿模擬試驗設備 59 3.4.4 滲透灌漿模擬試驗步驟 66 4.1 傳統可灌性經驗公式 71 4.2 超微粒水泥滲透灌漿可灌性預測公式 76 4.2.1 以禁忌演算法建立推估模式 76 4.2.2 拔靴法分析結果 83 4.3 現地資料分析結果 85 4.4 室內滲透灌漿模擬試驗結果與分析 86 4.5 綜合比較 89 第五章 結論與建議 92 5.1 結論 92 5.2 後續建議 94 參考文獻 95 附錄 102 附錄一:MCF-GM8000之八大重金屬溶出檢驗報告 103 附錄二:地下水污染管制標準 104 附錄三:現地資料 107 附錄四:符號表 109 附錄五:MATLAB程式碼 110 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 應用禁忌演算法於超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿之可灌性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Using Tabu Search Algorithm to Study the Groutability of Permeation Grouting with Microfine Cement Grout | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 童慶斌(Ching-Pin Tung),陳榮河(Rong-Her Chen),張國強,廖國偉 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 禁忌搜尋演算法,可灌性,超微粒水泥,滲透灌漿,拔靴法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | tabu search algorithm (TS),groutability,microfine cement,permeation grouting,bootstrap method, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 118 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf | 5.33 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
