請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8506
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳郁蕙(Yu-Hui Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jing-Hung Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 伍晉宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:56:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:56:09Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中華民國農訓協會,2018。亮點茶莊2.0成長共識營暨經濟效益評估計畫。 亮點茶莊網站,2020。https://www.utee.tw/zh/instant-pre-sale。 (2020/01/15) 宜蘭縣冬山鄉農會網站,2020。https://dsfa.org.tw/?lang=tw tb=1 id=99。(2020/03/30) 宜蘭縣礁溪鄉農會網站,2020。http://www.jsfa.org.tw/agriculture/show/72。(2020/03/30) 宜蘭縣三星地區農會網站,2020。http://www.sunshin.org.tw/p3.php?model=shop_az_2 sid=231。(2020/03/30) 宜蘭縣中山休閒農業區網站,2020。http://www.jhongshan.org.tw/WebMaster/。(2020/11/15) 宜蘭縣玉蘭休閒農業區網站,2020。http://yulan.sunshin.org.tw/p1.php。(2020/11/15) 內政部戶政司, 2020。「人口資料統計」。台北市:內政部戶政司。 宜蘭縣政府,2017。「再創佳績 宜蘭縣休閒農業區獲農委會公開表揚」。宜蘭縣:宜蘭縣政府。 宜蘭縣政府,2018。「107年統計通報-從遊客人次看宜蘭縣觀光發展特性」。宜蘭縣:宜蘭縣政府。 宜蘭縣政府,2020。「縣政資訊」。宜蘭縣:宜蘭縣政府。 行政院農業委員會,2020。「農業動態統計」。台北市:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2019。「推動特色休閒農業旅遊」。https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.phpid=2504015。(2020/03/22) 行政院農業委員會,2001。「加入WTO茶產業因應對策」。台北市:行政院農業委員會。 李秉恒,2015。「客家文化融入宜蘭縣大同鄉玉蘭休閒農業區茶業之研究」,宜蘭大學建築與永續規劃研究所學位論文。 吳國義,2003。「台灣茶產業輔導現況及展望」,農政與農情。128期。 吳淑娟,2007。「戰後台灣茶業的發展與變遷」,國立中央大學歷史研究所碩士論文。 谷翔鈞,2011。「戰後茶產業之研究」,淡江大學歷史學系在職專班碩士論文。 丘念渠,2005。「台灣茶葉產業的演進過程與發展困境」,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。 周孟嫻,2014。「善用多元策略 再現台茶風華 我國茶葉加值策略分析」,台灣經濟研究月刊。37卷3期,34-41。 林效賢、彭元興、李勝雄、葉維谷,2015。「台灣發展茶業觀光旅遊可行性評估」,休閒保健期刊。14期,1-18。 張依文,2005。「體驗經濟下的文化創意生活產業—以天仁喫茶趣的創意產業升級為例」,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。 張宏政,2013。「休閒農場之體驗經濟、休閒教育與行銷管理分析」,休閒產業管理學刊。6卷1期,71-102。 陳思萍,2007。「台灣日治時期近山茶工廠研究」,國立台北藝術大學建築與古蹟保存研究所碩士論文。 陳依婷、許惠珠、胡惟喻、吳崇仁,2008。「雪山隧道通車後是否能夠提高宜蘭地區觀光住宿效益?-以遊客住宿行前期望、滿意度及再宿意願為例」,中華技術學院學報。39期,167-179。 陳凱俐、張高誠,2003。「閒農業及產業文化活動之經濟效益評估-以宜蘭縣為例」,宜蘭大學學報。1期,91-103。 莊瑞雄、雷立芬,2016。「貓空地區茶業發展策略之研究」,台灣農學會報。17卷4期,415-425。 湯惠媄,2010。「宜蘭縣推動休閒農業區特色環境自主營造成果」,農政與農情。212期。 黃雅蘭,2010。「專程與順道旅遊對遊憩效益之影響-以宜蘭縣休閒農業為例」,國立宜蘭大學應用經濟學系碩士論文。 楊曹弘、陳凱俐、陳昭樺,2014。「綠色旅遊對遊客環境觀點及願付價格之影響-以宜蘭縣新南休閒農業區為例」,宜蘭大學生物資源學刊。10期,95-118。 陸允怡、盧俊吉,2011。「宜蘭遊客旅遊行為與滿意度之研究」,農業推廣文彙。56期,141-151。 廖家宏,2011。「台灣茶產業的轉型—以建構傳統製茶廠觀光化潛力指標為例」,國立高雄餐旅大學旅遊管理研究所碩士論文。 廖葆禎、劉瓊如,2012。「阿里山觀光茶園顧客價值創新策略之研究」,華岡地理學報。29期,19-39。 廖麗蘭,2013。「找茶玩柚-趣遊中山」,農政與農情。251期。 劉瓊如、李明燕、林濰榕,2015。「離島生態旅遊體驗經濟模式之研究以龜山島為例」,地理學報。78期,21-38。 賴正男、蘇雅惠,2009。「台灣休閒茶業發展之思維」,台灣農學會報。10卷5期,349-363。 賴依寧,2015。「宜蘭縣茶產業地產地消食材旅遊之政策評估」,國立台灣師範大學運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。 Asero, V., Patti, S., 2011. “Wine Tourism Experience and Consumer Behavior: The Case of Sicily,” Tourism analysis. 16(4), 431-442. Breidert, C., Hahsler, M., Reutter, T., 2006. “A Review of Methods for Measuring Willingness-to-pay,” Innovative Marketing. 2, 1-32. Brown, G., Getz, D., 2005. “Linking Wine Preferences to the Choice of Wine Tourism Destinations,” Journal of Travel Research. 43, 266-276. Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., James, S., 2001. “Consumer Attitudes to Gentetically Modified Organisms in Food in The UK,” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 28(4), 479-498. Byrd, E. T., Canziani, B., Hsieh, Y. C., Debbage, K., Sonmez, S., 2016. “Wine Tourism: Motivating Visitors Through Core and Supplementary Services,” Tourism Management. 52, 19-29. Campo, S., Yagüe, M. J., 2008. “Tourist Loyalty to Tour Operator: Effects of Price Promotions and Tourist Effort,” Journal of Travel Research. 46, 318-326. Carmichael, B., 2005. “Understanding the Wine Tourism Experience for Winery Visitors in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada,” Tourism Geographies. 7(2), 185-204. Chaminuka, P., Groeneveld, R. A., Selomane, A. O., Ierland, E. C. V., 2012. “Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach,” Tourism Management. 33, 168-176. Charters, S., Ali-Knight, J., 2002. “Who is the wine tourist?” Tourism Management. 23, 311-319. Chen, S. W., Xu, F. F., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y. T., 2010. “Tourists' Attitudes Toward Tea Tourism: A Case Study in Xinyang, China,” Journal of Travel Tourism Marketing. 27(2), 211-220. Choi, A. S., Ritchie, B., W., Papandrea, F., Bennett, J., 2010. “Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage Sites: A Choice Modeling Approach,” Tourism Management. 31(2), 213-220. Crouch, G. I., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., Islam, T., 2009. “Modelling consumer choice behaviour in space tourism,” Tourism Management. 30, 441-454. Dawson, H., Holmes, M., Jacobs, H., Wade, R. I., 2011. “Wine tourism: Winery visitation in the wine appellations of Ontario,” Journal of Vacation Marketing. 17(3), 237–246. Dezső, K., 2014. “From mass production to a genuine rural experience economy: the case of the Villány wine region in Hungary,” Studies in Agricultural Economics. 116, 49-56. Ewing, G., Sarigollu, E., 2000. “Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment,” Journal of Public Policy Marketing. 19(1), 106-118 Erdem, S., 2015. “Consumers’ Preference for Nanotechnology in Food Packaging: A Discrete Choice Experiment,” Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66(2), 259-279. Fedrigotti, V. B., Troiano, S., Fischer, C., Marangon, F., 2020. “Public Preference for Farmed Landscapes: the Case of Traditional Chesnut Orchards in South Tyrol,” European Countryside. 12(1), 99-118. Getz, D, Brown, G., 2006. “Critical Success Factors for Wine Tourism Regions: a Demand Analysis,” Tourism Management. 27(1), 146-158. Gracia, A., Loureiro, M. L., Nayga, R. M., 2009. “Consumers’ Valuation of Nutritional Information: A Choice Experiment Study,” Food Quality and Preference. 28(1), 57-65. Greene, W. H., 2012. “NLOGIT reference guide,” Australia: Econometric Software. Hanley, N., Mourato, S., Wright, R. E., 2001. “Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin?” Journal of Economic Surveys. 15(3): 435-462. Hausman, J., Mcfadden, D., 1984. “A Specification Test for the Multinomial Logit Model,” Ecomometrica. 52, 1219-1240. Hoyos, D., 2010. “The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments,” Ecological Economics. 69: 1595-1603. Huber, M., Hofstetter, P., Hochuli, A., 2020. “A Demand-driven Success Factor Analysis for Agritourism in Switzerland,” Journal of Rural and Community Development. 15(1), 1-16. Huybers, T., 2003. “ Domestic Tourism Destination Choices — a Choice Modelling Analysis,” International Journal of Tourism Research. 5, 445-459. Hwang, J., Lee, J. H., 2019. “A strategy for enhancing senior tourists' well-being perception: focusing on the experience economy,” journal of Travel Tourism Marketing. 36(3), 314-329. Juutinen, A., Mitani, Y., Mantymaa, E., Shoji, Y., Siikamaki, P., Svento, R., 2011. “Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application,” Ecological Economics. 70(6):1231-1239. Karpov, A, Merzlov, A., 2016. “The experience economy approach to marketing Les Plus Beaux Villages brand in Russia,” Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 8(3), 373-379. Kim, D., Park, B. J., 2017. “The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment,” Tourism Management. 63, 439-451. Kong, N., Wang, L., Wang, L., Wang, R., 2019. “Research on Features and Functions of Marine Sports Based on Experience Economy,” Journal of Coastal Research. 1(94), 754-757. Lancaster, K. J., 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy. 74(2): 132-157. Li, C., Zhang, Y., Su, C. H., Chen, M. H., Wang, J., 2019. “Understanding Tourists’ Willingness-to-Pay for Rural Landscape Improvement and Preference Heterogeneity,” Sustainability. 11(24). Loureiro, M. L., Umberger, W. J., 2007. “A Choice Experiment Model for Beef: What US Consumers Responses Tell Us About Relative Preference for Food Safety, Country-of-origin Labeling and Traceability,” Food Policy. 32(4), 496-514. Loureiro, S. M. C., 2014. “The role of the rural tourism experience economy in place attachment and behavioral intentions,” International Journal of Hospitality Management. 40, 1-9. Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T.N., Carson, R. T., 2010. “Discrete Choice Experiments are Not Conjoint Analysis,” Journal of Choice Modeling. 3(3), 57-72 McFadden, D., 1973. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior ,” In:Frontiers of Economics, ed. by P.Zarembka., P. New York, Academic Press: 105-142. Mtimet, N., Albisu, L. M., 2006. “Spanish Wine Consumer Behavior: A Choice Experiment Approach,” Agribusiness. 22(3), 343-362. Pine, B. J., Gilmore, J. H., 1999. “The experience economy: Word is theatre and every business a stage,” Boston, Harvard Business School Press. Pratt, M., 2014. “Four wine tourist profiles,” Academy of Wine Business Research, 8th international conference. Sekulić, D., Mandarić, M, 2016. “Motivation of travelers for participation in wine tourism in Serbia,” Economics of Agriculture. 63(4), 1237-1252. Shen, J., Gao, S., 2008. “A solution to Separation and Multicollinearity in Multiple Logistic Regression,” Journal of Data Science. 6(4), 515. Sieczko, A., Parzonko, A. J., Bieńkowska-Gołasa, W., 2020. “Principles of the experience economy in designing an agritourism product,” Agricultural Economics. 66(4), 175-182. Sparks, B., 2007. “Planning a wine tourism vacation? Factors that help to predict tourist behavioural intentions,” Tourism Management. 28, 1180-1192. Thomas, B., Quintal, V. A., Phau, I., 2011. “A Research Proposal to Explore the Factors influencing Wine Tourist Satisfaction,” Paper presented at Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand. Therkildsen, H. P, Hansen, C. J., Lorentzen, A., 2009. “The Experience Economy and the Transformation of Urban Governance and Planning,” European Planning Studies. 17(6),925-941. Toledano, B. I. S., Kallas, Z., Gil, J. M., 2017. “Farmer preference for improved corn seeds in Chiapas, Mexico: A choice experiment approach,” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 15(3), 1-15. Zanoli, R., Scarpa, R., Napolitano, F., Piasentier, E., Naspetti, S., Bruschi, V., 2012. “Organic label as an identifier of environmentally related quality: A consumer choice experiment on beef in Italy,” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 28(1), 1-10. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8506 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 茶產業早期是支持我國經濟發展的重要支柱,然而隨著社會型態轉變以及競爭對手的出現,導致種茶面積下降,許多茶園逐漸消失,茶園發展遭遇困境。為了改善此情況,政府開始輔導茶園轉型為觀光茶園,發展觀光為茶園未來發展的重要方向。由於宜蘭縣近年來開始推動宜蘭茶,觀光旅遊資源豐富,加上鄰近消費力高的雙北地區,十分適合發展觀光茶園,因此本研究將探討消費者對宜蘭縣觀光茶園的套裝活動之認知,並透過選擇實驗法瞭解消費者對茶園提供套裝活動的偏好及願付價格。 本研究以問卷調查雙北居民的方式,藉由敘述統計分析瞭解其對宜蘭縣觀光茶園套裝活動的認知,並利用選擇實驗法中的多元羅吉特模型(Multinomial Logit Model, MNL)分析其偏好與願付價格。結果顯示在各屬性水準影響上,消費者對採製茶體驗、茶食DIY、套餐與自然風景有正向顯著偏好;各屬性願付價格部分,對於所有受訪者,活動類型中採製茶體驗的願付價格最高;餐點類型則以套餐的願付價格最高,周遭旅遊資源部分,有遊憩經驗受訪者以夜市的願付價格最高,而無遊憩經驗的受訪者則是對自然資源的願付價格最高;根據結果決定出採製茶體驗、套餐、以自然風景作為周遭旅遊資源的茶園旅遊方案效益為最佳。 綜合以上結果,本研究認為茶園套裝活動的體驗對促進觀光茶園發展有重要的作用,茶園應針對不同社經背景的消費者推出多樣化活動,才能滿足不同層面的消費者需求。此外,周遭自然風景對消費者選擇茶園也有很大影響,茶園應結合周遭自然資源推出套裝活動以吸引更多消費者遊憩。最後,茶園應更積極透過社群媒體宣傳茶園資訊,以開發更多潛在客群。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The tea industry was an important sector at one time sustaining the economic development in Taiwan. However, following the evolution of social formation and the emergence of global competitors, tea-farming acreage reduces, a great many of tea farms gradually submerge and tea farming faces great difficulties. To encounter this situation, Government initiated a promotion program for “Tourist Tea Farm” aiming at promoting tourism as an important direction for future development of tea farms. Yilan County in recent years devoted greatly into promoting Yilan tea. Along with its richness of other tourism resources and the geological proximity to the Twin-Taipei region of high consuming power, Yilan stands upfront an ideal location to develop “Tourist Tea Farm”. As such this research will study consumer cognitions on packaged tour activities at Yilan tea farms. A Choice Experiment was implemented to understand the consumer preferences and willingness to pay for packaged activities. We conducted a questionnaire survey involving residents of New Taipei and Taipei City to study their perception on Yilan tea farm packaged activities via descriptive statistical analysis. We analyzed by the multinomial logit model (MNL) of the Choice-Experiment Method on the consumer preferences and willingness to pay. Regarding levels of each attributes, consumers expressed positive preferences towards hands-on tea making experience, DIY meals, set-menu meals and natural scenery. Regarding willingness to pay, hands-on tea making enjoys the highest spot among activities, set-menu meals earns the highest on meals. For surrounding tourism resources, those with touring experiences willing to pay high for night market, while those with no touring experiences, natural scenery earns the highest. Results of the study reveal that hands-on tea making, set-menu meals, and combining with surrounding tourism resources contribute for a most welcomed tea farm tour program. In summary, this study conceives that participating packaged activities are key to promote tourist tea farm programs. Tea farms shall design diversified activities to suit the needs of consumers of different socioeconomic backgrounds. In addition, the surrounding natural scenery also plays a big role in the decision making of selecting a tea farm of consumer preference. Tea farms with a touring program in conjunction with its surrounding natural scenery can attract more tourists. It pays for the tea farm to attract tourists by exposing comprehensive tourist information through social media. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:56:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0302202110594600.pdf: 2011126 bytes, checksum: 7ef9849cfbf890c06abd4790b96c44d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究步驟 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 產業背景與政策介紹 5 第一節 台灣茶產業簡介 5 第二節 發展亮點茶莊計畫介紹 9 第三節 宜蘭縣茶產業與觀光茶園發展概況 11 第四節 小結 17 第三章 文獻回顧 18 第一節 旅遊相關文獻 18 第二節 體驗經濟相關文獻 22 第三節 選擇實驗相關文獻 24 第四節 小結 27 第四章 選擇實驗法之方法與模型 29 第五章 問卷設計與調查方法 34 第一節 問卷設計 34 第二節 選擇模型設計 35 第三節 調查對象與調查方法 40 第六章 敘述統計與交叉分析 43 第一節 敘述統計分析 43 第二節 交叉分析 59 第七章 實證結果 73 第一節 屬性等級變數定義與模型設定 73 第二節 旅遊方案屬性偏好分析 76 第三節 願付價格分析 83 第八章 結論與建議 87 第一節 結論 87 第二節 建議 89 參考文獻 91 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 消費者對宜蘭縣觀光茶園套裝活動之認知、偏好與願付價格:以雙北居民為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Consumer Perception, Preference, and Willingness to Pay for Activities in Tourist Tea Farms in Yilan County: A Case Study of Residents in New Taipei and Taipei City | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳雅惠(Ya-Hui Chen),何率慈(Shuay-Tsyr Ho) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 觀光茶園,套裝活動,選擇實驗,願付價格,消費者偏好,體驗經濟, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | tourist tea farm,activity,choice experiment,willingness to pay,consumers’ preference,experience economy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100437 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0302202110594600.pdf | 1.96 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。